Recombinant Uncharacterized membrane protein yoyJ (yoyJ)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Definition and Basic Properties

The protein yoyJ (UniProt ID: C0H439) is encoded by the yoyJ gene (locus tag: BSU20999) in Bacillus subtilis. It spans 83 amino acids (aa) and is annotated as an uncharacterized membrane protein due to limited functional data. Key identifiers include:

PropertyDetails
Source OrganismBacillus subtilis (strain 168)
Expression SystemE. coli (recombinant expression)
TagN-terminal 10xHis-tag (for purification and detection)
Protein LengthFull-length (1–83 aa)
Molecular Weight~9,957 Da
SequenceMNFSFSSYPYYNMIKHIANMKRFSLWFTHITFIGLFLMFQLIKDYFSSEGQALINTIFVV TCIIAILLWIIYCVFLKLRNKSH

Expression and Purification

  • Host System: Expressed in E. coli using bacterial expression vectors .

  • Tag Type: N-terminal His-tag enables affinity chromatography purification .

  • Purity: ≥90% (SDS-PAGE validated) , though suppliers like MyBioSource report ≥85% purity .

Functional Studies

  • Membrane Protein Dynamics: Used to investigate transmembrane protein interactions, folding, and stability .

  • Enzyme Assays: Serves as a control in enzymatic activity studies or receptor-ligand binding assays .

  • Structural Biology: Facilitates X-ray crystallography or cryo-EM studies to elucidate membrane protein structures .

Cellular Assays

  • Cell Culture: Employed to modulate cellular responses in Bacillus subtilis or heterologous systems .

  • Immunostaining: His-tag enables detection via anti-His antibodies in Western blot or ELISA .

Key Research Findings

  • Overexpression Challenges: Recombinant membrane proteins like yoyJ often face solubility issues, necessitating specialized systems (e.g., E. coli with chaperones) .

  • Z-Membrane Formation: Studies of similar recombinant membrane proteins highlight their role in forming artificial membrane structures for high-yield production .

  • Functional Annotation Gaps: Despite structural insights, functional roles (e.g., transport, signaling) remain uncharacterized, underscoring the need for further biochemical studies .

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: We will prioritize shipping the format we have in stock. However, if you have a specific format requirement, please indicate it in your order notes, and we will fulfill your request.
Lead Time
Delivery time may vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please consult your local distributor for specific delivery details.
Note: All our proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. If you require dry ice shipping, please inform us in advance as additional fees will apply.
Notes
Repeated freezing and thawing is not recommended. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
We recommend centrifuging the vial briefly before opening to ensure the contents settle at the bottom. Reconstitute the protein in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting the solution at -20°C/-80°C. Our default final glycerol concentration is 50%. Customers may use this as a reference.
Shelf Life
Shelf life is influenced by various factors, including storage conditions, buffer ingredients, storage temperature, and the inherent stability of the protein.
Generally, the shelf life of liquid form is 6 months at -20°C/-80°C. For the lyophilized form, the shelf life is 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquoting is necessary for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type will be determined during the manufacturing process.
The tag type will be determined during the production process. If you have a specific tag type requirement, please inform us, and we will prioritize developing the specified tag.
Synonyms
yoyJ; BSU20999; Uncharacterized membrane protein YoyJ
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-83
Protein Length
full length protein
Species
Bacillus subtilis (strain 168)
Target Names
yoyJ
Target Protein Sequence
MNFSFSSYPYYNMIKHIANMKRFSLWFTHITFIGLFLMFQLIKDYFSSEGQALINTIFVV TCIIAILLWIIYCVFLKLRNKSH
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Database Links

KEGG: bsu:BSU20999

Subcellular Location
Cell membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is Recombinant Uncharacterized Membrane Protein YoyJ?

