The recombinant uncharacterized protein Rv2083/MT2145, also known as Rv2083 and MT2145, is a protein derived from Mycobacterium tuberculosis, a bacterium responsible for tuberculosis. This protein is of particular interest due to its potential roles in various cellular processes, although its specific functions remain largely uncharacterized. The recombinant form of this protein is produced through genetic engineering techniques, typically in Escherichia coli (E. coli), and is used in research and development, including vaccine studies.
The amino acid sequence of Rv2083/MT2145 is crucial for understanding its structure and potential functions. The sequence includes various motifs that could be involved in protein-protein interactions or enzymatic activities .
Recombinant Rv2083/MT2145 protein is used in vaccine development against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Its role in eliciting immune responses makes it a candidate for inclusion in vaccine formulations .
Although the specific pathways in which Rv2083/MT2145 is involved are not well-documented, it is believed to participate in several cellular processes. Further research is needed to elucidate its exact roles .
Recombinant Uncharacterized Protein Rv2083/MT2145 is a protein derived from Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the bacterium responsible for tuberculosis. Despite its potential significance in pathogenesis, its specific functions remain largely uncharacterized. The recombinant form is typically produced through genetic engineering techniques, primarily in Escherichia coli (E. coli) expression systems, for research purposes including vaccine development studies.
Initial characterization of Rv2083/MT2145 should employ a systematic bioinformatic workflow:
Sequence analysis using BLAST for homology detection
Motif and domain identification using NCBI Conserved Domain Database (CDD)
Physicochemical property prediction (instability index, theoretical pI, GRAVY values)
Subcellular localization prediction using tools like PSORTb
Secretory nature analysis using SignalP 5.0
Structure prediction through homology modeling or ab initio approaches
This multi-faceted approach provides a foundation for understanding potential functions before experimental validation. In similar analyses of uncharacterized proteins, researchers have found that approximately 70% of hypothetical proteins demonstrate stability with instability index values below 40, while about 70% typically show negative GRAVY values indicating non-polar nature .
The following physicochemical properties should be systematically analyzed:
| Property | Analytical Method | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Molecular weight | Mass spectrometry | Confirms predicted size from amino acid sequence |
| Stability | Instability index calculation | Values <40 indicate stable proteins |
| pI value | Isoelectric focusing | Important for purification strategy design |
| GRAVY value | Computational prediction | Indicates hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity |
| Secondary structure | Circular dichroism spectroscopy | Reveals α-helices, β-sheets composition |
| Transmembrane domains | TMHMM or similar tools | Indicates potential membrane association |
| Secretory nature | SignalP analysis | Suggests cellular localization |
When characterizing uncharacterized proteins, researchers typically find theoretical pI values ranging from 4.05 to 11.99, with specific distributions varying by organism and protein family .
While multiple expression systems can be employed for recombinant protein production, each offers distinct advantages for expressing Rv2083/MT2145:
| Expression System | Advantages | Disadvantages | Suitability for Rv2083/MT2145 |
|---|---|---|---|
| E. coli | Low cost, rapid growth, high yields, well-established protocols | Limited post-translational modifications, potential inclusion body formation | Primary choice for initial characterization |
| Yeast (P. pastoris) | Proper protein folding, some post-translational modifications | Longer production time, lower yields than E. coli | Secondary option if functional studies require glycosylation |
| Mammalian cells (HEK293, CHO) | Human-like glycosylation, authentic folding | High cost, complex media, slow growth | Only if native-like modifications are essential |
| Insect cells (Sf9, Sf21) | High expression levels, most eukaryotic PTMs | Requires specialized expertise | Alternative for complex folding requirements |
E. coli remains the preferable host for recombinant proteins due to its low cost, well-known biochemistry and genetics, rapid growth, and good productivity . The selection should be guided by specific experimental objectives and protein characteristics.
Optimizing expression of Rv2083/MT2145 in E. coli requires systematic adjustment of multiple parameters:
Codon optimization: Adjusting the coding sequence to match E. coli codon usage preferences can increase expression by many folds, particularly for mycobacterial genes which may contain rare codons .
Fusion tags selection:
Expression conditions optimization:
Inclusion body management strategies:
Implementation of these strategies has been shown to increase soluble protein yields by 2-10 fold in challenging recombinant protein expression systems.
A multi-step purification strategy is typically required to obtain research-grade Rv2083/MT2145:
Initial capture: Affinity chromatography (IMAC for His-tagged protein)
Intermediate purification: Ion exchange chromatography based on predicted pI
Polishing: Size exclusion chromatography for final purity enhancement
Quality control: SDS-PAGE, Western blot, and mass spectrometry validation
For structural studies requiring ultra-pure protein, additional considerations include:
Buffer optimization through thermal shift assays to enhance stability
Removal of fusion tags with high-specificity proteases (TEV, PreScission)
Monitoring protein homogeneity through dynamic light scattering
When designing purification protocols, researchers should consider that approximately 23-27% of mycobacterial hypothetical proteins may localize to the cytoplasmic membrane, which can impact solubilization and purification strategies .
Structural determination of Rv2083/MT2145 requires a strategic combination of techniques:
The strategic approach should begin with crystallization trials while simultaneously pursuing lower-resolution techniques to gain preliminary structural insights. Prior to expensive structural studies, computational prediction through AlphaFold2 or RoseTTAFold can provide valuable initial models.
