Recombinant Treponema denticola 50S ribosomal protein L15 (rplO)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder Note: We will prioritize shipping the format currently in stock. If you require a specific format, please specify this in your order notes.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchase method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates. Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping is available upon request, but will incur additional charges. Please contact us in advance to arrange this.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Before opening, briefly centrifuge the vial to collect the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50%, which can serve as a guideline.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on several factors, including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and the protein's inherent stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized forms have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquot to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during the manufacturing process. The tag type will be determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
rplO; TDE_0786; 50S ribosomal protein L15
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-150
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Treponema denticola (strain ATCC 35405 / CIP 103919 / DSM 14222)
Target Names
rplO
Target Protein Sequence
MFEFNLTVPA GATHKKKIVG RGSSSGWGKT SGKGHKGQQA RSGGKVYAGF EGGQMPLYRR VAKKGFSNYP FKKEFYVVNL AMLETKYSDG ETVNKESLMQ KGLLRKGSLY VKVLGTGDIT KKLTVDVDRI SASAKEKIEK AGGTIVQSEA
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function

Binds to the 23S rRNA.

Database Links

KEGG: tde:TDE0786

STRING: 243275.TDE0786

Protein Families
Universal ribosomal protein uL15 family

Q&A

What is Treponema denticola and why is it significant in periodontal research?

Treponema denticola is an oral spirochete strongly implicated in periodontal disease pathogenesis. It functions as a keystone pathogen that, in association with other members of a complex polymicrobial oral biofilm, contributes to tissue damage and alveolar bone loss . Approximately 30% of the US adult population has at least one periodontal site with demonstrable gingival recession and bone loss . Unlike healthy gingival plaque dominated by facultative Gram-positive bacteria, periodontal lesions harbor a microflora dominated by proteolytic Gram-negative anaerobes and spirochetes . T. denticola numbers are highly elevated in the deepest recesses of active periodontal lesions and persist in cases refractory to standard treatments . Its significance extends beyond periodontal disease, as it serves as a model organism for studying Treponema physiology and host-microbe interactions .

What is the general role of 50S ribosomal protein L15 (rplO) in bacterial systems?

While the search results don't specifically address rplO in T. denticola, ribosomal proteins generally function as components of the translation machinery. The 50S ribosomal protein L15 is part of the large ribosomal subunit involved in protein synthesis. Understanding ribosomal proteins in T. denticola is important because they can potentially have moonlighting functions beyond protein synthesis, including possible roles in stress response, virulence, or interactions with host components, similar to what has been observed with other bacterial ribosomal proteins.

How does the study of ribosomal proteins relate to understanding T. denticola pathogenesis?

Studying ribosomal proteins like rplO can provide insights into basic bacterial physiology and potentially virulence mechanisms. While major virulence factors like the major surface protein (Msp) and dentilisin protease complex have been extensively characterized , ribosomal proteins might contribute to bacterial adaptation in the host environment. Research into T. denticola proteins has revealed sophisticated mechanisms for protein expression, processing, and surface presentation that could be relevant to understanding how ribosomal proteins function in this organism.

What expression systems are recommended for producing recombinant T. denticola rplO?

Based on successful expression of other T. denticola proteins, researchers should consider:

Expression SystemAdvantagesChallengesConsiderations for rplO
E. coliHigh yield, economicalPotential folding issuesMay require optimization of codon usage
Cell-free systemsAvoids toxicity issuesHigher costUseful if rplO is toxic to host cells
Co-expression systemsBetter folding with partnersMore complex setupConsider co-expression with interacting ribosomal components

For experimental validation, researchers have successfully used recombinant expression for various T. denticola proteins, including Msp domains . The expression system choice should be guided by the specific research questions about rplO structure or function.

What mutagenesis approaches are most effective for studying T. denticola proteins?

Several mutagenesis approaches have proven successful with T. denticola proteins:

  • Targeted gene disruption using antibiotic resistance cassettes, as demonstrated with the dentilisin protease complex

  • Allelic replacement mutagenesis for precise genetic alterations

  • Site-directed mutagenesis of specific residues, exemplified by the Ser447→Ala mutation in PrtP

  • Domain deletions to assess functional regions, as shown with Msp N-terminal and C-terminal studies

  • Epitope tag substitutions to study protein domains, as demonstrated with FLAG tag insertions in Msp

For rplO research, these approaches could identify critical residues for ribosome assembly, protein stability, or potential secondary functions.

