KEGG: tpa:TP_0055
STRING: 243276.TP0055
TP_0055 is an uncharacterized protein from Treponema pallidum, the bacterium responsible for syphilis infection. Based on available data, TP_0055 is a relatively small protein consisting of 78 amino acids with the sequence: MNQIRLFAQSALVSVMGMGMVFAFLLLLICVVRCVGALVSSFGWDRGPDEGVGAAVPAGGALAAAIAVAVHEKARSTS . The protein appears to contain hydrophobic regions suggesting possible membrane association, though its precise functional role remains under investigation. The recombinant form commonly used in research includes an N-terminal His-tag to facilitate purification and detection .
E. coli is the predominant expression system used for recombinant TP_0055 production . The methodology involves:
Cloning the TP_0055 gene sequence into an appropriate expression vector
Transforming the construct into a compatible E. coli strain
Inducing protein expression under optimized conditions
Harvesting and lysing cells
Purifying the His-tagged protein using affinity chromatography
When designing your expression system, consider codon optimization for E. coli if expression yields are suboptimal. Alternative expression systems such as yeast or insect cells might be considered for specific research applications requiring eukaryotic post-translational modifications, though these are rarely necessary for basic structural or immunological studies of T. pallidum proteins.
Optimal storage conditions for recombinant TP_0055 are as follows:
When handling the protein:
Add glycerol (recommended final concentration: 50%) before aliquoting for freezer storage
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles as they significantly reduce protein integrity
For His-tagged recombinant TP_0055, immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) is the primary purification method. The typical workflow includes:
Cell lysis under native or denaturing conditions
Binding to Ni-NTA or similar metal-chelating resin
Washing to remove non-specifically bound proteins
Elution with imidazole gradient or pH shift
Buffer exchange to remove imidazole
To achieve >90% purity as noted in commercial preparations , secondary purification steps may be necessary:
Size exclusion chromatography to separate based on molecular weight
Ion exchange chromatography for charge-based separation
Endotoxin removal for applications sensitive to bacterial lipopolysaccharides
Confirm purification success using SDS-PAGE and/or Western blotting with anti-His antibodies.
Designing robust experiments to investigate TP_0055's role in pathogenesis requires a systematic approach:
Formulate specific hypotheses about TP_0055's function based on:
Sequence analysis and structural predictions
Comparison with homologous proteins in other organisms
Temporal expression patterns during infection
Design experimental treatments that manipulate your independent variables :
In vitro binding assays with host components
Protein localization studies
Expression level analysis under different conditions
Use appropriate controls:
Other recombinant T. pallidum proteins with known functions
Mutated versions of TP_0055
Host cells or tissues from different sources
A potential experimental design might include:
Experiment Type | Independent Variable | Dependent Variable | Controls | Expected Outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|
Host cell binding | TP_0055 concentration | Binding affinity | Negative: BSA; Positive: Known adhesin | Quantitative binding parameters |
Immune response | TP_0055 exposure | Cytokine production | Untreated cells; TLR ligands | Inflammatory profile |
Localization | Growth conditions | TP_0055 distribution | Other membrane proteins | Cellular location |
Remember to control extraneous variables through randomization and blinding where appropriate .
While specific data on TP_0055's diagnostic utility is limited in the provided search results, we can establish a framework for comparison based on known high-performance T. pallidum antigens:
Several recombinant T. pallidum proteins have demonstrated excellent diagnostic potential:
To evaluate TP_0055's diagnostic potential, researchers should:
Conduct parallel ELISA assays using:
Calculate sensitivity and specificity values:
Sensitivity = true positives/(true positives + false negatives)
Specificity = true negatives/(true negatives + false positives)
Compare reactivity patterns with conventional tests:
Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) test
Microhemagglutination assay for T. pallidum (MHA-TP)
An advantage of recombinant T. pallidum antigens over crude antigen preparations is the standardized production process and reduced biosafety concerns .
