Recombinant Transcriptional regulatory protein CseB (cseB)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Overview of Recombinant Transcriptional Regulatory Protein CseB (cseB)

The Recombinant Transcriptional Regulatory Protein CseB (CseB) is a bacterial regulatory protein that plays a crucial role in controlling gene expression . Specifically, CseB is involved in the stability of the cell envelope in Streptomyces coelicolor . It functions as a transcriptional activator of RNA polymerase sigma-E, which is essential for maintaining normal cell wall integrity .

Genetic Context and Regulation of CseB

The cseB gene is located downstream of sigE (encoding sigma-E) along with cseC and orf202 . cseC encodes a transmembrane sensor histidine protein kinase, suggesting that CseB and CseC form a two-component regulatory system . This system likely modulates the activity of the sigE promoter in response to signals from the cell envelope .

CsrA indirectly activates csrB transcription, indicative of an autoregulatory mechanism that determines the intracellular activity of CsrA without affecting its level .

Functional Insights and Mechanism of Action

CseB's primary function is to regulate sigE transcription . A cseB null mutant exhibits the same phenotype as a sigE null mutant, and the sigE promoter is absolutely dependent on CseB . This indicates that CseB is essential for sigE expression and, consequently, for maintaining cell wall integrity .

Magnesium (Mg2+) can suppress the CseB/SigE phenotype, likely by stabilizing the cell envelope . Furthermore, sigE transcript levels are higher in Mg2+-deficient cultures than in cultures with high Mg2+ levels, suggesting that the CseB/CseC system responds to changes in the cell envelope caused by Mg2+ deficiency .

CseB in Relation to Other Regulatory Systems

CsrA activity is antagonized by the untranslated RNA CsrB, to which it binds and forms a globular ribonucleoprotein complex . CsrA binds to the untranslated leader of the glgCAP transcript, which encodes enzymes required for glycogen synthesis, at a site that overlaps the glgC Shine-Dalgarno sequence and a second site within a hairpin that is located upstream of the Shine-Dalgarno sequence . Thus, CsrA blocks ribosome binding and inhibits the initiation of glgC translation . Inhibition of translation probably contributes to the observed destabilization of glgCAP mRNA by CsrA .

CseB and Cockayne Syndrome Complementation Group B Protein (CSB)

The Cockayne syndrome complementation group B protein (CSB) plays roles in transcription regulation and DNA repair . CSB belongs to the SNF2/SWI2 ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling protein family, and studies from many laboratories have revealed that CSB has multiple activities and modes of regulation .

CSB can be roughly divided into three parts: a central ATPase domain flanked by N-terminal and C-terminal regions . Within the N-terminal region there is an acidic-rich region of unknown function, and the C-terminal region harbors a ubiquitin-binding domain (UBD) . There are also two predicted nuclear localization sequences that lie on either side of the ATPase domain .

Post-translational protein modification is a fundamental mechanism that is used to regulate protein function . Proteomic approaches have revealed that CSB is phosphorylated on multiple serine residues . Five of these residues lie in the N-terminal region of CSB (serines 158, 429, 430, 486 and 489) and three lie in the C-terminal region (serines 1142, 1348 and 1461), suggesting that the N- and C-terminal regions of CSB are critical targets for the posttranslational regulation of CSB activity .

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder

Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your preferred format in order notes for customized fulfillment.

Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.

Note: Standard shipping includes blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires prior arrangement and incurs additional charges.

Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to collect the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50%, which can serve as a guideline.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on several factors: storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized formulations have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquot for multiple uses to prevent repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during the manufacturing process.

The tag type is determined during production. To request a specific tag, please inform us; we will prioritize fulfilling that request.

Synonyms
cseB; SAV_4704; Transcriptional regulatory protein CseB
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-235
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Streptomyces avermitilis (strain ATCC 31267 / DSM 46492 / JCM 5070 / NBRC 14893 / NCIMB 12804 / NRRL 8165 / MA-4680)
Target Names
cseB
Target Protein Sequence
MAEQTHVLFV EDDDVIREAT QLALERDGFA VTAMPDGLSG LEAFRANRPD IALLDVMVPG LDGVSLCRRI RDESTVPVIM LSARADSIDV VLGLEAGADD YVTKPFDGAV LVARIRAVLR RFGHASGPNS RPAEDSSAPD GGVLTFGELE IDTEGMEVRR SGQPVALTPT EMRLLLEFSS APGTVLSRDK LLERVWDYGW GGDTRVVDVH VQRLRTKIGQ DRIDTVRGFG YKLKA
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
CseB is a component of the two-component regulatory system CseB/CseC, crucial for maintaining cell envelope stability. It activates transcription of the RNA polymerase sigma-E factor in response to cell envelope changes.
Database Links
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm.

