The recombinant uncharacterized protein Rv0104/MT0113 is a protein derived from the bacterium Mycobacterium tuberculosis, specifically from the H37Rv strain. This protein is classified as a conserved hypothetical protein, meaning its function is not well understood despite its conservation across various species. The protein is encoded by the gene Rv0104 and has a length of 504 amino acids .
Source: The protein is sourced from Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
Length: The protein consists of 504 amino acids.
Function: The function of this protein is currently unknown, though it shows weak similarity to cAMP-dependent protein kinases .
Expression Host: Recombinant versions of this protein are often expressed in Escherichia coli (E. coli) for research purposes .
Recombinant versions of Rv0104/MT0113 are produced using E. coli as the host organism. These proteins are typically tagged with a His-tag to facilitate purification and identification . The recombinant protein is available in various quantities, such as 50 µg, and is stored in a Tris-based buffer with 50% glycerol at -20°C .
The protein Rv0104/MT0113 is involved in several pathways, although specific details about these pathways are not well-documented. It is known to interact with other proteins and molecules, which can be crucial for understanding its role in cellular processes .
While the specific function of Rv0104/MT0113 remains unclear, its involvement in M. tuberculosis pathogenicity makes it a target for further research. Understanding its interactions and pathways could lead to the development of novel therapeutic strategies against tuberculosis.
| Product Name | Source (Host) | Species | Tag | Protein Length | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recombinant Full Length Uncharacterized Protein Rv0104/MT0113 | E. coli | Mycobacterium tuberculosis | His | Full Length (1-504) | Not Available |
| Gene | Length (aa) | Function | Functional Category |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rv0104 | 504 | Unknown | Conserved Hypotheticals |
Recombinant Rv0104/MT0113 can be expressed in multiple heterologous systems, each offering distinct advantages for different research applications. Expression hosts include E. coli, yeast, baculovirus-infected insect cells, and mammalian cell lines .
The choice of expression system depends on experimental goals:
| Expression Host | Advantages | Limitations | Typical Yield | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E. coli | High yield, rapid production, cost-effective | Limited post-translational modifications | 1mg+ | Structural studies, antibody production |
| Yeast | Eukaryotic processing, high yield | More complex than E. coli | 1mg+ | Functional studies requiring some modifications |
| Baculovirus | Complex eukaryotic modifications | Lower yield, longer production time | 200μg | Studies requiring authentic folding |
| Mammalian cells | Most authentic post-translational modifications | Lowest yield, highest cost | 200μg | Interaction studies with host proteins |
When selecting an expression system, researchers should consider whether post-translational modifications are critical for their research questions . For basic biochemical characterization, E. coli-expressed protein with a His-tag offers the most cost-effective approach with sufficient purity for most applications .
Proper storage and handling of recombinant Rv0104/MT0113 is critical for maintaining protein integrity and experimental reproducibility. The protein is typically supplied as a lyophilized powder and should be reconstituted according to specific protocols .
For optimal stability:
Store the lyophilized protein at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt
Reconstitute in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL
Add glycerol to a final concentration of 5-50% (optimally 50%) to prevent freeze-thaw damage
Aliquot to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles
Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week
Repeated freeze-thaw cycles significantly reduce protein activity, with each cycle potentially decreasing activity by 15-20%. Therefore, creating multiple small aliquots is strongly recommended. Additionally, the protein is stabilized in Tris/PBS-based buffer with 6% trehalose at pH 8.0, which helps maintain native conformation during freeze-thaw cycles .
Sequence analysis of Rv0104/MT0113 reveals several conserved domains that suggest potential functional roles, although definitive characterization remains incomplete. Bioinformatic analysis indicates domains associated with metabolic functions that may be critical for M. tuberculosis survival within host macrophages .
The protein sequence contains motifs suggesting:
A potential enzymatic role in lipid metabolism, consistent with the importance of lipid metabolism for M. tuberculosis virulence
Domains suggesting possible involvement in cell wall synthesis or modification
Sequence homology with proteins involved in redox reactions, potentially important for survival under oxidative stress conditions within macrophages
To experimentally investigate these putative functions, researchers should consider:
Site-directed mutagenesis of conserved residues to determine their contribution to protein function
Co-immunoprecipitation studies to identify interaction partners
Metabolomic profiling of knockout strains to detect changes in metabolic pathways
Transcriptomic analysis to identify genes co-regulated with Rv0104 under different stress conditions
The protein's potential role in M. tuberculosis pathogenesis makes it a candidate for targeting in therapeutic development, particularly if it proves essential for bacterial survival in host environments .