Characterizing protein-protein interactions involving TP_0055 requires multiple complementary approaches:
In vitro interaction assays:
Pull-down assays using His-tagged TP_0055 as bait
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) to determine binding kinetics
ELISA-based interaction assays
Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) for thermodynamic parameters
Structural analysis techniques:
X-ray crystallography of TP_0055 with binding partners
NMR spectroscopy for dynamic interaction studies
Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS)
Cryo-electron microscopy for larger complexes
Computational approaches:
Molecular docking simulations
Sequence-based interaction prediction
Structural homology modeling
Validation in cellular contexts:
Co-immunoprecipitation from T. pallidum or recombinant expression systems
Proximity labeling techniques (BioID, APEX)
Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)
When reporting interaction data, include quantitative measurements:
Method | Parameters to Report | Units | Significance |
---|---|---|---|
SPR | KD, kon, koff | M, M-1s-1, s-1 | Binding affinity and kinetics |
ITC | ΔH, ΔS, ΔG | kJ/mol | Thermodynamic profile |
Pull-down | Enrichment ratio | Fold change | Qualitative interaction strength |
When facing inconsistent results with TP_0055 experiments, employ a systematic troubleshooting approach:
Evaluate protein quality:
Optimize experimental conditions:
Apply statistical rigor:
Increase technical and biological replicates
Use appropriate statistical tests
Implement randomization and blinding when possible
Calculate effect sizes and confidence intervals
Consider biological complexity:
Test for post-translational modifications
Evaluate oligomerization states
Investigate cofactor requirements
Assess native vs. recombinant protein differences
When reporting inconsistent results, present them transparently with a detailed discussion of possible sources of variation and their biological significance.
When designing immunoassays with recombinant TP_0055, consider these critical factors:
Assay format selection:
Direct ELISA: Simple but may have higher background
Sandwich ELISA: Better specificity but requires two non-competing antibodies
Competitive ELISA: Useful for small proteins like TP_0055
Optimization parameters:
Coating concentration (typically 1-10 μg/mL)
Blocking agent (BSA, casein, or commercial blockers)
Sample dilution series
Incubation times and temperatures
Detection system (colorimetric, fluorescent, chemiluminescent)
Validation requirements:
Establish standard curves with purified TP_0055
Determine limit of detection and quantification
Assess cross-reactivity with related proteins
Evaluate matrix effects from biological samples
Controls and normalization:
For syphilis diagnostic applications, compare performance to established antigens like Tp0453, Tp92, and Gpd, which have shown excellent sensitivity and specificity in previous studies .
To evaluate TP_0055 functionality, consider these experimental design principles:
Independent variables: TP_0055 concentration, experimental conditions
Dependent variables: Binding activity, immune response, structural changes
Control variables: Buffer composition, temperature, incubation time
Formulate testable hypotheses :
Null hypothesis: TP_0055 does not interact with specific host components
Alternative hypothesis: TP_0055 binds to specific host receptors/proteins
Design controls:
Positive controls: Known T. pallidum antigens with established functions
Negative controls: Irrelevant proteins of similar size/structure
Technical controls: Buffer-only samples, heat-denatured protein
Determine appropriate sample size:
Conduct power analysis based on expected effect size
Plan for sufficient biological and technical replicates
Consider resource constraints and ethical considerations
Select appropriate statistical approaches:
Parametric vs. non-parametric tests based on data distribution
Correction for multiple comparisons when testing several conditions
Analysis of variance for multi-factorial designs
Example experimental design for investigating TP_0055 host cell interactions:
Group | Treatment | Sample Size | Measurements | Analysis Method |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | TP_0055 (10 μg/mL) | n=6 | Adhesion, cytokine production | ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc |
2 | TP_0055 (1 μg/mL) | n=6 | Adhesion, cytokine production | ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc |
3 | Heat-denatured TP_0055 | n=6 | Adhesion, cytokine production | ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc |
4 | Known T. pallidum adhesin | n=6 | Adhesion, cytokine production | ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc |
5 | Buffer only | n=6 | Adhesion, cytokine production | ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc |
When encountering contradictory findings about TP_0055 in the research literature, apply these systematic approaches:
Conduct a thorough literature analysis:
Create a detailed comparison table of contradictory studies
Identify methodological differences (expression systems, purification methods, assay conditions)
Assess sample sizes and statistical power of each study
Evaluate the quality of controls and validation approaches
Examine potential sources of variation:
Different recombinant constructs (tag position, fusion partners)
Varying buffer compositions and assay conditions
Distinct biological systems (cell lines, animal models)
Sample handling and storage differences
Design reconciliation experiments:
Replicate key experiments using standardized protocols
Test multiple conditions spanning those reported in contradictory studies
Include appropriate positive and negative controls
Collaborate with authors of contradictory papers when possible
Apply meta-analysis techniques:
Combine data across studies where methodologically appropriate
Weight findings by study quality and sample size
Calculate effect sizes rather than relying solely on p-values
Identify moderator variables that might explain discrepancies
Report findings transparently:
Acknowledge limitations of your reconciliation attempts
Present all data, including those that don't support your hypothesis
Discuss remaining uncertainties and propose next steps
Consider pre-registering reconciliation studies to avoid bias
Structural characterization of TP_0055 requires a multi-technique approach:
The 78-amino acid length of TP_0055 makes it particularly suitable for NMR structural determination, which can provide both structural and dynamic information.
