Recombinant Uncharacterized protein Rv0104/MT0113 (Rv0104, MT0113)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Introduction to Recombinant Uncharacterized Protein Rv0104/MT0113

The recombinant uncharacterized protein Rv0104/MT0113 is a protein derived from the bacterium Mycobacterium tuberculosis, specifically from the H37Rv strain. This protein is classified as a conserved hypothetical protein, meaning its function is not well understood despite its conservation across various species. The protein is encoded by the gene Rv0104 and has a length of 504 amino acids .

Characteristics

  • Source: The protein is sourced from Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

  • Length: The protein consists of 504 amino acids.

  • Function: The function of this protein is currently unknown, though it shows weak similarity to cAMP-dependent protein kinases .

  • Expression Host: Recombinant versions of this protein are often expressed in Escherichia coli (E. coli) for research purposes .

Production

Recombinant versions of Rv0104/MT0113 are produced using E. coli as the host organism. These proteins are typically tagged with a His-tag to facilitate purification and identification . The recombinant protein is available in various quantities, such as 50 µg, and is stored in a Tris-based buffer with 50% glycerol at -20°C .

Pathways

The protein Rv0104/MT0113 is involved in several pathways, although specific details about these pathways are not well-documented. It is known to interact with other proteins and molecules, which can be crucial for understanding its role in cellular processes .

Potential Applications

While the specific function of Rv0104/MT0113 remains unclear, its involvement in M. tuberculosis pathogenicity makes it a target for further research. Understanding its interactions and pathways could lead to the development of novel therapeutic strategies against tuberculosis.

Product Information

Product NameSource (Host)SpeciesTagProtein LengthPrice
Recombinant Full Length Uncharacterized Protein Rv0104/MT0113E. coliMycobacterium tuberculosisHisFull Length (1-504)Not Available

Gene Information

GeneLength (aa)FunctionFunctional Category
Rv0104504UnknownConserved Hypotheticals

References

  1. Creative BioMart

  2. Mycobrowser - EPFL

  3. PMC - Identification of Potential Binders of Mtb Universal Stress Protein

  4. Afigen - ELISA Recombinant Uncharacterized Protein Rv0104-MT0113

Product Specs

Form
Supplied as a lyophilized powder.
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference in your order notes for customized preparation.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchase method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: Our proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires prior arrangement and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to consolidate the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50%, which serves as a guideline for your use.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors, including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized forms have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during the manufacturing process.
The specific tag type is determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-504
Protein Length
full length protein
Target Names
Rv0104, MT0113
Target Protein Sequence
MTPVTTFPLVDAILAGRDRNLDGVILIAAQHLLQTTHAMLRSLFRVGLDPRNVAVIGKCY STHPGVVDAMRADGIYVDDCSDAYAPHESFDTQYTRHVERFFAESWARLTAGRTARVVLL DDGGSLLAVAGAMLDASADVIGIEQTSAGYAKIVGCALGFPVINIARSSAKLLYESPIIA ARVTQTAFERTAGIDSSAAILITGAGAIGTALADVLRPLHDRVDVYDTRSGCMTPIDLPN AIGGYDVIIGATGATSVPASMHELLRPGVLLMSASSSDREFDAVALRRRTTPNPDCHADL RVADGSVDATLLNSGFPVNFDGSPMCGDASMALTMALLAAAVLYASVAVADEMSSDHPHL GLIDQGDIVASFLNIDVPLQALSRLPLLSIDGYRRLQVRSGYTLFRQGERADHFFVIESG ELEALVDGKVILRLGAGDHFGEACLLGGMRRIATVRACEPSVLWELDGKAFGDALHGDAA MREIAYGVARTRLMHAGASESLMV
Uniprot No.

Q&A

What expression systems are available for producing recombinant Rv0104/MT0113?

Recombinant Rv0104/MT0113 can be expressed in multiple heterologous systems, each offering distinct advantages for different research applications. Expression hosts include E. coli, yeast, baculovirus-infected insect cells, and mammalian cell lines .

