Recombinant Uncharacterized Membrane Protein yozV (yozV) is a recombinant protein derived from Bacillus subtilis, a Gram-positive model organism. The protein corresponds to the gene yozV (locus BSU18849) and is annotated in the UniProt database under accession C0H423. It is classified within the COG2314 cluster (NCBI COG database), which groups uncharacterized membrane proteins containing a TM2 domain and phosphotyrosine (pTyr) motifs . Despite its classification, its precise biological function remains unexplored, making it a subject of interest for structural and functional studies.
The full-length protein sequence is:
MVSKKNKIVAALLAFFFGGLGIHKFYLGRVGQGILYILFCWTGIPSIIAFIEFIIFLCGS EEGFDQKYNFYYFQQQSKA .
The protein is primarily marketed for ELISA assays and structural studies. Potential applications include:
Despite its availability, no peer-reviewed studies directly utilizing yozV have been identified in the literature.
Based on domain composition and COG classification :
Membrane Transport: The TM2 domain could participate in ion or solute transport.
Signaling Regulation: pTyr motifs might mediate kinase interactions or protein-protein interactions.
Stress Response: Bacillus subtilis employs membrane proteins in osmotic or pH stress adaptation.
Lack of Functional Data: No experimental evidence links yozV to specific biochemical pathways.
Structural Ambiguity: Three-dimensional structure and oligomerization state remain unresolved.
Heterologous Expression Challenges: Membrane proteins often require specialized systems (e.g., yeast, insect cells) for proper folding , but yozV’s expression host and folding efficiency are unspecified.
KEGG: bsu:BSU18849
Recombinant uncharacterized membrane protein yozV is a 79-amino acid protein from Bacillus subtilis with the sequence MVSKKNKIVAALLAFFFGGLGIHKFYLGRVGQGILYILFCWTGIPSIIAFIEFIIFLCGS EEGFDQKYNFYYFQQQSKA . Based on hydrophobicity analysis and sequence patterns common to membrane proteins, yozV appears to contain transmembrane domains typical of integral membrane proteins. The protein's high content of hydrophobic residues (including multiple phenylalanines, leucines, and isoleucines) suggests it spans the membrane, likely with hydrophilic regions on either side serving as interaction interfaces . To characterize its structure fully, researchers should employ multiple complementary approaches:
Methodological approach: Begin with computational prediction tools such as TMHMM, Phobius, or TOPCONS to predict transmembrane domains and topology. Follow with experimental validation using techniques such as protease protection assays, which can determine which portions of the protein are accessible (and thus exposed) versus protected (embedded in the membrane). For more detailed structural information, consider techniques like circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy to assess secondary structure content and NMR studies if sufficient quantities of isotopically labeled protein can be produced.
While E. coli expression systems offer high yields and rapid production for many recombinant proteins, membrane proteins present unique challenges requiring specialized approaches . For yozV specifically:
Methodological approach: Test multiple expression systems with the following considerations:
| Expression System | Advantages | Limitations | Optimization Strategies |
|---|---|---|---|
| E. coli | High yield, economical, rapid | May form inclusion bodies, lacks eukaryotic PTMs | Use C41/C43 strains, lower induction temperature (16-20°C), mild inducers |
| Yeast (P. pastoris) | Higher eukaryotic system, glycosylation capacity | Longer expression time | Optimize methanol induction, codon optimization |
| Insect cells | Good membrane protein folding, PTMs | More complex, higher cost | Optimize MOI, harvest timing |
| Mammalian cells | Native-like membrane, complete PTMs | Lowest yield, highest cost | Consider stable cell lines, optimize transfection |
Fusion tags can significantly improve expression and purification. For membrane proteins like yozV, consider N-terminal fusions such as MBP (maltose-binding protein) or SUMO, which can improve solubility and expression while remaining cleavable for structural studies .
Detergent selection is critical for membrane protein isolation while maintaining native structure and function:
Methodological approach: Implement a systematic detergent screening approach:
Begin with a panel of detergents representing different classes:
Mild non-ionic detergents (DDM, LMNG)
Zwitterionic detergents (LDAO, FC-12)
Newer amphipols or nanodiscs for downstream applications
Evaluate solubilization efficiency by measuring protein recovery in the supernatant after centrifugation using Western blotting or activity assays.
Assess protein stability in each detergent using techniques such as size-exclusion chromatography coupled with multi-angle light scattering (SEC-MALS) to monitor monodispersity over time.
