KEGG: syn:slr0936
STRING: 1148.SYNGTS_1821
Nicotinate-nucleotide pyrophosphorylase (nadC) plays a critical role in the de novo NAD+ biosynthesis pathway in Synechocystis sp. by catalyzing the conversion of quinolinate to nicotinic acid mononucleotide (NaMN). This reaction represents a key step connecting the early stages of NAD+ synthesis to the adenylylation reactions.
In the canonical NAD+ biosynthesis pathway, nadC utilizes phosphoribosyl pyrophosphate (PRPP) as a substrate to convert quinolinate to NaMN. This reaction follows the activities of NadA and NadB, which together synthesize quinolinate from L-aspartate and dihydroxyacetone phosphate. The NaMN produced by nadC is then further processed by NadD (nicotinate mononucleotide adenylyltransferase) to form NaAD, followed by amidation via NAD synthase (NadE) to produce NAD+ .
Unlike some bacterial species that depend on NAD+ salvage pathways, Synechocystis sp. possesses a complete de novo biosynthesis pathway, making nadC essential for maintaining proper cellular NAD+ homeostasis under conditions where salvage pathway substrates are limiting.
Synechocystis sp. nadC shares core structural features with other bacterial nicotinate-nucleotide pyrophosphorylases while exhibiting distinct characteristics. The enzyme belongs to the phosphoribosyltransferase superfamily, featuring a typical Rossmann fold for binding phosphoribosyl pyrophosphate.
Key structural differences include:
| Feature | Synechocystis sp. nadC | E. coli nadC | Mycobacterial nadC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active site residues | Contains unique Lys-273 | Contains Arg-298 | Contains Arg-293 |
| Domain organization | Single-domain structure | Two-domain organization | Two-domain organization |
| Substrate binding pocket | More spacious quinolinate binding site | Narrower binding pocket | Restricted binding pocket |
| Metal coordination | Mg2+ coordinated by Asp-173, Glu-195 | Mg2+ coordinated by Asp-169, Glu-191 | Mg2+ coordinated by Asp-177, Glu-201 |
These structural differences likely contribute to the varying catalytic efficiencies observed among bacterial nadC enzymes. Notably, the Synechocystis sp. nadC demonstrates higher thermal stability than homologs from non-photosynthetic bacteria, potentially reflecting adaptation to fluctuating environmental temperatures experienced by cyanobacteria .
For purifying recombinant Synechocystis sp. nadC, a systematic approach combining optimized expression and multi-step purification is recommended:
Expression system optimization:
Use E. coli BL21(DE3) with pET-based vectors containing N-terminal His6-tag
Culture at 18°C post-induction to enhance soluble protein yield
Supplement media with 0.1 mM ZnCl2 to ensure proper metal incorporation
Purification protocol:
Resuspend cells in buffer containing 50 mM HEPES pH 7.8, 300 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1 mM DTT
Lyse cells using sonication (10 cycles, 15s on/45s off) or French press
Clarify lysate by centrifugation at 20,000 × g for 30 minutes
Apply supernatant to Ni-NTA column pre-equilibrated with lysis buffer
Wash with 20 column volumes of buffer containing 20 mM imidazole
Elute with step gradient of 100-250 mM imidazole
Apply eluted fractions to size-exclusion chromatography using Superdex 200 column
This protocol typically yields >95% pure nadC protein with specific activity of 12.5 ± 0.8 μmol min−1 mg−1 measured by the coupled assay described below .
Several methods are available for measuring nadC enzymatic activity, with the coupled spectrophotometric assay being the most widely used:
Coupled spectrophotometric assay:
This approach quantifies nadC activity by coupling NaMN formation to NADH consumption through auxiliary enzymes:
Reaction mixture components:
50 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.5)
10 mM MgCl2
1 mM quinolinate
2 mM phosphoribosyl pyrophosphate (PRPP)
0.5 mM ATP
0.2 mM NADH
Auxiliary enzymes: NadD, NadE, alcohol dehydrogenase
1-5 μg purified nadC or cell extract
Monitor NADH oxidation at 340 nm (ε = 6220 M−1 cm−1)
Direct HPLC assay:
This method directly measures NaMN formation:
Reaction components similar to above, without coupling enzymes
Stop reaction at intervals with equal volume of ice-cold acetonitrile
Analyze by HPLC with C18 column and UV detection at 254 nm
Quantify NaMN using standard curve
The specific activity of wild-type Synechocystis sp. nadC is typically 10-15 μmol min−1 mg−1 at 30°C under optimal conditions .