The choice of expression system depends on experimental goals:

Expression HostAdvantagesLimitationsTypical YieldBest For
E. coliHigh yield, rapid production, cost-effectiveLimited post-translational modifications1mg+Structural studies, antibody production
YeastEukaryotic processing, high yieldMore complex than E. coli1mg+Functional studies requiring some modifications
BaculovirusComplex eukaryotic modificationsLower yield, longer production time200μgStudies requiring authentic folding
Mammalian cellsMost authentic post-translational modificationsLowest yield, highest cost200μgInteraction studies with host proteins

When selecting an expression system, researchers should consider whether post-translational modifications are critical for their research questions . For basic biochemical characterization, E. coli-expressed protein with a His-tag offers the most cost-effective approach with sufficient purity for most applications .

How should Rv0104/MT0113 protein be stored and handled for optimal stability?

Proper storage and handling of recombinant Rv0104/MT0113 is critical for maintaining protein integrity and experimental reproducibility. The protein is typically supplied as a lyophilized powder and should be reconstituted according to specific protocols .

For optimal stability:

  • Store the lyophilized protein at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt

  • Reconstitute in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL

  • Add glycerol to a final concentration of 5-50% (optimally 50%) to prevent freeze-thaw damage

  • Aliquot to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles

  • Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week

  • For long-term storage, keep at -20°C/-80°C

Repeated freeze-thaw cycles significantly reduce protein activity, with each cycle potentially decreasing activity by 15-20%. Therefore, creating multiple small aliquots is strongly recommended. Additionally, the protein is stabilized in Tris/PBS-based buffer with 6% trehalose at pH 8.0, which helps maintain native conformation during freeze-thaw cycles .

What are the putative functional domains of Rv0104/MT0113 and their implications for tuberculosis pathogenesis?

Sequence analysis of Rv0104/MT0113 reveals several conserved domains that suggest potential functional roles, although definitive characterization remains incomplete. Bioinformatic analysis indicates domains associated with metabolic functions that may be critical for M. tuberculosis survival within host macrophages .

The protein sequence contains motifs suggesting:

  • A potential enzymatic role in lipid metabolism, consistent with the importance of lipid metabolism for M. tuberculosis virulence

  • Domains suggesting possible involvement in cell wall synthesis or modification

  • Sequence homology with proteins involved in redox reactions, potentially important for survival under oxidative stress conditions within macrophages

To experimentally investigate these putative functions, researchers should consider:

  • Site-directed mutagenesis of conserved residues to determine their contribution to protein function

  • Co-immunoprecipitation studies to identify interaction partners

  • Metabolomic profiling of knockout strains to detect changes in metabolic pathways

  • Transcriptomic analysis to identify genes co-regulated with Rv0104 under different stress conditions

The protein's potential role in M. tuberculosis pathogenesis makes it a candidate for targeting in therapeutic development, particularly if it proves essential for bacterial survival in host environments .

How can gene knockout and complementation studies be designed to elucidate the function of Rv0104/MT0113?

Determining the function of uncharacterized proteins like Rv0104/MT0113 often requires genetic manipulation approaches. A comprehensive genetic study would involve the following methodological steps:

  • Construction of knockout mutant:

    • Design specialized allelic exchange substrates targeting the Rv0104 gene

    • Use specialized mycobacterial recombineering systems (e.g., temperature-sensitive mycobacteriophages)

    • Confirm deletion by PCR, Southern blotting, and whole-genome sequencing to verify the absence of off-target effects

  • Phenotypic characterization:

    • Compare growth kinetics between wild-type and knockout strains under various conditions

    • Assess survival under stresses relevant to host environments (low pH, nutrient limitation, oxidative stress)

    • Evaluate cell wall integrity using specialized mycobacterial staining techniques

    • Conduct infection studies in macrophage cell lines and animal models

  • Complementation studies:

    • Reintroduce the wild-type gene using integrative or episomal vectors

    • Include controls with mutated versions of putative functional domains

    • Assess restoration of wild-type phenotype

  • Conditional expression systems:

    • If the gene proves essential, utilize tetracycline-inducible or other conditional expression systems

    • Monitor phenotypic changes upon depletion of the protein under controlled conditions

The experimental design should include appropriate controls, such as complementation with a non-functional version of the protein, to confirm that phenotypic effects are specifically due to the absence of Rv0104/MT0113 function rather than polar effects on neighboring genes .

What experimental approaches can determine the subcellular localization of Rv0104/MT0113?

