The recombinant Synechocystis sp. UPF0187 protein sll1024 (UniProt ID: P72926) is a bioengineered form of the native sll1024 gene product from Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. This protein belongs to the UPF0187 family, a class of uncharacterized proteins with conserved sequences across cyanobacteria but no well-established functional annotations .
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Gene Name | sll1024 |
| UniProt ID | P72926 |
| Expression Host | E. coli |
| Tag Type | Undisclosed (determined during production) |
| Protein Length | 1–307 amino acids |
| Purity | >90% (SDS-PAGE) |
| Storage Buffer | Tris-based, 50% glycerol, pH optimized |
| Storage Conditions | -20°C/-80°C (long-term); 4°C (working aliquots) |
While no specific studies on sll1024’s function are cited in available literature, UPF0187 proteins are often candidates for:
Structural Studies: Resolving the 3D structure to infer evolutionary conservation or functional motifs.
Interaction Mapping: Identifying binding partners via yeast two-hybrid or affinity pull-down assays .
Metabolic Engineering: Leveraging its cyanobacterial origin for biotechnological applications (e.g., biosynthesis pathways) .
Functional Annotation: No direct evidence links sll1024 to metabolic pathways, stress responses, or regulatory networks.
Experimental Data: Absence of biochemical assays (e.g., kinase/phosphatase activity, ligand binding) in public repositories .
UPF0187 proteins in Synechocystis share low sequence similarity to characterized enzymes, distinguishing them from well-studied proteins like:
| Protein | Function | Source | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| SLL0260 | UPF0053 protein (unknown function) | Synechocystis | |
| Slr0058 | PHB granule formation | Synechocystis | |
| SynPPP1 (sll1387) | Protein phosphatase (PPP family) | Synechocystis |
Functional Screens: High-throughput assays to identify sll1024’s role in cyanobacterial metabolism.
Evolutionary Analysis: Phylogenetic studies to trace UPF0187 distribution across cyanobacteria.
Biotechnological Utility: Assessing sll1024’s compatibility with heterologous expression systems for scalable production .
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your preferred format in order notes for customized fulfillment.
Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires prior arrangement and incurs additional charges.
Tag type is finalized during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
KEGG: syn:sll1024
STRING: 1148.SYNGTS_0367
The optimal storage conditions for recombinant sll1024 protein involve storing the purified protein at -20°C or -80°C in appropriate buffer systems. The recommended storage buffer is Tris/PBS-based with 6% trehalose at pH 8.0. For long-term storage, it is advisable to add glycerol to a final concentration of 5-50% (with 50% being the standard recommendation) and aliquot the protein solution to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles, which can compromise protein stability and activity .
For working with the protein, reconstitution should be performed in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. Working aliquots can be stored at 4°C for up to one week, but repeated freezing and thawing should be avoided to maintain protein integrity .
The purity of recombinant sll1024 protein is typically assessed using SDS-PAGE (sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis). This technique separates proteins based on their molecular weight, allowing researchers to visualize the purified protein as a distinct band. Commercial preparations generally ensure a purity greater than 90% as determined by SDS-PAGE .
For more precise analysis, researchers may employ additional techniques:
| Method | Application | Resolution | Additional Information |
|---|---|---|---|
| SDS-PAGE | Basic purity assessment | Medium | Standard for protein visualization |
| Western Blot | Specific protein identification | High | Uses antibodies against His-tag or protein |
| Mass Spectrometry | Exact mass determination | Very High | Can confirm protein identity and modifications |
| Size Exclusion Chromatography | Oligomeric state assessment | High | Determines aggregation state |
Each method provides complementary information about protein purity and integrity, with the combination of techniques offering the most comprehensive assessment.
For efficient expression of recombinant sll1024 in E. coli, researchers should consider a methodological approach similar to that used for other cyanobacterial proteins. Based on protocols developed for Synechocystis proteins, the following steps are recommended:
Vector Selection: Choose an expression vector with an N-terminal His-tag that works well in E. coli systems, such as pET series vectors.
Codon Optimization: Consider codon optimization for E. coli expression, as cyanobacterial codon usage can differ from E. coli.
Bacterial Strain Selection: BL21(DE3) or Rosetta(DE3) strains are commonly used for expressing cyanobacterial proteins due to their reduced protease activity and, in the case of Rosetta, supplementation with rare codons.