Determining the function of uncharacterized proteins like Rv0104/MT0113 often requires genetic manipulation approaches. A comprehensive genetic study would involve the following methodological steps:
Construction of knockout mutant:
Design specialized allelic exchange substrates targeting the Rv0104 gene
Use specialized mycobacterial recombineering systems (e.g., temperature-sensitive mycobacteriophages)
Confirm deletion by PCR, Southern blotting, and whole-genome sequencing to verify the absence of off-target effects
Phenotypic characterization:
Compare growth kinetics between wild-type and knockout strains under various conditions
Assess survival under stresses relevant to host environments (low pH, nutrient limitation, oxidative stress)
Evaluate cell wall integrity using specialized mycobacterial staining techniques
Conduct infection studies in macrophage cell lines and animal models
Complementation studies:
Reintroduce the wild-type gene using integrative or episomal vectors
Include controls with mutated versions of putative functional domains
Assess restoration of wild-type phenotype
Conditional expression systems:
If the gene proves essential, utilize tetracycline-inducible or other conditional expression systems
Monitor phenotypic changes upon depletion of the protein under controlled conditions
The experimental design should include appropriate controls, such as complementation with a non-functional version of the protein, to confirm that phenotypic effects are specifically due to the absence of Rv0104/MT0113 function rather than polar effects on neighboring genes .
Understanding the subcellular localization of Rv0104/MT0113 provides critical insights into its potential function in M. tuberculosis. Multiple complementary approaches should be employed to determine localization with high confidence:
Computational prediction:
Analysis using specialized algorithms for mycobacterial proteins
Identification of signal sequences, transmembrane domains, and localization signals
Biochemical fractionation:
Differential ultracentrifugation to separate cytosolic, membrane, and cell wall fractions
Sequential extraction with increasingly harsh detergents to differentiate between peripheral and integral membrane associations
Western blotting of fractions using anti-Rv0104 antibodies
Fluorescence microscopy:
Construction of fluorescent protein fusions (GFP or mCherry) at either N- or C-terminus
Live-cell imaging in M. tuberculosis or surrogate mycobacterial species
Co-localization studies with markers of specific subcellular compartments
Immunoelectron microscopy:
High-resolution visualization using gold-labeled antibodies against native Rv0104 or epitope tags
Quantitative analysis of gold particle distribution across cellular compartments
Proximity-dependent labeling:
BioID or APEX2 fusion proteins to identify proximal interacting partners
Mass spectrometry analysis of labeled proteins to create a subcellular interaction map
A comprehensive localization study would generate data such as:
| Approach | Primary Localization | Secondary Localization | Confidence Level |
|---|---|---|---|
| Computational | Cell membrane | Periplasm | Medium |
| Biochemical fractionation | Cell membrane fraction | Cytosolic fraction | High |
| Fluorescence microscopy | Polar localization | Cell envelope | Medium-high |
| Immunoelectron microscopy | Cell membrane | Cell wall | Very high |
| Proximity labeling | Cell membrane proteins | Metabolic enzymes | High |
Integration of results from multiple approaches provides the most reliable determination of subcellular localization and generates hypotheses about potential interaction partners and functions .
Despite being uncharacterized, sequence analysis of Rv0104/MT0113 suggests potential enzymatic functions. Designing experiments to detect and characterize possible enzymatic activities requires a systematic approach:
Bioinformatic prediction of potential activities:
Sequence homology with characterized enzymes
Structural motif identification
Phylogenetic analysis across mycobacterial species
Activity screening assays:
Design a panel of assays based on predicted functions
Include controls for specificity (heat-inactivated protein, catalytic site mutants)
Test under various conditions (pH, temperature, cofactors)
Enzyme kinetics characterization:
Determine optimal conditions for activity
Calculate kinetic parameters (Km, Vmax, kcat)
Assess substrate specificity
Structural analysis in relation to function:
Crystallography or cryo-EM studies
In silico molecular docking of potential substrates
Structure-guided mutagenesis of potential catalytic residues
A well-designed enzymatic characterization would produce data that could be presented as follows:
| Parameter | Condition 1 | Condition 2 | Condition 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Optimal pH | 6.5 | 7.0 | 7.5 |
| Temperature optimum (°C) | 30 | 37 | 42 |
| Km (μM) | 125 ± 15 | 85 ± 10 | 150 ± 20 |
| Vmax (μmol/min/mg) | 12.5 | 18.7 | 9.3 |
| kcat (s-1) | 3.2 | 5.1 | 2.4 |
| kcat/Km (M-1s-1) | 2.56 × 104 | 6.00 × 104 | 1.60 × 104 |
The experimental design should account for potential challenges specific to mycobacterial proteins, such as the need for specialized cofactors or conditions that mimic the intracellular environment of macrophages where M. tuberculosis resides during infection .
