Recombinant Thymidylate kinase (tmk)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder. We will preferentially ship the format we have in stock. If you have special format requirements, please note them when ordering, and we will fulfill your request.
Lead Time
Delivery time may vary based on purchasing method and location. Consult your local distributors for specific delivery times. All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. For dry ice shipping, please contact us in advance; extra fees will apply.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Briefly centrifuge the vial before opening to collect contents at the bottom. Reconstitute the protein in sterile deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our default final glycerol concentration is 50%.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on storage conditions, buffer components, storage temperature, and protein stability. Generally, the liquid form has a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while the lyophilized form has a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
The tag type will be determined during the manufacturing process. If you require a specific tag type, please inform us, and we will prioritize developing it.
Synonyms
tmk; Ecok1_09880; APECO1_179Thymidylate kinase; EC 2.7.4.9; dTMP kinase
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-213
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Escherichia coli O1:K1 / APEC
Target Names
tmk
Target Protein Sequence
MRSKYIVIEG LEGAGKTTAR NVVVETLEQL GIRDMVFTRE PGGTQLAEKL RSLVLDIKSV GDEVITDKAE VLMFYAARVQ LVETVIKPAL ANGTWVIGDR HDLSTQAYQG GGRGIDQHML ATLRDAVLGG FRPDLTLYLD VTPEVGLKRA RARGELDRIE QESFDFFNRT RARYLELAAQ DKSIHTIDAT QPLEAVMDAI RTTVTNWVKE LDA
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Phosphorylates dTMP to form dTDP in both de novo and salvage pathways of dTTP synthesis.
Database Links
Protein Families
Thymidylate kinase family

Q&A

What is thymidylate kinase and what is its biochemical function?

Thymidylate kinase (TMK) is an essential enzyme in the DNA synthesis pathway that catalyzes the phosphorylation of thymidine monophosphate (TMP) to form thymidine diphosphate (TDP) . This reaction represents a critical step in the synthesis of deoxythymidine triphosphate (dTTP), an essential component for DNA replication . TMK belongs to the nucleoside monophosphate (NMP) kinase family and is also referred to as thymidylic acid kinase or thymidine monophosphate kinase . The enzyme requires divalent cations for activity, with Mg²⁺ typically being the most effective cofactor .

How does TMK structure and function vary across different species?

TMK exhibits significant structural and functional differences across species while maintaining core catalytic features:

SpeciesStructural FeaturesEnzymatic PropertiesNotable Characteristics
Bacterial (M. tuberculosis)"Chimeric" structure with features from both E. coli and yeast enzymes AZT-MP acts as competitive inhibitor rather than substrate Unique Arg14 substitution in P-loop instead of conserved Thr
Bacterial (S. aureus)TMK complex with inhibitors shows induced-fit interactions Target for selective antibacterial compounds Picomolar affinity achieved with novel inhibitors
Parasitic (B. malayi)Homodimeric structure (~52kDa) Km values: 17μM (dTMP), 66μM (ATP); kcat: 38.09s⁻¹ Sensitive to nucleoside analogs like 5-BrdU, 5-CldU, AZT
Viral (WSSV)Chimeric TK-TMK organization Catalyzes phosphorylation of thymidine to TMP Similar to eukaryotic cytosolic TKs; sensitive to TTP feedback inhibition

These differences in structure and substrate specificity provide opportunities for designing species-specific inhibitors with therapeutic potential .

What expression systems are most effective for producing recombinant TMK?

The choice of expression system depends on the source organism and research objectives:

For bacterial TMK enzymes, Escherichia coli expression systems generally provide high yields of functional protein. The M. tuberculosis tmk gene has been successfully cloned and expressed in E. coli, followed by characterization using various biochemical and physicochemical methods .

For more complex TMK enzymes, insect/baculovirus expression systems may be preferable. The chimeric TK-TMK from white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) was effectively expressed in an insect/baculovirus system, which allowed for proper folding and activity . The recombinant enzyme was purified by affinity chromatography using a His-tag, facilitating downstream characterization .

When designing expression constructs, researchers should consider codon optimization, fusion tags to enhance solubility, and purification strategies compatible with maintaining enzymatic activity. Expression conditions including temperature, induction timing, and media composition should be optimized for each specific TMK variant.

What are the standard methods for characterizing TMK enzymatic activity?

Characterization of TMK activity typically involves several complementary approaches:

  • Steady-state kinetics analysis:

    • Determination of Km and kcat values for both substrates (TMP and ATP)

    • Analysis of pH and temperature dependence (optimal conditions typically around pH 7.4 and 37°C)

    • Assessment of divalent cation requirements and preferences

  • Substrate specificity profiling:

    • Testing various nucleoside monophosphates and analogs as potential substrates

    • For example, WSSV TK-TMK can utilize thymidine, 2'-deoxyuridine, and 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine as substrates

    • B. malayi TMK shows specific inhibition patterns with nucleoside analogs including 5-BrdU, 5-CldU, and AZT

  • Regulatory mechanism investigation:

    • Analysis of feedback inhibition (e.g., WSSV TK-TMK is sensitive to feedback inhibition by thymidine triphosphate)

    • Identification of allosteric regulators and their binding sites

  • Structural stability assessment:

    • Equilibrium denaturation studies using spectroscopic techniques

    • For instance, urea denaturation of M. tuberculosis TMK studied by fluorescence and circular dichroism suggests a three-state unfolding mechanism with a monomeric intermediate

These methodological approaches provide comprehensive insights into TMK function and can guide inhibitor design strategies for antimicrobial development.