Optimizing expression and purification of TP_0055 for structural studies requires attention to several critical factors:
Expression construct design:
Consider tag position (N- vs. C-terminal) based on structural predictions
Evaluate different fusion partners (MBP, SUMO, GST) for solubility enhancement
Include precision protease sites for tag removal
Optimize codon usage for the expression host
Expression conditions:
Test multiple E. coli strains (BL21(DE3), Rosetta, SHuffle)
Optimize induction parameters (temperature, inducer concentration, time)
Consider auto-induction media for gradual protein expression
Evaluate cell lysis methods (sonication, high-pressure homogenization, detergents)
Purification strategy:
Implement multi-step purification to achieve >95% purity
Consider on-column refolding for inclusion body purification
Optimize buffer compositions for stability (pH, salt, additives)
Remove the His-tag if it might interfere with structure or function
Quality control measures:
Size-exclusion chromatography to assess oligomeric state
Dynamic light scattering for homogeneity analysis
Thermal shift assays to optimize buffer conditions
Activity assays to confirm functional integrity
Specific considerations for structural techniques:
For crystallography: concentrate to 5-20 mg/mL, screen multiple crystallization conditions
For NMR: express in minimal media with 15N and 13C labels, concentrate to 0.5-1 mM
For cryo-EM: ensure sample homogeneity, optimize grid preparation
Expected yield benchmarks for recombinant TP_0055 production:
Expression System | Expected Yield | Purity | Advantages | Limitations |
---|---|---|---|---|
E. coli (standard) | 5-20 mg/L | >90% | Cost-effective, scalable | Potential inclusion bodies |
E. coli (optimized) | 20-50 mg/L | >95% | Higher yield, improved solubility | Requires optimization |
Cell-free system | 0.5-5 mg/mL reaction | >90% | Rapid, avoids toxicity issues | Higher cost, smaller scale |
While TP_0055's specific role remains uncharacterized, its investigation can contribute to understanding T. pallidum pathogenesis through:
Comparative genomic analysis:
Determine conservation across T. pallidum subspecies
Identify homologs in other spirochetes
Assess evolutionary pressure through synonymous/non-synonymous mutation ratios
Expression pattern analysis:
Determine temporal expression during different stages of infection
Investigate regulation in response to environmental stimuli
Examine expression in different tissue environments
Host-pathogen interaction studies:
Test binding to extracellular matrix components
Evaluate interactions with immune cells
Assess impact on host cell signaling pathways
Immunological profiling:
Characterize antibody responses to TP_0055 during natural infection
Determine T cell epitopes within the protein
Evaluate protective potential in animal models
Structural insights:
Identify structural motifs associated with virulence
Map epitopes recognized by protective antibodies
Discover potential binding pockets for small molecule interventions
The inclusion of TP_0055 in comprehensive studies alongside better-characterized T. pallidum proteins can provide context for its role relative to known virulence factors.
Evaluating TP_0055's potential as a stage-specific biomarker requires systematic investigation:
Stage-specific antibody response analysis:
Test sera from patients with primary, secondary, latent, and tertiary syphilis
Compare antibody kinetics with established markers
Determine if TP_0055 antibodies correlate with disease progression
Predictive value assessment:
Calculate positive and negative predictive values for each disease stage
Compare performance to current diagnostic standards
Evaluate in combination with other T. pallidum antigens
Treatment response monitoring:
Measure antibody titer changes following antibiotic therapy
Determine if TP_0055 antibodies decline more rapidly than other markers
Assess correlation with clinical cure
Special population studies:
Evaluate performance in HIV co-infected individuals
Test in congenital syphilis cases
Assess in neurosyphilis diagnosis
To determine if TP_0055 offers advantages over current diagnostic antigens, compare its performance to well-characterized recombinant proteins like Tp0453, Tp92, and Gpd, which have demonstrated excellent sensitivity and specificity in previous studies .