Recombinant Treponema denticola Acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase carboxyl transferase subunit alpha (accA)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference during order placement for customized preparation.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires prior arrangement and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to collect the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our default glycerol concentration is 50% and may serve as a reference for your application.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on several factors: storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized forms have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquoting is essential for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during the manufacturing process.
The tag type will be determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
accA; TDE_0589Acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase carboxyl transferase subunit alpha; ACCase subunit alpha; Acetyl-CoA carboxylase carboxyltransferase subunit alpha; EC 2.1.3.15
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-305
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Treponema denticola (strain ATCC 35405 / CIP 103919 / DSM 14222)
Target Names
accA
Target Protein Sequence
MSNKDQTNLL NNLKDIAQKA GLDISEELAK INAKLESSTA LSKTWERVEL ARHSDRPRTL DYINLIFDNF TELHGDRFFG DDPAMIGGIG FIDGMPVTVI GTQKGRNLRE TIDRNGGMAN PEGYRKAMRL AKQAEKFKRP IITFIDTQGA YPGLGAEERG IGEAIAFNLR EFSRLKTPII CIIIGEGGSG GALGIGVGDK IYMLENAIFS VISPEGCASI LLRDSSRAKD AAAMLKITSQ EVLDLKVING IIPEPEKGAH TDPKKTADAI KEQILKDLAD LTKRDPAVLV KYRSKKIRSI GKYSE
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function

Treponema denticola Acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase carboxyl transferase subunit alpha (accA): A component of the acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase (ACC) complex. Biotin carboxylase first catalyzes the carboxylation of biotin on its carrier protein (BCCP). Subsequently, the CO2 group is transferred by the carboxyltransferase to acetyl-CoA, yielding malonyl-CoA.

Database Links

KEGG: tde:TDE0589

STRING: 243275.TDE0589

Protein Families
AccA family
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm.

Q&A

What is the role of Acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase carboxyl transferase subunit alpha (accA) in Treponema denticola?

Acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase carboxyl transferase subunit alpha (accA) in Treponema denticola is a critical component of the fatty acid biosynthesis pathway. This enzyme catalyzes the rate-limiting step in fatty acid synthesis, specifically the carboxylation of acetyl-CoA to produce malonyl-CoA. In T. denticola, this process is essential for cell membrane formation and maintenance, which directly impacts the organism's survival and virulence in periodontal disease development. Research has demonstrated that T. denticola, like other oral treponemes, exists in multiple genetic lineages within the oral cavity, with strain variations potentially affecting the expression and function of metabolic genes including accA .

How does Treponema denticola accA differ structurally and functionally from accA in other oral treponemes?

Treponema denticola accA exhibits structural and functional distinctions from its homologs in related oral treponemes such as T. vincentii and T. medium. While the core catalytic domains remain conserved across species, T. denticola accA contains unique amino acid sequences that may contribute to its specific activity in different microenvironments within periodontal pockets. Analysis of treponeme populations in subgingival plaque has revealed that T. denticola is more prevalent in deep periodontal pockets compared to other treponeme species, suggesting potential adaptations in its metabolic machinery including accA functionality . Comparative sequence analysis indicates that while T. denticola accA shares approximately 75-80% sequence identity with homologs from other oral treponemes, the differences in specific substrate-binding regions may impact enzyme efficiency and regulation.

What are the optimal conditions for expressing recombinant T. denticola accA in laboratory settings?

For optimal expression of recombinant T. denticola accA, researchers should consider the following methodological approach:

Expression System Selection:

Expression SystemAdvantagesDisadvantagesTypical Yield
E. coli BL21(DE3)High yield, simple protocolsPotential folding issues15-25 mg/L
E. coli RosettaBetter for rare codon usageModerate yield10-18 mg/L
Insect cell systemBetter folding, post-translational modificationsTime-consuming, expensive5-15 mg/L

The optimal protocol involves cloning the accA gene into a pET vector system with an N-terminal His-tag for purification. Expression in E. coli BL21(DE3) should be induced with 0.5-1.0 mM IPTG at OD600 of 0.6-0.8, followed by growth at 18-20°C for 16-18 hours to minimize inclusion body formation . Since T. denticola is a strict anaerobe, consideration of protein folding under aerobic expression conditions is crucial for obtaining functionally active enzyme.

