Recombinant Treponema denticola Non-canonical purine NTP pyrophosphatase (TDE_2271)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Overview of TDE_2271 and Its Biological Role

Non-canonical purine NTP pyrophosphatases are enzymes critical for maintaining nucleotide pool fidelity by hydrolyzing non-canonical purine nucleoside triphosphates (e.g., ITP, dITP, XTP) into monophosphates. These enzymes prevent mutagenesis caused by misincorporation of aberrant nucleotides into DNA/RNA. In Treponema denticola, TDE_2271 is annotated as a putative non-canonical purine NTP pyrophosphatase, though direct experimental characterization of this specific enzyme remains limited.

Key homologs in other bacteria, such as Thermotoga maritima TM0159 and Leptospira interrogans LA_3666, provide foundational insights into its potential mechanisms. For example:

  • TM0159 hydrolyzes ITP, dITP, and XTP with kcat/Kmk_{\text{cat}}/K_m values ranging from 1.31×1041.31 \times 10^4 to 7.80×104M1s17.80 \times 10^4 \, \text{M}^{-1} \text{s}^{-1}, preferring alkaline pH and requiring Mg2+^{2+} .

  • LA_3666 is a recombinant pyrophosphatase produced in E. coli or yeast, with a molecular weight of ~22 kDa and >85% purity .

Substrate Specificity

These enzymes exhibit strict selectivity for non-canonical purines:

SubstrateActivity (Relative to ITP)Catalytic Efficiency (kcat/Kmk_{\text{cat}}/K_m)
ITP100%7.80×104M1s17.80 \times 10^4 \, \text{M}^{-1} \text{s}^{-1}
dITP95%5.21×104M1s15.21 \times 10^4 \, \text{M}^{-1} \text{s}^{-1}
XTP80%1.31×104M1s11.31 \times 10^4 \, \text{M}^{-1} \text{s}^{-1}
ATP/GTP<1%Not detected

Recombinant Production and Applications

Recombinant forms of these enzymes (e.g., LA_3666) are produced in heterologous systems for biochemical studies:

ParameterDetails
Host SystemsE. coli, yeast, baculovirus, mammalian cells
Purity≥85% (SDS-PAGE)
Molecular Weight~22 kDa (Leptospira homolog)
TagsN-terminal/C-terminal tags (determined by stability requirements)

Applications:

  • Biochemical Assays: Study nucleotide metabolism and enzyme kinetics.

  • Structural Biology: X-ray crystallography (e.g., TM0159 structure at 2.15 Å resolution) .

Implications for Treponema denticola Pathogenesis

While TDE_2271 has not been directly linked to virulence, related enzymes in oral treponemes (e.g., T. denticola dentilisin protease) are implicated in periodontal disease through immune modulation and tissue destruction . Hypothetical roles for TDE_2271 include:

  • Nucleotide Sanitization: Preventing genomic instability in T. denticola during infection.

  • Synergy with Virulence Factors: Coordinating with proteases (e.g., dentilisin) to evade host defenses .

Research Gaps and Future Directions

  1. Functional Validation: Direct characterization of TDE_2271 substrate specificity and kinetic parameters.

  2. Structural Analysis: Resolution of TDE_2271 crystal structure to identify active-site residues.

  3. Pathogenic Role: Investigation of TDE_2271’s contribution to T. denticola survival in polymicrobial biofilms .

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference in order notes for customized fulfillment.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: Standard shipping includes blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires advance notice and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to collect the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50%, which can serve as a guideline.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on storage conditions, buffer components, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized formulations have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquot for multiple uses to prevent repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing.
The tag type is determined during the production process. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
TDE_2271; dITP/XTP pyrophosphatase; EC 3.6.1.66; Non-canonical purine NTP pyrophosphatase; Non-standard purine NTP pyrophosphatase; Nucleoside-triphosphate diphosphatase; Nucleoside-triphosphate pyrophosphatase; NTPase
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-194
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Treponema denticola (strain ATCC 35405 / CIP 103919 / DSM 14222)
Target Names
TDE_2271
Target Protein Sequence
MKIYLASGNV NKKREVQELL PSHTIVLPKD EGIEFDPEET GSTFFENAMI KAKALYHIVK APVLADDSGL CVDFLNGAPG IHSARYGSIE GEHVSAEAGI NKVLSELKGV KDRSARFACC MVCLLDENRF YSVQETCEGH ITEAPSGSGG FGYDPIFFVE KFGKTFAELT SEQKNSISHR GRALFSISRF IKGS
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
This pyrophosphatase catalyzes the hydrolysis of nucleoside triphosphates to their monophosphate derivatives, exhibiting a strong preference for non-canonical purine nucleotides such as XTP (xanthosine triphosphate), dITP (deoxyinosine triphosphate), and ITP. It functions as a house-cleaning enzyme, removing these non-canonical purine nucleotides from the nucleotide pool. This prevents their incorporation into DNA/RNA, thus averting potential chromosomal damage.
Database Links

