Recombinant GroL is typically produced in E. coli expression systems due to their scalability and compatibility with bacterial chaperones .
Production involves proprietary chromatographic techniques to minimize endotoxin contamination .
GroL forms a tetradecameric double-ring structure that encapsulates unfolded proteins. ATP hydrolysis drives conformational changes, enabling substrate folding within the central cavity . Key functional attributes:
Substrate Binding: Preferentially interacts with hydrophobic regions of misfolded proteins .
Cochaperone Interaction: Requires GroES (Hsp10) for ATPase activity and substrate release .
Protein Refolding: Used in vitro to rescue aggregation-prone proteins .
Vaccine Development: HSP60 family members are immunogenic and explored as adjuvants .
Chaperonin inhibitors (e.g., pyrazolopyrimidines) are under investigation to disrupt bacterial proteostasis .
Knowledge Gaps: No direct structural or functional data exist for S. maltophilia GroL. Studies on homologs suggest conserved roles, but species-specific adaptations are likely .
Research Needs:
The 60 kDa chaperonin (groL) of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia belongs to the chaperonin family of molecular chaperones found in many bacteria. It functions as a crucial protein folding machinery, assisting the proper folding of many proteins that would otherwise misfold or aggregate. The protein requires the co-chaperonin GroES to function properly, forming a barrel-like structure that creates an isolated environment for protein folding .
In eukaryotes, the mitochondrial heat shock protein 60 (Hsp60) is structurally and functionally similar to bacterial GroEL due to their endosymbiotic origin . The chaperonin system is essential for cellular viability, particularly under stress conditions when protein misfolding becomes more prevalent.
Recombinant S. maltophilia groL expression typically involves heterologous systems, most commonly E. coli. When expressing recombinant groL, researchers must consider several factors that differ from endogenous expression:
Expression levels: Recombinant systems often produce higher concentrations than naturally occur in S. maltophilia
Co-expression requirements: Optimal folding and function may require co-expression with GroES
Post-translational modifications: These may differ between the native and recombinant systems
Inclusion body formation: High-level expression often leads to protein aggregation requiring solubilization strategies
Studies have shown that co-expression of GroEL-GroES can assist in the folding of multiple substrate proteins simultaneously when over-expressed in E. coli, potentially serving as a tool for enhanced production of multiple functional recombinant proteins .
The S. maltophilia groL protein shares the characteristic structure of other bacterial GroEL proteins, comprising:
A double-ring tetradecameric structure (14 subunits)
Three distinct domains: apical, intermediate, and equatorial
An ATP binding pocket in the equatorial domain
Hydrophobic residues in the apical domain for substrate binding
The functional cycle involves ATP binding, GroES association, substrate protein encapsulation, and conformational changes that facilitate proper folding. The large central cavity created by this structure provides an isolated environment that prevents aggregation of partially folded proteins.
Recombinant S. maltophilia groL can be employed to investigate several aspects of pathogenesis:
Immunological studies: GroL proteins are often immunogenic and can be used to study host immune responses against S. maltophilia
Protein-protein interaction analyses: Identifying host proteins that interact with S. maltophilia groL
Stress response investigations: Examining how groL levels change during infection conditions
Structure-function relationship studies: Using site-directed mutagenesis to identify residues critical for pathogenesis
The immunoproteomic approach has proven efficient for screening immunogenic proteins of S. maltophilia, which can lead to identification of potential vaccine candidates . Similar approaches could be used with groL to understand its role in host-pathogen interactions.
While the search results don't directly address groL's role in antimicrobial resistance, several hypotheses can be explored:
GroL may help properly fold proteins involved in efflux pump assembly
The chaperone could stabilize altered target proteins that would otherwise be destabilized by antibiotic binding
Under antibiotic stress, increased groL expression might help maintain cellular proteostasis
S. maltophilia is known for its inherent antibiotic resistance , making it increasingly challenging to treat effectively. Understanding the role of groL in maintaining cellular functions under antibiotic pressure could provide insights into resistance mechanisms.