How should researchers design experiments to compare accA gene expression across different T. denticola clinical isolates?

When designing experiments to compare accA gene expression across different T. denticola clinical isolates, researchers should implement a nested experimental design with appropriate controls. This approach accounts for the hierarchical structure of sampling (patient → periodontal pocket → bacterial isolate) while controlling for confounding variables .

Recommended Design Structure:

  • Sample Collection: Obtain subgingival plaque samples from both periodontitis and gingivitis patients (minimum n=10 per group based on power analysis)

  • Isolation Protocol: Use selective media containing rifampicin, polymyxin B, and nalidixic acid to isolate T. denticola strains

  • Strain Verification: Confirm T. denticola identity through 16S rRNA sequencing and species-specific PCR as described in previous literature

  • Expression Analysis: Implement real-time quantitative PCR using TaqMan probes specific to accA gene, with normalization to multiple reference genes (16S rRNA and pyrH)

  • Statistical Analysis: Analyze using a nested ANOVA design with factors for:

    • Disease status (periodontitis vs. gingivitis)

    • Patient (nested within disease status)

    • Sampling site (nested within patient)

    • Clinical isolate (nested within sampling site)

This experimental design allows for rigorous assessment of whether accA expression varies significantly between strains isolated from different disease states while accounting for patient-specific and site-specific variations .

What controls are essential when analyzing the enzymatic activity of recombinant T. denticola accA?

When analyzing enzymatic activity of recombinant T. denticola accA, a comprehensive set of controls must be implemented to ensure reliable and reproducible results:

Essential Controls for accA Enzymatic Assays:

  • Negative Controls:

    • Buffer-only control (substrate without enzyme)

    • Heat-inactivated enzyme control (95°C for 10 minutes)

    • Non-catalytic protein control (e.g., BSA at equivalent concentration)

  • Positive Controls:

    • Commercial acetyl-CoA carboxylase (if available)

    • Well-characterized accA from model organisms (e.g., E. coli)

  • Specificity Controls:

    • Assays with competitive inhibitors of accA

    • Substrate analogs to verify enzyme specificity

  • Technical Controls:

    • Multiple biological replicates (minimum n=3)

    • Technical replicates for each biological sample (minimum n=3)

    • Randomized assay order to control for systematic biases

These controls help distinguish true enzymatic activity from artifacts and provide benchmarks for comparing results across different experimental conditions and between laboratories . Enzyme kinetics should be analyzed using appropriate models (Michaelis-Menten or allosteric models) with statistically robust fitting procedures.

How do you design experiments to resolve contradictory findings about T. denticola accA function in the literature?

Resolving contradictory findings about T. denticola accA function requires a systematic experimental approach that addresses potential sources of discrepancy:

  • Comprehensive Literature Review: First, catalog all contradictory findings with detailed analysis of methodological differences, strain variations, and experimental conditions that might explain discrepancies .

  • Replication Study Design: Design experiments that directly replicate contradictory studies using:

    • Identical strains where possible (or well-characterized substitutes)

    • Matched experimental conditions

    • Blinded assessment of outcomes

    • Increased statistical power (sample sizes calculated based on effect sizes from conflicting studies)

  • Mediating Variable Exploration: Identify potential mediating variables that might explain contradictions, such as:

    • Environmental conditions (pH, oxygen tension, nutrient availability)

    • Strain-specific genetic variations

    • Post-translational modifications

    • Interaction with other cellular components

  • Methodological Triangulation: Apply multiple independent techniques to measure the same parameter:

    • Enzymatic activity assays

    • Protein-protein interaction studies

    • Gene knockout/complementation experiments

    • Structural biology approaches (X-ray crystallography, cryo-EM)

  • Statistical Meta-analysis: Combine data from all available studies using appropriate meta-analytical techniques to determine if contradictions might be explained by random variation or by systematic differences in experimental approaches .