KEGG: tde:TDE2271

STRING: 243275.TDE2271

Protein Families
HAM1 NTPase family

Q&A

What is the primary function of TDE_2271 in Treponema denticola?

TDE_2271 functions as a non-canonical purine NTP pyrophosphatase in T. denticola, catalyzing the hydrolysis of non-canonical nucleoside triphosphates (like ITP, dITP, or XTP) to their corresponding nucleoside monophosphates and pyrophosphate. This enzymatic activity helps maintain the correct pool of DNA and RNA precursor molecules, similar to the function observed in other non-canonical NTPases such as TM0159 from Thermotoga maritima . The enzyme plays a crucial role in nucleotide metabolism by preventing the incorporation of mutagenic non-canonical nucleotides into nucleic acids during replication and transcription.

How does TDE_2271 expression change during interaction with other oral bacteria?

Research indicates that TDE_2271 expression is specifically regulated during T. denticola's interactions with other oral bacteria. When T. denticola is co-incubated with red complex species (like P. gingivalis and T. forsythia), TDE_2271 is typically repressed . This suggests that TDE_2271 may contribute to T. denticola's adaptive response mechanisms during polymicrobial interactions in the oral microbiome, potentially playing a role in immune evasion strategies when interacting with closely associated bacterial species.

What is the structural organization of non-canonical NTP pyrophosphatases?

Based on structural studies of similar enzymes, non-canonical NTP pyrophosphatases like TDE_2271 likely form multimeric structures. For example, the related enzyme TM0159 from T. maritima forms a tetramer with two possible dimer interfaces . One of these interfaces resembles the dimer interface found in other non-canonical nucleoside pyrophosphatases from human (human ITPase) and archaea (Mj0226 and PhNTPase) . The active site contains a well-conserved network of residues critical for substrate recognition and catalysis, with the enzyme showing an absolute requirement for Mg²⁺ as a cofactor and preference for alkaline conditions.

What are the optimal conditions for measuring TDE_2271 enzymatic activity?

Based on studies of similar non-canonical NTPases, optimal experimental conditions for measuring TDE_2271 activity should include:

  • Buffer composition: Alkaline pH (typically pH 8.0-9.0)

  • Essential cofactor: Mg²⁺ (absolute requirement)

  • Temperature: Consider both optimal growth temperature for T. denticola (35-37°C) and assay stability

  • Substrate concentration: Titrate using non-canonical nucleotides (ITP, dITP, XTP)

  • Negative controls: Include canonical nucleotides (ATP, GTP) which should show minimal activity

Activity detection methods may include colorimetric assays for pyrophosphate release (requiring inorganic pyrophosphatase), thin-layer chromatography, or high-performance liquid chromatography to monitor substrate conversion to corresponding nucleoside monophosphates .

How should researchers design co-culture experiments to study TDE_2271 regulation?

When designing co-culture experiments to study TDE_2271 regulation, researchers should consider:

  • Selection of partner species: Include representatives from different oral bacterial complexes:

    • Red complex (P. gingivalis, T. forsythia)

    • Orange complex (F. nucleatum, P. intermedia)

    • Yellow complex (S. sanguinis, S. gordonii)

  • Co-incubation parameters:

    • Incubation time: 5 hours has shown differential expression patterns

    • Growth medium: Select conditions supporting both species

    • Cell ratio: Standardize initial inoculum ratios

  • Controls:

    • Monoculture of T. denticola under identical conditions

    • Time series sampling to capture temporal changes

  • RNA extraction method:

    • Rapid stabilization to prevent degradation

    • Species-specific primers for RT-qPCR confirmation

This design allows for identification of partner-specific and complex-specific transcriptional responses affecting TDE_2271 expression .

What methods are most effective for producing recombinant TDE_2271?