How can researchers verify the structural integrity and function of recombinant rplO?

To verify structural integrity and function:

  • Mass spectrometry to confirm protein identity and modifications, as performed for Msp fragments

  • Circular dichroism spectroscopy to assess secondary structure

  • Size-exclusion chromatography to determine oligomeric state

  • In vitro translation assays to test functional incorporation into ribosomes

  • Complementation studies in rplO-deficient strains to verify biological activity

Researchers verified Msp structure through proteinase K treatment of intact cells, which released a 25 kDa polypeptide containing the surface epitope, subsequently characterized by LC-MS/MS . Similar approaches could identify structural features of rplO.

How can computational approaches enhance structural understanding of T. denticola proteins?

Advanced computational methods have proven valuable for T. denticola protein research:

  • Metagenome-derived multiple sequence alignment (MSA) algorithms used successfully for Msp modeling

  • Molecular modeling to predict three-dimensional structures, as demonstrated with Msp's predicted β-barrel structure

  • Comparative analysis with orthologous proteins, such as relating T. denticola Msp to T. pallidum TprA-K proteins

  • Integration of experimental data with computational models to refine structural predictions

For rplO, researchers could apply these approaches to model its structure within the context of the T. denticola ribosome, potentially revealing unique features compared to better-characterized bacterial ribosomal proteins.

What protein-protein interaction methods are most suitable for studying ribosomal protein complexes in T. denticola?

Based on successful approaches with other T. denticola proteins:

  • Co-immunoprecipitation with antibodies against specific proteins, which revealed interactions between Msp and PrcA2

  • Pull-down assays with recombinant protein domains

  • Crosslinking followed by mass spectrometry to identify interaction networks

  • Bacterial two-hybrid systems for validating specific interactions

  • Comparative analysis of protein expression in wild-type and mutant strains, which showed that Msp expression is greatly reduced in dentilisin mutants

These methods could identify rplO interactions within the ribosome and potentially reveal unexpected extra-ribosomal interaction partners.

How might rplO research contribute to understanding bacterial adaptation mechanisms?

Research on rplO could provide insights into:

  • Translational regulation during environmental stress

  • Ribosome assembly dynamics in spirochetes

  • Potential moonlighting functions beyond protein synthesis

  • Evolutionary adaptations in the translation machinery of oral spirochetes

  • Comparative analysis with orthologous proteins in related pathogens like T. pallidum

Understanding these aspects could potentially reveal adaptation mechanisms specific to T. denticola's periodontal niche.

What challenges are commonly encountered when studying T. denticola proteins and how can they be addressed?

Researchers face several challenges when studying T. denticola proteins:

ChallengeManifestationSolution Strategies
Genetic manipulationLow transformation efficiencyOptimized transformation protocols and selection systems
Protein expressionFolding and solubility issuesTesting multiple expression systems and solubility tags
Membrane associationDifficulty in purificationDetergent screening and membrane fraction preparation
Complex formationInstability of isolated proteinsCo-expression with interaction partners
Functional assessmentComplexity of in vivo systemsDevelopment of relevant in vitro assays

For example, successful genetic manipulations in T. denticola have been achieved through carefully designed strategies for allelic replacement mutagenesis and fine-scale mutagenesis .

How can researchers distinguish between essential and non-essential functions of ribosomal proteins?

To distinguish between essential and non-essential functions:

  • Generate conditional mutants rather than knockouts if the protein is potentially essential

  • Create domain-specific mutations to separate different functions

  • Use complementation with mutant variants to assess functional requirements

  • Employ ribosome profiling to assess effects on translation

  • Compare growth under different stress conditions to identify condition-specific requirements

These approaches have been successfully applied to study domain functions in other T. denticola proteins, such as the fine-scale mutagenesis of Msp that revealed the importance of both N and C termini for oligomer formation .

