Recombinant Teredinibacter turnerae Elongation factor G (fusA), partial

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder. We will ship the in-stock format preferentially. Please specify any format requirements when ordering.
Lead Time
Delivery time varies by purchase method and location. Consult local distributors for specific delivery times. Proteins are shipped with blue ice packs by default. Request dry ice in advance (extra fees apply).
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Briefly centrifuge the vial before opening. Reconstitute protein in sterile deionized water to 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. Add 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquot for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Default glycerol concentration is 50%.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on storage conditions, buffer, temperature, and protein stability. Liquid form: 6 months at -20°C/-80°C. Lyophilized form: 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing. Specify your preferred tag type, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
fusA; TERTU_0888Elongation factor G; EF-G
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Protein Length
Partial
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Teredinibacter turnerae (strain ATCC 39867 / T7901)
Target Names
fusA
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Catalyzes GTP-dependent ribosomal translocation during translation elongation. The ribosome transitions from the pre-translocational (PRE) to the post-translocational (POST) state. The new A-site peptidyl-tRNA and P-site deacylated tRNA move to the P and E sites, respectively. Coordinates tRNA movement, mRNA movement, and ribosomal conformational changes.
Database Links
Protein Families
TRAFAC class translation factor GTPase superfamily, Classic translation factor GTPase family, EF-G/EF-2 subfamily
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm.

Q&A

What is Teredinibacter turnerae and why is its Elongation Factor G significant?

Teredinibacter turnerae is a cellulolytic Gammaproteobacterium belonging to the Cellvibrionaceae family that exists as an intracellular endosymbiont in the gills of wood-eating bivalves (shipworms) of the family Teredinidae . This bacterium has gained scientific attention for its role in lignocellulose degradation within the shipworm gut system and its production of biologically active compounds .

Elongation Factor G (fusA) represents a critical component of the bacterial translation machinery, catalyzing the translocation step during protein synthesis. In T. turnerae, this protein may exhibit unique adaptations related to the organism's symbiotic lifestyle and specialized metabolic capabilities. Research on recombinant fusA provides insights into:

  • Evolutionary adaptations in translation machinery of symbiotic bacteria

  • Potential structural modifications that reflect the organism's specialized metabolism

  • Comparative analysis with other bacterial translation factors to understand divergence in symbiotic species

What expression systems are most effective for recombinant T. turnerae fusA production?

When expressing recombinant T. turnerae fusA, researchers should consider several factors that influence protein yield and functionality:

Expression SystemAdvantagesLimitationsRecommended Applications
E. coli BL21(DE3)High yield, simple induction, well-established protocolsPotential for inclusion bodies, lack of post-translational modificationsInitial functional studies, structural analysis
E. coli Arctic ExpressBetter folding at lower temperatures, suitable for challenging proteinsSlower growth, more expensiveWhen standard systems yield insoluble protein
Cell-free systemsRapid expression, avoids toxicity issues, direct incorporation of modified amino acidsLower yields, higher costMechanistic studies requiring modified proteins
Insect cellsBetter folding for complex proteins, some post-translational modificationsTime-consuming, more expensiveStudies requiring native-like protein conformation

The choice should be guided by experimental endpoints, with E. coli systems providing sufficient yield for most biochemical and structural studies while maintaining the bacterial context of codon usage and folding machinery.

How can researchers optimize purification of recombinant T. turnerae fusA?

A systematic purification strategy for T. turnerae fusA typically involves:

  • Affinity chromatography: Utilizing His-tag, GST-tag, or Strep-tag fusions for initial capture. His-tagged constructs on Ni-NTA resin provide effective initial purification with imidazole gradient elution (50-250 mM).

  • Ion exchange chromatography: Since bacterial Elongation Factor G typically has a theoretical pI around 5.2-5.6, cation exchange chromatography at pH 7.5 often serves as an effective second step.

  • Size exclusion chromatography: Final polishing step to separate monomeric fusA from aggregates and remove remaining contaminants, typically using Superdex 200 column.

For functional studies, researchers should verify that the purification conditions preserve protein activity through:

  • GTPase activity assays comparing different buffer compositions

  • Limited proteolysis to confirm stable folding

  • Dynamic light scattering to assess monodispersity

When encountering solubility challenges, additives such as arginine (50-100 mM), glycerol (10-15%), or specific detergents (0.05-0.1% Tween-20) may improve yield without compromising function.

How does T. turnerae fusA structure-function relationship compare to other bacterial homologs?

Comparative analysis of T. turnerae fusA with other bacterial homologs provides insights into potential adaptations related to its symbiotic lifestyle. While specific structural data for T. turnerae fusA is limited, general approaches include:

  • Sequence alignment analysis: Multiple sequence alignment of fusA from T. turnerae with homologs from free-living bacteria reveals conservation patterns and unique substitutions, particularly in GTP-binding domains and ribosome interaction sites.

