Recombinant Thermosynechococcus elongatus ATP synthase subunit c (atpE) is a bioengineered protein derived from the cyanobacterium Thermosynechococcus elongatus. It represents the F₀-sector subunit c of the F₀F₁-ATP synthase complex, critical for proton translocation and ATP synthesis in photosynthetic organisms. This recombinant protein is expressed in E. coli with an N-terminal histidine (His) tag for purification and structural characterization .
The recombinant atpE is produced via heterologous expression in E. coli, leveraging the organism’s robust protein synthesis machinery. The His-tag facilitates affinity chromatography, yielding high-purity protein suitable for structural and functional studies .
Cloning: The atpE gene (Q8DLP7) is inserted into a plasmid vector.
Expression: Induced in E. coli under optimized conditions.
Purification: Nickel affinity chromatography (via His-tag) followed by gel filtration.
Notes: Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles; store at -20°C/-80°C .
Subunit c interacts with regulatory proteins to modulate ATP synthase activity:
AtpΘ Interaction: AtpΘ, a cyanobacterial inhibitor, binds to subunit c and other F₀F₁ components to arrest ATP hydrolysis during darkness or low proton gradients .
γ Subunit Coordination: The β-hairpin structure in the γ subunit (rotor) influences subunit c’s proton-translocating efficiency, balancing ATP synthesis and hydrolysis .
In Thermosynechococcus elongatus, subunit c contributes to survival under environmental stress:
Proton Gradient Maintenance: Subunit c-driven proton translocation sustains membrane potential during darkness .
ATP Homeostasis: Coordination with AtpΘ prevents ATP depletion by blocking reverse ATP hydrolysis .
atpE Knockouts: Not feasible in cyanobacteria, indicating essentiality for ATP synthase assembly .
γ Subunit Mutants: Loss of β-hairpin disrupts rotational coupling, reducing ATP synthesis .
Structural Elucidation: High-resolution crystallography of subunit c in complex with AtpΘ or γ subunit remains pending.
Dynamic Regulation: Mechanisms underlying light-dependent AtpΘ expression and subunit c interaction require further study .
Biotechnological Applications: Recombinant atpE may aid in developing biohybrid systems for renewable energy .
F1F0 ATP synthase synthesizes ATP from ADP using a proton or sodium gradient. This enzyme comprises two domains: the extramembranous catalytic F1 domain and the membrane-bound proton channel F0 domain, linked by a central and peripheral stalk. ATP synthesis in the F1 catalytic domain is coupled to proton translocation via a rotary mechanism involving the central stalk subunits. A key component of the F0 channel, subunit c plays a direct role in transmembrane translocation. A homomeric c-ring, consisting of 10-14 subunits, forms the central stalk rotor element with the F1 delta and epsilon subunits. The enzyme from Thermosynechococcus elongatus exhibits exceptional stability, retaining functionality after 6 hours at 55°C.
KEGG: tel:tlr0431
STRING: 197221.tlr0431
ATP synthase subunit c (atpE) is a membrane-embedded component of the Fo portion of the FoF1 ATP synthase complex. This protein forms a ring structure in the membrane that facilitates proton translocation across the thylakoid membrane, which drives the rotary mechanism needed for ATP synthesis. In cyanobacteria like Thermosynechococcus elongatus, this process is particularly important as ATP synthase complexes can utilize proton gradients generated by both photosynthesis and respiration .
The atpE protein typically contains two transmembrane alpha-helices connected by a hydrophilic loop. The c-ring structure in ATP synthase comprises multiple copies of this subunit arranged in a circular formation. This arrangement creates a pathway for protons, contributing to the proton motive force that drives ATP synthesis.
Under light conditions, the proton gradient driving ATP synthase activity in T. elongatus is primarily generated through photosynthetic electron transport. In darkness, respiratory complexes become the main contributors to the proton gradient. Unlike plant chloroplasts, cyanobacteria cannot use the same inhibitory mechanisms for ATP synthases during night periods because both respiratory and photosynthetic complexes share the same membrane system .