Recombinant Uncharacterized membrane protein YoyJ (YoyJ) is a bacterial membrane protein from Bacillus subtilis, consisting of 83 amino acids. The protein is characterized by its amino acid sequence: MNFSFSSYPYYNMIKHIANMKRFSLWFTHITFIGLFLMFQLIKDYFSSEGQALINTIFVVTCIIAILLWIIYCVFLKLRNKSH. It belongs to the category of membrane proteins, which typically play crucial roles in cellular functions including molecule transport, cell communication, and signal transduction. As an uncharacterized protein, YoyJ's specific cellular function remains to be fully elucidated through targeted research methodologies .

Why are uncharacterized membrane proteins important research targets?

Uncharacterized membrane proteins like YoyJ represent significant research opportunities for several reasons. Membrane proteins constitute approximately 60% of known drug targets, making them highly relevant for pharmaceutical research and development . Additionally, studying uncharacterized proteins can lead to the discovery of novel cellular mechanisms, metabolic pathways, or potential therapeutic targets. The systematic investigation of these proteins contributes to completing our understanding of cellular proteomes and can reveal unexpected biological functions that may have evolutionary or therapeutic significance .

What is known about the structural features of YoyJ protein?

The YoyJ protein is a relatively small membrane protein of 83 amino acids from Bacillus subtilis . While detailed three-dimensional structural data is currently limited, sequence analysis suggests it contains hydrophobic regions typical of transmembrane domains. Like many membrane proteins, YoyJ likely undergoes conformational changes that are essential to its function . The protein can be recombinantly produced with an N-terminal His-tag, facilitating purification and subsequent structural studies . Advanced techniques such as coarse-grained modeling, similar to those used for other membrane proteins, may be valuable for predicting its structural characteristics and functional mechanisms .

What are the recommended storage and handling procedures for recombinant YoyJ protein?

For optimal preservation of recombinant YoyJ protein integrity, store the lyophilized powder at -20°C to -80°C upon receipt . After reconstitution, working aliquots may be stored at 4°C for up to one week, but repeated freeze-thaw cycles should be strictly avoided as they can compromise protein structure and function . For long-term storage after reconstitution, it is recommended to add glycerol to a final concentration of 5-50% (with 50% being the default recommendation) and store aliquots at -20°C to -80°C . Prior to use, briefly centrifuge the vial to ensure all contents are at the bottom. These protocols help maintain the structural integrity and functional properties of the membrane protein for research applications.

What reconstitution methods are appropriate for YoyJ protein studies?

Reconstitution of YoyJ protein should be performed in deionized sterile water to achieve a concentration between 0.1-1.0 mg/mL . The process should begin with a brief centrifugation of the vial to bring all contents to the bottom before opening. After initial reconstitution, the addition of glycerol (5-50% final concentration) is recommended for samples intended for long-term storage . For functional studies, researchers may need to incorporate the protein into appropriate lipid environments or membrane mimetics that reflect its native cellular context. This step is critical for membrane proteins, as their structural integrity and functionality are often dependent on lipid interactions that stabilize transmembrane domains.

How should researchers design experiments to investigate the function of an uncharacterized protein like YoyJ?

Designing experiments for uncharacterized proteins requires a multi-faceted approach. Begin with comparative sequence analysis to identify homologs with known functions, which may provide initial functional hypotheses. Follow with expression analysis to determine when and where the protein is expressed in the bacterial cell cycle. For membrane proteins like YoyJ, investigation of conformational changes is essential, as these often correlate with function . Implement techniques such as site-directed mutagenesis to identify critical residues, coupled with functional assays relevant to predicted roles (e.g., transport assays if a transporter role is suspected). Interaction studies using pull-down assays or crosslinking can identify binding partners that may reveal functional contexts. Finally, phenotypic studies of knockout or overexpression strains can demonstrate physiological roles. This systematic approach progressively narrows potential functions while generating testable hypotheses.

What methodologies are most effective for studying conformational changes in YoyJ protein?