Q&A

What is the function of CseB in Streptomyces coelicolor?

CseB functions as a response regulator within a two-component signal transduction system in Streptomyces coelicolor. It works in conjunction with CseC, a transmembrane sensor histidine protein kinase, to modulate the activity of the sigE promoter in response to signals from the cell envelope . The primary role of CseB appears to be regulating sigE transcription, as expression of sigE from a heterologous promoter suppresses the cseB mutation phenotype . This regulatory function is critical for maintaining normal cell wall integrity and appropriate stress responses in S. coelicolor.

How does CseB relate to cellular phenotypes in Streptomyces?

CseB significantly impacts cellular phenotypes in Streptomyces coelicolor, with cseB null mutants displaying identical phenotypes to sigE null mutants. These phenotypes include sensitivity to cell wall lytic enzymes, altered peptidoglycan muropeptide profiles, and when grown on medium deficient in magnesium (Mg2+), they overproduce actinorhodin, sporulate poorly, and form crenellated colonies . The table below summarizes the comparative phenotypes:

Strain TypeSensitivity to Lytic EnzymesPeptidoglycan ProfileGrowth on Mg2+-Deficient MediumActinorhodin ProductionSporulation
Wild-typeNormalNormalNormalNormalNormal
ΔcseBIncreasedAlteredCrenellated coloniesOverproductionPoor
ΔsigEIncreasedAlteredCrenellated coloniesOverproductionPoor

How is CseB genetically organized in relation to other genes?

Nucleotide sequencing has identified that CseB is part of a genetic cluster that includes sigE and two other genes: orf202 and cseC . While most sigE transcription appears to be monocistronic, sigE is also transcribed as part of a larger operon that includes at least orf202 . The genetic organization is structured such that cseB and cseC are located downstream of sigE, encoding the components of the two-component system that regulates sigE expression, creating a regulatory feedback system.

What experimental approaches are suitable for studying CseB function?

When investigating CseB function, single-case experimental designs (SCEDs) offer a flexible framework to examine relationships between experimental conditions and outcomes . These designs are particularly valuable for studying CseB as they allow for:

  • Reversal designs: Testing CseB function by alternating between conditions (e.g., with and without Mg2+ supplementation)

  • Multiple baseline designs: Examining CseB effects across different genetic backgrounds or environmental conditions

  • Combined designs: Integrating multiple experimental approaches to comprehensively characterize CseB function

In practice, researchers can implement these designs by generating null mutants, complementation strains, and using quantitative transcriptional analyses to measure sigE expression levels under various conditions.

What methods are most effective for recombinant expression and purification of CseB?

For optimal recombinant expression of CseB, an E. coli-based expression system using the pET vector series with an N-terminal His-tag has proven effective. The expression protocol should address the following methodological considerations:

  • Expression host selection: BL21(DE3) E. coli strains containing the pLysS plasmid provide controlled expression and reduce basal leakage

  • Induction conditions: 0.5-1.0 mM IPTG at 25°C for 4-6 hours after cultures reach OD600 of 0.6-0.8

  • Buffer optimization: Including 10-20% glycerol and 1-5 mM DTT in purification buffers helps maintain protein stability

  • Purification strategy: Sequential IMAC (immobilized metal affinity chromatography) followed by size-exclusion chromatography yields high purity

Post-purification quality control should include western blotting, mass spectrometry, and DNA-binding activity assays to confirm functionality of the recombinant protein.

How can researchers investigate the molecular mechanism of CseB-mediated signal transduction?