What controls are essential when studying the effects of T. denticola ribosomal proteins?

Critical controls include:

  • Expression of unrelated recombinant proteins to control for expression system artifacts

  • Multiple purification methods to ensure reproducibility

  • Validation of protein identity through multiple methods (Western blot, mass spectrometry)

  • Comparison with known ribosomal protein behaviors from model organisms

  • Assessment of endotoxin contamination that could confound functional studies

Researchers studying Msp employed multiple controls, including proteinase K treatment of intact cells to identify surface-exposed domains and immunofluorescence microscopy with specific antibodies to determine protein localization .

How does research on T. denticola ribosomal proteins connect with studies of periodontal disease pathogenesis?

While ribosomal proteins are primarily involved in translation, their study can contribute to understanding periodontal disease through:

  • Identification of adaptation mechanisms specific to the periodontal environment

  • Potential roles in stress responses relevant to survival in the host

  • Possible moonlighting functions in host-pathogen interactions

  • Contributions to antibiotic resistance mechanisms

  • Relationship to expression of established virulence factors like Msp and dentilisin

T. denticola virulence factors like Msp have been shown to bind fibronectin, have cytotoxic pore-forming activity, disrupt intracellular processes, and inhibit neutrophil chemotaxis , while dentilisin induces cell shrinkage and increases permeability of intercellular junctions . Understanding how ribosomal proteins might interact with these virulence systems could provide new insights.

What comparative approaches could reveal insights about rplO evolution among different Treponema species?

Evolutionary analysis approaches could include:

  • Comparative genomics across oral and non-oral Treponema species

  • Analysis of selection pressures on ribosomal proteins

  • Structural comparisons with orthologous proteins from related spirochetes

  • Functional complementation studies across species

  • Examination of ribosomal protein operon organization

The identification of T. denticola msp as an ortholog of the T. pallidum tprA to -K gene family demonstrates the value of comparative approaches for understanding protein evolution in these related pathogens.

How might research on T. denticola rplO contribute to antimicrobial development strategies?

Research on rplO could contribute to antimicrobial development through:

  • Identification of structural differences from human ribosomal counterparts

  • Discovery of spirochete-specific ribosomal protein interactions

  • Understanding of ribosomal assembly mechanisms unique to oral spirochetes

  • Identification of potential binding sites for selective inhibitors

  • Characterization of resistance mechanisms involving ribosomal modifications

Since ribosomal proteins are targets for many existing antibiotics, detailed characterization of T. denticola rplO could potentially reveal novel targets for periodontal pathogen-specific therapeutics.

What emerging technologies could advance our understanding of T. denticola ribosomal proteins?

Emerging technologies with potential applications include:

  • Cryo-electron microscopy for structural determination of intact ribosomes

  • Ribosome profiling to assess translational regulation under different conditions

  • Single-molecule techniques to study ribosome dynamics

  • Proximity labeling approaches to identify novel interaction partners

  • CRISPR interference systems adapted for T. denticola for targeted gene regulation

These technologies could provide unprecedented insights into the structure and function of T. denticola ribosomes and the specific roles of proteins like rplO.

How can systems biology approaches integrate ribosomal protein research with other aspects of T. denticola biology?

Systems approaches could include:

  • Integrative analysis of transcriptomics, proteomics, and ribosome profiling data

  • Network analysis to identify connections between translation and virulence

  • Mathematical modeling of translation dynamics under stress conditions

  • Comparative systems analysis across different growth conditions

  • Integration of structural and functional data across multiple proteins

The search results indicate that gene expression analysis has revealed potential links between dentilisin and iron uptake and homeostasis in T. denticola , demonstrating the value of integrative approaches.

What are the most promising interdisciplinary research directions for T. denticola ribosomal proteins?

Promising interdisciplinary directions include:

  • Structural biology and biophysics to determine atomic-level details of T. denticola ribosomes

  • Immunology research to explore potential immunomodulatory roles of ribosomal proteins

  • Evolutionary biology to understand ribosomal adaptations in host-associated spirochetes

  • Synthetic biology approaches to engineer ribosomes with desired properties

  • Clinical microbiology to translate basic research findings into diagnostic or therapeutic applications

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.