For investigating conformational changes in membrane proteins like YoyJ, a combination of computational and experimental approaches yields the most comprehensive results. Computationally, coarse-grained (CG) modeling can construct reaction pathways between different conformational states, calculate energy profiles, and identify energy barriers associated with protein movement . Experimentally, techniques such as hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) provide insights into protein dynamics and solvent accessibility changes. Single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer (smFRET) can monitor distance changes between strategically labeled residues during conformational shifts. Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) is increasingly valuable for capturing membrane proteins in different conformational states. Additionally, molecular dynamics simulations that incorporate membrane environments can predict conformational changes under various conditions. The integration of these approaches provides a more complete understanding of how YoyJ might function within the membrane environment.

How can researchers effectively incorporate YoyJ into artificial membrane systems for functional studies?

Incorporating YoyJ into artificial membrane systems requires careful consideration of lipid composition and reconstitution protocols. Begin by purifying the His-tagged recombinant protein using affinity chromatography under conditions that maintain native folding . For liposome reconstitution, select lipids that mimic the Bacillus subtilis membrane composition, typically including phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylglycerol, and cardiolipin in appropriate ratios. Use techniques such as detergent-mediated reconstitution followed by detergent removal via dialysis or bio-beads. Alternatively, nanodiscs provide a more controlled membrane environment and are especially useful for biophysical studies. For higher-throughput functional screening, consider proteoliposome arrays or droplet interface bilayers. Verification of successful incorporation should include proteoliposome characterization (size, lamellarity, protein orientation, and density) using techniques such as dynamic light scattering, electron microscopy, and fluorescence quenching assays. These systems then serve as platforms for functional assays including transport studies, binding assays, or electrophysiological measurements.

What approaches should be used to resolve contradictory data when studying uncharacterized proteins like YoyJ?

When confronted with contradictory data in YoyJ research, implement a systematic troubleshooting approach. First, critically evaluate experimental conditions across studies, as membrane proteins are particularly sensitive to their environment. Verify protein quality through multiple purity assessments (SDS-PAGE, mass spectrometry) and functional validation assays. Consider that contradictions may reflect different conformational states of the protein, as membrane proteins often exhibit functional plasticity . Employ orthogonal methodologies to cross-validate findings – for instance, if structural predictions contradict functional data, use alternative structural techniques or conduct site-directed mutagenesis to reconcile discrepancies. Assess whether contradictions stem from differences in experimental systems (e.g., detergent micelles versus lipid bilayers), as membrane context significantly impacts protein behavior. Finally, consider forming research collaborations to independently reproduce key findings. Document all variables systematically, as seemingly minor differences in buffer composition, temperature, or protein construct design can dramatically affect membrane protein behavior and experimental outcomes.

How does YoyJ research contribute to understanding broader membrane protein mechanisms?

Research on YoyJ contributes to membrane protein science through multiple avenues. As an uncharacterized protein, YoyJ exploration adds to the repertoire of known membrane protein structures and functions, helping fill critical gaps in protein databases. Membrane proteins typically function through conformational changes, and studying YoyJ's specific mechanisms may reveal novel patterns of structural dynamics applicable to other membrane protein families . Additionally, the methodological approaches developed for studying YoyJ – particularly those addressing the challenges of membrane protein purification, reconstitution, and functional characterization – can advance technical capabilities in the field broadly. From an evolutionary perspective, understanding YoyJ may illuminate how membrane proteins in Bacillus subtilis have adapted to specific cellular environments. Furthermore, as approximately 60% of drug targets are membrane proteins, characterizing previously unknown proteins like YoyJ has potential implications for identifying new therapeutic targets or antimicrobial strategies .

What can be learned from comparing YoyJ to other membrane proteins with known functions?

Comparative analysis between YoyJ and functionally characterized membrane proteins can yield valuable insights through several analytical frameworks. Sequence homology comparisons may reveal conserved motifs associated with specific functions, such as transport, signaling, or enzymatic activity. Structural comparison with membrane proteins of known function, particularly those from Bacillus subtilis or related species, can highlight shared architectural features that suggest functional similarities. Comparing transmembrane topology predictions for YoyJ with those of characterized proteins may indicate similar membrane integration patterns and functional categories. Energy profile comparisons during conformational changes can be particularly informative – similar energy barriers and profiles between YoyJ and known proteins might suggest related mechanisms, despite different primary sequences . Additionally, examining the genomic context of yoyJ within the Bacillus subtilis genome (neighboring genes, operon structure, co-regulation patterns) can provide clues about its functional role through the principle of guilt by association.