This comprehensive approach can identify whether contradictions reflect true biological variability, methodological differences, or statistical artifacts, leading to a more nuanced understanding of accA function.

What statistical approaches are appropriate for analyzing strain variation in T. denticola accA sequence and expression?

For analyzing strain variation in T. denticola accA sequence and expression, several statistical approaches are appropriate depending on the research question:

For Sequence Variation Analysis:

  • Phylogenetic Analysis:

    • Maximum Likelihood or Bayesian methods to construct phylogenetic trees

    • Bootstrap analysis (minimum 1000 replicates) to assess node support

    • Tests for selection (dN/dS ratio analysis) to identify regions under evolutionary pressure

  • Population Genetics Metrics:

    • Nucleotide diversity (π) and Watterson's theta (θ) to quantify genetic diversity

    • Tajima's D to test for selection or demographic changes

    • F-statistics to assess population structure across clinical isolates

For Expression Variation Analysis:

  • Differential Expression:

    • Nested ANOVA for hierarchical sampling designs (patient → site → isolate)

    • Linear mixed models with random effects for patient and sampling site

    • Post-hoc tests with appropriate corrections for multiple comparisons (e.g., Tukey HSD, Bonferroni)

  • Correlation Analysis:

    • Pearson or Spearman correlation between accA expression and clinical parameters

    • Multiple regression models to identify predictors of expression variation

    • Principal component analysis to identify patterns across multiple genes

The choice between parametric and non-parametric tests should be guided by thorough evaluation of assumptions including normality and homogeneity of variance . For sequence data with potential phylogenetic signal, comparative methods that account for shared evolutionary history (such as phylogenetic independent contrasts) are recommended.

How should researchers address variability in accA expression data across different T. denticola strains?

Addressing variability in accA expression data across different T. denticola strains requires a systematic approach to distinguish biological variation from technical noise:

  • Variance Component Analysis:

    • Implement a variance partitioning approach to quantify sources of variation

    • Perform Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) with nested design to partition variance into:

      • Between-strain variation (genetic factors)

      • Between-patient variation (host factors)

      • Within-strain variation (biological replication)

      • Technical variation (measurement error)

  • Normalization Strategies:

    • Use multiple reference genes validated for stability across experimental conditions

    • Apply geometric averaging of multiple housekeeping genes

    • Consider absolute quantification using digital PCR for highly variable samples

  • Robust Statistical Methods:

    • Apply transformations if data violate parametric test assumptions

    • Use robust statistical methods (e.g., permutation tests) that are less sensitive to outliers

    • Implement Bayesian approaches with appropriate prior distributions based on previous studies

  • Batch Effect Correction:

    • Include batch as a random effect in statistical models

    • Apply correction methods such as ComBat or Surrogate Variable Analysis

    • Use technical replicates across batches to quantify batch-to-batch variation

When reporting results, researchers should include both measures of central tendency and dispersion, and explicitly describe all steps taken to address variability . This approach enables more reliable interpretation of strain differences in accA expression and facilitates comparison across studies.

What approaches can resolve contradictory findings about T. denticola accA in published literature?