  • Homology modeling: Using structures of characterized bacterial EF-G proteins (typically from E. coli or Thermus thermophilus) as templates to predict T. turnerae fusA structure and identify potentially unique features.

  • Domain-swap experiments: Creating chimeric proteins with domains exchanged between T. turnerae fusA and well-characterized homologs to isolate functional differences.

T. turnerae's symbiotic lifestyle and specialized metabolism for lignocellulose degradation may have driven adaptation in its translational machinery . Researchers should pay particular attention to regions interacting with the ribosome and those involved in conformational changes during GTP hydrolysis.

What methods can resolve contradictory data in T. turnerae fusA characterization?

When researchers encounter contradictory results in T. turnerae fusA characterization, a systematic troubleshooting approach includes:

  • Protein preparation validation:

    • SDS-PAGE with Coomassie staining and western blot to confirm purity and identity

    • Mass spectrometry to verify protein sequence and potential post-translational modifications

    • Circular dichroism to confirm proper folding

  • Activity reconciliation:

    • Implementing multiple, orthogonal activity assays (GTPase activity, ribosome binding, translocation efficiency)

    • Titrating reaction components to identify potential inhibitors or activators

    • Examining buffer dependencies that might explain variable results

  • Experimental design considerations:

    • Using appropriate statistical approaches for biological replicates

    • Blind testing protocols to eliminate unconscious bias

    • Collaborating with independent laboratories to verify findings

For example, contradictory GTPase activity data might be resolved by testing activity under conditions that mimic the gill environment of shipworms where T. turnerae naturally resides, including considering the unique chemical environment created by symbiont-derived compounds .

How can recombinant T. turnerae fusA be used to study translational regulation in symbiotic bacteria?

Recombinant T. turnerae fusA provides a valuable tool for understanding translational regulation in symbiotic bacteria through several experimental approaches:

  • Reconstituted translation systems: In vitro translation assays using purified components (ribosomes, translation factors, tRNAs) to compare elongation rates and accuracy between free-living and symbiotic bacterial translation machinery.

  • Ribosome profiling comparisons: Comparing ribosome occupancy patterns in vivo with in vitro systems supplemented with recombinant fusA to identify regulatory checkpoints.

  • Stress response studies: Examining how translational efficiency mediated by fusA changes under conditions mimicking the symbiotic environment, including:

    • Nutrient limitation similar to gill tissue

    • Presence of host-derived regulatory molecules

    • Oxidative stress conditions

  • Antibiotic susceptibility analysis: Testing how T. turnerae fusA responds to translation-targeting antibiotics compared to non-symbiotic bacteria, potentially revealing adaptive mechanisms.

These approaches can reveal how T. turnerae has adapted its translation machinery to the specialized symbiotic environment within shipworm gills, potentially contributing to its ability to produce enzymes for lignocellulose degradation .

What analytical techniques best characterize T. turnerae fusA functional properties?

Comprehensive characterization of T. turnerae fusA functional properties requires multiple complementary techniques:

TechniqueInformation ProvidedTechnical Considerations
Steady-state GTPase assayBaseline enzymatic activityUse malachite green assay with controls for phosphate contamination
Pre-steady-state kineticsConformational change rates during GTP hydrolysisRequires stopped-flow apparatus with fluorescence detection
Thermofluor analysisThermal stability and buffer optimizationScreen multiple buffers and additives for stability enhancement
Microscale thermophoresisBinding affinity for ribosome and GTPRequires fluorescently labeled protein with minimal functional impact
Cryo-electron microscopyStructural details of fusA-ribosome complexesPrepare stable complexes using non-hydrolyzable GTP analogs

For functional analysis, researchers should compare T. turnerae fusA activity in the presence of various substrates related to wood degradation, as the bacterium's specialized metabolism may have influenced translation factor evolution. Additionally, testing activity across temperature and pH ranges reflecting the shipworm gill environment provides ecological relevance to biochemical findings.

How can site-directed mutagenesis of T. turnerae fusA reveal adaptation mechanisms?

Strategic site-directed mutagenesis of T. turnerae fusA can illuminate adaptation mechanisms through:

  • Comparative genomics-guided mutagenesis:

    • Identify amino acid positions unique to T. turnerae or conserved among symbiotic bacteria

    • Create point mutations reverting these residues to those found in free-living bacteria

    • Assess impact on function, stability, and regulation

  • Domain-focused approach:

    • Target the five domains of EF-G systematically

    • Focus particularly on domain IV which interacts with the decoding center

    • Create chimeric constructs exchanging domains with non-symbiotic homologs

  • GTPase center modifications:

    • Mutate key residues in the GTPase center (P-loop, switch regions)

    • Compare GTP hydrolysis rates and ribosome interaction

  • Quantitative analysis framework:

    • Employ thermal shift assays to assess stability changes

    • Measure translation rates in reconstituted systems

    • Determine kinetic parameters (kcat, KM) for each variant

These approaches can reveal whether T. turnerae fusA has evolved specific adaptations related to its role in producing enzymes for wood degradation and functioning within the symbiotic context of shipworm gills .