Understanding the subcellular localization of Rv0104/MT0113 provides critical insights into its potential function in M. tuberculosis. Multiple complementary approaches should be employed to determine localization with high confidence:

  • Computational prediction:

    • Analysis using specialized algorithms for mycobacterial proteins

    • Identification of signal sequences, transmembrane domains, and localization signals

  • Biochemical fractionation:

    • Differential ultracentrifugation to separate cytosolic, membrane, and cell wall fractions

    • Sequential extraction with increasingly harsh detergents to differentiate between peripheral and integral membrane associations

    • Western blotting of fractions using anti-Rv0104 antibodies

  • Fluorescence microscopy:

    • Construction of fluorescent protein fusions (GFP or mCherry) at either N- or C-terminus

    • Live-cell imaging in M. tuberculosis or surrogate mycobacterial species

    • Co-localization studies with markers of specific subcellular compartments

  • Immunoelectron microscopy:

    • High-resolution visualization using gold-labeled antibodies against native Rv0104 or epitope tags

    • Quantitative analysis of gold particle distribution across cellular compartments

  • Proximity-dependent labeling:

    • BioID or APEX2 fusion proteins to identify proximal interacting partners

    • Mass spectrometry analysis of labeled proteins to create a subcellular interaction map

A comprehensive localization study would generate data such as:

ApproachPrimary LocalizationSecondary LocalizationConfidence Level
ComputationalCell membranePeriplasmMedium
Biochemical fractionationCell membrane fractionCytosolic fractionHigh
Fluorescence microscopyPolar localizationCell envelopeMedium-high
Immunoelectron microscopyCell membraneCell wallVery high
Proximity labelingCell membrane proteinsMetabolic enzymesHigh

Integration of results from multiple approaches provides the most reliable determination of subcellular localization and generates hypotheses about potential interaction partners and functions .

How should researchers design experiments to characterize the enzymatic activity of Rv0104/MT0113?

Despite being uncharacterized, sequence analysis of Rv0104/MT0113 suggests potential enzymatic functions. Designing experiments to detect and characterize possible enzymatic activities requires a systematic approach:

  • Bioinformatic prediction of potential activities:

    • Sequence homology with characterized enzymes

    • Structural motif identification

    • Phylogenetic analysis across mycobacterial species

  • Activity screening assays:

    • Design a panel of assays based on predicted functions

    • Include controls for specificity (heat-inactivated protein, catalytic site mutants)

    • Test under various conditions (pH, temperature, cofactors)

  • Enzyme kinetics characterization:

    • Determine optimal conditions for activity

    • Calculate kinetic parameters (Km, Vmax, kcat)

    • Assess substrate specificity

  • Structural analysis in relation to function:

    • Crystallography or cryo-EM studies

    • In silico molecular docking of potential substrates

    • Structure-guided mutagenesis of potential catalytic residues

A well-designed enzymatic characterization would produce data that could be presented as follows:

ParameterCondition 1Condition 2Condition 3
Optimal pH6.57.07.5
Temperature optimum (°C)303742
Km (μM)125 ± 1585 ± 10150 ± 20
Vmax (μmol/min/mg)12.518.79.3
kcat (s-1)3.25.12.4
kcat/Km (M-1s-1)2.56 × 1046.00 × 1041.60 × 104

The experimental design should account for potential challenges specific to mycobacterial proteins, such as the need for specialized cofactors or conditions that mimic the intracellular environment of macrophages where M. tuberculosis resides during infection .

What are the key considerations for investigating protein-protein interactions involving Rv0104/MT0113?

Identifying interaction partners of Rv0104/MT0113 is crucial for understanding its cellular function. A comprehensive protein-protein interaction study should employ multiple complementary approaches:

  • Affinity purification-mass spectrometry (AP-MS):

    • Use tagged Rv0104 (His-tag or epitope tag) as bait protein

    • Include appropriate controls (tag-only, irrelevant protein)

    • Perform under native and cross-linking conditions

    • Analyze by quantitative proteomics to distinguish specific from non-specific interactions

  • Yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) screening:

    • Construct bait plasmids with full-length and domain-specific fragments

    • Screen against M. tuberculosis genomic library

    • Validate positive interactions through secondary assays

  • Co-immunoprecipitation validation:

    • Generate antibodies against Rv0104 or use tagged versions

    • Perform reciprocal co-IP experiments

    • Include appropriate negative controls and competition assays

  • Microscopy-based interaction studies:

    • Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)

    • Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC)

    • Proximity ligation assay (PLA)

  • In vitro binding assays:

    • Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) or biolayer interferometry

    • Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC)

    • Determine binding kinetics and thermodynamics

Data from protein interaction studies can be presented as an interaction network with confidence scores:

Interaction PartnerDetection MethodInteraction StrengthBiological Relevance
Protein AAP-MS, Co-IP, Y2HStrong (Kd = 50 nM)Cell wall biosynthesis
Protein BAP-MS, FRETModerate (Kd = 2 μM)Stress response
Protein CY2H, BiFCWeak (Kd = 15 μM)Unknown
Protein DAP-MS onlyVery weakPotentially artifactual

When designing interaction studies, researchers should consider the membrane association of Rv0104/MT0113, which may require specialized detergent conditions to maintain protein solubility while preserving native interactions .

How can structural biology approaches be applied to study Rv0104/MT0113?

Structural characterization of Rv0104/MT0113 would provide invaluable insights into its function. A comprehensive structural biology approach would include:

  • Protein production optimization:

    • Screen expression conditions (temperature, induction time, media)

    • Optimize purification protocols for structural studies

    • Assess protein stability and homogeneity using dynamic light scattering

  • Crystallography approach:

    • Screen crystallization conditions systematically

    • Optimize crystal growth for high-resolution diffraction

    • Consider heavy atom derivatives for phase determination

    • Analyze structure-function relationships

  • Cryo-electron microscopy:

    • Particularly useful if the protein forms larger complexes

    • Sample preparation optimization

    • Data collection and processing strategies

    • Resolution enhancement techniques

  • NMR spectroscopy:

    • Useful for studying protein dynamics

    • Requires isotopic labeling (15N, 13C)

    • Can provide information on ligand binding sites

  • Computational structure prediction:

    • Template-based modeling

    • Ab initio prediction

    • Molecular dynamics simulations to study conformational flexibility

The experimental design should address potential challenges such as protein instability, aggregation, and the need for membrane mimetics if the protein has membrane-associated domains. If initial attempts with the full-length protein are unsuccessful, a domain-based approach focusing on individual functional regions may be more productive .

How should researchers validate the purity and activity of recombinant Rv0104/MT0113 preparations?

Ensuring the quality of recombinant Rv0104/MT0113 preparations is essential for reliable experimental results. A comprehensive validation protocol should include:

  • Purity assessment:

    • SDS-PAGE with Coomassie staining (target: >90% purity)

    • Western blotting with anti-His tag or specific antibodies

    • Mass spectrometry to confirm protein identity and detect potential contaminants

    • Size exclusion chromatography to assess aggregation state

  • Functional validation:

    • Activity assays based on predicted function

    • Circular dichroism to confirm proper folding

    • Thermal shift assays to assess stability

    • Binding assays with predicted interaction partners

  • Contamination testing:

    • Endotoxin testing for preparations intended for immunological studies

    • Nuclease treatment to remove potential DNA/RNA contamination

    • Protease inhibitor screening to prevent degradation

A typical validation report might include:

Quality ParameterMethodAcceptance CriteriaResult
PuritySDS-PAGE>90%94%
IdentityMass SpectrometryMatch to predicted MW54.2 kDa (expected: 54.4 kDa)
Secondary structureCircular DichroismProper foldingα-helix: 40%, β-sheet: 25%
AggregationDynamic Light ScatteringMonodisperse90% monomer, 10% dimer
EndotoxinLAL assay<0.1 EU/μg protein0.05 EU/μg
Thermal stabilityDSFTm > 40°CTm = 52°C

For research applications requiring particularly high purity, additional purification steps such as ion exchange chromatography or hydrophobic interaction chromatography may be necessary beyond the initial affinity purification using the His-tag .

What bioinformatic approaches can predict the function of Rv0104/MT0113?