For small membrane proteins like yozV (79 amino acids), consider native mass spectrometry to verify that the protein-detergent complex maintains appropriate oligomeric states .
Understanding how yozV is oriented within the membrane is fundamental to elucidating its function:
Methodological approach: Employ multiple complementary techniques:
Cysteine scanning mutagenesis: Introduce cysteine residues at various positions and assess their accessibility to membrane-impermeable sulfhydryl reagents. This will distinguish cytoplasmic from extracellular domains.
Fluorescence-based techniques: Create GFP fusion constructs at either terminus to determine their localization relative to the membrane.
Protease protection assays: Expose membrane preparations to proteases with and without membrane permeabilization, then identify protected fragments by mass spectrometry.
Reporter fusion approach: Create dual reporter constructs (such as alkaline phosphatase/beta-galactosidase) to determine which segments reside in which cellular compartments.
A comprehensive analysis should integrate these methods, as relying on a single technique often gives incomplete or misleading results for small membrane proteins like yozV .
As an uncharacterized protein, identifying interaction partners is critical for understanding yozV's cellular function:
Methodological approach: Implement a multi-faceted interactome analysis:
In vivo crosslinking: Use membrane-permeable crosslinkers of varying lengths to capture transient interactions in native Bacillus subtilis.
Proximity labeling: Fuse yozV to enzymes like BioID or APEX2 that biotinylate nearby proteins, allowing their subsequent purification and identification.
Co-immunoprecipitation with mild detergents: Optimize detergent conditions that maintain protein-protein interactions while solubilizing the membrane complex.
Bacterial two-hybrid screening: Create a Bacillus subtilis-specific library to screen for potential interaction partners.
Bioinformatic approaches: Analyze gene neighborhood, co-expression patterns, and phylogenetic profiles to predict functional associations.
Integration of these approaches can help overcome limitations inherent to each individual method and provide stronger evidence for true interaction partners versus experimental artifacts .
Without knowing the function of yozV, researchers need systematic approaches to test possible roles:
Methodological approach: Design a functional characterization pipeline:
Phenotypic analysis of knockout/overexpression strains: Create yozV deletion and overexpression strains in Bacillus subtilis and subject them to various growth conditions (temperature, pH, osmolarity, nutrient limitation) to identify conditions where the protein becomes important.
Subcellular localization studies: Determine if yozV localizes to specific membrane microdomains or cellular regions using fluorescent protein fusions and super-resolution microscopy.
Transport assays: Test if yozV mediates the transport of ions or small molecules across membranes using liposome reconstitution systems and fluorescent probes or radiolabeled substrates.
Structural homology modeling: Use tools like AlphaFold to predict structural features that might suggest function through comparison with characterized proteins.
Electrophysiological measurements: For potential channel/transporter functions, employ patch-clamp techniques on cells overexpressing yozV or reconstitute the protein into planar lipid bilayers .
When membrane protein localization studies yield conflicting results (a common challenge with small membrane proteins like yozV), multiple validation approaches become necessary:
Methodological approach: Implement a systematic validation framework:
Multiple tagging positions: Create different constructs with tags at N-terminus, C-terminus, and within predicted loops to determine if tag position affects localization.
Complementary visualization techniques:
Immunogold electron microscopy for high-resolution localization
Super-resolution techniques (STORM, PALM) with different fluorophores
Split-GFP systems for in vivo verification
Fractionation controls: Use established marker proteins for different membrane fractions (plasma membrane, septal regions, membrane microdomains) as controls in biochemical fractionation.
Functional validation: Determine if the protein's function (once identified) is consistent with its proposed localization.
Native expression levels: Ensure studies are conducted at physiologically relevant expression levels, as overexpression can cause mislocalization .
Distinguishing primary from secondary effects in knockout studies is critical for accurate functional characterization:
Methodological approach: Design rigorous controls and validation experiments:
Complementation analysis: Reintroduce yozV on an expression plasmid to confirm phenotype reversal.
Construct point mutants: Create specific mutations in conserved residues rather than complete knockouts.
Temporal control systems: Use inducible degron systems for rapid protein depletion to observe immediate versus delayed effects.
Epistasis analysis: Combine yozV deletion with knockouts of potentially related genes to establish pathway relationships.