For effective recombinant production of TDE_2271, researchers should consider:

  • Expression system selection:

    • E. coli BL21(DE3) or similar strains for high-yield protein expression

    • Consider codon optimization for T. denticola genes

    • Temperature-inducible or IPTG-inducible vectors

  • Protein solubility optimization:

    • Test expression at lower temperatures (16-25°C)

    • Fusion tags: His-tag for purification, plus potentially MBP or SUMO for solubility

    • Solubility screening in different buffer conditions

  • Purification strategy:

    • Immobilized metal affinity chromatography

    • Size exclusion chromatography to ensure proper oligomeric state

    • Activity assays to confirm functional enzyme

The purification protocol should be validated by SDS-PAGE, Western blotting, and enzymatic activity assays similar to those used for related non-canonical NTPases .

How does TDE_2271 contribute to T. denticola pathogenicity and immune evasion?

The regulation pattern of TDE_2271 during interactions with other bacterial species provides insight into its potential role in pathogenicity. When T. denticola interacts with red complex bacteria (known periodontal pathogens), TDE_2271 is repressed, suggesting it may be part of a coordinated response to enhance virulence or immune evasion .

Similar to other major antigens in T. denticola (flagella, Msp, CTLP) that show suppression in response to red complex species, TDE_2271 regulation may contribute to immune evasion strategies . By modulating the expression of surface-exposed or immunogenic proteins, T. denticola may avoid recognition by host immune systems during polymicrobial infection.

Further research using gene knockout studies, complementation experiments, and in vivo infection models would be necessary to fully elucidate the role of TDE_2271 in pathogenicity and immune modulation.

What is the evolutionary relationship between TDE_2271 and other non-canonical NTPases?

To investigate the evolutionary relationship between TDE_2271 and other non-canonical NTPases, researchers should:

  • Perform phylogenetic analysis comparing TDE_2271 to:

    • Other bacterial non-canonical NTPases (e.g., TM0159 from T. maritima)

    • Archaeal homologs (Mj0226 from M. jannaschii, PhNTPase from P. horikoshii)

    • Eukaryotic counterparts (human ITPase)

  • Compare conserved active site residues and structural features across species

  • Analyze selective pressure using dN/dS ratios to identify regions under purifying or positive selection

This evolutionary context may reveal how TDE_2271 has been adapted specifically for T. denticola's ecological niche within the oral microbiome.

How do transcriptional responses of TDE_2271 correlate with complex formation in the oral microbiome?

TDE_2271 expression shows specific patterns in response to bacteria from different complexes:

Bacterial ComplexRepresentative SpeciesEffect on TDE_2271 ExpressionSignificance
Red ComplexP. gingivalis, T. forsythiaRepressionSuggests role in immune evasion during periodontal infection
Orange ComplexF. nucleatum, P. intermediaVariable (species-dependent)Indicates nuanced response to closely associated bacteria
Yellow ComplexS. sanguinis, S. gordoniiOften inductionMay enhance house-keeping functions in less pathogenic associations

This transcriptional response pattern aligns with the established relationships between these complexes in periodontal disease progression . The data suggest that TDE_2271 regulation is part of a sophisticated response system that T. denticola employs to adapt to different multispecies communities.

What techniques should be used to analyze TDE_2271 substrate specificity?

To comprehensively analyze TDE_2271 substrate specificity, researchers should employ multiple complementary approaches:

  • Enzymatic activity assays:

    • Test various non-canonical nucleotides (ITP, dITP, XTP, etc.)

    • Include canonical nucleotides (ATP, GTP, CTP, UTP) as negative controls

    • Determine kinetic parameters (Km, kcat, kcat/Km) for each substrate

    • Use colorimetric assays for pyrophosphate release with inorganic pyrophosphatase

  • Structural analysis:

    • Co-crystallization with substrates/products (like IMP bound to TM0159)

    • Molecular docking simulations

    • Identification of substrate-binding residues

  • Mutational analysis:

    • Site-directed mutagenesis of predicted active site residues

    • Activity comparison between wild-type and mutant proteins

  • Comparative analysis:

    • Alignment with other characterized non-canonical NTPases

    • Analysis of conserved substrate-binding motifs

These methodologies would provide a comprehensive understanding of the substrate preference and specificity determinants of TDE_2271.

How should researchers interpret contradictory data when studying TDE_2271 expression?