Culture Conditions:
Grow cultures at 37°C until OD600 reaches 0.6-0.8
Induce with IPTG (typically 0.5-1.0 mM)
Lower the temperature to 18-25°C post-induction
Continue expression for 16-20 hours
Lysis Buffer Composition:
50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0
300 mM NaCl
10 mM imidazole
1 mM PMSF (protease inhibitor)
Optional: 5% glycerol to enhance stability
The natural transformation methods used for Synechocystis (as described in search result ) can provide insights into gene manipulation, though these are specific to the cyanobacterium rather than E. coli expression systems .
The most effective purification strategy for isolating recombinant sll1024 protein with an N-terminal His-tag involves immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC), followed by additional purification steps if higher purity is required:
IMAC Purification (Primary Step):
Ni-NTA or Co-NTA agarose columns are commonly used
Equilibration buffer: 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 10 mM imidazole
Wash buffer: Same as equilibration but with 20-30 mM imidazole
Elution buffer: Same base buffer with 250-300 mM imidazole
Collect fractions and analyze by SDS-PAGE
Size Exclusion Chromatography (Secondary Step):
Using columns such as Superdex 75 or 200
Buffer: 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl
Flow rate: 0.5-1.0 mL/min
Buffer Exchange and Concentration:
Use centrifugal filters with appropriate molecular weight cut-off
Exchange into storage buffer (Tris/PBS-based buffer with 6% trehalose, pH 8.0)
Add glycerol to desired final concentration (5-50%)
This purification approach has been successful for similar cyanobacterial proteins and should be effective for sll1024 as well .
Structural Integrity Assessment:
Circular Dichroism (CD) spectroscopy to confirm proper folding
Thermal shift assays to evaluate protein stability
Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) to assess aggregation states
Binding Assays:
If potential binding partners are hypothesized, pull-down assays can be performed
Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) or Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC) for quantitative binding measurements
Enzymatic Activity Testing:
Based on bioinformatic predictions of function, design appropriate enzymatic assays
For proteins with unknown function, test for common activities (phosphatase, kinase, etc.)
In Vivo Complementation:
For example, researchers studying other Synechocystis proteins have used gene knockout techniques followed by phenotypic characterization to understand protein function. The methodology for creating knockout strains involves homologous recombination with resistance cassettes, as demonstrated in studies of other proteins such as SyOC and Kai proteins .
The potential interactions of sll1024 with other proteins in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 metabolic pathways require advanced investigation methods. While specific interaction data for sll1024 is limited in the provided search results, researchers can employ the following approaches:
Bioinformatic Analysis:
Sequence-based predictions of protein-protein interactions
Structural modeling to identify potential interaction domains
Comparative analysis with homologous proteins in related organisms
Experimental Interaction Studies:
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) using antibodies against the His-tag
Bacterial two-hybrid (B2H) or yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) screens
Protein crosslinking followed by mass spectrometry analysis
Functional Genomics Approaches:
Localization Studies:
Fluorescent protein tagging to determine subcellular localization
Co-localization experiments with known pathway components
Given that researchers have successfully studied other Synechocystis proteins using knockout approaches and competitive fitness assays , similar methodologies could be applied to understand sll1024's role in metabolic pathways.
While the specific role of sll1024 in oxidative stress response is not directly addressed in the provided search results, researchers can design experiments to investigate this possibility based on approaches used for other Synechocystis proteins:
Oxidative Stress Exposure Experiments:
Subject wild-type and sll1024 knockout strains to various oxidative stressors (H₂O₂, paraquat, high light)
Measure survival rates, growth curves, and physiological parameters
Monitor photosynthetic efficiency using PAM fluorometry
Molecular Response Analysis:
Examine transcriptional changes of known oxidative stress genes in sll1024 mutants
Measure reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels using fluorescent probes
Assess antioxidant enzyme activities (catalase, peroxidase, SOD)
Protein Modification Analysis:
Investigate potential redox-sensitive residues in sll1024
Examine post-translational modifications under stress conditions
Assess protein stability and turnover during oxidative stress
Comparative Analysis with Known Stress Proteins:
Research on the pseudo-orthocaspase (SyOC) in Synechocystis has demonstrated involvement in oxidative stress responses , providing a methodological framework that could be adapted for studying sll1024's potential role in similar processes.