Multi-omics integration:
| Omics Approach | Application to yozV Research | Data Integration Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Transcriptomics | Identify genes differentially expressed in ΔyozV | Compare immediate vs. delayed expression changes |
| Proteomics | Quantify protein-level changes | Focus on membrane proteome alterations |
| Metabolomics | Detect metabolite changes | Look for accumulation/depletion of potential substrates |
| Fluxomics | Measure metabolic flux changes | Identify altered pathways that might reflect function |
Acute phenotypic assays: Develop assays that can detect immediate functional defects (seconds to minutes) after protein inhibition, which are more likely to represent direct effects .
Membrane protein reconstitution is essential for definitive functional characterization:
Methodological approach: Consider multiple reconstitution platforms with distinct advantages:
Proteoliposomes: The traditional approach involving protein incorporation into artificial lipid vesicles.
Optimize lipid composition to mimic Bacillus subtilis membranes
Control protein orientation through reconstitution protocols
Implement consistent size control through extrusion techniques
Nanodiscs: Provide a native-like bilayer environment with defined size.
Select appropriate MSP (membrane scaffold protein) constructs for the small size of yozV
Optimize lipid:protein:MSP ratios for homogeneous preparations
Validate incorporation using analytical ultracentrifugation
Polymer-based systems: Amphipols and SMALPs can extract membrane proteins with their native lipid environment.
Particularly useful if yozV function depends on specific lipid interactions
Allow for direct extraction from native membranes
Cell-free expression systems: Direct incorporation into liposomes during translation.
Eliminates extraction and reconstitution steps
Particularly useful for toxic membrane proteins
Each system should be validated using:
Structural integrity assessment (CD spectroscopy)
Orientation analysis (protease accessibility)
Even in prokaryotic systems like Bacillus subtilis, post-translational modifications can critically influence membrane protein function:
Methodological approach: Implement a comprehensive PTM analysis:
Mass spectrometry-based PTM mapping:
Use multiple proteases to ensure complete sequence coverage
Apply enrichment strategies for specific PTMs (phosphorylation, glycosylation)
Compare PTM profiles across different growth conditions
Site-directed mutagenesis of potential PTM sites:
Create non-modifiable variants (e.g., Ser to Ala for phosphorylation sites)
Create phosphomimetic mutations (e.g., Ser to Asp) to simulate constitutive modification
Assess functional consequences of these mutations
Heterologous expression comparison:
Express yozV in systems with different PTM capabilities (E. coli vs. B. subtilis)
Compare protein properties and function between expression systems
In vitro enzymatic modification:
Expose purified yozV to relevant modifying enzymes
Assess changes in structure, stability, or function
PTM-specific antibodies or probes:
Small membrane proteins (<100 amino acids) present particular challenges for cryo-EM analysis:
Methodological approach: Implement specialized techniques for small membrane proteins:
Multimerization strategies:
Create chimeric constructs with multimerizing proteins (e.g., apoferritin) to increase molecular weight
Use antibody fragments (Fabs) to add mass and distinctive features
Apply symmetry-based multimerization approaches using engineered protein scaffolds
Sample preparation optimization:
Test multiple grid types and surface treatments
Optimize detergent concentration to minimize background
Implement the CHAPSO-MNG mixed micelle system, which has shown success with small membrane proteins
Data collection strategies:
Use specialized phase plates to enhance contrast
Implement energy filters to improve signal-to-noise ratio
Apply motion correction algorithms optimized for small proteins
Computational approaches:
Use focused classification to separate protein from detergent belt
Apply specialized 3D refinement procedures for small particles
Integrate AlphaFold models as starting points for model building
This comprehensive approach can potentially overcome the size limitations that would otherwise make yozV unsuitable for cryo-EM analysis .
Understanding membrane protein structure in native contexts requires combining multiple structural techniques:
Methodological approach: Implement an integrative structural biology workflow:
Cryo-electron tomography:
Visualize yozV in its native membrane context
Determine in situ organization and potential higher-order assemblies
Solid-state NMR:
Obtain distance constraints and orientation information in lipid bilayers
Measure dynamics of specific protein regions in membrane environments
EPR spectroscopy with site-directed spin labeling:
Map distances between specific residues
Determine accessibility of different protein regions to the aqueous or lipid environments
Cross-linking mass spectrometry:
Identify residues in close proximity in the native structure
Provide distance constraints for computational modeling
Computational integration:
Develop hybrid models incorporating constraints from all experimental approaches
Use Bayesian integrative modeling platforms to weight different data sources appropriately
Validate models against experimental data not used in the modeling process
This multi-technique approach can provide a more complete structural picture than any single method, particularly for challenging targets like small membrane proteins .