Several methodological approaches can identify groL client proteins:
Co-immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry
Bacterial two-hybrid screening
Protein microarray analysis
Comparative proteomics of wild-type vs. groL-depleted strains
Cross-linking coupled with mass spectrometry
| Technique | Advantages | Limitations | Sample preparation requirements |
|---|---|---|---|
| Co-immunoprecipitation with MS | Identifies physical interactions | May detect transient interactions | Requires specific anti-groL antibodies |
| Bacterial two-hybrid | In vivo detection | False positives common | Genomic or cDNA library construction |
| Protein microarray | High-throughput | Artificial conditions | Purified recombinant groL required |
| Comparative proteomics | Physiologically relevant | Indirect associations | GroL-depleted mutant construction |
| Cross-linking MS | Captures transient interactions | Complex data analysis | Optimization of cross-linking conditions |
Expression and purification of functional recombinant S. maltophilia groL requires careful optimization:
Expression conditions:
Host strain: BL21(DE3) or derivatives are typically preferred for chaperonin expression
Growth temperature: 25-30°C often yields better solubility than 37°C
Induction: Low IPTG concentrations (0.1-0.5 mM) with longer induction times
Co-expression: Include GroES for improved folding and stability
Purification strategy:
Cell lysis: Sonication or French press in buffer containing 20-50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 100-300 mM NaCl
Initial capture: Affinity chromatography using His-tag or other suitable tags
Intermediate purification: Ion exchange chromatography
Polishing: Size exclusion chromatography to isolate properly assembled tetradecamers
Folding of aggregation-prone recombinant proteins through co-expression of chaperonin GroEL and GroES has become a popular practice to optimize preparation of functional proteins in E. coli .
Multiple assays can be employed to evaluate groL functionality:
ATPase activity assay: Measures ATP hydrolysis rate using colorimetric phosphate detection
Protein refolding assay: Monitors the refolding of denatured model substrates like malate dehydrogenase
Aggregation prevention assay: Quantifies the ability of groL to prevent thermal aggregation of model proteins
Co-chaperonin binding assay: Evaluates interaction with GroES using surface plasmon resonance
| Assay type | Readout method | Positive control | Negative control |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATPase activity | Malachite green | E. coli GroEL | K→A ATP binding site mutant |
| Protein refolding | Enzymatic activity recovery | Native substrate protein | Refolding without groL |
| Aggregation prevention | Light scattering | E. coli GroEL | Heat-inactivated groL |
| GroES binding | SPR/BLI binding kinetics | E. coli GroEL-GroES | Apical domain mutant |
Studies have demonstrated that GroEL and GroES can assist in the folding of multiple substrate proteins simultaneously, making them valuable tools for recombinant protein production .
Several challenges exist in developing groL-based interventions:
Cross-reactivity with human Hsp60, potentially causing autoimmune responses
Identifying specific epitopes unique to S. maltophilia groL
Demonstrating sufficient immunogenicity to confer protection
Establishing appropriate animal models for testing efficacy
The immunoproteomic approach has proven efficient for screening immunogenic proteins of S. maltophilia . While current research has focused on outer membrane proteins like OmpA and Smlt4123 as vaccine candidates, similar approaches could potentially identify immunogenic epitopes in groL.
As a molecular chaperone, groL likely plays critical roles in stress adaptation:
Temperature stress: Preventing protein denaturation and aggregation at elevated temperatures
Oxidative stress: Maintaining function of proteins damaged by reactive oxygen species
Antibiotic stress: Preserving cellular proteostasis during antimicrobial treatment
Nutrient limitation: Ensuring proper folding of key metabolic enzymes
S. maltophilia is an emerging global multi-drug-resistant organism that is increasingly challenging to treat effectively . Understanding how groL contributes to stress resistance could provide insights into bacterial persistence during infection and treatment.
Recombinant S. maltophilia groL could serve as a diagnostic tool in several capacities:
Serological detection of S. maltophilia infections through anti-groL antibody detection
PCR-based identification using groL-specific primers
Mass spectrometry-based identification in clinical samples
The growing importance of S. maltophilia as an opportunistic pathogen, particularly in cystic fibrosis patients , highlights the need for improved diagnostic approaches.