Recombinant Treponema pallidum Uncharacterized protein TP_0093 (TP_0093)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder.
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your preferred format in order notes for customized preparation.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchase method and location. Contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: Standard shipping includes blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires advance notification and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to consolidate the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50% and serves as a guideline.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized formulations have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquot for multiple uses to prevent repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing.
The tag type is determined during the production process. If a specific tag type is required, please inform us; we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
TP_0093; Uncharacterized protein TP_0093
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-215
Protein Length
full length protein
Species
Treponema pallidum (strain Nichols)
Target Names
TP_0093
Target Protein Sequence
MRTCPDCAAWCAYVDGEGSQLQRREMCAHLQGCTHCATCVAHYRAMRSLVKHADRVSSRD FTMAFPYLRVRHRVASCMPRPWWQARSSPLSAAGPVRAAALAVAVASLCVCTLLLTHIVE RRPVSRAGEASFTPIVPMRVRAPVGYARGVKVFGPAVSANSNVLRKPAAVFTVCAFAQLY GSDPAYEMETVPVRLSVIPVPSYVLNASKAQFFSP
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Database Links

KEGG: tpa:TP_0093

STRING: 243276.TP0093

Subcellular Location
Membrane; Single-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What are the basic physicochemical properties of TP_0093?

To determine the basic physicochemical properties of TP_0093, researchers should analyze the protein using computational tools like ExPASy ProtParam. These analyses typically reveal:

  • Molecular weight

  • Theoretical pI

  • Amino acid composition

  • Extinction coefficient

  • Estimated half-life

  • Instability index

  • Grand average of hydropathicity (GRAVY)

These baseline properties provide fundamental insights into protein behavior during purification and experimentation, helping researchers design appropriate buffer systems and handling protocols .

How is recombinant TP_0093 typically produced and purified?

Recombinant TP_0093 is commonly expressed in E. coli systems with an N-terminal His-tag to facilitate purification. The standard production process involves:

  • Cloning the TP_0093 gene into an expression vector with His-tag

  • Transforming the construct into E. coli expression strains

  • Inducing protein expression under optimized conditions

  • Cell lysis and extraction of soluble protein

  • Affinity chromatography using Ni-NTA or similar matrices

  • Additional purification steps if needed (ion exchange, size exclusion)

  • Final preparation as a lyophilized powder

The purified protein requires proper reconstitution in deionized water to achieve concentrations of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL, with recommended addition of 5-50% glycerol for long-term storage .

What experimental designs are most appropriate for studying an uncharacterized protein like TP_0093?

When studying uncharacterized proteins like TP_0093, researchers should implement a structured experimental design approach:

Experimental Design TypeApplication for TP_0093Key Considerations
True-experimental DesignTesting hypotheses about protein functionRequires random assignment, control groups, and defined variables
Quasi-experimental DesignComparing TP_0093 to related proteinsUsed when random assignment isn't possible
Statistical Experimental DesignOptimizing conditions for TP_0093 activityEssential for determining optimal reaction conditions

The process should begin with clearly defined research objectives and hypotheses about potential functions. Independent variables (e.g., pH, temperature, ligands) and dependent variables (e.g., binding affinity, enzymatic activity) should be carefully selected based on preliminary bioinformatics analyses. Controls should include both negative controls (buffer only) and positive controls (proteins with known functions) .

How should researchers analyze sequence conservation of TP_0093 across different Treponema strains?

To analyze sequence conservation effectively:

  • Collect all available TP_0093 homolog sequences from different Treponema strains using BLAST searches

  • Perform multiple sequence alignment using tools like MUSCLE or CLUSTAL

  • Calculate conservation scores for each residue

  • Identify highly conserved regions that may indicate functional importance

  • Generate phylogenetic trees to understand evolutionary relationships

  • Map conservation data onto predictive structural models

High conservation across strains often indicates functional importance. Researchers should pay particular attention to conserved motifs that might suggest enzymatic activity, binding sites, or structural importance .

What are the optimal storage and handling conditions for recombinant TP_0093?

For optimal experimental outcomes, researchers should follow these storage and handling protocols:

  • Store lyophilized protein at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt

  • Briefly centrifuge vials before opening to collect all material

  • Reconstitute in deionized sterile water to 0.1-1.0 mg/mL

  • Add glycerol to 5-50% final concentration (50% recommended) for long-term storage

  • Aliquot to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles

  • For short-term use, store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week

  • Use Tris/PBS-based buffer with 6% Trehalose, pH 8.0 as a base storage buffer

Maintaining protein stability is crucial for experimental reproducibility, and researchers should avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles which can lead to protein degradation and loss of activity .

What computational methods should be used to predict the secondary structure of TP_0093?