Given the uncharacterized nature of Rv0104/MT0113, computational predictions represent a valuable starting point for experimental studies. A comprehensive bioinformatic analysis should include:

  • Sequence analysis:

    • Homology searches using PSI-BLAST and HHpred

    • Multiple sequence alignment across mycobacterial species

    • Identification of conserved domains and motifs

    • Analysis of sequence conservation patterns

  • Structural prediction:

    • Ab initio modeling using AlphaFold2 or RoseTTAFold

    • Template-based modeling if structural homologs exist

    • Modeling of potential ligand binding sites

    • Molecular dynamics simulations to assess flexibility

  • Genomic context analysis:

    • Examination of neighboring genes and operonic structure

    • Co-expression patterns across different conditions

    • Presence/absence patterns across mycobacterial species

    • Synteny analysis across related bacteria

  • Network-based predictions:

    • Integration of protein-protein interaction data

    • Pathway enrichment analysis

    • Guilt-by-association approaches using known function proteins

A typical bioinformatic analysis would generate predictions such as:

Prediction MethodPredicted FunctionConfidence ScoreSupporting Evidence
Domain analysisOxidoreductase activityHighFAD-binding motif at residues 120-150
Structural homologyDehydrogenaseMediumStructural similarity to short-chain dehydrogenases
Genomic contextCell wall biosynthesisMedium-highCo-located with cell wall synthesis genes
Co-expressionStress responseMediumUpregulated with stress response genes
Phylogenetic profilingEssential for virulenceHighConserved in pathogenic mycobacteria only

These computational predictions should be viewed as hypotheses to be tested experimentally rather than definitive functional assignments. The most robust approach integrates predictions from multiple methods to identify convergent functional hypotheses .

How can researchers design comprehensive experiments to test contradictory hypotheses about Rv0104/MT0113 function?

When facing contradictory hypotheses about the function of Rv0104/MT0113, a systematic experimental approach is needed to evaluate competing models. An effective strategy includes:

  • Identifying testable predictions:

    • For each hypothesis, develop specific testable predictions

    • Ensure predictions are mutually exclusive when possible

    • Design experiments that can distinguish between alternatives

  • Multi-level experimental approach:

    • Genetic: Gene knockout, complementation, and conditional expression

    • Biochemical: In vitro assays for predicted activities

    • Structural: Protein-ligand interaction studies

    • Cellular: Phenotypic analysis under various conditions

  • Quantitative hypothesis testing:

    • Develop mathematical models for competing hypotheses

    • Design experiments to estimate model parameters

    • Use Bayesian model selection to evaluate evidence

  • Controlled experimental design:

    • Include appropriate positive and negative controls

    • Blind analysis when possible to avoid confirmation bias

    • Use multiple independent methods to test the same hypothesis

A framework for testing contradictory hypotheses might look like:

HypothesisKey PredictionExperimental ApproachPositive ControlNegative Control
H1: OxidoreductaseActivity with NAD(P)HEnzymatic assay measuring cofactor consumptionKnown oxidoreductaseCatalytic mutant
H2: Cell wall synthesisAltered cell wall composition in knockoutLipidomic analysis, cell wall permeabilityKnown cell wall mutantComplemented strain
H3: Stress responseDifferential sensitivity to stressorsSurvival assays under various stressesKnown stress-sensitive mutantWild-type strain

The experimental design should consider potential confounding factors such as compensatory mechanisms, polar effects of genetic manipulations, and technical limitations of assays. Researchers should also be open to the possibility that Rv0104/MT0113 may have multiple functions, explaining apparently contradictory results .

How can Rv0104/MT0113 be evaluated as a potential drug target for tuberculosis treatment?

The evaluation of Rv0104/MT0113 as a potential drug target requires a systematic approach to assess essentiality, druggability, and therapeutic potential:

  • Essentiality assessment:

    • Conditional gene knockdown systems to determine growth dependency

    • Transposon mutagenesis to identify insertion-tolerant regions

    • Testing essentiality across different growth conditions and in infection models

  • Druggability analysis:

    • Structural analysis of potential binding pockets

    • Fragment-based screening to identify chemical starting points

    • In silico docking studies with virtual compound libraries

  • Target validation:

    • Chemical genetic approaches with prototype inhibitors

    • Structure-activity relationship studies

    • Target engagement assays in whole cells

  • Therapeutic window evaluation:

    • Comparison with human homologs to assess selectivity

    • Cytotoxicity testing of lead compounds

    • Assessment of resistance development potential

A comprehensive target assessment would generate data such as:

Assessment CriterionMethodResultInterpretation
Genetic essentialityCRISPRiGrowth arrest upon depletionEssential under standard conditions
Chemical vulnerabilityFragment screeningMultiple fragment hits identifiedChemically tractable
Structural druggabilityComputational pocket analysis2 druggable pockets identifiedGood potential for small molecule binding
Selectivity potentialHomology analysisNo close human homologsLow risk of off-target effects
Resistance frequencySpontaneous mutant selectionLow frequency (10^-9)Low resistance development risk

The target validation process should also consider the role of Rv0104/MT0113 in different stages of tuberculosis infection, particularly in dormant or persistent bacteria that are difficult to eradicate with current treatments .

