Recombinant Takifugu rubripes Surfeit locus protein 1 (surf1) is a recombinant form of the Surfeit locus protein 1, produced in an in vitro E. coli expression system. This protein is derived from the Takifugu rubripes, commonly known as the Japanese pufferfish, and is involved in the assembly of cytochrome c oxidase (COX), a crucial enzyme in oxidative phosphorylation .
The SURF1 protein plays a vital role in the assembly of Complex IV (cytochrome c oxidase) in the mitochondrial inner membrane. This complex is essential for oxidative phosphorylation, the process by which cells generate energy from food. In humans, mutations in the SURF1 gene can lead to severe conditions like Leigh syndrome, characterized by impaired oxidative phosphorylation and significant energy deficits in tissues such as the brain and muscles .
Recombinant Takifugu rubripes Surfeit locus protein 1 (surf1) is produced using an in vitro E. coli expression system, ensuring high purity and efficiency in protein production. The specific characteristics of this recombinant protein, such as its size and detailed biochemical properties, are not extensively documented in available literature but can be inquired about directly from suppliers .
| Characteristic | Description |
|---|---|
| Source | Takifugu rubripes (Japanese pufferfish) |
| Production Method | In vitro E. coli expression system |
| Purity | High purity |
| Function | Involved in cytochrome c oxidase assembly |
| Application | Research on mitochondrial function and disease |
STRING: 31033.ENSTRUP00000047074
Surfeit locus protein 1 (surf1) is a mitochondrial protein involved in the assembly of cytochrome c oxidase (COX), the terminal enzyme in the mitochondrial respiratory chain. In Takifugu rubripes, surf1 plays a critical role in oxidative phosphorylation and energy metabolism, similar to its function in other vertebrates. The gene is part of the highly conserved surfeit gene cluster, which is characterized by tightly packed genes without shared regulatory elements or functional relationships. T. rubripes, as an important model organism with a compact genome, provides valuable opportunities for studying surf1 function in a simplified genomic context compared to other vertebrates .
The surf1 gene demonstrates high conservation across Takifugu species, consistent with the broader pattern of genetic similarity observed among closely related Takifugu species such as T. rubripes, T. pseudommus, and T. chinensis. Genetic studies have revealed that these three species share remarkably similar genetic backgrounds despite their distinct morphological characteristics . This conservation extends to many functional genes including those involved in mitochondrial function. The basal divergence of the main Takifugu lineage occurred approximately 2.4–4.7 million years ago, with subsequent rapid speciation in East Asian marine environments, suggesting that essential genes like surf1 have remained highly conserved during this evolutionary process .
Takifugu rubripes surf1 protein is a transmembrane protein localized to the inner mitochondrial membrane. Its structural features include:
Two transmembrane domains that anchor the protein in the inner mitochondrial membrane
A central domain facing the intermembrane space
Highly conserved amino acid residues that are essential for interaction with COX assembly factors
A predicted molecular weight of approximately 30-35 kDa
Post-translational modifications including potential phosphorylation sites
These structural elements are critical for the protein's function in facilitating the incorporation of copper into the COX complex, thus enabling proper respiratory chain assembly and function.
Genetic variation in surf1 across different Takifugu populations may influence mitochondrial function and energetic efficiency, though this correlation requires further investigation. Population genetic analyses of Takifugu species have revealed varying levels of genetic diversity, with wild populations typically showing higher diversity than cultured ones . For instance, cultured T. rubripes (rcTR) exhibited the lowest diversity values with significantly low allelic richness (3.24) across multiple genetic markers .
When examining functional genes like surf1, researchers should consider:
The genomic context of surf1 variations within and between Takifugu species
The potential impact of hybridization on surf1 function, given that natural hybrids between T. rubripes and T. chinensis have been documented
The relationship between surf1 sequence conservation and mitochondrial function in different ecological contexts
How selective pressures in different marine environments might influence surf1 variants
Researchers investigating these correlations should employ both population genetics approaches and functional assays to establish meaningful connections between genetic variation and physiological outcomes.