Identifying interaction partners of Rv0104/MT0113 is crucial for understanding its cellular function. A comprehensive protein-protein interaction study should employ multiple complementary approaches:
Affinity purification-mass spectrometry (AP-MS):
Use tagged Rv0104 (His-tag or epitope tag) as bait protein
Include appropriate controls (tag-only, irrelevant protein)
Perform under native and cross-linking conditions
Analyze by quantitative proteomics to distinguish specific from non-specific interactions
Yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) screening:
Construct bait plasmids with full-length and domain-specific fragments
Screen against M. tuberculosis genomic library
Validate positive interactions through secondary assays
Co-immunoprecipitation validation:
Generate antibodies against Rv0104 or use tagged versions
Perform reciprocal co-IP experiments
Include appropriate negative controls and competition assays
Microscopy-based interaction studies:
Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)
Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC)
Proximity ligation assay (PLA)
In vitro binding assays:
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) or biolayer interferometry
Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC)
Determine binding kinetics and thermodynamics
Data from protein interaction studies can be presented as an interaction network with confidence scores:
| Interaction Partner | Detection Method | Interaction Strength | Biological Relevance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein A | AP-MS, Co-IP, Y2H | Strong (Kd = 50 nM) | Cell wall biosynthesis |
| Protein B | AP-MS, FRET | Moderate (Kd = 2 μM) | Stress response |
| Protein C | Y2H, BiFC | Weak (Kd = 15 μM) | Unknown |
| Protein D | AP-MS only | Very weak | Potentially artifactual |
When designing interaction studies, researchers should consider the membrane association of Rv0104/MT0113, which may require specialized detergent conditions to maintain protein solubility while preserving native interactions .
Structural characterization of Rv0104/MT0113 would provide invaluable insights into its function. A comprehensive structural biology approach would include:
Protein production optimization:
Screen expression conditions (temperature, induction time, media)
Optimize purification protocols for structural studies
Assess protein stability and homogeneity using dynamic light scattering
Crystallography approach:
Screen crystallization conditions systematically
Optimize crystal growth for high-resolution diffraction
Consider heavy atom derivatives for phase determination
Analyze structure-function relationships
Cryo-electron microscopy:
Particularly useful if the protein forms larger complexes
Sample preparation optimization
Data collection and processing strategies
Resolution enhancement techniques
NMR spectroscopy:
Useful for studying protein dynamics
Requires isotopic labeling (15N, 13C)
Can provide information on ligand binding sites
Computational structure prediction:
Template-based modeling
Ab initio prediction
Molecular dynamics simulations to study conformational flexibility
The experimental design should address potential challenges such as protein instability, aggregation, and the need for membrane mimetics if the protein has membrane-associated domains. If initial attempts with the full-length protein are unsuccessful, a domain-based approach focusing on individual functional regions may be more productive .
Ensuring the quality of recombinant Rv0104/MT0113 preparations is essential for reliable experimental results. A comprehensive validation protocol should include:
Purity assessment:
SDS-PAGE with Coomassie staining (target: >90% purity)
Western blotting with anti-His tag or specific antibodies
Mass spectrometry to confirm protein identity and detect potential contaminants
Size exclusion chromatography to assess aggregation state
Functional validation:
Activity assays based on predicted function
Circular dichroism to confirm proper folding
Thermal shift assays to assess stability
Binding assays with predicted interaction partners
Contamination testing:
Endotoxin testing for preparations intended for immunological studies
Nuclease treatment to remove potential DNA/RNA contamination
Protease inhibitor screening to prevent degradation
A typical validation report might include:
| Quality Parameter | Method | Acceptance Criteria | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Purity | SDS-PAGE | >90% | 94% |
| Identity | Mass Spectrometry | Match to predicted MW | 54.2 kDa (expected: 54.4 kDa) |
| Secondary structure | Circular Dichroism | Proper folding | α-helix: 40%, β-sheet: 25% |
| Aggregation | Dynamic Light Scattering | Monodisperse | 90% monomer, 10% dimer |
| Endotoxin | LAL assay | <0.1 EU/μg protein | 0.05 EU/μg |
| Thermal stability | DSF | Tm > 40°C | Tm = 52°C |
For research applications requiring particularly high purity, additional purification steps such as ion exchange chromatography or hydrophobic interaction chromatography may be necessary beyond the initial affinity purification using the His-tag .
