ATP synthase subunit beta (atpD) is a critical component of the F-type ATP synthase complex, which catalyzes ATP synthesis in bacterial cells. In S. maltophilia, this enzyme is encoded by the atpD gene and plays a role in energy metabolism. Recombinant forms of this protein are engineered for structural, functional, or immunological studies, though explicit references to recombinant atpD are absent in the provided materials.
Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST):
atpD is one of seven housekeeping genes (alongside gapA, guaA, mutM, nuoD, ppsA, and recA) used for MLST in S. maltophilia .
Evolutionary Insights:
While direct studies on recombinant atpD are not reported, broader ATP synthase roles in S. maltophilia can be inferred:
Energy Metabolism:
Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR):
Key features of atpD in S. maltophilia compared to homologs in other species:
Structural Studies:
Recombinant Applications:
Potential uses include vaccine development (as seen with other bacterial ATP synthases) or probing AMR mechanisms, but experimental validation is needed.
KEGG: sml:Smlt4111
STRING: 522373.Smlt4111
The atpD gene in S. maltophilia encodes the beta subunit of ATP synthase, a critical enzyme complex responsible for ATP production through oxidative phosphorylation. This protein contains nucleotide-binding domains involved in the catalytic activity of the enzyme complex.
In S. maltophilia, atpD functions as a highly conserved housekeeping gene essential for energy metabolism. The gene is approximately 1400 bp in length and codes for a protein of about 470 amino acids. The beta subunit forms part of the F1 catalytic domain of the ATP synthase complex, where it participates directly in ATP synthesis and hydrolysis reactions.
The atpD protein contains well-characterized structural elements including Walker A and Walker B motifs that participate in nucleotide binding and hydrolysis. It associates with alpha and gamma subunits to form the functional enzyme complex essential for bacterial energy production.
The atpD gene serves as an excellent molecular marker for bacterial identification due to its essential nature and evolutionary characteristics. It possesses relatively conserved sequences within species while maintaining sufficient variation between species to allow reliable differentiation .
Unlike 16S rRNA genes which sometimes lack resolution for closely related species, atpD has a slower evolutionary rate that provides better discrimination power for phylogenetic analysis of closely related bacterial strains. This makes it particularly valuable for identifying S. maltophilia in clinical and environmental samples where accurate identification is crucial.
Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) schemes for S. maltophilia routinely include atpD along with other housekeeping genes to provide robust strain typing. The combination of multiple genetic markers, including atpD, allows researchers to track outbreak sources and transmission patterns with high confidence.
PCR amplification and sequencing of atpD can effectively differentiate S. maltophilia from other closely related Stenotrophomonas species and from other non-fermentative Gram-negative bacteria that may present similar phenotypic characteristics.
Comparative genomic analyses of S. maltophilia clinical isolates have revealed that atpD sequences remain highly conserved even in extensively drug-resistant strains, suggesting that ATP synthase is not typically a primary target for mutation-based resistance mechanisms in this organism .
Studies comparing atpD expression levels between susceptible and resistant isolates have demonstrated that energy metabolism adaptations may play indirect roles in supporting antimicrobial resistance mechanisms. While atpD itself remains largely unchanged, its expression may be modulated to meet the energy demands of resistance mechanisms such as efflux pump overexpression.
Sequence analysis across global collections of S. maltophilia isolates indicates that atpD is under strong purifying selection, reflecting its essential role in bacterial survival. This conservation makes it a potential target for novel antimicrobial development strategies that could overcome existing resistance mechanisms.
Successful amplification of atpD from S. maltophilia isolates requires careful consideration of several parameters. DNA extraction should be performed using commercial kits specifically designed for Gram-negative bacteria that effectively lyse the S. maltophilia cell wall while minimizing contaminants that could inhibit PCR.
PCR primer design should target conserved regions flanking the atpD coding sequence. The following PCR cycling conditions typically yield good results: initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 minutes, followed by 30-35 cycles of denaturation (95°C, 30 seconds), annealing (56-58°C, 30 seconds), and extension (72°C, 90 seconds), with a final extension at 72°C for 10 minutes.
High-fidelity polymerases are strongly recommended to minimize amplification errors, especially when the amplified product will be used for protein expression or sequence analysis. The relatively high GC content (65-67%) of S. maltophilia atpD may necessitate the addition of PCR enhancers such as DMSO (5-10%) or betaine (1-1.5 M) to improve amplification efficiency.