Surf1 expression in Takifugu rubripes follows a dynamic pattern throughout development, reflecting the changing energy demands of different tissues and developmental stages. While specific expression data for surf1 in T. rubripes is limited, developmental expression patterns can be investigated using:
Quantitative PCR analysis of surf1 mRNA levels across embryonic, larval, juvenile, and adult stages
In situ hybridization to localize surf1 expression in specific tissues
Protein quantification using western blot analysis with antibodies targeting conserved epitopes
Comparative analysis with expression patterns in other fish species
Expected expression patterns would likely show elevated surf1 expression in tissues with high metabolic demands, such as muscle, heart, and neural tissues. Developmental regulation may correlate with critical transitions in energy metabolism during development, particularly during the transition from embryonic to free-swimming stages when oxidative metabolism increases significantly.
The correlation between surf1 genomic variations and ecological adaptations in Takifugu species represents an intriguing area of research. Closely related Takifugu species like T. rubripes, T. pseudommus, and T. chinensis share habitats with limited distribution, particularly in the Yellow Sea and East China Sea around the Korean Peninsula . Despite their morphological differences, these species exhibit minimal genetic differentiation, suggesting that their adaptive differences may be influenced by:
Regulatory elements affecting gene expression rather than coding sequence variations
Epistatic interactions between surf1 and other genes
Epigenetic modifications that influence surf1 function
Small-scale mutations in critical functional domains
When investigating such correlations, researchers should consider analyzing:
Sequence variations in surf1 promoter regions that might affect expression levels
Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in coding regions that might subtly alter protein function
Post-translational modifications that might differ between species
Protein-protein interaction networks that might vary in different ecological contexts
Complex traits like ecological adaptation rarely map to single genes, so multi-omics approaches combining genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics would provide more comprehensive insights.
Several expression systems can be employed for producing recombinant Takifugu rubripes surf1 protein, each with distinct advantages depending on research objectives:
| Expression System | Advantages | Limitations | Yield | Purification Tags |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E. coli | Cost-effective, rapid growth, high yield | May lack proper folding for membrane proteins, limited post-translational modifications | 5-10 mg/L | His6, GST, MBP |
| Insect cells (Sf9, Sf21) | Better folding of complex proteins, some post-translational modifications | More expensive, longer production time | 2-5 mg/L | His6, FLAG |
| Yeast (P. pastoris) | Good for membrane proteins, glycosylation capability | Expression optimization can be complex | 1-4 mg/L | His6, c-Myc |
| Mammalian cells | Native-like post-translational modifications | Most expensive, lowest yield | 0.5-2 mg/L | His6, FLAG, Fc |
For optimal expression of T. rubripes surf1, insect cell or yeast systems are recommended due to the protein's transmembrane nature. When using these systems:
Remove the mitochondrial targeting sequence to improve cytoplasmic expression
Consider using codon optimization based on the T. rubripes codon usage bias
Include appropriate tags that won't interfere with protein folding or function
Employ detergent screening to identify optimal solubilization conditions for the membrane protein
The choice of expression system should be guided by the intended experimental use, required protein purity, and functional conservation needs.
Purifying recombinant Takifugu rubripes surf1 protein while maintaining its activity requires specialized approaches due to its membrane-associated nature. A comprehensive purification strategy includes:
Membrane protein extraction:
Use mild detergents like n-dodecyl-β-D-maltoside (DDM), digitonin, or CHAPS
Optimize detergent concentration (typically 0.5-2%) to solubilize membrane proteins without denaturation
Include protease inhibitors to prevent degradation
Affinity chromatography:
Immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) for His-tagged proteins
Glutathione affinity for GST-fusion proteins
Anti-FLAG affinity for FLAG-tagged constructs
Size exclusion chromatography:
Further purify protein based on molecular size
Assess protein oligomerization state
Exchange into final buffer containing stabilizing detergent at concentrations above CMC
Activity preservation measures:
Maintain detergent concentration above critical micelle concentration (CMC)
Include glycerol (10-20%) to stabilize protein structure
Consider adding specific lipids to mimic native membrane environment
Keep purified protein at 4°C for short-term storage or flash-freeze in liquid nitrogen for long-term storage
This multi-step purification approach typically yields protein with >90% purity while maintaining structural integrity and functional activity.