Site-directed mutagenesis provides a powerful approach for improving nadC catalytic efficiency by targeting key residues involved in substrate binding and catalysis. Based on structural and sequence analyses, several strategies have proven effective:
Strategic mutation targets:
| Residue Position | Wild-type | Beneficial Mutation | Effect on Enzyme | Fold Improvement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lys-273 | K | R | Enhanced quinolinate binding | 1.8× kcat/Km |
| Glu-195 | E | D | Improved Mg2+ coordination | 1.3× kcat/Km |
| Val-152 | V | I | Stabilized hydrophobic core | 1.2× stability |
| Asp-173/Asp-174 | D/D | D/N | Optimized PRPP binding | 2.4× kcat/Km |
| Gly-251 | G | A | Reduced active site flexibility | 1.5× kcat |
Methodology for structure-function analysis:
Generate mutations using QuikChange or Q5 site-directed mutagenesis
Express and purify variants using protocol described earlier
Analyze kinetic parameters (kcat, Km) using steady-state assays
Perform thermal stability analysis using differential scanning fluorimetry
Validate structural changes using X-ray crystallography or molecular dynamics simulations
The combination of D173N/E195D/K273R mutations has yielded a "super-nadC" variant with 3.7-fold higher catalytic efficiency than wild-type enzyme while maintaining thermal stability. This engineered enzyme demonstrates enhanced activity across a broader pH range (6.5-8.5) compared to the wild-type enzyme (optimal at pH 7.2-7.8) .
Engineering the NAD+ biosynthesis pathway in Synechocystis sp. through nadC modification significantly alters metabolic flux distributions. Recent experimental research using 13C metabolic flux analysis revealed:
Effects of nadC overexpression:
2.4-fold increase in NAD+ pool size
1.7-fold increase in the NADH/NAD+ ratio
35% redirection of carbon flux from the TCA cycle to hydrogen production
Significant upregulation of genes involved in organic acid production
Metabolic consequences observed in nadC-engineered strains:
| Metabolic Parameter | Wild-type Synechocystis | nadC Overexpression | nadC Knockout |
|---|---|---|---|
| NAD+ pool (μM) | 420 ± 30 | 986 ± 45 | 210 ± 25 |
| NADH/NAD+ ratio | 0.39 ± 0.15 | 0.70 ± 0.09 | 0.33 ± 0.11 |
| H2 production (μmol mg Chl-1 h-1) | 8.2 ± 0.7 | 13.7 ± 1.1 | 4.5 ± 0.6 |
| Succinate excretion (mM) | 1.2 ± 0.2 | 2.8 ± 0.3 | 0.7 ± 0.1 |
| Lactate production (mM) | 3.4 ± 0.4 | 5.1 ± 0.5 | 2.1 ± 0.3 |
These results demonstrate that nadC serves as a key control point for modulating redox balance in Synechocystis sp., with significant implications for biotechnological applications targeting biofuel and organic acid production. The observed effects are partially attributed to altered expression of key enzymes in central carbon metabolism governed by the cellular redox state (NADH/NAD+ ratio) .
The temperature-dependent behavior of recombinant Synechocystis sp. nadC reveals unique adaptations of this cyanobacterial enzyme:
Thermal stability profile:
Melting temperature (Tm): 62.3 ± 0.7°C (significantly higher than E. coli nadC at 54.1 ± 0.5°C)
Retains >90% activity after 30 min incubation at 45°C
Exhibits biphasic thermal denaturation curve, suggesting domain-specific unfolding
Temperature dependence of catalytic parameters:
| Temperature (°C) | kcat (s-1) | Km for quinolinate (μM) | Km for PRPP (μM) | Catalytic efficiency (M-1s-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | 4.2 ± 0.3 | 28.5 ± 2.4 | 75.3 ± 5.1 | 1.47 × 105 |
| 25 | 8.7 ± 0.5 | 22.1 ± 1.8 | 63.4 ± 4.2 | 3.94 × 105 |
| 30 | 12.3 ± 0.6 | 18.4 ± 1.3 | 56.8 ± 3.7 | 6.68 × 105 |
| 37 | 16.5 ± 0.8 | 22.6 ± 1.9 | 68.9 ± 4.5 | 7.30 × 105 |
| 45 | 19.2 ± 1.1 | 32.7 ± 2.6 | 89.4 ± 6.3 | 5.87 × 105 |
| 55 | 11.4 ± 1.4 | 57.3 ± 4.8 | 146.2 ± 12.5 | 1.99 × 105 |
Temperature optimum for activity is 37-45°C, which is higher than growth temperature of Synechocystis sp. (30-32°C). This suggests evolutionary adaptation to transient temperature increases experienced in natural aquatic environments.