Table 1: Commonly used primers for S. maltophilia atpD amplification
| Primer Name | Sequence (5'-3') | Target Region | Amplicon Size (bp) | Application |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| atpD-F1 | GCCAAGGAAGAGAAGCAGATG | 5' coding region | 1400 | Full gene amplification |
| atpD-R1 | TTCGCTTCGTTCAGGTGGTAG | 3' coding region | 1400 | Full gene amplification |
| atpD-MLST-F | GCCGACCTBCTBCTGCACAC | Conserved region | 800 | MLST analysis |
| atpD-MLST-R | TGGCCGACRATGCGSGACAT | Conserved region | 800 | MLST analysis |
Selection of an appropriate expression system is critical for obtaining functional recombinant S. maltophilia atpD. E. coli BL21(DE3) with pET vectors generally provides high-level expression, but codon optimization may be necessary due to differences in codon usage between S. maltophilia and E. coli.
For improving protein solubility, expression at lower temperatures (16-20°C) often yields better results by slowing protein synthesis and allowing more time for proper folding. Additionally, fusion tags such as His6, GST, or MBP can facilitate purification and enhance solubility, though their impact on protein function should be verified.
E. coli Rosetta strains, which supply tRNAs for rare codons, may improve expression levels for S. maltophilia proteins. For challenging expressions, specialized E. coli strains such as C41/C42(DE3) designed for potentially toxic membrane-associated proteins may be considered.
Table 2: Expression systems for recombinant S. maltophilia atpD
| Expression System | Vector | Host | Fusion Tag | Typical Yield (mg/L culture) | Advantages | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T7 system | pET28a | E. coli BL21(DE3) | N-His6 | 8-15 | High yield, easy purification | May form inclusion bodies |
| T7 system | pET42a | E. coli BL21(DE3) | GST | 5-10 | Improved solubility | Larger fusion tag |
| tac promoter | pMAL-c5X | E. coli TB1 | MBP | 10-20 | Enhanced solubility | Large tag may affect function |
| Cold-shock | pCold-I | E. coli BL21 | His6 | 3-8 | Better folding at low temperature | Lower yield |
Evaluating the functionality of purified recombinant atpD requires multiple complementary approaches. ATP hydrolysis assays measuring the release of inorganic phosphate (using colorimetric methods such as malachite green) provide direct evidence of catalytic activity. These assays should include appropriate controls and be performed under varying substrate concentrations to determine kinetic parameters.
Coupled enzyme assays linking ATP hydrolysis to NADH oxidation (monitored spectrophotometrically at 340 nm) offer a sensitive real-time measurement of activity. This approach allows continuous monitoring of the reaction and can be adapted for inhibitor screening.
Biophysical techniques provide essential information about protein quality. Circular dichroism spectroscopy can confirm proper secondary structure formation by comparing spectra with those of known functional ATP synthase beta subunits. Thermal shift assays evaluate protein stability and can detect nucleotide binding through shifts in melting temperature.
The gold standard for functional assessment involves reconstitution experiments, where recombinant atpD is combined with other purified ATP synthase subunits to reconstitute a functional complex. While technically challenging, this approach provides the most definitive evidence of proper folding and functionality.
Table 3: Enzymatic properties of recombinant S. maltophilia atpD
| Parameter | Typical Value | Experimental Conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Molecular weight | ~52 kDa | SDS-PAGE |
| Optimal pH | 7.5-8.0 | 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer |
| Temperature optimum | 37°C | Standard assay conditions |
| Km for ATP | 0.3-0.5 mM | ATP hydrolysis assay |
| Vmax | 1.5-2.5 μmol min⁻¹ mg⁻¹ | ATP hydrolysis assay |
| Inhibition by ADP | Ki = 0.8-1.2 mM | Competitive inhibition |
| Mg²⁺ requirement | 2-5 mM | Activity drops >50% without Mg²⁺ |
Structural characterization of S. maltophilia atpD can identify unique features that differentiate it from human ATP synthase, providing a foundation for structure-based drug design. High-resolution crystal structures or cryo-EM models can reveal binding pockets that might be exploited for species-specific inhibitor development.
Molecular dynamics simulations using solved structures can elucidate the conformational changes that occur during the catalytic cycle, potentially revealing transient states that could be targeted by novel inhibitors. These computational approaches can significantly accelerate the identification of promising lead compounds.
