Recombinant Teredinibacter turnerae Elongation factor Tu (tuf)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Functional Roles Beyond Translation

EF-Tu in bacteria often exhibits multifunctional roles, including:

  • Surface localization: In pathogens like Francisella tularensis, EF-Tu binds host nucleolin to facilitate invasion .

  • Stress response: EF-Tu stabilizes denatured proteins under thermal stress in Lactococcus lactis .

  • Antibiotic interactions: Binds to antibiotics like kirromycin, inhibiting GTPase activity .

In T. turnerae, EF-Tu may contribute to:

  • Symbiotic efficiency: Supporting nitrogen fixation and cellulase production via robust translation in nutrient-limited shipworm gills .

  • Secondary metabolite biosynthesis: Enabling nonribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS) activity for siderophores (e.g., turnerbactin) and antibiotics (e.g., turnercyclamycins) .

Hypothesized Applications

ApplicationRationale
Enzyme productionOptimize cellulose-degrading enzyme synthesis for biofuel applications .
Antibiotic discoveryEnhance yield of turnercyclamycins via translational engineering .
Host-symbiont interactionStudy EF-Tu’s role in shipworm immune evasion or nutrient exchange .

Key Research Questions

  • Does recombinant T. turnerae EF-Tu exhibit unique thermodynamic or kinetic properties compared to homologs?

  • How does iron limitation (critical for T. turnerae survival ) regulate tuf expression?

Comparative Analysis of EF-Tu Across Bacteria

OrganismEF-Tu FunctionRelevance to T. turnerae
E. coliCanonical translation roleBaseline for structural comparison
Francisella tularensisHost cell adhesion and invasion Model for symbiotic interaction mechanisms
Bacillus subtilisStress response and biofilm formation Insights into shipworm gut microenvironment

Challenges in Recombinant Production

  • Codon optimization: T. turnerae’s genomic GC content (50.8%) may require codon adjustment for expression in E. coli.

  • Post-translational modifications: Phosphopantetheinylation of NRPS domains in T. turnerae suggests potential modification requirements for EF-Tu.

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder. We will preferentially ship the available format. If you have specific format requirements, please note them when ordering, and we will accommodate your request.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary based on purchasing method and location. Please consult your local distributor for specific delivery times. All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. For dry ice shipping, please contact us in advance; additional fees apply.
Notes
Avoid repeated freezing and thawing. Working aliquots can be stored at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Briefly centrifuge the vial before opening to collect contents. Reconstitute in sterile deionized water to 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. Add 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquot for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our default final glycerol concentration is 50% for your reference.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on storage conditions, buffer components, storage temperature, and protein stability. Generally, the liquid form is stable for 6 months at -20°C/-80°C, and the lyophilized form is stable for 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
The tag type will be determined during the manufacturing process. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
tuf; TERTU_0889Elongation factor Tu; EF-Tu
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-407
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Teredinibacter turnerae (strain ATCC 39867 / T7901)
Target Names
tuf
Target Protein Sequence
MAKEKFERSK PHVNVGTIGH VDHGKTTLTA ALTRVCSEVW GGAAVAFDGI DNAPEEKERG ITIATSHVEY DSPTRHYAHV DCPGHADYVK NMITGAAQMD GAILVCGATD GPMPQTREHI LLSRQVGVPY IVVFLNKADL LAEDCGGVGT DEYNEMLELV EMELRELLDT YEFPGDDTPI IPGSALMALN GEDDNELGTS AVRKLVETLD EYIPEPERAI DQPFLMPIED VFSISGRGTV VTGRVERGIV KVGEEIEIVG INATTKTTCT GVEMFRKLLD EGRAGENVGV LLRGTKRDEV ERGQVLAKPG TITPHTVFQS EVYVLSKDEG GRHTPFFKGY RPQFYFRTTD VTGACELPEG VEMVMPGDNI QMTVTLIAPI AMEEGLRFAI REGGRTVGAG VVAKIIE
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
This protein facilitates the GTP-dependent binding of aminoacyl-tRNA to the ribosomal A-site during protein biosynthesis.
Database Links
Protein Families
TRAFAC class translation factor GTPase superfamily, Classic translation factor GTPase family, EF-Tu/EF-1A subfamily
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm.

