Recombinant Staphylococcus haemolyticus UPF0316 protein SH1041 (SH1041) is a bioengineered protein derived from the UPF0316 family, a group of uncharacterized proteins in prokaryotic genomes. The protein is encoded by the SH1041 gene (UniProt ID: Q4L7M5) and spans 202 amino acids (1–202). It is produced via heterologous expression in Escherichia coli, with an N-terminal His tag for purification .
SH1041 is synthesized in E. coli and purified using His-tag affinity chromatography. The final product is lyophilized in a Tris/PBS-based buffer with 6% trehalose (pH 8.0) to enhance stability .
Expression: Induced in E. coli under optimized conditions.
Cell Lysis: Harvested bacterial pellets are lysed to release intracellular proteins.
Affinity Chromatography: His-tagged SH1041 binds to nickel columns, eluted with imidazole.
Lyophilization: Concentrated protein is freeze-dried for long-term storage.
Genomic studies of S. haemolyticus highlight its adaptation to clinical environments, including antibiotic resistance and biofilm formation . While SH1041 itself is not explicitly linked to these traits, its classification as a UPF0316 protein suggests potential roles in:
Cell Wall Integrity: Similar to LPXTG-motif proteins (e.g., Atl, SceD) critical for peptidoglycan remodeling .
Horizontal Gene Transfer: UPF0316 genes may be acquired via plasmids or phages, as seen in ermC resistance genes .
Functional Characterization: Determine SH1041’s role in bacterial physiology or pathogenesis.
Interaction Mapping: Identify host-cell receptors or bacterial partners using proteomics.
Therapeutic Targeting: Assess SH1041 as a candidate for vaccines or antibody-based therapies.
KEGG: sha:SH1041
STRING: 279808.SH1041
SH1041 is a UPF0316 family protein originating from the bacterium Staphylococcus haemolyticus. S. haemolyticus is a skin commensal organism that has emerged as a significant nosocomial pathogen . The recombinant form typically refers to the full-length protein (202 amino acids) expressed heterologously in E. coli with an N-terminal His-tag . The protein is identified in UniProt under the accession number Q4L7M5 .
Recombinant SH1041 is typically supplied as a lyophilized powder with purity greater than 90% as determined by SDS-PAGE . The protein is stable when stored properly, though repeated freeze-thaw cycles should be avoided. Key properties include:
| Property | Characteristic |
|---|---|
| Length | 202 amino acids |
| Tag | N-terminal His-tag |
| Expression system | E. coli |
| Solubility | Soluble in Tris/PBS-based buffer |
| Storage form | Lyophilized powder |
| Purity | >90% (SDS-PAGE) |
| Storage conditions | -20°C/-80°C |
For optimal results when working with recombinant SH1041, follow these methodological guidelines:
Briefly centrifuge the vial prior to opening to bring contents to the bottom
Reconstitute the lyophilized protein in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL
Add glycerol to a final concentration of 5-50% (50% is recommended)
Aliquot for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles; working aliquots can be stored at 4°C for up to one week
The protein is supplied in a Tris/PBS-based buffer containing 6% trehalose at pH 8.0, which helps maintain stability during lyophilization and reconstitution .
Multiple analytical methods should be employed to assess protein quality:
SDS-PAGE to confirm molecular weight and purity
Western blotting using anti-His antibodies to verify the presence of the His-tag
Mass spectrometry to confirm protein identity and detect potential modifications
Size exclusion chromatography to assess aggregation state
Circular dichroism to evaluate secondary structure integrity
Any deviation from expected results may indicate protein degradation or misfolding, which could affect experimental outcomes.
The protein may function as a membrane-associated protein based on its hydrophobic regions
It could potentially be involved in bacterial cell wall processes or membrane integrity
It might play a role in bacterial adaptation to environmental stresses
Research comparing S. haemolyticus surface proteins has identified numerous proteins involved in bacterial adhesion, colonization, and biofilm formation . While SH1041 was not specifically highlighted in these studies, its membrane localization suggests potential involvement in bacterial surface interactions.
To elucidate the function of SH1041, researchers should consider these methodological approaches:
Gene knockout/knockdown studies: Create SH1041-deficient S. haemolyticus strains and assess phenotypic changes in:
Growth kinetics
Membrane integrity
Stress responses
Biofilm formation capacity
Protein interaction studies:
Pull-down assays using His-tagged SH1041 to identify binding partners
Bacterial two-hybrid screens
Co-immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry
Localization studies:
Immunofluorescence microscopy
Cell fractionation followed by Western blotting
Cryo-electron microscopy
Structural studies:
X-ray crystallography or NMR to determine three-dimensional structure
Molecular dynamics simulations to predict functional domains
S. haemolyticus is an emerging nosocomial pathogen, and understanding its virulence factors is crucial for developing therapeutic strategies . While SH1041's specific role in virulence is not yet established, several potential contributions can be investigated:
Surface protein functionality: If SH1041 is expressed on the bacterial surface, it may contribute to adhesion to host tissues or medical devices, a critical first step in infection
Biofilm formation: S. haemolyticus is known to form biofilms, which contribute to antibiotic resistance and persistent infections. Surface proteins often play key roles in biofilm development and maturation
Immune evasion: Some staphylococcal surface proteins interfere with host immune responses. Similar functions could be investigated for SH1041
Research on S. haemolyticus has identified 65 surface proteins involved in adhesion and biofilm formation, including elastin binding protein (EbpS) and several LPXTG domain-containing proteins . Comparative studies could reveal functional similarities between SH1041 and these known virulence factors.