Given the uncharacterized nature of Rv0104/MT0113, computational predictions represent a valuable starting point for experimental studies. A comprehensive bioinformatic analysis should include:
Sequence analysis:
Homology searches using PSI-BLAST and HHpred
Multiple sequence alignment across mycobacterial species
Identification of conserved domains and motifs
Analysis of sequence conservation patterns
Structural prediction:
Ab initio modeling using AlphaFold2 or RoseTTAFold
Template-based modeling if structural homologs exist
Modeling of potential ligand binding sites
Molecular dynamics simulations to assess flexibility
Genomic context analysis:
Examination of neighboring genes and operonic structure
Co-expression patterns across different conditions
Presence/absence patterns across mycobacterial species
Synteny analysis across related bacteria
Network-based predictions:
Integration of protein-protein interaction data
Pathway enrichment analysis
Guilt-by-association approaches using known function proteins
A typical bioinformatic analysis would generate predictions such as:
| Prediction Method | Predicted Function | Confidence Score | Supporting Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain analysis | Oxidoreductase activity | High | FAD-binding motif at residues 120-150 |
| Structural homology | Dehydrogenase | Medium | Structural similarity to short-chain dehydrogenases |
| Genomic context | Cell wall biosynthesis | Medium-high | Co-located with cell wall synthesis genes |
| Co-expression | Stress response | Medium | Upregulated with stress response genes |
| Phylogenetic profiling | Essential for virulence | High | Conserved in pathogenic mycobacteria only |
These computational predictions should be viewed as hypotheses to be tested experimentally rather than definitive functional assignments. The most robust approach integrates predictions from multiple methods to identify convergent functional hypotheses .
When facing contradictory hypotheses about the function of Rv0104/MT0113, a systematic experimental approach is needed to evaluate competing models. An effective strategy includes:
Identifying testable predictions:
For each hypothesis, develop specific testable predictions
Ensure predictions are mutually exclusive when possible
Design experiments that can distinguish between alternatives
Multi-level experimental approach:
Genetic: Gene knockout, complementation, and conditional expression
Biochemical: In vitro assays for predicted activities
Structural: Protein-ligand interaction studies
Cellular: Phenotypic analysis under various conditions
Quantitative hypothesis testing:
Develop mathematical models for competing hypotheses
Design experiments to estimate model parameters
Use Bayesian model selection to evaluate evidence
Controlled experimental design:
Include appropriate positive and negative controls
Blind analysis when possible to avoid confirmation bias
Use multiple independent methods to test the same hypothesis
A framework for testing contradictory hypotheses might look like:
| Hypothesis | Key Prediction | Experimental Approach | Positive Control | Negative Control |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1: Oxidoreductase | Activity with NAD(P)H | Enzymatic assay measuring cofactor consumption | Known oxidoreductase | Catalytic mutant |
| H2: Cell wall synthesis | Altered cell wall composition in knockout | Lipidomic analysis, cell wall permeability | Known cell wall mutant | Complemented strain |
| H3: Stress response | Differential sensitivity to stressors | Survival assays under various stresses | Known stress-sensitive mutant | Wild-type strain |
The experimental design should consider potential confounding factors such as compensatory mechanisms, polar effects of genetic manipulations, and technical limitations of assays. Researchers should also be open to the possibility that Rv0104/MT0113 may have multiple functions, explaining apparently contradictory results .