Investigating the structure-function relationship of sll1024 requires a multi-faceted approach combining structural biology techniques with functional analyses:
Structural Determination Methods:
| Technique | Resolution | Information Provided | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| X-ray Crystallography | Very High (1-3Å) | Atomic-level structure | Requires protein crystals |
| NMR Spectroscopy | High (3-5Å) | Solution structure, dynamics | Size limitations (~30 kDa) |
| Cryo-EM | Medium-High (3-4Å) | Structure without crystals | Equipment accessibility |
| CD Spectroscopy | Low | Secondary structure content | Limited structural details |
Site-Directed Mutagenesis Strategy:
Identify conserved residues through sequence alignment
Generate point mutations at these sites
Express and purify mutant proteins
Compare biochemical properties with wild-type protein
Domain Analysis and Truncation Studies:
Create constructs expressing specific protein domains
Assess function of individual domains
Investigate domain interactions
Molecular Dynamics Simulations:
Use structural data for computational simulations
Predict conformational changes and dynamics
Identify potential functional sites and mechanisms
Researchers studying other Synechocystis proteins have successfully employed targeted mutagenesis approaches, as seen in the study of SynPPM3 where replacement of Asp608 with asparagine enhanced activity toward phosphotyrosine-containing proteins . This demonstrates the value of structure-guided mutagenesis in understanding protein function.
Researchers working with recombinant sll1024 may encounter several challenges during expression and purification. Here are common issues and their solutions:
Low Expression Levels:
Optimize codon usage for E. coli
Test different E. coli strains (BL21(DE3), Rosetta, Arctic Express)
Vary induction conditions (IPTG concentration, temperature, duration)
Consider using stronger promoters or specialized expression vectors
Protein Insolubility/Inclusion Bodies:
Lower induction temperature (16-20°C)
Reduce IPTG concentration (0.1-0.5 mM)
Add solubility enhancers to media (sorbitol, glycine betaine)
Use fusion partners known to enhance solubility (SUMO, MBP, TrxA)
If inclusion bodies persist, develop refolding protocols
Protein Instability:
Purification Difficulties:
For poor His-tag binding: adjust imidazole concentrations
For co-purifying contaminants: add additional purification steps (ion exchange, size exclusion)
For protein aggregation: add mild detergents or optimize buffer composition
The natural transformation methods developed for genetic manipulation of Synechocystis provide insights into the biology of this organism, which may help inform expression strategies for its proteins.
Inconsistent results in functional assays involving recombinant sll1024 can stem from various sources. Here's a systematic approach to troubleshooting:
Protein Quality Assessment:
Verify protein purity by SDS-PAGE and other methods
Check for degradation using western blot
Assess protein folding using CD spectroscopy
Determine aggregation state using size exclusion chromatography or DLS
Assay Optimization Matrix:
| Parameter | Variables to Test | Monitoring Method |
|---|---|---|
| Buffer Composition | pH (6.5-8.5), Salt (50-500 mM) | Activity measurements |
| Temperature | Range from 4-37°C | Thermal stability assay |
| Cofactors | Metal ions, potential binding partners | Enhanced activity |
| Protein Concentration | Serial dilutions | Linearity of response |
Controls and Standards:
Include positive and negative controls in each assay
Prepare standards with known activity levels
Use freshly prepared reagents and buffers
Standardize protocols between experiments
Equipment and Technical Variables:
Calibrate instruments regularly
Control for environmental factors (temperature, humidity)
Minimize operator variability through detailed protocols
Consider automated systems for greater consistency
The approach used to study protein phosphatases in Synechocystis, where researchers tested enzyme activity under various conditions and with different substrates , exemplifies how systematic optimization can lead to reliable functional assays.