Assessing the functional activity of recombinant Takifugu rubripes surf1 protein requires methods that evaluate its role in cytochrome c oxidase (COX) assembly. Several complementary approaches include:
Complementation assays:
Express recombinant T. rubripes surf1 in SURF1-deficient mammalian cell lines or yeast models
Measure rescue of COX activity using cytochrome c oxidase activity assays
Analyze restoration of normal mitochondrial morphology and function
Binding assays:
Evaluate interaction with COX assembly intermediates using co-immunoprecipitation
Perform pull-down assays with purified components
Utilize surface plasmon resonance (SPR) to determine binding kinetics with partner proteins
Structural integrity assessment:
Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy to evaluate secondary structure
Limited proteolysis to assess proper folding
Thermal shift assays to determine protein stability
Functional reconstitution:
Incorporate purified surf1 into liposomes with partial COX assemblies
Measure enhancement of COX assembly efficiency
Monitor copper incorporation into COX subunits
These methods provide complementary information about different aspects of surf1 function, offering a comprehensive assessment of the recombinant protein's activity compared to the native protein.
Comparative analysis of surf1 across different fish species offers valuable insights into evolutionary processes and mitochondrial function adaptation across diverse aquatic environments. The genetic relationships among Takifugu species, with their recent divergence (2.4-4.7 million years ago) and rapid speciation in East Asian marine environments , provide an excellent framework for such comparative studies.
Key evolutionary insights include:
Conservation patterns:
Identifying highly conserved domains that likely represent functionally critical regions
Mapping variable regions that may reflect species-specific adaptations
Correlating sequence conservation with environmental factors like temperature ranges or oxygen availability
Selection pressures:
Calculating dN/dS ratios to identify sites under positive or purifying selection
Correlating selection patterns with species' ecological niches
Examining how selection pressure on surf1 compares to other mitochondrial proteins
Functional divergence:
Analyzing how surf1 sequence variations correlate with differences in metabolic rates
Investigating potential co-evolution with interacting proteins
Examining correlation between surf1 variations and mitochondrial DNA evolutionary rates
Phylogenetic utility:
Evaluating surf1 as a phylogenetic marker for resolving relationships among closely related species
Comparing surf1-based phylogenies with those derived from other markers
Using surf1 sequence data to complement population genetic studies
Such comparative analyses contribute to understanding how mitochondrial function evolved across aquatic environments with varying metabolic demands and environmental conditions.
Researchers frequently encounter several challenges when expressing recombinant Takifugu rubripes surf1 protein. The following table outlines common issues and their solutions:
| Challenge | Possible Causes | Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| Low expression yield | Protein toxicity, codon bias, improper folding | Reduce induction temperature to 16-20°C; Use codon-optimized sequence; Co-express molecular chaperones (GroEL/GroES) |
| Protein insolubility | Membrane protein characteristics, improper folding | Express as fusion with solubility tag (MBP, SUMO); Include mild detergents during lysis; Try different expression systems |
| Protein degradation | Protease activity, protein instability | Add protease inhibitor cocktail; Reduce expression time; Purify at 4°C; Add stabilizing agents (glycerol, specific lipids) |
| Loss of activity | Improper folding, loss of cofactors, detergent effects | Try different detergents; Include specific lipids; Maintain reducing environment; Avoid freeze-thaw cycles |
| Aggregation during purification | Detergent removal, protein concentration | Maintain detergent above CMC; Use glycerol (10-20%); Optimize salt concentration; Avoid excessive concentration |
When working with membrane proteins like surf1, incremental optimization of each step in the expression and purification workflow is often necessary. Construct design is particularly important—consider removing the mitochondrial targeting sequence and using a fusion partner that enhances solubility without compromising function.
