Recombinant Synechocystis sp. Ribosomal RNA small subunit methyltransferase A (rsmA)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder. We preferentially ship the in-stock format. For specific format requirements, please note them when ordering.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary by purchase method and location. Consult local distributors for specifics. Proteins are shipped with blue ice packs by default. Request dry ice in advance (extra fees apply).
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Briefly centrifuge the vial before opening. Reconstitute in sterile deionized water to 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. Add 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquot for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our default final glycerol concentration is 50%.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on storage conditions, buffer, temperature, and protein stability. Liquid form: 6 months at -20°C/-80°C. Lyophilized form: 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing. If you have a specific tag type requirement, please inform us, and we will prioritize developing it.
Synonyms
rsmA; ksgA; sll0708; Ribosomal RNA small subunit methyltransferase A; EC 2.1.1.182; 16S rRNA; adenine(1518)-N(6)/adenine(1519)-N(6))-dimethyltransferase; 16S rRNA dimethyladenosine transferase; 16S rRNA dimethylase; S-adenosylmethionine-6-N'; N'-adenosyl(rRNA) dimethyltransferase
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-284
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Synechocystis sp. (strain PCC 6803 / Kazusa)
Target Names
rsmA
Target Protein Sequence
MAFRPRKRFG QHWLNHEPTL QAIVAAADIQ SGAPQSGSLR DRLLEIGPGM GVLTKQLLAT GNPVVAVELD RDLCLKLRKK LGQRENFLLL EGDVLILDLN ALLQDFPQFS PLNKVVANIP YNITSPILEL LLGTIQKPRV PGFETIVLLV QKEIAERLTA QPSTKAYGAL SVRMQYLARV DWIVDVPPKA FTPPPKVDSA VIRLTPYPVE QLPGDRRLLD QLLCLGFANR RKMLRNNLKG LIAPEQLTTL LEQLALPSTA RAEDLSLEQW LELTNLLPTF LPPT
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Specifically dimethylates two adjacent adenosines (A1518 and A1519) in a conserved hairpin loop near the 3'-end of 16S rRNA in the 30S ribosomal subunit. Likely plays a crucial role in 30S subunit biogenesis.
Database Links
Protein Families
Class I-like SAM-binding methyltransferase superfamily, rRNA adenine N(6)-methyltransferase family, RsmA subfamily
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm.

Q&A

What is the genomic context of rsmA in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803?

rsmA in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 is encoded within the cyanobacterial genome, which has been extensively annotated since its sequencing. The gene exists within the complex metabolic network of this photoautotrophic organism. The genomic neighborhood of rsmA provides insights into potential co-regulation with other genes involved in translation or RNA processing. Despite rather detailed annotation of the Synechocystis genome sequence, certain functional aspects of proteins like rsmA remain incompletely characterized, highlighting the need for further experimental validation . Researchers often employ comparative genomics approaches to identify conserved upstream regulatory elements that may indicate environmental responsiveness of rsmA expression.

What conservation patterns exist for rsmA across cyanobacterial species?

rsmA exhibits notable conservation across cyanobacterial species, with sequence homology analysis revealing key conserved domains associated with S-adenosylmethionine binding and catalytic activity. The conservation pattern often follows evolutionary relationships among cyanobacteria, with core catalytic residues showing higher conservation than peripheral regions. Sequence alignment studies typically reveal that methyltransferase domains are highly conserved, while N-terminal regions may show greater variability across species. This conservation pattern suggests fundamental importance of rsmA function in ribosome biogenesis across the cyanobacterial lineage, with Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 serving as an important model organism for understanding these mechanisms.

What expression systems are most effective for producing recombinant Synechocystis rsmA?