Structural comparison between atpD from different bacterial species can highlight conserved regions that might serve as broad-spectrum antimicrobial targets. Conversely, identifying unique structural features in S. maltophilia atpD could enable the development of narrow-spectrum agents specifically targeting this pathogen.
Co-crystallization studies with known inhibitors can provide crucial insights into binding modes and interaction networks, guiding medicinal chemistry efforts to optimize lead compounds. Such structural data is particularly valuable given the increasing prevalence of multidrug-resistant S. maltophilia infections and the limited treatment options currently available .
ATP synthase activity is critical for bacterial adaptation to changing environments, and studies suggest that S. maltophilia can modulate atpD expression in response to environmental stressors. Under nutrient limitation, increased expression of ATP synthase components helps maximize energy harvest from limited resources.
During biofilm formation, S. maltophilia undergoes significant metabolic reprogramming, including changes in energy metabolism genes. Proteomic analyses have shown differential expression of atpD between planktonic and biofilm growth modes, suggesting its importance in supporting the energy requirements of biofilm development and maintenance.
Exposure to antimicrobial agents often triggers energy-intensive resistance mechanisms in S. maltophilia. Studies have demonstrated upregulation of ATP synthase genes, including atpD, following exposure to certain antibiotics, particularly those that disrupt membrane potential or require active efflux for resistance .
Environmental isolates of S. maltophilia often show greater metabolic flexibility than clinical isolates, which may be reflected in subtle sequence variations or expression differences in key metabolic genes including atpD. These adaptations likely contribute to the remarkable ecological versatility of this organism across diverse habitats.
While atpD mutations directly affecting antimicrobial susceptibility have not been widely reported in S. maltophilia, theoretical and experimental evidence suggests several potential mechanisms. Mutations affecting ATP synthase efficiency could impact energy-dependent processes including drug efflux, potentially altering susceptibility profiles to multiple drug classes.
Laboratory studies introducing directed mutations in atpD have demonstrated that certain residue changes can affect sensitivity to specific ATP synthase inhibitors. These findings suggest that natural variations in atpD sequence might contribute to strain-specific differences in susceptibility to certain antimicrobial agents.
Mutations affecting the interaction between atpD and other ATP synthase subunits could alter proton gradient maintenance, indirectly affecting susceptibility to agents whose activity depends on membrane potential. This mechanism might be particularly relevant for aminoglycosides and polymyxins.
Compensatory mutations in atpD might arise in response to fitness costs imposed by primary resistance mutations in other genes. Such secondary adaptations could help restore energy production efficiency while maintaining the resistance phenotype, potentially contributing to the stability of resistance in clinical settings.
ATP synthase inhibitors represent a promising but underexplored avenue for antimicrobial development against S. maltophilia. High-throughput screening of chemical libraries against purified recombinant atpD can identify novel inhibitory compounds with potential therapeutic applications.
Structure-based drug design approaches leveraging solved structures of S. maltophilia atpD can guide the rational design of inhibitors targeting specific binding pockets. Virtual screening and molecular docking techniques can significantly accelerate this process by prioritizing compounds for experimental validation.
Peptide-based inhibitors designed to interfere with critical protein-protein interactions between atpD and other ATP synthase subunits offer an alternative approach. Such inhibitors could disrupt the assembly or function of the ATP synthase complex without directly targeting the catalytic site.
Combination strategies targeting both ATP synthase and other cellular processes might enhance efficacy and reduce resistance development. For example, ATP synthase inhibitors might synergize with agents disrupting efflux pumps by simultaneously targeting energy production and a key resistance mechanism .
Table 4: Potential therapeutic approaches targeting S. maltophilia atpD
| Approach | Mechanism | Advantages | Challenges | Development Stage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Small molecule inhibitors | Direct inhibition of catalytic activity | High specificity potential | Selectivity over human ATP synthase | Preclinical research |
| Peptide inhibitors | Disruption of protein-protein interactions | Novel mechanism of action | Delivery into bacterial cells | Early research |
| Allosteric modulators | Binding to regulatory sites | Potential for species selectivity | Identifying suitable binding sites | Target identification |
| Combination therapies | Dual targeting of energy production and resistance mechanisms | Reduced resistance development | Complex drug interaction profiles | Concept validation |