Resolving contradictory findings about T. denticola accA in published literature requires a systematic approach that combines critical evaluation, meta-analysis, and new experimental evidence:

  • Systematic Review Process:

    • Develop explicit inclusion/exclusion criteria for relevant studies

    • Extract methodological details including strain information, growth conditions, and analytical methods

    • Formally assess risk of bias in each study using validated tools

    • Create comparison tables highlighting methodological differences between contradictory studies

  • Meta-analytical Approaches:

    • Conduct formal meta-analysis where sufficient quantitative data exist

    • Test for heterogeneity using Q-test and I² statistics

    • Use random-effects models if significant heterogeneity is detected

    • Perform subgroup analyses based on methodological factors

    • Conduct sensitivity analyses excluding potentially biased studies

  • Experimental Resolution Strategies:

    • Design direct replication studies with increased statistical power

    • Implement factorial designs to test interaction effects between variables

    • Use more sensitive or specific techniques than those in original studies

    • Collaborate with original authors to identify unrecognized methodological differences

  • Interpretation Framework:

    • Consider that seemingly contradictory results may reflect genuine biological complexity

    • Evaluate whether "not significant" results truly contradict "significant" findings

    • Assess whether differences in effect size rather than statistical significance drive apparent contradictions

This systematic approach can transform contradictory findings from a limitation into an opportunity for deeper understanding of accA biology and its contextual dependencies.

How can structural analysis of T. denticola accA inform the development of targeted inhibitors?

Structural analysis of T. denticola accA provides crucial insights for developing targeted inhibitors through a multi-stage process:

  • Structural Determination Approaches:

    • X-ray crystallography of purified recombinant accA (2.0-2.5Å resolution)

    • Cryo-electron microscopy for analysis of protein in complex with substrates

    • NMR spectroscopy for dynamic regions and ligand interactions

    • Computational modeling based on homologous proteins when experimental structures are unavailable

  • Structure-Based Drug Design Strategy:

    • Identify unique binding pockets present in T. denticola accA but absent in human ACC

    • Focus on catalytic site and allosteric regulatory sites

    • Map conservation of binding sites across oral treponemes to assess spectrum of activity

    • Apply molecular dynamics simulations to identify transient binding pockets

  • Virtual Screening Workflow:

    • Use pharmacophore-based and structure-based virtual screening

    • Molecular docking of compound libraries against identified binding sites

    • Score compounds based on predicted binding energy and interactions

    • Filter compounds for drug-likeness properties and synthetic accessibility

  • Experimental Validation Pipeline:

    • Enzymatic inhibition assays with top virtual screening hits

    • Structure-activity relationship studies to optimize lead compounds

    • X-ray crystallography of enzyme-inhibitor complexes to confirm binding mode

    • Cellular assays to determine effects on T. denticola growth and virulence

This integrated approach leverages structural insights to develop inhibitors that could serve as research tools for studying accA function or as potential therapeutic agents targeting T. denticola in periodontal disease .

What are the most effective approaches for studying the role of T. denticola accA in multispecies oral biofilms?

Studying the role of T. denticola accA in multispecies oral biofilms requires sophisticated experimental approaches that capture the complexity of the periodontal microenvironment:

  • Biofilm Model Selection and Development:

    • Flow cell systems that simulate subgingival environment

    • Constant depth film fermenters (CDFF) for mature biofilm development

    • Saliva-coated hydroxyapatite discs to mimic tooth surface

    • Microfluidic devices for spatial control of bacterial interactions

  • Genetic Manipulation Strategies:

    • Construction of accA conditional knockdown strains using tetracycline-inducible systems

    • CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) for tunable gene repression

    • Fluorescent protein tagging of accA for localization studies

    • Complementation with wild-type or mutant accA variants

  • Analytical Methods:

    • Confocal laser scanning microscopy with species-specific fluorescent probes

    • Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for spatial distribution analysis

    • Laser capture microdissection coupled with RNA-Seq for localized transcriptomics

    • Imaging mass spectrometry for spatial metabolomics

  • Interaction Analysis:

    • Co-aggregation assays between T. denticola and other oral bacteria

    • Metabolic labeling to track carbon flow between species

    • Differential gene expression analysis in mono- versus multi-species biofilms

    • Quorum sensing molecule identification and functional analysis

Research has demonstrated that T. denticola exists within complex multispecies communities where metabolic interactions significantly impact gene expression and virulence . Understanding accA function in this context provides insights into how fatty acid metabolism contributes to T. denticola survival and pathogenicity within the polymicrobial environment of periodontal disease.

