Recombinant Streptomyces coelicolor Uncharacterized protein SCO3924 (SCO3924)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Please note: We prioritize shipping the format currently in stock. However, if you have specific requirements for the format, please indicate them when placing your order. We will then prepare the product according to your specifications.
Lead Time
Delivery time may vary depending on the purchase method or location. For specific delivery timeframes, please consult your local distributors.
Note: All our proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. If you require dry ice shipping, please contact us in advance, as additional fees will apply.
Notes
Repeated freezing and thawing is not recommended. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
We recommend centrifuging the vial briefly before opening to ensure the contents settle at the bottom. Reconstitute the protein in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our default final glycerol concentration is 50%, which can be used as a reference.
Shelf Life
Shelf life is influenced by various factors including storage conditions, buffer composition, storage temperature, and the inherent stability of the protein.
Generally, the shelf life of liquid form is 6 months at -20°C/-80°C. The shelf life of lyophilized form is 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type will be determined during the manufacturing process.
The specific tag type will be determined during production. If you have a specific tag type preference, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
SCO3924; SCQ11.07; Uncharacterized protein SCO3924
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-70
Protein Length
full length protein
Species
Streptomyces coelicolor (strain ATCC BAA-471 / A3(2) / M145)
Target Names
SCO3924
Target Protein Sequence
MREIFTGLPWWVKWIAVPVIALVVFGGLIVSVVGFVVGLLFKLLVFVALVGGLIYVVRKF MSSSSSRSDW
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Database Links

KEGG: sco:SCO3924

STRING: 100226.SCO3924

Subcellular Location
Cell membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is the predicted function of the uncharacterized protein SCO3924 in Streptomyces coelicolor?

While SCO3924 remains uncharacterized, prediction of its function requires a multi-tool approach similar to methods used for other uncharacterized proteins. Researchers should employ a combination of bioinformatic tools including InterProScan, Motif, SMART, HMMER, and NCBI CDART for domain identification. These methods have demonstrated approximately 83.6% efficacy through receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis when applied to other uncharacterized proteins . Physicochemical properties including molecular weight, extinction coefficient, isoelectric point, and grand average of hydropathicity should be estimated through programs like Expasy's ProtParam to establish basic characterization .

How does SCO3924 compare to other characterized proteins in Streptomyces coelicolor?

Comparative analysis should begin with homology searches using BlastP against characterized proteins in S. coelicolor. For higher confidence in functional assignment, identify conserved domains predicted by two or more databases (as demonstrated in studies of other uncharacterized proteins) . The final confidence level for functional prediction can be categorized as either high confidence (domains predicted by multiple tools) or relatively low confidence (fewer predictive agreements). String analysis can reveal potential interacting partners, providing further insights into possible functional relationships within the Streptomyces proteome.

What techniques are most effective for initial characterization of SCO3924?

Initial characterization should follow a stepwise approach:

  • Sequence retrieval from UniProt database (Proteome ID UP000002521 for S. coelicolor)

  • Physicochemical property estimation using ProtParam

  • Domain identification using multiple tools

  • Structural prediction using homology-based modeling (Swiss PDB and Phyre2 servers)

  • Subcellular localization prediction

This multi-faceted approach has proven successful for annotating previously uncharacterized proteins with an average accuracy of 83% .

What methods can be used to generate a SCO3924 null mutant in Streptomyces coelicolor?

Creating a SCO3924 null mutant requires careful consideration of genetic techniques proven effective in S. coelicolor. Gene replacement mediated by Escherichia coli-Streptomyces conjugation has been successfully used to generate null mutations in other S. coelicolor genes, such as recA . The protocol should include:

  • Construction of a deletion cassette containing antibiotic resistance markers

  • Transfer to S. coelicolor via intergeneric conjugation with E. coli

  • Selection of double crossover mutants

  • Confirmation of mutation through PCR, sequencing, and Southern blotting

Researchers should be aware that, as observed with recA mutants, some null mutations in S. coelicolor may affect growth, segregate minute colonies with low viability, or produce more anucleate spores than wild type .

How can I construct a SCO3924 knock-in strain for overexpression studies?

For overexpression studies, the following methodology is recommended based on successful approaches with other S. coelicolor genes:

  • PCR-amplify SCO3924 with appropriate restriction sites

  • Clone the gene into an integrative expression vector (e.g., pIJ8600) under control of an inducible promoter (such as thiostrepton-inducible promoter PtipA)

  • Deliver the construct to S. coelicolor through interspecific conjugation

  • Verify correct integration at the attB ΦC31 site via PCR, sequencing, and Southern blotting

A strain containing the empty vector should be constructed as a control. Expression levels should be monitored via qRT-PCR, and researchers should consider that the integrated construct may show increased expression even without addition of the inducer .

What phenotypic changes should I monitor when studying SCO3924 mutants?

Based on studies of other S. coelicolor proteins, comprehensive phenotypic analysis should include:

ParameterMethodologyExpected Observations
Growth kineticsGrowth curves in liquid mediumChanges in biomass accumulation, growth rate
Morphological developmentMicroscopy at 24h, 48h, 72h, 120hSubstrate mycelium formation, aerial hyphae development, spore chain formation
Antibiotic productionSpectrophotometric measurementACT (actinorhodin), RED (undecylprodigiosin), CDA (calcium-dependent antibiotic)
Medium pHpH monitoringChanges in alkalinization patterns
Protein expression patterns2D-DIGE proteomic analysisDifferential protein abundance
Metabolite profilesLC-ESI-MS/MSChanges in amino acid and central carbon intermediate levels

This comprehensive approach has successfully identified the functional roles of other previously uncharacterized proteins in S. coelicolor .