A specific example methodology includes:

  • Generate point mutations in conserved GTPase motifs (G1-G5)

  • Express and purify variants alongside wild-type protein

  • Compare GTPase activity with and without ribosomes

  • Assess translocation efficiency using fluorescence-based assays

  • Determine structures of key variants by cryo-EM or X-ray crystallography

How does T. turnerae fusA function relate to the bacterium's role in lignocellulose degradation?

T. turnerae plays a crucial role in wood digestion within shipworms through secretion of enzymes that degrade cellulose, hemicellulose, and pectin . The relationship between fusA function and this specialized metabolism may involve:

  • Translational adaptation for enzyme production: T. turnerae fusA may have evolved specific properties to optimize translation of the numerous carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes) encoded in its genome.

  • Response to nutrient fluctuation: As wood degradation produces variable nutrient availability, fusA may have adapted to maintain translation efficiency under changing conditions.

  • Coordination with secretion mechanisms: Recent research shows T. turnerae secretes enzymes via outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) . The translation machinery, including fusA, might be coordinated with this secretion pathway.

  • Regulatory networks: Translational regulation via fusA may be integrated with signaling pathways that detect wood substrates and regulate CAZyme production.

Experimental approaches to investigate these relationships include:

  • Ribosome profiling under various carbon sources (cellulose vs. glucose)

  • Protein synthesis rate measurements for CAZymes vs. housekeeping genes

  • Analysis of translational efficiency of CAZyme mRNAs in reconstituted systems with recombinant fusA

What insights can comparative analysis of T. turnerae fusA provide about bacterial adaptation to symbiosis?

Comparative analysis of T. turnerae fusA can reveal fundamental mechanisms of bacterial adaptation to symbiotic lifestyles:

  • Evolutionary rate analysis: Calculating dN/dS ratios for fusA sequences across free-living and symbiotic bacteria to identify selection pressures.

  • Co-evolution patterns: Examining co-evolution between fusA and other components of the translation machinery in symbiotic vs. free-living bacteria.

  • Host-microbe interface considerations: Investigating whether fusA has adapted to host-derived signals or regulatory molecules present in shipworm gills.

  • Metabolic integration analysis: Exploring connections between translational regulation and the production of both wood-degrading enzymes and secondary metabolites like the boronated tartrolon antibiotics .

This research has broader implications for understanding how essential cellular processes adapt during the evolution of symbiosis, potentially revealing convergent adaptations across different symbiotic systems.

How might techniques like cryo-EM advance our understanding of T. turnerae fusA?

Cryo-electron microscopy offers transformative potential for understanding T. turnerae fusA function through:

  • Structural determination at different functional states:

    • Pre-translocation complex with GDP and Pi

    • Post-translocation complex with GTP

    • Intermediate states captured using GTP analogs

  • Comparative structural analysis:

    • Direct comparison with structures from model organisms

    • Identification of unique structural features in symbiont fusA

    • Visualization of potential adaptation mechanisms

  • Integrative structural biology approaches:

    • Combining cryo-EM with molecular dynamics simulations

    • Integrating hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry data

    • Correlating structure with mutagenesis results

Such structural insights could inform the design of experiments to test hypotheses about how T. turnerae fusA function relates to the bacterium's specialized role in wood degradation and its symbiotic lifestyle within shipworms.

What are promising approaches for studying T. turnerae fusA interactions with antibiotics?

T. turnerae produces antibacterial compounds that might regulate microbial populations in the shipworm gut . Investigating fusA interactions with these compounds and other antibiotics offers valuable research opportunities:

  • Antibiotic interaction studies:

    • In vitro translation assays with purified components including recombinant fusA

    • Competition assays between antibiotics and GTP for fusA binding

    • Structural studies of fusA-antibiotic complexes

  • Resistance mechanism investigation:

    • Comparing T. turnerae fusA susceptibility to translation-targeting antibiotics

    • Identifying potential resistance mutations through directed evolution

    • Testing cross-resistance patterns with the bacterium's own antibacterial compounds

  • Ecological context exploration:

    • Examining whether T. turnerae's tartrolon antibiotics affect translation

    • Investigating potential self-immunity mechanisms involving fusA

    • Determining whether fusA properties contribute to competitive advantage in the symbiotic environment

These approaches could reveal not only basic biological principles but also potentially inform antibiotic development strategies.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.