To investigate the role of SH1041 in host-pathogen interactions, researchers should consider these approaches:
Cell culture infection models:
Keratinocyte (HaCaT) colonization assays to mimic skin interaction
Comparison of wildtype and SH1041-deficient strains in adhesion assays
Quantification of bacterial internalization and persistence
Biofilm assays:
Static and dynamic biofilm formation assays
Confocal microscopy to assess biofilm architecture
Anti-biofilm agent susceptibility testing
Proteomics approaches:
Bacterial surface shaving followed by mass spectrometry to confirm SH1041 surface exposure under different conditions
Comparative proteomics between planktonic and biofilm growth modes
Protein expression analysis after host cell contact
Immune response studies:
Assessment of inflammatory cytokine production in response to recombinant SH1041
Neutrophil activation and phagocytosis assays
Complement activation studies
Detailed structural characterization of SH1041 could provide insights for developing novel antimicrobial strategies:
Structure-based drug design: If SH1041 plays a crucial role in bacterial survival or virulence, its structure could inform the design of specific inhibitors
Epitope mapping: Identifying immunogenic regions of SH1041 could guide vaccine development efforts
Protein engineering: Modification of SH1041 could potentially create diagnostic tools or therapeutic delivery systems
Recent studies have highlighted surface proteins as potential targets for antimicrobial treatment and diagnostics . The identification of expressed proteins after host-microbe interaction offers tools for the discovery and design of novel antimicrobial approaches.
Evolutionary analysis of SH1041 across staphylococcal species could reveal important insights:
Phylogenetic analysis: Comparing SH1041 homologs across staphylococcal species to understand evolutionary conservation and divergence
Selection pressure analysis: Identifying regions under positive or negative selection to infer functional importance
Horizontal gene transfer assessment: Investigating whether SH1041 shows evidence of acquisition through horizontal gene transfer
Structural comparison: Comparing predicted structures of SH1041 homologs to identify conserved structural features
These approaches could reveal whether SH1041 has evolved species-specific functions or maintained conserved roles across staphylococcal species.
Researchers working with recombinant SH1041 may encounter several technical challenges:
Expression optimization: Membrane proteins often require specialized expression systems. Consider:
Testing different E. coli strains optimized for membrane protein expression
Varying induction conditions (temperature, IPTG concentration, induction time)
Using solubility-enhancing fusion partners
Screening different detergents for membrane protein extraction
Purification challenges:
Optimizing imidazole concentrations in His-tag purification to reduce non-specific binding
Implementing additional purification steps (ion exchange, size exclusion chromatography)
Testing different buffer compositions to enhance stability
Protein activity assessment:
Developing functional assays to verify that the recombinant protein retains native activity
Comparing properties of different tag positions (N-terminal vs. C-terminal)
When facing contradictory results in SH1041 research, consider these methodological approaches:
Experimental variability sources:
Batch-to-batch variation in recombinant protein preparation
Differences in bacterial strains and growth conditions
Variation in host cell models and passage number
Data integration strategies:
Meta-analysis of multiple experimental approaches
Replication with standardized protocols across different laboratories
Careful control of environmental variables
Resolution approaches:
Developing quantitative assays with internal controls
Using multiple complementary techniques to address the same question
Implementing appropriate statistical analyses for complex datasets
Several cutting-edge technologies could significantly enhance SH1041 research:
CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing:
Precise modification of the SH1041 gene to study structure-function relationships
Creation of reporter fusions to monitor expression patterns
Generation of conditional knockouts to study essential functions
Cryo-electron microscopy:
High-resolution structural determination of membrane-embedded SH1041
Visualization of protein-protein interactions in native membrane environment
Advanced proteomics:
Thermal proteome profiling to identify binding partners
Protein-protein interaction mapping using proximity labeling techniques
Quantitative proteomics to assess expression under different conditions
Single-cell techniques:
Single-cell RNA-seq to examine expression heterogeneity
Time-lapse microscopy to track protein localization during infection processes
To place SH1041 in the broader context of S. haemolyticus biology, researchers should consider:
Systems biology approaches:
Network analysis to identify functional modules containing SH1041
Integration of transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics data
Mathematical modeling of protein interactions and signaling pathways
Comparative analysis across conditions:
Expression profiling during different growth phases
Response to antimicrobial treatments
Adaptation to host environments
Multi-omics integration:
Correlation of genomic variations with proteome changes
Linking metabolic shifts to protein expression patterns
Connecting structural variations to functional consequences