What are the best approaches for generating antibodies against Rv0104/MT0113 for research applications?

Generating high-quality antibodies against Rv0104/MT0113 is valuable for numerous research applications. The approach should be tailored to the intended use:

  • Antigen design strategies:

    • Full-length protein: Provides comprehensive epitope coverage but may have solubility issues

    • Domain-specific: Targets functional domains with better solubility

    • Peptide-based: Targets predicted surface-exposed regions

    • Multi-epitope approach: Combines multiple antigenic regions

  • Production platforms:

    • Polyclonal antibodies: Broader epitope recognition but batch variation

    • Monoclonal antibodies: Consistent specificity and renewable source

    • Recombinant antibodies: Engineered for specific properties

    • Nanobodies: Better penetration for certain applications

  • Validation requirements:

    • Western blotting against recombinant protein and native extracts

    • Immunoprecipitation efficiency testing

    • Immunofluorescence microscopy with appropriate controls

    • Testing in knockout strains to confirm specificity

  • Application optimization:

    • For each application (WB, IP, IF, etc.), optimize conditions

    • Determine sensitivity and linear detection range

    • Assess cross-reactivity with related mycobacterial proteins

A comprehensive antibody development project would include:

Antibody TypeImmunogenApplicationsValidation MethodPerformance
Rabbit polyclonalFull-length proteinWB, IP, ELISAComparison with KO strainHigh sensitivity, some background
Mouse monoclonal (Clone 3B4)N-terminal domain (aa 1-180)WB, IHC, ChIPPeptide competitionHigh specificity, lower sensitivity
Alpaca nanobodyCentral domain (aa 181-350)Live cell imagingRecombinant expressionExcellent penetration, medium affinity
Chicken IgYC-terminal peptideWB, IPPre-immune comparisonLow background in mycobacterial extracts

When developing antibodies against Rv0104/MT0113, researchers should consider the protein's native conformation and potential post-translational modifications that might affect epitope recognition .

How can systems biology approaches integrate Rv0104/MT0113 into the broader understanding of tuberculosis pathogenesis?

Understanding the role of Rv0104/MT0113 within the broader context of tuberculosis pathogenesis requires integrative systems biology approaches that connect molecular function to cellular and organismal phenotypes:

  • Multi-omics integration:

    • Transcriptomics: RNA-seq of wildtype vs. knockout strains

    • Proteomics: Quantitative analysis of protein abundance changes

    • Metabolomics: Metabolic profile alterations in mutant strains

    • Lipidomics: Changes in cell wall lipid composition

  • Network analysis:

    • Protein-protein interaction networks

    • Gene regulatory networks

    • Metabolic pathway integration

    • Host-pathogen interaction mapping

  • Temporal and spatial dynamics:

    • Time-course analyses during infection progression

    • Single-cell approaches to capture heterogeneity

    • Tissue-specific expression patterns in different infection sites

  • Computational modeling:

    • Constraint-based modeling of metabolic networks

    • Agent-based modeling of host-pathogen interactions

    • Machine learning integration of diverse datasets

A systems biology study would generate integrative data such as:

Data Integration LevelKey FindingsBiological Implications
Gene co-expressionRv0104 clusters with redox homeostasis genesPotential role in oxidative stress response
Protein interactomeCentral position in cell wall synthesis networkMay coordinate multiple cell wall processes
Metabolic impactAltered TCA cycle intermediates in knockoutConnects to central carbon metabolism
Host responseDifferential macrophage activation patternMay modulate host immune recognition
Cross-species comparisonConserved in virulent species onlyPotential virulence determinant

The systems biology approach should be iterative, with computational predictions guiding focused experimental validation, and experimental results refining computational models. This cycle helps position Rv0104/MT0113 within the complex molecular networks that underlie tuberculosis pathogenesis and persistence .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.