What roles might YoyJ play in Bacillus subtilis physiology based on current evidence?

Although YoyJ remains uncharacterized, several hypotheses regarding its physiological role can be formulated based on available evidence. As a membrane protein in Bacillus subtilis, YoyJ may function in maintaining membrane integrity, particularly during stress conditions that bacteria commonly encounter. Its relatively small size (83 amino acids) suggests it might serve as an accessory protein in larger membrane complexes rather than functioning independently . The hydrophobic regions in its sequence indicate possible roles in small molecule transport, proton conduction, or signal transduction across the membrane. Alternatively, YoyJ might function in bacterial cell division processes, where membrane proteins often coordinate divisome assembly. The protein could also participate in species-specific functions such as sporulation, where membrane remodeling is critical. Future research combining transcriptomic analyses (determining when yoyJ is expressed), interaction studies (identifying binding partners), and phenotypic characterization of knockout mutants will be essential to discriminate between these potential physiological roles.

What are the main challenges in expressing and purifying membrane proteins like YoyJ for structural studies?

Membrane protein expression and purification present numerous challenges that require specialized approaches. For YoyJ specifically, expression systems must be carefully selected – E. coli has been successfully used , but optimization of expression conditions (temperature, induction timing, media composition) is crucial to prevent aggregation or inclusion body formation. During purification, maintaining the native fold is particularly challenging – the use of appropriate detergents at concentrations above their critical micelle concentration is essential when extracting membrane proteins from their lipid environment. Purification yields are typically lower for membrane proteins compared to soluble proteins, necessitating scale-up strategies. The small size of YoyJ (83 amino acids) may present additional challenges in purification steps involving size-based separation . Furthermore, functional validation of the purified protein is critical but complicated by the need to reconstitute the protein in a membrane-like environment. Researchers must implement quality control steps throughout the purification process, using techniques such as circular dichroism or fluorescence spectroscopy to verify proper folding before proceeding to structural or functional studies.

How can researchers overcome the limitations of traditional structural biology techniques when studying membrane proteins like YoyJ?

Overcoming structural biology limitations for membrane proteins like YoyJ requires innovative approaches that address their unique challenges. While X-ray crystallography traditionally struggles with membrane proteins due to their flexibility and hydrophobicity, researchers can utilize lipidic cubic phase crystallization specifically designed for membrane proteins. For YoyJ's relatively small size (83 amino acids), solution NMR becomes a viable option when the protein is reconstituted in detergent micelles or nanodiscs . Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) has revolutionized membrane protein structural biology by eliminating the need for crystallization, though YoyJ's small size may challenge resolution unless it forms larger complexes. Computational approaches, particularly coarse-grained modeling, can predict structural features and conformational changes when experimental structures are unavailable . Additionally, integrative structural biology approaches combine data from multiple techniques (crosslinking mass spectrometry, SAXS, EPR spectroscopy) to build comprehensive structural models. For functional insights without complete structures, directed evolution coupled with deep mutational scanning can map functional regions of the protein. These complementary approaches collectively overcome the limitations of any single structural determination method.

What data analysis approaches are recommended for interpreting experimental results from YoyJ studies?