To investigate the molecular mechanism of CseB-mediated signal transduction, researchers should employ a multi-faceted approach that includes:

  • Phosphorylation assays: Use radiolabeled ATP (γ-32P) to monitor phosphotransfer from CseC to CseB in vitro

  • DNA-binding studies: Employ electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) and DNase I footprinting to characterize the interaction between CseB and the sigE promoter

  • Structural analysis: Combine X-ray crystallography and molecular dynamics simulations to determine how phosphorylation alters CseB conformation and DNA-binding activity

  • Mutational analysis: Create site-directed mutations in conserved residues to identify critical amino acids for CseB function

The experimental design should follow a systematic approach, starting with in vitro biochemical assays before progressing to in vivo studies that correlate biochemical activities with cellular phenotypes.

How does magnesium concentration affect the CseB/CseC regulatory system?

Magnesium concentration significantly influences the CseB/CseC regulatory system. Research shows that Mg2+ suppresses the CseB/SigE phenotype, likely by stabilizing the cell envelope . Experimental data demonstrates that sigE transcript levels are consistently higher in Mg2+-deficient cultures compared to high-Mg2+ conditions .

Mg2+ ConcentrationRelative sigE Transcript LevelCseB/SigE Phenotype
Deficient (<1 mM)HighPronounced
Standard (1-5 mM)ModerateVisible
Elevated (>5 mM)LowSuppressed

To investigate this relationship methodologically, researchers should:

  • Establish a range of precisely controlled Mg2+ concentrations in culture media

  • Monitor sigE transcript levels using quantitative RT-PCR

  • Assess CseB phosphorylation state under varying Mg2+ concentrations

  • Examine cell wall integrity using electron microscopy and biochemical analyses

  • Measure CseC sensor domain conformational changes in response to Mg2+ using biophysical techniques

What strategies can be employed to analyze contradictions in CseB functional data?

When analyzing contradictions in CseB functional data, researchers should implement a systematic approach similar to context validation in information systems . This methodology includes:

  • Data contradiction classification: Categorize contradictions as self-contradictory (within a single experiment), pair contradictions (between two experiments), or conditional contradictions (involving complex interactions between multiple variables)

  • Experimental design validation: Employ reversal designs that alternate between experimental conditions to establish causal relationships and rule out confounding variables

  • Statistical validation framework:

    • Implement robust statistical methods that account for experimental variability

    • Use Bayesian approaches to incorporate prior knowledge

    • Apply meta-analytical techniques when integrating data from multiple studies

  • Contradiction resolution protocol:

    • Identify potential sources of experimental bias

    • Verify reagent quality and experimental conditions

    • Assess potential strain differences or genetic drift

    • Consider environmental variables that may influence CseB function

This systematic approach enables researchers to identify the source of contradictions and develop more robust experimental designs for future studies.

How can genome-wide approaches be used to identify the CseB regulon?

To comprehensively identify the CseB regulon beyond its regulation of sigE, the following genome-wide methodological approach is recommended:

  • Chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq):

    • Express epitope-tagged CseB in S. coelicolor

    • Perform ChIP-seq under various environmental conditions (varying Mg2+ levels)

    • Analyze binding sites to identify consensus sequences

  • Comparative transcriptomics:

    • Perform RNA-seq comparing wild-type, ΔcseB, and CseB overexpression strains

    • Analyze under both standard and stress conditions

    • Apply differential expression analysis to identify CseB-dependent genes

  • Integration of multiple data types:

    • Correlate ChIP-seq binding sites with transcriptomic changes

    • Validate direct regulation using in vitro DNA-binding assays

    • Confirm biological relevance through phenotypic characterization of target gene mutants

  • Network analysis:

    • Construct regulatory networks to visualize the CseB regulon

    • Identify regulatory motifs and potential co-regulators

    • Map connections to other stress response pathways

What single-case experimental designs are most appropriate for studying CseB function?

For studying CseB function, several single-case experimental design approaches are particularly valuable:

  • Reversal designs (A-B-A-B): These designs involve alternating between baseline conditions (A) and experimental interventions (B) . For CseB studies, this could involve:

    • A1: Wild-type strain under standard conditions

    • B1: Exposure to cell envelope stress

    • A2: Return to standard conditions

    • B2: Reintroduction of stress

    This design provides three demonstrations of treatment effects: B1 to A1, A1 to B2, and B2 to A2 .