Regulatory proteins like AtpΘ (encoded by atpT) work alongside atpE to prevent ATP hydrolysis (the reverse reaction) under unfavorable conditions, which would otherwise deplete cellular ATP reserves. This regulation ensures energy conservation when light is unavailable. The expression of these regulatory factors is typically highest in darkness but minimal under optimal phototrophic growth conditions .
When designing experiments to study recombinant T. elongatus atpE function, researchers should employ true experimental research designs with proper controls and variable manipulation . A recommended approach includes:
Define variables clearly:
Independent variables: Expression conditions, mutation sites, or inhibitor concentrations
Dependent variables: ATP synthesis/hydrolysis rates, proton translocation efficiency, or binding affinity
Controlled variables: Temperature, pH, ion concentrations
Implement proper controls:
Negative controls: Inactive atpE variants or reactions without substrate
Positive controls: Wild-type atpE or well-characterized variants
Randomization and replication:
Perform experiments in random order to minimize systemic bias
Conduct sufficient biological and technical replicates to ensure statistical significance
Variable manipulation:
Developing accurate structural models of T. elongatus atpE requires a systematic homology modeling approach:
Template selection:
Identify resolved structures of homologous ATP synthase subunit c proteins
Prioritize templates with high sequence identity (>30%) and resolution (<2.5Å)
Consider templates from related cyanobacterial species when available
Sequence alignment and model building:
Energy minimization and refinement:
Model validation:
Evaluate stereochemical quality using Ramachandran plots
Assess model quality using metrics like QMEAN or ProSA
Compare conservation of key functional residues with homologous proteins
This methodological approach provides a reliable structural foundation for further functional and inhibitor studies of T. elongatus atpE.
Analyzing proton translocation through recombinant T. elongatus atpE requires specialized techniques:
Reconstitution in liposomes:
Purify recombinant atpE protein using detergent solubilization
Reconstitute into liposomes with defined lipid composition
Verify proper orientation using protease protection assays
Proton flux measurements:
Monitor pH changes using pH-sensitive fluorescent dyes (e.g., ACMA, pyranine)
Establish proton gradients using valinomycin/K+ or acid-base transitions
Quantify proton flux rates under different conditions
Patch-clamp electrophysiology:
Form giant liposomes or proteoliposomes
Measure ion currents across membranes containing reconstituted atpE
Analyze conductance properties under varying voltage and ionic conditions
Site-directed mutagenesis:
Introduce mutations at key residues predicted to participate in proton translocation
Compare proton translocation efficiency between wild-type and mutant proteins
Correlate functional changes with structural perturbations
These methodological approaches provide direct functional assessments of atpE's role in proton translocation, the fundamental process driving ATP synthesis.
Studying interactions between T. elongatus atpE and potential inhibitors requires a systematic approach:
Virtual screening and docking:
Binding assays:
Develop fluorescence-based binding assays using labeled inhibitors
Perform isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) to determine binding thermodynamics
Use surface plasmon resonance (SPR) to measure binding kinetics
Functional inhibition assays:
Measure ATP synthesis/hydrolysis rates in the presence of potential inhibitors
Determine IC50 values and inhibition constants
Characterize inhibition mechanisms (competitive, non-competitive, uncompetitive)
Structure-activity relationship (SAR) studies:
Test structural analogs of promising inhibitors
Correlate structural features with inhibition potency
Guide rational design of improved inhibitors
Validation in biological systems:
Test effects on ATP synthesis in membrane vesicles or whole cells
Evaluate specificity by testing effects on other ATP-dependent processes
Assess potential off-target effects through proteomic approaches
This comprehensive approach enables identification and validation of specific atpE inhibitors with potential applications in fundamental research and possibly therapeutic development.