For comprehensive secondary structure prediction of TP_0093, researchers should employ multiple complementary approaches:

  • Use SOPMA server for initial prediction of secondary structure elements

  • Apply PSIPRED for improved accuracy through position-specific scoring matrices

  • Validate predictions with JPred for consensus-based secondary structure assignment

  • Apply PsiPred and GOR IV methods for additional validation

  • Compare results across methods to identify consistent structural predictions

These analyses typically classify each residue as participating in alpha helices, beta strands, or random coils. Consistency across multiple prediction methods increases confidence in the structural assignments .

How can researchers model the tertiary structure of TP_0093?

To generate reliable tertiary structure models of TP_0093:

  • Begin with homology modeling if similar proteins exist in structural databases

    • Use SWISS-MODEL, Phyre2, or I-TASSER servers

    • Identify suitable templates with sequence similarity >30% if possible

  • If no suitable templates exist, use ab initio modeling approaches:

    • Rosetta, QUARK, or similar tools for template-free modeling

  • Validate the models using multiple approaches:

    • PROCHECK for stereochemical quality assessment

    • Ramachandran plot analysis (aim for >90% residues in favored regions)

    • Verify3D for compatibility of 3D structure with primary sequence

  • Refine models as needed based on validation results

The resulting structural models should be analyzed for potential functional sites and compared with known protein structures to generate hypotheses about protein function .

What approaches can identify potential active sites or binding regions in TP_0093?

To identify functional sites in the TP_0093 structure:

  • Use the CASTp v3.0 server to:

    • Identify and measure potential binding pockets

    • Analyze pocket volume, area, and depth

    • Determine amino acids lining these pockets

  • Apply complementary methods:

    • DEPTH server for pocket hydrophobicity analysis

    • fpocket for druggability assessment of predicted pockets

    • ConSurf for evolutionary conservation mapping onto structural models

  • Visualize results using PyMOL or similar molecular visualization software

  • Prioritize sites for experimental validation based on:

    • Conservation scores

    • Physiochemical properties

    • Structural features resembling known functional sites

These computational predictions generate testable hypotheses about protein function that guide subsequent experimental investigations .

How can domain prediction tools help characterize TP_0093?

Domain prediction is essential for uncharacterized proteins like TP_0093:

  • Use NCBI's CD Search tool to identify conserved domains by comparing against:

    • Conserved Domain Database (CDD)

    • Protein families database (Pfam)

    • Simple Modular Architecture Research Tool (SMART)

    • Protein ANalysis THrough Evolutionary Relationships (PANTHER)

  • Map identified domains onto the sequence and structural models

  • Use domain information to:

    • Infer potential molecular functions

    • Identify potential binding partners

    • Guide selection of experimental approaches

    • Develop hypotheses about cellular roles

Even partial domain matches can provide valuable clues about protein function when working with uncharacterized proteins like TP_0093 .

What protein-protein interaction studies are most appropriate for investigating TP_0093 function?

To investigate potential interaction partners of TP_0093:

TechniqueAdvantagesLimitationsApplication for TP_0093
Pull-down assaysCan identify novel interactionsMay detect non-physiological interactionsUsing His-tagged TP_0093 as bait
Co-immunoprecipitationDetects interactions in cellular contextRequires specific antibodiesIf antibodies are available or can be developed
Yeast two-hybridHigh-throughput screeningHigh false positive rateInitial screening of T. pallidum proteome
Surface plasmon resonanceQuantitative binding parametersRequires purified proteinsConfirming and characterizing specific interactions
Crosslinking mass spectrometryIdentifies interaction interfacesComplex data analysisMapping binding regions once partners identified

A systematic approach beginning with computational prediction of interaction partners followed by experimental validation using multiple complementary methods is recommended for uncharacterized proteins like TP_0093 .

How should researchers design experiments to test enzymatic activity hypotheses for TP_0093?

Based on bioinformatic predictions of potential enzymatic functions, researchers should design targeted activity assays:

  • Identify potential enzymatic functions based on:

    • Sequence similarity to known enzymes

    • Presence of catalytic motifs

    • Structural features resembling known enzyme active sites

  • Design experimental activity assays with:

    • Appropriate substrates for predicted activities

    • Controls including heat-inactivated protein

    • Varying reaction conditions (pH, temperature, cofactors)

  • Monitor activity using:

    • Spectrophotometric assays for colorimetric changes

    • HPLC for product formation

    • Mass spectrometry for reaction products

  • Confirm specificity through:

    • Site-directed mutagenesis of predicted catalytic residues

    • Inhibitor studies

    • Substrate specificity analysis

This structured approach allows systematic testing of multiple potential functions for uncharacterized proteins like TP_0093 .

How can comparative genomics provide insights into the potential role of TP_0093 in pathogenesis?