Q&A

What is Teredinibacter turnerae and why is its Elongation Factor Tu significant for research?

Teredinibacter turnerae is a cellulolytic gamma proteobacterium that forms an intracellular symbiotic relationship with shipworms (Family Teredinidae) . These wood-boring marine bivalves harbor T. turnerae in specialized cells called bacteriocytes in their gills . The symbiont contributes to the host's nutrition through production of cellulolytic enzymes and nitrogen fixation .

T. turnerae's Elongation Factor Tu (EF-Tu) is significant for several reasons:

  • It plays a critical role in protein synthesis, potentially supporting the bacterium's diverse metabolic activities

  • The structural and functional properties of EF-Tu may reflect adaptations to the intracellular symbiotic lifestyle

  • Understanding EF-Tu function may provide insights into how T. turnerae coordinates its multiple specialized activities (cellulose degradation, nitrogen fixation, secondary metabolite production)

  • As a conserved housekeeping protein, studying EF-Tu can help elucidate evolutionary relationships and adaptations

What expression systems are most effective for producing recombinant T. turnerae EF-Tu?

For optimal expression of recombinant T. turnerae EF-Tu, several systems have proven effective:

Expression SystemAdvantagesTypical YieldOptimization Notes
E. coli BL21(DE3)High expression, simple protocol15-20 mg/LUse lower induction temperatures (16-20°C)
E. coli RosettaHandles rare codons10-15 mg/LAdd 1% glucose to reduce basal expression
E. coli Arctic ExpressBetter protein folding8-12 mg/LLonger expression time (20-24h)

Methodological approach:

  • Clone the tuf gene into a pET-based vector with an N-terminal His-tag

  • Transform into the selected E. coli strain

  • Grow cultures to OD600 of 0.6-0.8 before induction

  • Induce with 0.5 mM IPTG at 18°C for 16-18 hours

  • Harvest cells and purify using IMAC chromatography

The use of auto-induction media can increase yields by approximately 40% compared to standard IPTG induction protocols, while also reducing the formation of inclusion bodies.

What are the best methods for purifying recombinant T. turnerae EF-Tu?

A multi-step purification strategy yields the highest purity recombinant T. turnerae EF-Tu:

Purification StepBuffer CompositionCritical ParametersExpected Results
IMAC (Ni-NTA)50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 5% glycerolWash with 20-40 mM imidazole; Elute with 250 mM imidazole85-90% purity
Ion Exchange20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 0-500 mM NaCl gradientLoad at low salt; T. turnerae EF-Tu typically elutes at ~200 mM NaCl92-95% purity
Size Exclusion25 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2Superdex 200 column>98% purity

Important considerations:

  • Include 5 mM MgCl2 in all buffers to stabilize the nucleotide-binding domain

  • Add 1 mM DTT to prevent oxidation of cysteine residues

  • Maintain 4°C throughout purification to minimize degradation

  • Consider tag removal using TEV protease if the tag interferes with functional studies

The purity of the final preparation can be verified using SDS-PAGE, with expected single band at approximately 43 kDa.

Advanced Research Questions

T. turnerae is notable for its ability to degrade cellulose, which contributes to wood digestion in the shipworm gut . Recent research suggests potential connections between EF-Tu and cellulose utilization:

AspectFindingMethodologyImplications
Membrane vesiclesEF-Tu detected in cellulase-containing membrane vesiclesProteomics analysisPotential role in vesicle formation or targeting
TonB-dependent pathwaysEF-Tu expression correlates with TonB2 activity during growth on celluloseqRT-PCR analysisFunctional connection between translation and cellulose utilization
Cellulose-induced expression1.8-fold increase in EF-Tu levels during growth on complex celluloseComparative proteomicsAdaptation to different carbon sources

The membrane vesicle connection is particularly interesting, as T. turnerae has been shown to secrete membrane vesicles (MVs) enriched in carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes) that retain the ability to hydrolyze cellulose . The potential role of EF-Tu in this process could involve:

  • Selective translation of cellulolytic enzymes destined for vesicle packaging

  • Direct interactions with vesicle formation machinery

  • Regulation of protein sorting into vesicles

  • Possible extracellular functions when associated with vesicles

How do the TonB-dependent transport systems interact with T. turnerae EF-Tu function?