How can homology modeling and structural analysis inform TMK inhibitor design?

Homology modeling has proven valuable for understanding TMK structure-function relationships when crystallographic data is unavailable:

  • Model construction process:

    • Identification of suitable template structures (e.g., yeast or E. coli TMK)

    • Sequence alignment focusing on conserved motifs like the P-loop and LID region

    • Model refinement and validation

    • Analysis of species-specific structural features

  • Structure-based insights:

    • For M. tuberculosis TMK, structural modeling revealed that "slight differences at the level of primary and 3D-structure explain strong variations in the phosphorylation rate of substrate analogs"

    • The model identified key features including an acidic residue (Asp9) in the P-loop and a unique Arg14 substitution instead of the conserved Thr found in other species

    • These insights enabled the design of dTMP analogs acting either as substrates or specific inhibitors of M. tuberculosis TMK

  • Comparative modeling for selectivity:

    • Structural differences between pathogen and human TMK can be exploited for selective inhibitor design

    • For B. malayi TMK, differences in binding interactions compared to human TMK correlated with selective inhibition by nucleoside analogs

This structural approach has successfully guided the design of selective inhibitors, as exemplified by compound TK-666, which binds partly in the TMP substrate site while forming novel induced-fit interactions with bacterial TMK .

What methodologies are most effective for screening and evaluating potential TMK inhibitors?

A comprehensive inhibitor discovery pipeline for TMK typically includes:

  • In silico screening approaches:

    • Structure-based virtual screening using docking algorithms

    • Pharmacophore modeling based on known TMK inhibitors

    • Molecular dynamics simulations to account for protein flexibility

    • Binding free energy calculations to prioritize candidates

  • Biochemical evaluation:

    • Enzyme inhibition assays determining IC₅₀ and Ki values

    • Mechanism of action studies (competitive, non-competitive, uncompetitive)

    • Structure-activity relationship analysis

    • Assessment of specificity against TMK from different species

  • Cellular efficacy testing:

    • Antimicrobial activity against target pathogens

    • For example, compound TK-666 demonstrates "potent, broad-spectrum Gram-positive microbiological activity (including activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus)"

    • Cytotoxicity evaluation against mammalian cells to assess selectivity

  • In vivo validation:

    • Pharmacokinetic and safety profiling

    • Efficacy in relevant disease models

    • As demonstrated with TK-666, which showed "in vivo efficacy against S. aureus in a murine infected-thigh model"

This integrated approach has successfully validated TMK as "a compelling antibacterial target and provides a rationale for pursuing novel clinical candidates for treating Gram-positive infections through TMK" .

How do species-specific differences in TMK structure create opportunities for selective drug design?

The structural variations among TMK enzymes from different organisms create promising opportunities for species-selective inhibitor design:

  • Key structural determinants of selectivity:

    • P-loop variations: M. tuberculosis TMK has a unique Arg14 substitution instead of the conserved Thr in other NMPKs

    • LID region differences: M. tuberculosis TMK has a helical LID region containing three arginines (Arg149 and Arg153 likely involved in ATP binding)

    • Substrate binding pocket: The TMK from M. tuberculosis exhibits a "chimeric" nature with sequence motifs from both E. coli and yeast enzymes

  • Differential substrate/inhibitor responses:

    • AZT-MP serves as a substrate for yeast and E. coli TMK but functions as a competitive inhibitor for M. tuberculosis TMK

    • Nucleoside analogs like 5-BrdU, 5-CldU, and AZT show "specific inhibitory effect on the enzyme activity" of B. malayi TMK, with "good association with binding interactions and the scoring functions as compared to human TMK"

  • Structure-based design strategies:

    • Targeting non-conserved residues: The TK-666 compound achieves "picomolar affinity" through "new induced-fit interactions" with bacterial TMK

    • Exploiting dynamic differences: Understanding conformational changes in the LID domain and P-loop during catalysis can guide inhibitor design

These structural insights have enabled the development of selective TMK inhibitors with "excellent target selectivity over the human ortholog" , demonstrating the value of structure-based approaches in antimicrobial drug discovery.

What is the current understanding of TMK's role in pathogen virulence and host-pathogen interactions?