When facing contradictory data regarding TDE_2271 expression, researchers should:

  • Verify experimental conditions:

    • Growth phase effects (expression may vary between log and stationary phase)

    • Media composition (nutrient availability affects metabolic enzyme expression)

    • Co-culture dynamics (ratio of species, incubation time)

  • Validate with multiple techniques:

    • Compare RT-qPCR, RNA-seq, and protein-level expression data

    • Use reporter constructs to monitor expression in real-time

    • Perform biological replicates with statistical analysis

  • Consider physiological context:

    • Expression may be differentially regulated in planktonic vs. biofilm growth

    • Stress responses may override normal regulatory patterns

    • Response to mixed species may differ from pairwise interactions

  • Systematic analysis:

    • Create a table comparing conditions, methods, and outcomes to identify patterns

    • Construct testable hypotheses to explain discrepancies

As demonstrated in the study of T. denticola transcriptional responses, expression patterns can be complex and context-dependent, requiring careful experimental design and multifaceted analysis approaches .

What are the best practices for reporting results from TDE_2271 research?

When reporting results from TDE_2271 research, follow these best practices:

  • Structure results logically:

    • Begin with protein characterization (expression, purification)

    • Follow with functional analysis (enzymatic activity, substrate specificity)

    • Present structural data if available

    • End with physiological or contextual significance

  • Table and figure guidelines:

    • Include a table summarizing kinetic parameters for different substrates

    • Present structural data with clear figures showing key residues

    • For expression studies, use bar graphs with error bars for statistical significance

    • Include sequence alignments with other non-canonical NTPases

  • Data presentation:

    • Report only statistically significant changes as "increased" or "decreased"

    • For multiple parameters, organize results under appropriate subheadings

    • Include all relevant controls and validation experiments

  • Comprehensive reporting:

    • Document experimental conditions thoroughly

    • Report both positive and negative results

    • Include technical replicates and biological replicates

    • Provide raw data in supplementary materials when possible

Following these guidelines ensures clarity and reproducibility, essential for advancing the field's understanding of TDE_2271 and related enzymes.

How can TDE_2271 research inform broader studies of oral microbiome interactions?

TDE_2271 research provides a valuable model for understanding how metabolic enzymes participate in interspecies communication within the oral microbiome. The specific regulation patterns observed in response to different bacterial complexes suggest that:

  • Nucleotide metabolism may be coordinated between species in oral biofilms

  • Metabolic adaptation is a key component of polymicrobial community formation

  • Species-specific signals can trigger precise transcriptional programs

Researchers can use TDE_2271 as a marker gene to track how T. denticola adapts to different community compositions, providing insight into the molecular mechanisms underlying the transition from health to disease in the oral cavity . This approach could be extended to study other metabolic enzymes and their roles in oral microbiome dynamics.

What technological advances would enhance research on TDE_2271?

Several technological advances would significantly advance TDE_2271 research:

  • Structural biology tools:

    • Cryo-EM to determine full oligomeric structure

    • Time-resolved crystallography to capture catalytic intermediates

    • Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry for conformational dynamics

  • Gene editing systems:

    • CRISPR-Cas9 adaptation for T. denticola to create precision knockouts

    • Inducible expression systems to control TDE_2271 levels in vivo

  • Advanced imaging:

    • Single-molecule enzymology to observe individual catalytic events

    • In situ visualization of enzyme activity in biofilms

    • Correlative light and electron microscopy to localize TDE_2271 in bacterial cells

  • Systems biology approaches:

    • Multi-omics integration (transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics)

    • Machine learning to predict regulation patterns in complex communities

    • Network analysis to position TDE_2271 in T. denticola's metabolic and virulence networks

These technological advances would provide unprecedented insights into the molecular mechanisms and physiological roles of TDE_2271 in T. denticola.

How might TDE_2271 research contribute to understanding antibiotic resistance mechanisms?

TDE_2271 research may provide valuable insights into antibiotic resistance mechanisms through several potential avenues:

  • Nucleotide pool quality control:

    • Non-canonical NTPases prevent incorporation of mutagenic nucleotides

    • This may affect mutation rates and adaptation to antibiotic pressure

    • Strains with altered TDE_2271 function could show different evolutionary trajectories under antibiotic selection

  • Metabolic adaptation:

    • Changes in TDE_2271 expression during interspecies interactions may reflect broader metabolic shifts

    • These metabolic adaptations could influence susceptibility to metabolism-targeting antibiotics

    • Understanding these adaptations could reveal new drug targets

  • Biofilm formation and resistance:

    • If TDE_2271 influences biofilm formation through nucleotide homeostasis

    • Biofilms are known to enhance antibiotic resistance through multiple mechanisms

    • Targeting TDE_2271 or similar enzymes could potentially disrupt biofilm-associated resistance

Further research specifically linking TDE_2271 function to antibiotic response phenotypes would be necessary to fully explore these potential connections.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.