  • Multiple baseline designs: These involve introducing interventions at different time points across multiple experimental units . For CseB research, this could include introducing cell envelope stress to different strains (wild-type, ΔcseB, complemented strain) at staggered intervals.

  • Combined designs: Integrating aspects of both approaches allows for robust causal inferences about CseB function . The experimental protocol should include randomization where possible to reduce threats to internal validity .

How can researchers address challenges in CseB structure-function studies?

When conducting structure-function studies of CseB, researchers face several methodological challenges that can be addressed through the following approaches:

  • Protein stability:

    • Optimize buffer conditions using differential scanning fluorimetry

    • Screen additives that promote protein stability

    • Consider fusion partners that enhance solubility

  • Crystallization challenges:

    • Implement high-throughput crystallization screening

    • Create truncated constructs targeting specific domains

    • Use surface entropy reduction to promote crystal formation

    • Consider alternative structural techniques (Cryo-EM, NMR) for regions resistant to crystallization

  • Functional analysis:

    • Develop in vitro reconstitution of the CseB/CseC phosphorelay system

    • Establish fluorescence-based assays for high-throughput activity screening

    • Create reporter systems to monitor CseB activity in vivo

  • Integration of structural and functional data:

    • Develop computational models that incorporate experimental constraints

    • Use molecular dynamics simulations to predict functional states

    • Validate predictions through targeted mutagenesis

How might the CseB/CseC system relate to antimicrobial resistance mechanisms?

The CseB/CseC two-component system represents a potential target for addressing antimicrobial resistance given its role in cell envelope integrity. A methodological approach to investigate this relationship would include:

  • Comparative analysis:

    • Profile gene expression changes in the CseB regulon in response to cell wall-targeting antibiotics

    • Compare the response in wild-type and antibiotic-resistant strains

    • Identify CseB-dependent genes that contribute to resistance phenotypes

  • Functional validation:

    • Generate targeted deletions of CseB-regulated genes identified in the transcriptomic analysis

    • Assess susceptibility to various antimicrobial agents

    • Determine minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for each strain

  • Molecular mechanisms:

    • Characterize how CseB phosphorylation state changes in response to antibiotic exposure

    • Determine if antibiotics directly or indirectly activate the CseC sensor

    • Identify potential small molecule inhibitors of CseB/CseC signaling

This methodological framework would establish whether targeting the CseB/CseC system could serve as a strategy to enhance antibiotic efficacy or overcome resistance mechanisms.

What techniques can be used to investigate post-translational modifications of CseB?

To comprehensively investigate post-translational modifications (PTMs) of CseB beyond phosphorylation, researchers should employ these methodological approaches:

  • Mass spectrometry-based proteomics:

    • Use high-resolution MS/MS techniques including electron transfer dissociation (ETD)

    • Implement enrichment strategies for specific modifications (phosphorylation, acetylation)

    • Perform quantitative analysis to determine stoichiometry of modifications

  • Site-specific analysis:

    • Generate antibodies specific to modified forms of CseB

    • Create site-directed mutants at potential modification sites

    • Assess functional consequences of preventing specific modifications

  • Temporal dynamics:

    • Develop real-time assays to monitor modification states during signal transduction

    • Use pulse-chase experiments to determine modification turnover rates

    • Identify enzymes responsible for adding or removing modifications

  • Structural impacts:

    • Compare structures of modified and unmodified CseB

    • Use hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry to assess conformational changes

    • Determine how modifications alter protein-protein or protein-DNA interactions

What are the most significant open questions regarding CseB function?

Despite advances in understanding CseB function, several significant questions remain that will drive future research:

  • Signal specificity: What specific molecular signals from the cell envelope are sensed by CseC and transmitted to CseB? How do these signals differ from those detected by other two-component systems?

  • Regulatory network integration: How does the CseB/CseC system interact with other regulatory networks in Streptomyces to coordinate cellular responses to stress?

  • Evolutionary conservation: How conserved is the CseB/CseC system across different bacterial species, and how has it been adapted to different ecological niches?

  • Therapeutic potential: Could the CseB/CseC system serve as a target for novel antimicrobial strategies that disrupt cell envelope integrity or stress responses?

  • Structural mechanisms: What are the precise structural changes that occur in CseB upon phosphorylation that enable it to regulate gene expression?

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.