Advanced comparative genomics approaches can reveal the pathogenic relevance of TP_0093:

  • Compare TP_0093 presence, sequence, and genomic context across:

    • Pathogenic Treponema strains

    • Non-pathogenic Treponema species

    • Related bacterial genera

  • Analyze gene neighborhood for functional associations

  • Examine expression patterns during different stages of infection

  • Identify co-evolving genes that may function in the same pathway

  • Determine if TP_0093 is part of the core or accessory genome of T. pallidum

If TP_0093 is specifically conserved in pathogenic strains or shows patterns of positive selection in surface-exposed regions, this may suggest involvement in host-pathogen interactions or immune evasion .

What approaches can determine if TP_0093 is involved in immune evasion mechanisms?

To investigate potential roles in immune evasion:

  • Perform epitope mapping studies:

    • Predict B-cell and T-cell epitopes computationally

    • Synthesize overlapping peptides covering the protein sequence

    • Test binding to antibodies from syphilis patients

  • Investigate antigenic variation:

    • Compare sequences across clinical isolates

    • Identify hypervariable regions

    • Determine if sequence variations affect antibody recognition

  • Assess interaction with immune components:

    • Test binding to pattern recognition receptors

    • Evaluate effects on complement activation

    • Measure impacts on neutrophil function

  • Perform immunization studies in animal models:

    • Evaluate protective capacity

    • Measure antibody production

    • Assess cellular immune responses

These approaches can determine whether TP_0093 contributes to the remarkable immune evasion capabilities of T. pallidum .

How can structural biology techniques be leveraged to resolve the function of TP_0093?

Advanced structural biology approaches provide deeper insights into protein function:

These advanced structural approaches can provide definitive insights into protein function when combined with biochemical and computational analyses .

How should researchers interpret contradictory results in TP_0093 characterization studies?

When faced with contradictory data about TP_0093:

  • Evaluate methodology differences:

    • Protein preparation methods

    • Buffer compositions

    • Experimental conditions

    • Detection methods

  • Consider protein state factors:

    • Post-translational modifications

    • Oligomerization states

    • Presence of cofactors

    • Protein degradation or truncation

  • Implement verification approaches:

    • Use multiple orthogonal techniques

    • Vary experimental conditions systematically

    • Collaborate with other laboratories for independent validation

  • Present data transparently with appropriate tables:

StudyMethodKey FindingPotential LimitationsReconciliation Approach
Study AMethod 1Finding XLimitation 1Approach 1
Study BMethod 2Finding Y (contradicts X)Limitation 2Approach 2

This structured analysis helps identify sources of discrepancies and guides additional experiments to resolve contradictions .

What statistical approaches are most appropriate for analyzing TP_0093 experimental data?

  • For activity assays:

    • Use appropriate replicates (minimum n=3, preferably n≥5)

    • Apply one-way ANOVA for comparing multiple conditions

    • Use t-tests for pairwise comparisons with Bonferroni correction

  • For binding studies:

    • Fit binding data to appropriate models (e.g., one-site binding, Hill equation)

    • Calculate confidence intervals for derived parameters

    • Use AIC or BIC for model selection

  • For structural comparisons:

    • Use RMSD calculations for structural alignments

    • Apply clustering algorithms to identify conformational states

  • For all experiments:

    • Report effect sizes along with p-values

    • Clearly state null hypotheses

    • Use appropriate controls for normalization

What are the key challenges in characterizing uncharacterized proteins like TP_0093?

Characterizing uncharacterized proteins like TP_0093 presents several significant challenges:

  • Limited reference information:

    • Absence of characterized homologs

    • Lack of validated functional assays

    • Minimal structural information

  • Technical difficulties:

    • Protein expression and solubility issues

    • Potential requirements for specific cofactors or binding partners

    • Challenges in developing specific antibodies

  • Validation complexities:

    • Difficulty confirming predicted functions

    • Potential for multiple or context-dependent functions

    • Challenges in demonstrating physiological relevance

Researchers should adopt integrated approaches combining computational prediction, structural analysis, and diverse experimental techniques to overcome these challenges .

How can researchers contribute findings about TP_0093 to the scientific community?

To maximize the impact of TP_0093 research:

  • Deposit sequence variations in appropriate databases:

    • UniProt for protein sequence updates

    • GenBank for nucleotide sequences

  • Submit structural data to:

    • Protein Data Bank (PDB) for 3D structures

    • Electron Microscopy Data Bank (EMDB) for EM maps

  • Publish findings in:

    • Peer-reviewed journals with detailed methods sections

    • Open-access platforms when possible

    • Preprint servers for rapid dissemination

  • Include comprehensive supplementary data:

    • Raw experimental data

    • Detailed protocols

    • Plasmid maps and sequences

  • Update protein annotation databases:

    • Submit functional evidence to UniProt

    • Contribute to GO term assignments

    • Update protein family databases

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.