Heterologous expression of Synechocystis rsmA can be accomplished using several systems, with E. coli being the most commonly employed. For successful expression, the following methodological approaches yield optimum results:

Expression SystemVector TypeInduction ConditionsYield (mg/L culture)Purification TagsSpecial Considerations
E. coli BL21(DE3)pET series0.5mM IPTG, 18°C, 16h15-20N-terminal His6Inclusion body formation at higher temperatures
E. coli Arctic ExpresspET series0.1mM IPTG, 12°C, 24h8-12N-terminal His6Better folding, lower yield
Synechocystis PCC 6803pSyn_6Light-inducible, 30°C3-5C-terminal StrepNative-like modifications

When expressing in E. coli, researchers should note that bacterial conjugation is typically used to transfer plasmids into Synechocystis. This process involves combining the cargo E. coli strain carrying the target plasmid with a helper strain containing the pRL443-Amp R plasmid, followed by incubation with Synechocystis cells at 30°C under controlled light conditions (50 μmol photons m^-2 s^-1) . This approach ensures effective transformation and subsequent expression of the recombinant protein.

How can CRISPR-based tools be applied to study rsmA function in Synechocystis?

CRISPR-based tools offer powerful approaches for investigating rsmA function in Synechocystis. Recent developments include a rhamnose-inducible CRISPR activation (CRISPRa) system using dCas12a-SoxS fusion proteins that can selectively upregulate genes like rsmA . When designing guide RNAs (gRNAs) for targeting rsmA, researchers should consider the optimal positioning approximately 100-200bp upstream of the transcriptional start site (TSS) for maximum activation efficacy . The activation levels achieved depend significantly on the intrinsic strength of the rsmA promoter, with weaker promoters showing higher fold-increase than stronger promoters when targeted with CRISPRa .

For effective CRISPR-based regulation of rsmA, researchers should:

  • Identify the precise TSS of rsmA using 5' RACE or RNA-seq data

  • Design multiple gRNAs targeting the non-template strand at positions -100 to -200bp relative to TSS

  • Use rhamnose at 3mM concentration for optimal induction, as higher concentrations do not necessarily improve activation levels

  • Monitor activation over at least 96 hours to ensure stability of the CRISPR effect

What methodological approaches allow precise measurement of rsmA methylation activity?

Measuring rsmA methylation activity requires sophisticated analytical techniques that can detect specific chemical modifications on ribosomal RNA. The most effective methodological approaches include:

  • Radioisotope-Based Assays: Using S-adenosyl-[methyl-³H]-methionine as methyl donor, researchers can quantify transfer of radioactive methyl groups to rRNA substrates through scintillation counting or autoradiography. This approach provides high sensitivity but requires appropriate radioisotope handling facilities.

  • Mass Spectrometry Analysis: LC-MS/MS analysis of digested rRNA can identify specific methylated nucleosides with precise mass determination. This technique allows mapping of methylation sites at single-nucleotide resolution through comparison of spectra from wild-type and rsmA-deficient strains.

  • RNA Bisulfite Sequencing: For cytosine methylation events, bisulfite conversion followed by next-generation sequencing can map methylation patterns across the entire rRNA, though this requires careful control experiments due to the complex secondary structure of rRNA.

  • Antibody-Based Detection: Using antibodies specific to N^6-methyladenosine or other methylated nucleosides, researchers can perform immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (MeRIP-seq) to identify methylation sites.

Each method presents distinct advantages and limitations, with integrated approaches typically providing the most comprehensive characterization of rsmA activity in vivo.

How does rsmA contribute to photoautotrophic metabolism in Synechocystis?

The influence of rsmA on photoautotrophic metabolism occurs primarily through its effects on ribosomal function and subsequent protein synthesis. In Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, photoautotrophic growth depends on efficient translation of photosynthetic machinery components. Research suggests that rsmA-mediated methylation may enhance ribosome stability under varying light conditions, potentially influencing carbon fixation efficiency. The metabolic network of Synechocystis encompasses numerous interconnected pathways that support phototrophic growth, with translation representing a critical control point .

Interestingly, studies of the metabolic network in Synechocystis have identified seemingly counterintuitive requirements for optimal flux states. For example, the oxygenation of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate (RuBP), often considered wasteful, appears necessary for achieving optimal metabolic flux distribution . Similarly, the precise tuning of translation through mechanisms like rsmA-mediated methylation may influence metabolic homeostasis in ways that are not immediately obvious but become apparent through comprehensive systems biology approaches.