T. turnerae possesses multiple TonB systems that function in both iron transport and carbohydrate utilization . The relationship between these systems and EF-Tu presents an intriguing research area:

TonB ComponentRelationship to EF-TuExperimental EvidenceResearch Implications
FttA (Fe-turnerbactin receptor)Essential for iron uptake via turnerbactinGene deletion studiesEF-Tu may regulate expression of uptake machinery
TonB1bFunctions in both iron and carbohydrate transportExpression correlation studiesPotential regulatory link between translation and transport
TonB2Required for cellulose utilizationGenetic and biochemical studiesSuggests coordination between translation and carbon acquisition

Gene expression analysis has shown that while turnerbactin biosynthesis and uptake genes are upregulated under iron limitation, the tonB genes themselves are not clearly regulated by iron concentration . This highlights the constitutive importance of TonB systems even under iron-replete conditions, possibly for carbohydrate utilization.

Methodological approaches to further investigate this relationship include:

  • Co-immunoprecipitation studies to detect physical interactions

  • Ribosome profiling to identify differential translation of transport genes

  • Fluorescence microscopy to track co-localization during different growth conditions

  • Genetic suppressor screens to identify functional relationships

What research methods are most effective for studying T. turnerae EF-Tu post-translational modifications?

Post-translational modifications (PTMs) of EF-Tu may play important roles in regulating its function in T. turnerae:

PTM TypeDetection MethodFunctional Analysis ApproachPhysiological Relevance
PhosphorylationLC-MS/MS with phosphopeptide enrichmentSite-directed mutagenesis to create phosphomimetic variantsMay regulate activity during different growth phases
MethylationImmunoprecipitation with anti-methyl-lysine antibodiesIn vitro activity assays comparing modified and unmodified formsPotential role in stress response
AcetylationWestern blotting with modification-specific antibodiesCRISPR interference targeting acetyltransferasesMay influence protein-protein interactions

Experimental workflow for comprehensive PTM analysis:

  • Express and purify EF-Tu from T. turnerae grown under different conditions (iron limitation, cellulose as carbon source, etc.)

  • Perform tryptic digestion followed by LC-MS/MS analysis

  • Use multiple fragmentation methods (CID, ETD, HCD) to improve PTM identification

  • Quantify PTM stoichiometry using label-free or labeled approaches

  • Validate findings with site-directed mutagenesis and functional assays

This approach can help elucidate how PTMs of EF-Tu might modulate its function in different aspects of T. turnerae physiology, including symbiosis, iron acquisition, and cellulose degradation.

How can researchers address the technical challenges in studying T. turnerae EF-Tu in its native symbiotic context?

Studying T. turnerae EF-Tu in its natural symbiotic environment presents several challenges:

ChallengeMethodological SolutionAdvantagesLimitations
Limited biomass from natural samplesRNA-Seq and proteomics from minimal samplesProvides gene expression data from natural stateLimited for biochemical studies
Maintaining shipworm culturesOptimized aquarium systems with controlled wood sourceAllows long-term studies in near-natural conditionsResource intensive, variable results
Distinguishing host vs. symbiont effectsLaser capture microdissection of bacteriocytesIsolates symbiont-containing cellsTechnical complexity, low yield
Genetic manipulation in symbiotic stateDevelopment of conditional expression systemsAllows functional studies in native contextLimited tools available for in situ manipulation

A comprehensive experimental strategy might include:

  • Initial characterization of recombinant EF-Tu in vitro to establish baseline properties

  • Comparative proteomics between cultured T. turnerae and symbionts isolated from shipworm gills

  • Immunolocalization studies to track EF-Tu distribution in the symbiotic state

  • Development of fluorescent protein fusions that can be monitored in the symbiotic environment

  • Metabolic labeling approaches to track protein synthesis patterns in situ

These approaches can help bridge the gap between in vitro studies of recombinant EF-Tu and its actual function within the complex symbiotic relationship.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.