To study transcriptional regulation of T. elongatus atpE, researchers should consider these methodological approaches:
Promoter analysis:
Identify promoter regions through bioinformatic analysis
Clone promoter regions into reporter gene constructs
Measure reporter activity under different conditions (light/dark cycles, nutrient availability)
Transcription factor identification:
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP):
Perform ChIP experiments with antibodies against suspected transcription factors
Quantify enrichment of atpE promoter regions
Map binding sites through ChIP-seq analysis
Transcriptional response analysis:
Monitor atpE mRNA levels under different conditions using RT-qPCR
Compare with other ATP synthase components to identify coordinated regulation
Create transcriptional profiles across different growth phases and environmental conditions
These approaches can reveal the complex regulatory networks controlling atpE expression in response to changing environmental conditions.
Post-transcriptional regulation of atpE can be investigated through these methodological approaches:
mRNA stability analysis:
Measure atpE mRNA half-life using transcription inhibitors
Compare stability under different conditions (light/dark, nutrient availability)
Identify sequence elements affecting stability through mutation analysis
For cyanobacteria, mRNA stability has been identified as a major regulatory process governing expression of ATP synthase components
RNA-binding protein identification:
Perform RNA immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry
Identify proteins that bind to atpE mRNA
Map binding sites through techniques like CLIP-seq
Translational efficiency measurement:
Ribosome profiling:
Perform ribosome profiling to measure ribosome occupancy on atpE mRNA
Compare translational efficiency under different conditions
Identify potential translational pausing sites
These methodological approaches provide a comprehensive understanding of the post-transcriptional mechanisms that fine-tune atpE expression in response to cellular energy demands.
Membrane proteins like atpE present unique challenges in recombinant expression and purification. Researchers can overcome these through:
Expression system optimization:
Test multiple expression systems (E. coli, yeast, insect cells)
Evaluate different promoters, fusion tags, and signal sequences
Consider specialized E. coli strains designed for membrane protein expression
Optimize growth temperature, induction conditions, and media composition
Solubilization strategies:
Screen multiple detergents (DDM, LMNG, digitonin) for optimal extraction
Test detergent:protein ratios and solubilization times
Consider native nanodiscs or styrene-maleic acid copolymer lipid particles (SMALPs)
Maintain proper lipid environment throughout purification
Purification optimization:
Implement two-step affinity purification using tags on both N- and C-termini
Add stabilizing agents (glycerol, specific lipids) to all buffers
Minimize exposure to detergents through rapid purification protocols
Consider on-column detergent exchange or reconstitution
Functional verification:
Develop activity assays compatible with detergent-solubilized protein
Verify proper folding through circular dichroism or limited proteolysis
Confirm oligomeric state through size-exclusion chromatography
Validate proton translocation function in reconstituted systems
These methodological strategies address the specific challenges associated with membrane protein biochemistry, improving the likelihood of obtaining functional recombinant T. elongatus atpE.
When facing inconsistent results in ATP synthase activity assays involving recombinant T. elongatus atpE, consider these troubleshooting approaches:
Sample quality assessment:
Verify protein purity through SDS-PAGE and mass spectrometry
Confirm proper folding and oligomerization state
Check protein stability under assay conditions using thermal shift assays
Ensure consistent protein:lipid ratios in reconstituted systems
Assay condition optimization:
Systematically vary pH, temperature, and ionic strength
Test different lipid compositions for reconstitution
Optimize ATP, ADP, and Pi concentrations
Control for pre-existing ion gradients that may affect results
Technical considerations:
Implement rigorous controls for each experiment
Standardize reagent preparation and storage
Use multiple detection methods to cross-validate results
Ensure instruments are properly calibrated
Experimental design improvements:
Environmental variables:
Control light exposure during preparation and assays
Monitor and eliminate oxidative damage to the protein
Standardize all buffer components and their quality
Consider effects of mechanical stress during preparation
By systematically addressing these factors, researchers can identify sources of variability and establish reliable, reproducible assay conditions for studying T. elongatus atpE function.