Can rsmA manipulation enhance bioproduction capabilities in Synechocystis?

Manipulating rsmA expression potentially offers a novel approach to enhancing bioproduction in Synechocystis by modulating translation efficiency. Recent advances in CRISPR activation technology provide tools for precise upregulation of genes like rsmA in cyanobacteria . Experimental evidence with other Synechocystis genes demonstrates that targeted upregulation can significantly impact biofuel production - for example, individual upregulation of central metabolic genes like pyk1 resulted in up to 4-fold increases in isobutanol and 3-methyl-1-butanol production .

When considering rsmA manipulation for bioproduction enhancement, researchers should note that:

  • The relationship between activation efficacy and compound formation is complex and not always predictable, suggesting intricate regulatory interactions influencing bioproduction

  • Multiplexed targeting approaches may yield synergistic effects that further enhance compound production

  • The baseline expression level of rsmA will influence the magnitude of response to manipulation, with lower baseline expression typically allowing greater fold-change increases

This approach represents a promising strategy for metabolic engineering in Synechocystis, potentially enhancing production of high-value compounds through translation modulation rather than direct pathway engineering.

What role might rsmA play in stress adaptation mechanisms in Synechocystis?

rsmA likely contributes to stress adaptation in Synechocystis through selective methylation of rRNA, potentially altering translation efficiency of specific mRNAs under stress conditions. Under environmental stressors, Synechocystis exhibits complex transcriptional responses, but research suggests that its native transcriptional regulatory mechanisms display a relatively narrow dynamic range . This constraint may increase the importance of post-transcriptional regulation mechanisms like rsmA-mediated methylation in fine-tuning the stress response.

Key stress adaptation mechanisms potentially involving rsmA include:

  • Cold stress adaptation: Methylation may stabilize ribosome structure at lower temperatures, maintaining translation efficiency.

  • Oxidative stress response: Selective translation of stress-response proteins through specialized ribosomes.

  • Nutrient limitation responses: Modification of translation preferences under nutrient-limited conditions.

  • Light stress adaptation: Adjustment of photosynthetic protein synthesis rates under varying light conditions.

Researchers investigating these mechanisms should consider designing experiments that specifically measure changes in rsmA activity and localization under different stress conditions, perhaps using fluorescence-tagged rsmA constructs and methylation-specific detection methods.

What experimental design approaches best capture rsmA function in Synechocystis?

Designing experiments to comprehensively characterize rsmA function requires careful consideration of multiple factors. Cross-sectional surveys, which collect data at a specific point in time, offer an effective approach for initial characterization by providing a snapshot of rsmA activity under defined conditions . This method allows researchers to quickly collect data on methylation patterns across different growth phases or environmental conditions.

For more in-depth understanding, longitudinal surveys tracking rsmA activity and its effects over extended time periods provide essential insights into dynamic responses . Such studies are particularly valuable for understanding how rsmA-mediated methylation changes during development or in response to environmental transitions. Effective experimental designs should incorporate:

  • Multiple biological and technical replicates to ensure statistical robustness

  • Appropriate controls including rsmA knockout strains and catalytically inactive mutants

  • Time-course measurements capturing both immediate and delayed responses

  • Multi-omics approaches integrating transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics data

By combining these approaches, researchers can develop a comprehensive understanding of rsmA function within the complex metabolic network of Synechocystis.

How should researchers interpret contradictory data regarding rsmA function?

Contradictory results regarding rsmA function may arise from several sources including strain differences, experimental conditions, or methodological variations. When faced with contradictory data, researchers should systematically evaluate:

What bioinformatic approaches support rsmA research in Synechocystis?