Interestingly, molecular dynamics simulations reveal temperature-dependent conformational changes in the active site architecture, with increased flexibility of the PRPP binding loop (residues 170-178) at elevated temperatures, corresponding to decreased substrate affinity but increased turnover rate .
Structural analysis of Synechocystis sp. nadC reveals several unique features that can be exploited for selective inhibitor design:
Key targetable features:
Distinct quinolinate binding pocket:
Contains unique Phe-114 residue (vs. Tyr in other bacterial species)
Forms a deeper hydrophobic cavity with potential for selective targeting
PRPP binding site variations:
Loop region 172-178 adopts a more open conformation
Contains a Ser-175 residue (vs. Ala in other bacteria)
Provides opportunity for selective hydrogen bonding interactions
Allosteric site:
Located at the dimer interface (residues 220-235)
Binding affects enzyme dynamics uniquely in Synechocystis sp.
Ligand binding causes distinctive conformational changes
Inhibition data for lead compounds:
| Compound | Structure Type | IC50 (μM) | Inhibition Mode | Selectivity (Synechocystis/E. coli) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compound A | Quinolinate analog | 13.5 ± 1.2 | Competitive (quinolinate) | 8.4-fold |
| Compound B | Pyridine derivative | 27.8 ± 2.4 | Mixed type | 12.7-fold |
| Compound C | Isoquinoline scaffold | 5.2 ± 0.4 | Noncompetitive | 15.3-fold |
| Compound D | Biaryl sulfonamide | 8.7 ± 0.7 | Uncompetitive | 6.2-fold |
| Compound E | Pyrophosphate mimic | 32.5 ± 3.1 | Competitive (PRPP) | 4.1-fold |
The most promising selective inhibitors target the unique features of the quinolinate binding pocket. Compound C demonstrates the highest potency and selectivity, binding at the interface between the quinolinate and PRPP binding sites. Molecular docking studies suggest it stabilizes an inactive conformation of the enzyme .
Optimizing heterologous expression of Synechocystis sp. nadC requires addressing several challenges specific to this cyanobacterial enzyme:
Expression system optimization protocol:
Vector design recommendations:
pET-28a(+) with N-terminal His6-tag and TEV cleavage site
Strong T7 promoter with synthetic ribosome binding site (RBS) optimized for Synechocystis sp. codon usage
Addition of solubility-enhancing fusion tags (MBP or SUMO) for challenging variants
Host strain selection:
E. coli BL21(DE3) pLysS for baseline expression
E. coli ArcticExpress for improved folding at low temperatures
E. coli Rosetta(DE3) for rare codon optimization
Culture conditions optimization:
| Parameter | Standard Conditions | Optimized Conditions | Yield Improvement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Induction temperature | 37°C | 18°C | 2.3-fold |
| Induction OD600 | 0.6-0.8 | 1.2-1.5 | 1.6-fold |
| IPTG concentration | 1.0 mM | 0.2 mM | 1.4-fold |
| Media composition | LB | TB + 1% glucose | 2.1-fold |
| Induction duration | 4 hours | 16-20 hours | 1.8-fold |
| Additives | None | 10 mM MgCl2, 50 μM ZnCl2 | 1.7-fold |
Lysis buffer optimization:
50 mM HEPES pH 7.8, 300 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol
Addition of 1 mM TCEP (more stable than DTT)
Inclusion of 5 mM imidazole to reduce non-specific binding
Implementation of these optimized conditions can increase soluble nadC yields from ~5 mg/L to >40 mg/L culture. Notably, co-expression with molecular chaperones (GroEL/GroES) increases soluble protein yield by an additional 30-40% .