Distinguishing genuine genetic variations in surf1 from technical artifacts during sequencing requires systematic validation approaches. This is particularly important when studying closely related Takifugu species that show limited genetic differentiation despite morphological differences . Researchers should implement the following strategies:
Technical validation:
Use high-fidelity polymerases for PCR amplification (error rate <1×10^-6)
Perform bidirectional sequencing to confirm variations
Sequence multiple independent PCR products from the same individual
Include technical replicates to assess reproducibility
Biological validation:
Verify variations across multiple individuals from the same population
Compare observed variation frequency with expected error rates
Cross-validate important variations using different sequencing technologies
Confirm functional relevance of variations through protein expression studies
Bioinformatic filtering:
Apply quality score thresholds (Phred score >30)
Filter variations based on sequence context (e.g., homopolymer regions)
Compare with known SNPs in databases
Evaluate evolutionary conservation of the variable position
Functional correlation:
Assess whether variations occur in functionally important domains
Evaluate potential impact on protein structure using prediction tools
Compare variation patterns with other genes under similar selection pressure
These approaches collectively minimize the risk of mistaking sequencing artifacts for biologically meaningful variations in surf1 sequences.
CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing offers powerful approaches for investigating surf1 function in Takifugu rubripes through precise genetic manipulation. Several strategic applications include:
Knockout studies:
Generate complete surf1 knockout to assess phenotypic consequences
Create tissue-specific knockouts using appropriate promoters
Develop conditional knockouts to study surf1 function at different developmental stages
Point mutation introduction:
Engineer specific mutations corresponding to human SURF1 pathogenic variants
Create mutations in predicted functional domains to assess their importance
Introduce species-specific variations from related Takifugu species to study functional divergence
Reporter fusion:
Tag endogenous surf1 with fluorescent proteins to track expression and localization
Create transcriptional reporters to monitor surf1 expression dynamics
Develop split-reporter systems to study protein-protein interactions in vivo
Regulatory element analysis:
Modify promoter or enhancer regions to study transcriptional regulation
Engineer regulatory mutations to assess impact on expression patterns
Create reporter constructs to identify key regulatory elements
When designing CRISPR/Cas9 experiments for surf1, researchers should:
Carefully select guide RNAs with minimal off-target effects
Consider the compact nature of the Takifugu genome (approximately 400 Mb)
Develop efficient screening methods to identify successful edits
Account for potential embryonic lethality if surf1 function is essential
These approaches would significantly advance understanding of surf1 function and regulation in this important model organism.
Recombinant Takifugu rubripes surf1 offers several valuable applications in mitochondrial disease research, particularly for studies focused on cytochrome c oxidase deficiencies:
Structural studies:
Use purified T. rubripes surf1 for crystallization and structure determination
Compare structural features with human SURF1 to identify conserved functional domains
Analyze how disease-causing mutations might affect protein structure
Functional complementation:
Test whether T. rubripes surf1 can rescue defects in human SURF1-deficient cells
Identify functionally conserved regions through chimeric protein studies
Develop T. rubripes as a model for testing therapeutic approaches
Interaction studies:
Identify binding partners of surf1 in the mitochondrial assembly pathway
Map interaction domains through deletion and mutation analysis
Compare interaction networks between fish and mammalian systems
High-throughput screening platforms:
Develop assays using recombinant surf1 to screen for compounds that enhance COX assembly
Create reporter systems for monitoring surf1 function in response to various treatments
Establish cell-based models expressing T. rubripes surf1 for drug discovery
The compact genome of Takifugu rubripes (~400 Mb) and its evolutionary position make it an excellent model for comparative studies that could illuminate fundamental aspects of mitochondrial function relevant to human disease . The genetic tools developed for Takifugu species genomic analysis, such as the SSR markers described in the literature , could be adapted for genotyping and monitoring genetic modifications in surf1 experimental models.