TMK plays crucial roles in pathogen survival and virulence through several mechanisms:

  • Essential role in DNA replication:

    • TMK is critical for thymidine nucleotide synthesis required for DNA replication and repair

    • Studies using in vivo expression technology suggest "bacterial pathogenicity depends on genes essential for bacterial growth and intracellular survival"

  • Differential expression during infection:

    • In WSSV-infected shrimp, "TK activity increased as infection advanced in the integument and gills of experimentally infected shrimp, suggesting its functional involvement during WSSV infection"

    • This temporal regulation indicates TMK may be particularly important during specific phases of the infection cycle

  • Therapeutic targeting implications:

    • The essential nature of TMK makes it an attractive target for antimicrobial development

    • Compound TK-666 demonstrates "bactericidal action with rapid killing kinetics" against important pathogens including MRSA and VRE

    • The "low resistance rates" observed with TMK inhibitors suggest a high barrier to resistance development

Understanding TMK's role in pathogen biology has "validated TMK as a compelling antibacterial target" and established it as a promising focus for developing novel antimicrobials against drug-resistant pathogens.

How do post-translational modifications and protein-protein interactions regulate TMK activity?

While the search results provide limited direct information on post-translational modifications of TMK, several regulatory mechanisms can be inferred:

  • Cell cycle-dependent regulation:

    • In yeast, the CDC8 protein (thymidylate kinase) is described as a "cell-cycle–regulated protein"

    • This regulation likely involves post-translational modifications and protein-protein interactions that modulate TMK activity at different cell cycle phases

  • Feedback inhibition mechanisms:

    • WSSV TK-TMK activity is "sensitive to feedback inhibition by thymidine triphosphate"

    • This regulatory mechanism helps maintain balanced nucleotide pools

  • Structural dynamics and regulation:

    • The LID domain of TMK undergoes conformational changes upon ATP binding, representing a key regulatory mechanism

    • These "solvent-exposed segments observed in various NMPKs" change conformation "upon binding of ATP, leading to closure of the catalytic site"

Further research is needed to fully characterize the post-translational modifications and protein interaction networks that regulate TMK activity in different organisms. Such insights could potentially reveal additional strategies for therapeutic intervention.

What are the most promising clinical applications of TMK inhibitors?

TMK inhibitors show significant promise across multiple therapeutic areas:

  • Antibacterial applications:

    • TMK inhibitors like TK-666 demonstrate "potent, broad-spectrum Gram-positive microbiological activity (including activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus)"

    • The validation of TMK as a compelling antibacterial target "provides a rationale for pursuing novel clinical candidates for treating Gram-positive infections through TMK"

  • Antituberculosis potential:

    • TMK has "garnered significant attention in the past twenty years in the development of prospective antituberculosis agents"

    • The unique structural features of M. tuberculosis TMK create opportunities for selective inhibition

    • This approach is particularly valuable given the "increasing emergence of drug resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis"

  • Antiparasitic applications:

    • TMK inhibitors show promise against parasites like Brugia malayi

    • "Differences in kinetic properties and structural differences in the substrate binding site of BmTMK model with respect to human TMK can serve as basis for designing specific inhibitors against parasitic enzyme"

  • Advantages over existing antimicrobials:

    • Novel target avoiding existing resistance mechanisms

    • Bactericidal action with rapid killing kinetics

    • Low resistance rates

    • Demonstrated in vivo efficacy

The development of TMK inhibitors represents an important strategy in addressing the global challenge of antimicrobial resistance by providing novel mechanisms of action against priority pathogens.

What challenges remain in translating TMK research into clinical applications?

Despite promising advances, several challenges must be addressed:

  • Selectivity optimization:

    • Ensuring sufficient selectivity for pathogen TMK over human orthologs

    • Balancing broad-spectrum activity with species selectivity

    • Developing inhibitors that exploit subtle structural differences between species

  • Pharmacological hurdles:

    • Optimizing pharmacokinetic properties for in vivo efficacy

    • Achieving sufficient tissue penetration and cellular uptake

    • Addressing potential toxicity concerns

  • Resistance mechanisms:

    • Understanding potential resistance pathways

    • Designing inhibitors with high barriers to resistance

    • Developing appropriate combination strategies

  • Clinical development considerations:

    • Establishing appropriate dosing regimens

    • Identifying suitable clinical indications

    • Designing efficient clinical trials

Addressing these challenges requires continued collaborative research between structural biologists, medicinal chemists, microbiologists, and clinical scientists to fully realize the therapeutic potential of TMK inhibitors.

What novel methodological approaches are emerging in TMK research?

Several innovative approaches are advancing TMK research:

  • Fragment-based drug discovery:

    • Identifying low-molecular-weight fragments that bind to TMK

    • Optimizing and linking fragments to create high-affinity inhibitors

    • Utilizing structural information to guide fragment elaboration

  • Targeted protein degradation:

    • Developing TMK-targeting PROTACs (proteolysis targeting chimeras)

    • Harnessing cellular degradation machinery to eliminate TMK protein

    • Potentially overcoming traditional resistance mechanisms

  • Advanced computational approaches:

    • Molecular dynamics simulations to understand TMK conformational dynamics

    • Machine learning for predicting selective inhibitors

    • Quantum mechanical calculations for more accurate binding predictions

  • Combination strategies:

    • Identifying synergistic combinations of TMK inhibitors with other antimicrobials

    • Dual-targeting inhibitors affecting multiple steps in nucleotide metabolism

    • Adjuvant approaches to enhance TMK inhibitor efficacy

These methodological innovations promise to accelerate the development of TMK-targeted therapeutics and expand their potential applications across diverse pathogen species.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.