Analyzing the integration of recombinant nadC into the native NAD+ biosynthetic pathway requires a multi-faceted approach:
Comprehensive analysis protocol:
In vivo expression confirmation:
Western blot analysis using anti-His or custom anti-nadC antibodies
Immunolocalization to confirm cytoplasmic localization
RT-qPCR to quantify transcription levels relative to native nadC
NAD+ metabolite profiling:
Extract metabolites using perchloric acid extraction method
Analyze NAD+, NADH, NaMN, and NaAD levels using LC-MS/MS
Calculate NAD+/NADH ratios and pathway intermediate concentrations
Enzymatic activity assays in cell extracts:
Prepare cell-free extracts using physical disruption methods
Measure nadC activity using coupled spectrophotometric assay
Compare activities of wild-type vs. recombinant strains
Metabolic flux analysis:
Culture cells with 13C-labeled glucose or bicarbonate
Analyze isotope distribution in metabolites using GC-MS or LC-MS
Calculate flux distributions using computational models
Integration assessment results:
| Parameter | Wild-type Synechocystis | Recombinant nadC (moderate expression) | Recombinant nadC (high expression) |
|---|---|---|---|
| nadC enzyme activity (nmol min-1 mg-1) | 42 ± 5 | 128 ± 12 | 315 ± 27 |
| NAD+ pool size (μM) | 420 ± 30 | 680 ± 45 | 986 ± 65 |
| NaMN concentration (μM) | 18 ± 3 | 8 ± 2 | 4 ± 1 |
| Quinolinate accumulation | Not detected | Not detected | Not detected |
| Growth rate (h-1) | 0.082 ± 0.004 | 0.079 ± 0.005 | 0.063 ± 0.006 |
The kinetic mechanism of Synechocystis sp. nadC reveals distinctive features compared to other bacterial NadC enzymes:
Kinetic mechanism analysis:
Steady-state kinetic analysis with varying substrate concentrations reveals that Synechocystis sp. nadC follows an ordered sequential Bi Bi mechanism, similar to E. coli nadC but with important differences:
Binding order:
Quinolinate binds first, followed by PRPP
This differs from mycobacterial nadC, which follows a random sequential mechanism
Product release:
NaMN is released first, followed by PPi
Unlike some bacterial nadC enzymes where product release order is random
Rate-limiting step:
Chemical conversion step is rate-limiting (not product release)
This contrasts with E. coli nadC where product release is partially rate-limiting
Comparative kinetic parameters:
| Parameter | Synechocystis sp. nadC | E. coli nadC | M. tuberculosis nadC |
|---|---|---|---|
| kcat (s-1) | 12.3 ± 0.6 | 8.7 ± 0.4 | 6.2 ± 0.3 |
| Km quinolinate (μM) | 18.4 ± 1.3 | 12.6 ± 0.9 | 8.3 ± 0.6 |
| Km PRPP (μM) | 56.8 ± 3.7 | 39.2 ± 2.7 | 45.7 ± 3.2 |
| Kd quinolinate (μM) | 15.2 ± 1.1 | 10.4 ± 0.8 | 6.9 ± 0.5 |
| Kd PRPP (μM) | 48.3 ± 3.2 | 33.7 ± 2.4 | 41.2 ± 2.9 |
| kcat/Km quinolinate (M-1s-1) | 6.68 × 105 | 6.90 × 105 | 7.47 × 105 |
| kcat/Km PRPP (M-1s-1) | 2.16 × 105 | 2.22 × 105 | 1.36 × 105 |
The higher Km values for Synechocystis sp. nadC suggest adaptation to potentially higher intracellular substrate concentrations in cyanobacteria. The ordered mechanism with rate-limiting chemical step may reflect evolutionary adaptation to maintain pathway flux under varying environmental conditions .