How can comparative genomics approaches enhance understanding of accA conservation and evolution across oral treponemes?

Comparative genomics approaches provide powerful insights into accA conservation and evolution across oral treponemes through several methodological strategies:

  • Phylogenomic Analysis:

    • Whole genome sequencing of diverse oral treponeme isolates

    • Construction of core and pan-genome for treponeme species

    • Phylogenetic analysis based on single-copy orthologs

    • Ancestral state reconstruction to infer evolutionary history

  • Synteny and Gene Context Analysis:

    • Examination of genomic regions flanking accA

    • Identification of operon structures and conservation

    • Analysis of mobile genetic elements and horizontal gene transfer signatures

    • Mapping of regulatory elements and their conservation

  • Selection Analysis:

    • Calculation of dN/dS ratios across accA sequence

    • Site-specific selection models to identify functionally important residues

    • Branch-site tests to detect lineage-specific selection

    • Population genetics approaches using clinical isolate data

  • Structure-Function Correlation:

    • Mapping of sequence conservation onto structural models

    • Identification of conserved catalytic residues versus variable surface regions

    • Coevolution analysis to identify functional interaction networks

    • Integration with experimental data on enzyme kinetics and substrate specificity

Research has shown that oral treponemes harbor diverse genetic lineages even within the same species, with individuals commonly carrying multiple strains of T. denticola . Comparative genomics can reveal whether accA diversity follows species boundaries or shows evidence of horizontal gene transfer and functional diversification across the oral treponeme community.

What are the key considerations for purifying recombinant T. denticola accA for structural and functional studies?

Purifying recombinant T. denticola accA for structural and functional studies requires careful optimization of multiple parameters:

Purification Strategy Table:

Purification StageMethodCritical ParametersTroubleshooting
Initial CaptureIMAC (Ni-NTA)pH 7.5-8.0, 20-40 mM imidazole in wash bufferIncrease imidazole in wash if contaminants persist
IntermediateIon ExchangeTest both anion (Q) and cation (S) exchangers at pH 6.5-8.5Optimize salt gradient based on elution profile
PolishingSize ExclusionFlow rate <0.5 ml/min, sample <5% column volumePre-filter samples, add 5% glycerol to prevent aggregation
Quality ControlDLS, SDS-PAGE, Western Blot, Mass Spec>95% purity by densitometry, monodisperse by DLSCentrifuge samples before DLS, optimize storage buffer

Key considerations include:

  • Buffer Optimization:

    • Test stability in various buffers (HEPES, Tris, Phosphate) at pH 6.5-8.0

    • Include reducing agents (1-5 mM DTT or TCEP) to prevent disulfide formation

    • Add stabilizers (10% glycerol, 150-300 mM NaCl) to prevent aggregation

    • Consider detergents (0.01-0.05% Triton X-100) if hydrophobic regions cause issues

  • Solubility Enhancement:

    • Express at lower temperatures (16-20°C) to improve folding

    • Co-express with chaperones (GroEL/ES, DnaK) for difficult constructs

    • Test fusion partners (MBP, SUMO) with cleavable linkers

    • Optimize cell lysis conditions to prevent aggregation

  • Activity Preservation:

    • Incorporate cofactors or substrates in purification buffers

    • Minimize freeze-thaw cycles (store small aliquots)

    • Determine optimal storage conditions (temperature, additives)

    • Perform activity assays at each purification step to track specific activity

  • Oligomeric State Analysis:

    • Analyze by size exclusion chromatography with multi-angle light scattering

    • Native PAGE to assess oligomeric distribution

    • Cross-linking studies to capture transient interactions

    • Analytical ultracentrifugation for accurate molecular weight determination

Each of these parameters should be systematically optimized based on the intended downstream application, whether it be enzymatic assays, crystallization trials, or binding studies .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.