When conducting comparative analyses between wild-type and recombinant sll1024 protein, researchers should be aware of several potential pitfalls:
Expression System Differences:
Recombinant protein is expressed in E. coli versus native expression in Synechocystis
Differences in protein folding machinery between organisms
Potential absence of Synechocystis-specific chaperones in E. coli
Solution: Consider parallel studies in native and recombinant systems
Post-translational Modifications:
E. coli may not reproduce the same PTMs present in Synechocystis
Potential phosphorylation, glycosylation, or other modifications missing
Solution: Analyze PTMs in native protein and develop E. coli strains capable of similar modifications if critical
Tag Interference:
The N-terminal His-tag may affect protein function or interactions
Solution: Compare tagged and tag-cleaved versions or use alternative tag positions
Functional Context:
Isolated protein may behave differently than in its native cellular environment
Solution: Develop in vitro systems that mimic the cellular environment or complement with in vivo studies
Quantitative Comparison Challenges:
| Aspect | Potential Issue | Mitigation Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Protein Amount | Different quantification methods | Use multiple quantification methods |
| Activity Measurement | Different assay conditions | Standardize conditions rigorously |
| Structural Integrity | Different analytical techniques | Apply identical techniques to both forms |
| Interaction Partners | Absence in recombinant system | Add potential partners to in vitro assays |
Studies of other Synechocystis proteins have addressed these issues by combining recombinant protein characterization with in vivo studies using gene knockouts and complementation , providing a holistic understanding of protein function.
CRISPR-Cas9 technology offers promising approaches for studying sll1024 function in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, potentially improving upon traditional homologous recombination methods:
Precise Gene Editing Applications:
Generate clean knockouts without antibiotic resistance markers
Create point mutations to study specific amino acid functions
Develop conditional knockdowns using inducible CRISPR systems
Engineer tagged versions of sll1024 at the native locus
Methodological Implementation:
Design sgRNAs targeting specific regions of sll1024
Introduce Cas9 and sgRNA expression constructs via natural transformation
Provide repair templates for precise editing
Screen transformants using PCR and sequencing
Multiplexed Gene Editing:
Simultaneously target sll1024 and potential interacting partners
Create multiple mutations to study genetic interactions
Engineer regulatory elements to modulate expression levels
Technical Considerations:
While traditional homologous recombination methods have been successful in Synechocystis , CRISPR-Cas9 could offer advantages in efficiency and precision, particularly for creating subtle mutations that might reveal specific functional aspects of sll1024.
Investigating sll1024's potential role in circadian rhythms or metabolic adaptation requires integrative approaches that build upon methods used to study other Synechocystis proteins:
Circadian Rhythm Investigation:
Metabolic Adaptation Studies:
Utilize the high-throughput culturing platform developed for metabolic response studies
Test growth of sll1024 mutants under various nutrient conditions
Analyze exometabolome profiles using the techniques described for nutrient response studies
Measure photosynthetic parameters under different conditions
Integration with Known Regulatory Networks:
Examine interactions with known circadian regulators (Kai proteins)
Investigate relationships with metabolic control proteins
Study transcriptional responses to environmental changes
Advanced Analytical Approaches:
Time-series transcriptomics and proteomics
Metabolic flux analysis using isotope labeling
Single-cell analyses to detect population heterogeneity
The methodologies used to study circadian rhythms in Synechocystis, including the creation of luminescence reporter strains and competitive fitness assays under different light conditions , provide excellent templates for investigating sll1024's potential role in these processes.
Systems biology approaches can significantly enhance our understanding of sll1024 within the broader context of cyanobacterial cellular networks:
Multi-omics Integration:
Combine transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics data
Identify correlations between sll1024 expression and other cellular components
Map sll1024 onto known metabolic and signaling networks
Develop predictive models of sll1024 function
Network Analysis Methods:
Construct protein-protein interaction networks
Perform gene co-expression analysis under various conditions
Apply graph theory to identify network motifs and modules
Use machine learning to predict functional relationships
Genome-Scale Modeling:
Incorporate sll1024 into genome-scale metabolic models
Simulate knockouts and overexpression effects on metabolic flux
Predict phenotypic outcomes under different environmental conditions
Validate model predictions with experimental data
Comparative Systems Analysis:
| Approach | Application to sll1024 | Expected Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Cross-species comparison | Identify functional orthologs in other cyanobacteria | Evolutionary insights |
| Condition-specific networks | Map sll1024 in stress vs. normal conditions | Context-dependent roles |
| Temporal network dynamics | Track network changes over diurnal cycles | Circadian regulation insights |
| Spatial organization | Localize sll1024 within subcellular compartments | Functional context |
The high-throughput methods developed for studying metabolic responses in Synechocystis and the genetic manipulation techniques established for studying various proteins provide a foundation for implementing these systems biology approaches.