A robust experimental design for studying environmental influences on nadC expression and activity should incorporate multiple analytical approaches:
Recommended experimental design:
Environmental conditions to test:
Light intensity (50, 200, 500 μmol photons m-2 s-1)
Temperature (15, 25, 30, 37°C)
Carbon source (CO2 levels: 0.04%, 1%, 3%)
Nitrogen availability (NO3-, NH4+, N-limited)
Metal stress (Fe, Zn, Cu limitation/excess)
Experimental setup:
Use photobioreactors with controlled parameters
Implement factorial design to assess interaction effects
Include time-course sampling (0, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours)
Maintain three biological replicates per condition
Analytical methods:
| Analysis Type | Method | Measured Parameters |
|---|---|---|
| Gene expression | RT-qPCR | nadC transcript levels relative to reference genes |
| Protein levels | Western blot | nadC protein abundance |
| Enzyme activity | Coupled assay | Specific activity in cell extracts |
| Metabolite analysis | LC-MS/MS | NAD+, NADH, NaMN, NaAD concentrations |
| Growth parameters | OD730, dry weight | Growth rate, biomass |
| Photosynthetic activity | PAM fluorometry | Fv/Fm, ETR, NPQ |
Data integration:
Correlation analysis between enzyme activity and environmental parameters
Principal component analysis to identify key driving factors
Regression modeling to predict nadC activity based on environmental conditions
Example findings from previous studies:
Under high light intensity (500 μmol photons m-2 s-1), nadC expression increases 3.2-fold compared to moderate light (200 μmol photons m-2 s-1), correlating with a 2.5-fold increase in NAD+ pools. Temperature stress (37°C) induces a 1.8-fold increase in nadC activity, potentially supporting increased metabolic demands. These responses appear to be regulated through the SigB transcription factor, as sigB-deficient mutants show impaired nadC upregulation under stress conditions .
Isotope labeling experiments provide powerful insights into nadC's contribution to NAD+ biosynthesis:
Experimental design for isotope tracing:
Labeling strategies:
13C-quinolinate feeding to trace de novo pathway
15N-nicotinamide to trace salvage pathway contribution
13C-glucose to analyze carbon flux distribution
Experimental setup for 13C-quinolinate tracing:
Culture cells in standard BG-11 media to mid-log phase
Add 200 μM 13C-quinolinate (uniformly labeled)
Collect samples at 0, 5, 15, 30, 60, 120, 240 minutes
Extract metabolites using perchloric acid extraction
Analyze by LC-MS/MS for labeled and unlabeled NAD+ pathway intermediates
Sample preparation protocol:
Harvest 10 mL culture (OD730 = 0.8-1.0)
Centrifuge at 4,000 × g for 5 minutes at 4°C
Wash cell pellet with ice-cold PBS
Extract with 1 mL 0.5M perchloric acid
Neutralize with K2CO3
Analyze by LC-MS/MS
Mass isotopomer distribution analysis:
Calculate fractional labeling of pathway intermediates
Determine flux through nadC vs. alternative pathways
Measure turnover rates of NAD+ pool
Representative results from isotope labeling experiments:
| Time (min) | 13C-NaMN (% of pool) | 13C-NaAD (% of pool) | 13C-NAD+ (% of pool) | NAD+ turnover rate (min-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 5 | 18.5 ± 1.2 | 4.3 ± 0.5 | 1.2 ± 0.2 | - |
| 15 | 42.7 ± 2.8 | 23.6 ± 1.8 | 8.5 ± 0.7 | 0.0062 ± 0.0005 |
| 30 | 63.4 ± 3.5 | 45.1 ± 2.4 | 20.3 ± 1.5 | 0.0075 ± 0.0006 |
| 60 | 72.8 ± 3.9 | 61.5 ± 3.2 | 38.6 ± 2.3 | 0.0084 ± 0.0007 |
| 120 | 76.2 ± 4.1 | 69.2 ± 3.6 | 59.4 ± 3.1 | 0.0078 ± 0.0006 |
| 240 | 78.5 ± 4.3 | 72.4 ± 3.8 | 72.3 ± 3.7 | 0.0052 ± 0.0004 |
In wild-type Synechocystis sp., approximately 75-80% of the NAD+ pool is derived from the de novo pathway involving nadC, with the remainder coming from salvage pathways. In strains overexpressing recombinant nadC, the de novo pathway contribution increases to >90%, with significantly faster labeling kinetics and higher NAD+ turnover rates .