Data analysis for YoyJ studies requires specialized approaches that account for membrane protein characteristics and the challenges of working with uncharacterized proteins. For sequence analysis, utilize membrane protein-specific algorithms that accurately predict transmembrane regions, topology, and potential functional motifs. When analyzing structural data, implement molecular dynamics simulations that explicitly include membrane environments to validate structural models and predict dynamic behavior. For functional studies, develop quantitative models that correlate conformational changes with energetic profiles, similar to approaches used for other membrane proteins . Statistical analysis should account for the typically higher variability in membrane protein experimental data by increasing replication and employing robust statistical methods resistant to outliers. Machine learning approaches can be particularly valuable for uncharacterized proteins, helping to identify patterns in experimental data that may not be apparent through conventional analysis. Integration of multi-omics data (proteomics, transcriptomics, metabolomics) using pathway analysis and protein-protein interaction networks can contextualize YoyJ within the broader cellular systems. Finally, implement rigorous controls and validation experiments to distinguish genuine biological effects from artifacts related to the challenging nature of membrane protein experimentation.

What emerging technologies show promise for advancing YoyJ research?

Several cutting-edge technologies hold significant promise for YoyJ research advancement. Cryo-electron tomography (cryo-ET) could visualize YoyJ in its native membrane environment, providing insights impossible with traditional structural methods. AlphaFold2 and other AI-based structure prediction tools have shown remarkable accuracy for membrane proteins and could generate reliable structural models of YoyJ to guide experimental design. Single-cell techniques applied to Bacillus subtilis could reveal cell-to-cell variability in YoyJ expression and localization under different conditions. Microfluidic platforms enabling high-throughput functional assays would accelerate the screening of potential YoyJ functions. CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing in Bacillus subtilis allows precise genetic manipulation to study YoyJ in its native context. Native mass spectrometry techniques adapted for membrane proteins could identify interaction partners and post-translational modifications. Nanobody development against YoyJ would provide tools for tracking, purification, and potentially structure determination. Finally, advanced computational approaches like molecular dynamics simulations specifically optimized for membrane environments could predict YoyJ behavior under various physiological conditions . These technologies collectively offer unprecedented opportunities to characterize this previously uncharacterized membrane protein.

How might understanding YoyJ contribute to broader bacterial membrane protein research?

Understanding YoyJ could advance bacterial membrane protein research through several significant avenues. As an uncharacterized protein, YoyJ characterization would contribute to completing the functional annotation of the Bacillus subtilis proteome, a model organism for Gram-positive bacteria. Methodologically, the techniques refined for studying this small membrane protein (83 amino acids) could improve approaches for similar challenging proteins . YoyJ research may reveal novel structural motifs or functional mechanisms specific to bacterial membrane proteins, potentially identifying new classes of membrane protein functions. From an evolutionary perspective, comparing YoyJ across different bacterial species could illuminate how membrane proteins adapt to different cellular environments. If YoyJ proves to have roles in bacterial survival, stress response, or pathogenicity, it could represent a new target for antimicrobial development – particularly relevant given that membrane proteins constitute approximately 60% of current drug targets . Furthermore, understanding bacterial membrane proteins like YoyJ provides critical reference points for distinguishing bacterial from eukaryotic membrane protein features, which has implications for both basic science and pharmaceutical development.

What experimental designs would be most informative for determining the physiological role of YoyJ?

To determine YoyJ's physiological role, a systematic multi-faceted experimental approach would be most informative. Begin with transcriptional profiling across various growth conditions and stress scenarios to identify conditions that induce yoyJ expression, providing initial functional clues. Construct Bacillus subtilis knockout strains and conduct comprehensive phenotypic screening under multiple growth conditions, measuring parameters such as growth rate, morphology, membrane integrity, and stress resistance. Complement these studies with controlled overexpression experiments to identify gain-of-function phenotypes. Conduct subcellular localization studies using fluorescent protein fusions or immunogold labeling to determine precise membrane positioning. Implement protein-protein interaction studies using approaches optimized for membrane proteins, such as membrane-based yeast two-hybrid systems or proximity labeling techniques like BioID. Perform lipidomic analyses comparing wild-type and knockout strains to identify potential roles in lipid homeostasis. Design transport assays testing various substrates based on preliminary findings. Finally, apply system biology approaches to integrate these diverse data types, potentially using computational modeling to predict physiological functions that can then be experimentally validated. This comprehensive approach maximizes the likelihood of definitively establishing YoyJ's physiological role.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.