What methods should I use to purify recombinant SCO3924 for biochemical studies?

For purification of recombinant SCO3924, implement a strategy similar to that used for other S. coelicolor proteins:

  • Clone SCO3924 into an expression vector with an affinity tag (His-tag recommended)

  • Express in a heterologous host (E. coli BL21 is commonly used)

  • Optimize expression conditions (temperature, IPTG concentration, induction time)

  • Perform cell lysis under conditions that maintain protein stability

  • Purify using affinity chromatography (Ni-NTA for His-tagged proteins)

  • Verify purity by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting

  • Perform further purification steps if needed (gel filtration, ion exchange)

Recombinant protein production allows for subsequent biochemical characterization including enzyme activity assays, protein-protein interaction studies, and structural analyses.

How can I identify potential protein-protein interactions involving SCO3924?

Multiple complementary approaches should be employed:

  • Computational prediction: Use STRING database to predict protein interaction networks based on genomic context

  • Co-immunoprecipitation: Express tagged SCO3924 in S. coelicolor, pull down with appropriate antibodies, and identify binding partners via mass spectrometry

  • Bacterial two-hybrid system: Test direct interactions with suspected partner proteins

  • Cross-linking experiments: Use chemical cross-linkers followed by mass spectrometry to identify proximal proteins in vivo

For example, interaction studies with TrpM and PepA in S. coelicolor revealed important regulatory relationships affecting antibiotic production and morphological differentiation .

What bioinformatic pipelines are most effective for predicting SCO3924 function?

A comprehensive bioinformatic pipeline should include:

  • Sequence homology searches: BlastP against various databases

  • Domain prediction: InterProScan, Motif, SMART, HMMER, NCBI CDART

  • Protein family classification: Pfam, PRINTS, PROSITE

  • Structural prediction: Swiss-Model, Phyre2, I-TASSER

  • Functional site prediction: Active site, binding pocket analysis

  • Genomic context analysis: Gene neighborhood, operons, regulons

  • Evolutionary analysis: Multiple sequence alignment, phylogenetic tree construction

Confidence in functional annotation increases when multiple tools converge on similar predictions. For previously uncharacterized proteins in other organisms, this approach has yielded successful functional assignments with approximately 83% accuracy .

How can I determine if SCO3924 is involved in secondary metabolite production in S. coelicolor?

To investigate potential roles in secondary metabolism:

  • Generate knockout and overexpression strains as described in section 2

  • Quantify production of known antibiotics (ACT, RED, CDA) using established spectrophotometric and bioassay methods

  • Perform untargeted metabolomics to identify changes in metabolite profiles

  • Conduct proteomic analysis to identify changes in expression of proteins involved in secondary metabolism

  • Examine expression correlation between SCO3924 and known secondary metabolism genes under various conditions

Changes in antibiotic production, as observed with trpM manipulation, would suggest involvement in secondary metabolism pathways .

What controls should be included when studying SCO3924 overexpression or knockout effects?

Proper experimental design requires:

  • Empty vector control: Strain containing the same vector backbone without SCO3924 insert

  • Wild-type control: Parental strain without genetic manipulation

  • Complementation strain: Knockout strain with reintroduced functional SCO3924 to verify phenotype restoration

  • Technical replicates: Minimum of three for each experimental condition

  • Biological replicates: Independent clones of the same genetic construct

  • Time course analysis: Monitoring changes at different growth phases

  • Media variation: Testing phenotypes on different growth media

These controls help distinguish SCO3924-specific effects from those caused by genetic manipulation procedures or vector insertion.

How can I resolve contradictory results when analyzing SCO3924 expression and protein abundance?

When facing contradictions between gene expression and protein abundance (as observed with pepA in trpM studies ), consider:

Additional methodologies:

  • Western blotting with specific antibodies

  • qRT-PCR with multiple reference genes

  • Ribosome profiling to assess translation efficiency

  • Pulse-chase experiments to determine protein turnover rates

How might SCO3924 contribute to stress response in S. coelicolor?

To investigate potential roles in stress response:

  • Subject wild-type and SCO3924 mutant strains to various stressors:

    • Oxidative stress (H₂O₂, paraquat)

    • Nutritional stress (carbon, nitrogen limitation)

    • Heat shock

    • Osmotic stress

    • pH stress

    • Antibiotic exposure

  • Measure stress markers:

    • Survival rates

    • Growth recovery times

    • Expression of known stress-response genes

    • Metabolite profiles under stress conditions

  • Perform comparative proteomics under stress conditions to identify differential protein expression patterns

The relationship between stress response proteins and Streptomyces development has been well established , making this an important avenue for investigation.

What advanced genetic techniques can help resolve the function of SCO3924 when traditional approaches yield inconclusive results?

When traditional approaches fail to determine function:

  • CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing: For precise manipulation of SCO3924 and potential interacting genes

  • Ribosome profiling: To examine translation efficiency

  • ChIP-seq: If SCO3924 is suspected to have DNA-binding properties

  • RNA-seq: To identify global transcriptional changes in response to SCO3924 manipulation

  • Synthetic genetic array analysis: To identify genetic interactions

  • Conditional expression systems: To study essential genes

  • Suppressor screens: To identify genes that can compensate for SCO3924 deficiency

These techniques can reveal functional relationships even when direct biochemical functions remain obscure.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.