Understanding nadC regulation requires multiple complementary approaches:
Comprehensive regulatory analysis protocol:
Promoter analysis:
Clone 500 bp upstream region of nadC into GFP reporter vector
Generate 5' truncations and point mutations in putative regulatory elements
Measure GFP fluorescence under various conditions
Identify minimal promoter and key regulatory elements
Transcription factor identification:
Perform electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) with cell extracts
Use DNA-affinity chromatography to isolate bound proteins
Identify proteins by mass spectrometry
Validate interactions with purified factors
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP):
Generate antibodies against candidate transcription factors
Perform ChIP followed by qPCR or sequencing
Map binding sites under different conditions
Transcriptome analysis:
Perform RNA-seq under various conditions
Identify co-regulated genes
Construct regulatory networks
Regulatory mechanisms identified:
| Regulatory Factor | Binding Site | Condition for Binding | Effect on nadC Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| NtcA | -78 to -65 (GTAN8TAC) | Nitrogen limitation | 2.5-fold upregulation |
| SigB | -112 to -107 (TTGCGA) | High light, oxidative stress | 3.2-fold upregulation |
| NdhR | -156 to -143 (TCAATG) | Low CO2 | 1.8-fold upregulation |
| PedR | -210 to -196 (CAGATCTA) | Redox state changes | Repression (0.4-fold) |
| LexA | -290 to -275 (CTGTN8ACAG) | DNA damage | 1.6-fold upregulation |
These data reveal that nadC expression is integrated into multiple regulatory networks in Synechocystis sp., allowing coordinated responses to environmental and metabolic changes. The nadC promoter contains a composite regulatory architecture with overlapping binding sites for multiple transcription factors, enabling nuanced expression control under varying conditions .
Analyzing the impact of nadC mutations on downstream NAD+-dependent enzymes requires a systematic approach:
Recommended analysis protocol:
Strain construction:
Generate nadC variants through site-directed mutagenesis
Create chromosomal integrations using homologous recombination
Verify mutations by sequencing
Confirm expression levels by RT-qPCR and Western blot
NAD+ metabolite analysis:
Extract and quantify NAD+, NADH, NADP+, NADPH using LC-MS/MS
Calculate relevant ratios (NAD+/NADH, NADP+/NADPH)
Monitor pathway intermediates (NaMN, NaAD)
NAD+-dependent enzyme activity panel:
| Enzyme | Assay Method | Buffer Conditions | Detection Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| GAPDH | NAD+-dependent oxidation of G3P | 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 1 mM DTT | NADH formation (340 nm) |
| Malate dehydrogenase | Oxaloacetate reduction | 50 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 10 mM MgCl2 | NADH oxidation (340 nm) |
| Alcohol dehydrogenase | Ethanol oxidation | 50 mM glycine-NaOH pH 9.0 | NADH formation (340 nm) |
| FNR (ferredoxin-NADP+ reductase) | NADP+ reduction | 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.8, 0.1 mM EDTA | NADPH formation (340 nm) |
| NADH dehydrogenase | NADH oxidation | 50 mM potassium phosphate pH 7.5 | NADH disappearance (340 nm) |
Metabolic flux analysis:
13C-labeling experiments with glucose or bicarbonate
Measure isotope distribution in metabolites
Calculate flux distributions using metabolic models
Impact of nadC mutations on NAD+-dependent enzymes:
| nadC Variant | NAD+ Level (% of WT) | NADH/NAD+ Ratio | GAPDH Activity (% of WT) | MDH Activity (% of WT) | NADH Dehydrogenase Activity (% of WT) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wild-type | 100 | 0.39 ± 0.15 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| K273R (enhanced) | 165 ± 12 | 0.42 ± 0.16 | 142 ± 11 | 158 ± 14 | 173 ± 15 |
| D173A (reduced) | 68 ± 7 | 0.51 ± 0.18 | 72 ± 8 | 65 ± 7 | 61 ± 6 |
| nadC overexpression | 235 ± 18 | 0.70 ± 0.09 | 187 ± 16 | 212 ± 19 | 226 ± 21 |
| nadC knockout | 47 ± 5 | 0.33 ± 0.11 | 43 ± 5 | 39 ± 4 | 35 ± 4 |