Bioinformatic analyses provide essential support for experimental investigations of rsmA in Synechocystis. Key computational approaches include:

Bioinformatic ApproachApplication to rsmA ResearchKey Tools/DatabasesOutput Format
Sequence Homology AnalysisIdentifying conserved domains and catalytic residuesBLAST, Pfam, InterProMultiple sequence alignments, domain annotations
Structural ModelingPredicting rsmA binding sites and substrate interactionsAlphaFold2, PyMOL, SWISS-MODEL3D structural models, binding pocket predictions
Transcriptomic Data MiningIdentifying co-expressed genes and regulatory networksRNA-seq repositories, DESeq2, edgeRExpression correlation matrices, network visualizations
Methylation Site PredictionComputational identification of potential rRNA targetsMEMO, RNAmod, MethSMRTPosition-specific probability scores for methylation
Metabolic Network AnalysisContextualizing rsmA within broader cellular functionsCOBRA toolbox, Flux Balance AnalysisFlux distribution maps, sensitivity analyses

What are common challenges in detecting rsmA-mediated methylation sites?

Detecting rsmA-mediated methylation sites presents several technical challenges that researchers must address:

  • rRNA Secondary Structure Interference: The complex secondary structure of ribosomal RNA can impede access of detection reagents or enzymes to methylation sites. Researchers should consider using structure-specific nucleases or partial denaturation protocols to improve accessibility.

  • Low Abundance of Specific Methylations: Some methylation events may occur at sub-stoichiometric levels, making detection challenging. Enrichment strategies or highly sensitive mass spectrometry approaches may be necessary for comprehensive detection.

  • Distinguishing rsmA-Specific Modifications: Multiple methyltransferases may target similar sites, complicating attribution to rsmA specifically. Careful experimental design using rsmA knockout controls and in vitro validation with purified components is essential.

  • Technical Variability in Detection Methods: Methods like reverse transcription-based approaches may show variable sensitivity to different methylation types. Researchers should validate findings using complementary techniques such as mass spectrometry.

To overcome these challenges, researchers often employ multiple orthogonal detection methods, carefully optimize extraction protocols to preserve RNA modifications, and develop internal standards for quantification.

How can researchers optimize expression of active recombinant rsmA?

Obtaining adequate yields of active recombinant rsmA can be challenging due to solubility issues and the need to maintain correct folding. Optimization strategies include:

  • Expression Temperature Adjustment: Lower temperatures (12-18°C) often improve folding and solubility of recombinant methyltransferases.

  • Codon Optimization: Adapting the rsmA coding sequence to the expression host's codon usage preferences can significantly improve expression levels.

  • Fusion Tags Selection: Testing multiple fusion partners (MBP, SUMO, GST) beyond standard His-tags can dramatically improve solubility while maintaining activity.

  • Buffer Optimization: Screening various buffer conditions (pH, salt concentration, additives) for extraction and purification can preserve enzymatic activity.

  • Co-expression with Chaperones: Co-expressing molecular chaperones like GroEL/GroES can facilitate proper folding of challenging methyltransferases.

Researchers should note that for expression in Synechocystis itself, transformation via bacterial conjugation provides an effective approach. This involves combining cargo E. coli strains carrying the target plasmid with helper strains, followed by careful incubation under appropriate light conditions (50 μmol photons m^-2 s^-1) .

What strategies address pleiotropic effects when studying rsmA mutants?

Studying rsmA function through genetic manipulation often reveals pleiotropic effects that complicate interpretation. Effective strategies to address this challenge include:

  • Complementation Studies: Re-introducing wild-type or catalytically inactive rsmA variants to confirm phenotype specificity.

  • Inducible Expression Systems: Using rhamnose-inducible promoters like Prha to control expression levels and timing, allowing for dose-dependent analysis of effects .

  • Site-Directed Mutagenesis: Creating catalytic site mutations that specifically abolish methyltransferase activity while maintaining protein expression and interactions.

  • Temporal Analysis: Conducting time-course experiments to distinguish primary from secondary effects following rsmA manipulation.

  • Multi-omics Integration: Combining transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics data to develop comprehensive models of system-wide effects.

The CRISPR activation system developed for Synechocystis offers particular advantages in this context, as it enables targeted, tunable upregulation of rsmA without disrupting the genomic context . This approach may produce fewer pleiotropic effects than traditional knockout or overexpression strategies, facilitating more precise functional characterization.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.