The evaluation of Rv0104/MT0113 as a potential drug target requires a systematic approach to assess essentiality, druggability, and therapeutic potential:
Essentiality assessment:
Conditional gene knockdown systems to determine growth dependency
Transposon mutagenesis to identify insertion-tolerant regions
Testing essentiality across different growth conditions and in infection models
Druggability analysis:
Structural analysis of potential binding pockets
Fragment-based screening to identify chemical starting points
In silico docking studies with virtual compound libraries
Target validation:
Chemical genetic approaches with prototype inhibitors
Structure-activity relationship studies
Target engagement assays in whole cells
Therapeutic window evaluation:
Comparison with human homologs to assess selectivity
Cytotoxicity testing of lead compounds
Assessment of resistance development potential
A comprehensive target assessment would generate data such as:
| Assessment Criterion | Method | Result | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Genetic essentiality | CRISPRi | Growth arrest upon depletion | Essential under standard conditions |
| Chemical vulnerability | Fragment screening | Multiple fragment hits identified | Chemically tractable |
| Structural druggability | Computational pocket analysis | 2 druggable pockets identified | Good potential for small molecule binding |
| Selectivity potential | Homology analysis | No close human homologs | Low risk of off-target effects |
| Resistance frequency | Spontaneous mutant selection | Low frequency (10^-9) | Low resistance development risk |
The target validation process should also consider the role of Rv0104/MT0113 in different stages of tuberculosis infection, particularly in dormant or persistent bacteria that are difficult to eradicate with current treatments .
Generating high-quality antibodies against Rv0104/MT0113 is valuable for numerous research applications. The approach should be tailored to the intended use:
Antigen design strategies:
Full-length protein: Provides comprehensive epitope coverage but may have solubility issues
Domain-specific: Targets functional domains with better solubility
Peptide-based: Targets predicted surface-exposed regions
Multi-epitope approach: Combines multiple antigenic regions
Production platforms:
Polyclonal antibodies: Broader epitope recognition but batch variation
Monoclonal antibodies: Consistent specificity and renewable source
Recombinant antibodies: Engineered for specific properties
Nanobodies: Better penetration for certain applications
Validation requirements:
Western blotting against recombinant protein and native extracts
Immunoprecipitation efficiency testing
Immunofluorescence microscopy with appropriate controls
Testing in knockout strains to confirm specificity
Application optimization:
For each application (WB, IP, IF, etc.), optimize conditions
Determine sensitivity and linear detection range
Assess cross-reactivity with related mycobacterial proteins
A comprehensive antibody development project would include:
| Antibody Type | Immunogen | Applications | Validation Method | Performance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rabbit polyclonal | Full-length protein | WB, IP, ELISA | Comparison with KO strain | High sensitivity, some background |
| Mouse monoclonal (Clone 3B4) | N-terminal domain (aa 1-180) | WB, IHC, ChIP | Peptide competition | High specificity, lower sensitivity |
| Alpaca nanobody | Central domain (aa 181-350) | Live cell imaging | Recombinant expression | Excellent penetration, medium affinity |
| Chicken IgY | C-terminal peptide | WB, IP | Pre-immune comparison | Low background in mycobacterial extracts |
When developing antibodies against Rv0104/MT0113, researchers should consider the protein's native conformation and potential post-translational modifications that might affect epitope recognition .
Understanding the role of Rv0104/MT0113 within the broader context of tuberculosis pathogenesis requires integrative systems biology approaches that connect molecular function to cellular and organismal phenotypes:
Multi-omics integration:
Transcriptomics: RNA-seq of wildtype vs. knockout strains
Proteomics: Quantitative analysis of protein abundance changes
Metabolomics: Metabolic profile alterations in mutant strains
Lipidomics: Changes in cell wall lipid composition
Network analysis:
Protein-protein interaction networks
Gene regulatory networks
Metabolic pathway integration
Host-pathogen interaction mapping
Temporal and spatial dynamics:
Time-course analyses during infection progression
Single-cell approaches to capture heterogeneity
Tissue-specific expression patterns in different infection sites
Computational modeling:
Constraint-based modeling of metabolic networks
Agent-based modeling of host-pathogen interactions
Machine learning integration of diverse datasets
A systems biology study would generate integrative data such as:
| Data Integration Level | Key Findings | Biological Implications |
|---|---|---|
| Gene co-expression | Rv0104 clusters with redox homeostasis genes | Potential role in oxidative stress response |
| Protein interactome | Central position in cell wall synthesis network | May coordinate multiple cell wall processes |
| Metabolic impact | Altered TCA cycle intermediates in knockout | Connects to central carbon metabolism |
| Host response | Differential macrophage activation pattern | May modulate host immune recognition |
| Cross-species comparison | Conserved in virulent species only | Potential virulence determinant |
The systems biology approach should be iterative, with computational predictions guiding focused experimental validation, and experimental results refining computational models. This cycle helps position Rv0104/MT0113 within the complex molecular networks that underlie tuberculosis pathogenesis and persistence .