Identifying the interaction network of Rv2083/MT2145 requires a multi-technique approach:
In vitro methods:
Cellular methods:
Bacterial two-hybrid screening
Co-immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry
Chemical cross-linking coupled with mass spectrometry
Proximity-dependent biotin labeling (BioID, APEX)
Computational predictions:
Protein-protein interaction databases mining
Structural docking simulations
Co-expression network analysis across tuberculosis transcriptome datasets
Combining these approaches provides a comprehensive view of potential interaction partners, which can significantly accelerate functional characterization of this uncharacterized protein.
Resolving contradictions in experimental data requires systematic investigation:
Identify the specific contradiction:
Document exact experimental conditions from conflicting studies
Compare protein constructs (tags, mutations, truncations)
Evaluate expression systems and purification methods
Design controlled experiments:
Perform side-by-side comparisons under identical conditions
Use multiple orthogonal techniques to measure the same parameter
Include positive and negative controls for validation
Statistical analysis:
Replication and validation:
Reproduce key experiments with blinded analysis
Collaborate with independent laboratories
Consider biological variability vs. technical artifacts
When reporting contradictory results, clear articulation in the results section of scientific papers is essential, avoiding terms like "increased" or "decreased" for insignificant changes and reserving these words for statistically significant differences .
Evaluating Rv2083/MT2145 as a vaccine candidate requires systematic assessment of multiple parameters:
Antigenicity and immunogenicity assessment:
In silico prediction of B-cell and T-cell epitopes
Experimental validation through ELISPOT or IFN-γ release assays
Analysis of antigen presentation by different MHC alleles
Safety profile determination:
Allergenicity prediction using computational tools
Homology analysis with human proteins to avoid cross-reactivity
In vitro cytotoxicity testing in relevant cell lines
Formulation optimization:
Adjuvant selection and combination testing
Stability studies under various storage conditions
Delivery system development (liposomes, nanoparticles)
Preclinical efficacy studies:
Challenge studies in appropriate animal models
Correlates of protection identification
Dose-response relationship determination
For effective vaccine development, proteins should be non-homologous to human proteins (to avoid cross-reactivity), antigenic, non-allergenic, and potentially contain virulence factors. Studies of hypothetical proteins have shown that approximately 99.7% are typically non-homologous to human proteins, while 36-41% demonstrate antigenicity properties favorable for vaccine development .
Research on Rv2083/MT2145 should follow these experimental design principles:
Clearly define variables:
Independent variables (protein concentration, buffer conditions, etc.)
Dependent variables (binding affinity, enzymatic activity, etc.)
Control variables to maintain consistency
Formulate specific, testable hypotheses based on:
Bioinformatic predictions
Preliminary data
Literature on related proteins
Design controlled experiments:
Include appropriate positive and negative controls
Minimize confounding variables
Use randomization and blinding where possible
Plan appropriate measurements:
Consider replication strategies:
Technical replicates to assess method reliability
Biological replicates to account for natural variation
Independent experimental repetitions
Following these principles ensures that research on Rv2083/MT2145 yields reliable, reproducible results that can advance our understanding of this uncharacterized protein.
Understanding the cellular localization of Rv2083/MT2145 requires complementary approaches:
Computational prediction:
Fluorescence microscopy techniques:
GFP fusion constructs for live cell imaging
Immunofluorescence with specific antibodies
Time-lapse imaging for dynamic trafficking studies
Biochemical fractionation:
Differential centrifugation to separate cellular compartments
Detergent solubility analysis for membrane association
Protease protection assays for topology determination
Proximity labeling approaches:
BioID or APEX2 fusion to identify neighboring proteins
Spatially-restricted enzymatic tagging of interaction partners
When characterizing hypothetical proteins, subcellular localization studies typically find that approximately 32-38% localize to the cytoplasm, 23-27% to the cytoplasmic membrane, 1-3% to extracellular spaces, and 37-40% have unknown localization .
Integrating multi-omics data provides comprehensive insights into Rv2083/MT2145 function:
Data acquisition and integration strategy:
Transcriptomics: RNA-seq under various conditions
Proteomics: Quantitative MS analysis
Metabolomics: Changes associated with protein expression
Interactomics: Protein-protein interaction networks
Correlation analysis:
Co-expression patterns with known proteins
Temporal relationships during infection process
Stress response signatures
Network reconstruction:
Contextual positioning within metabolic networks
Regulatory network mapping
Functional module identification
Condition-specific analysis:
Differential expression during host infection
Response to antibiotic treatment
Nutrient limitation effects
This systems biology approach can reveal functional associations even when direct biochemical functions remain uncharacterized, providing valuable context for targeted experimental studies.
Several significant challenges persist in characterizing proteins like Rv2083/MT2145:
Technical limitations:
Difficulty in expressing mycobacterial proteins in heterologous systems
Limited sensitivity of assays for detecting subtle biochemical activities
Challenges in crystallizing proteins for structural determination
Biological complexity:
Potential moonlighting functions (multiple distinct roles)
Context-dependent activity requiring specific co-factors or conditions
Functional redundancy masking phenotypes in knockout studies
Computational challenges:
Remote homology detection limitations
Difficulty predicting novel folds or enzymatic activities
Integration of conflicting predictions from different algorithms
Experimental design issues:
Selection of appropriate cellular or biochemical assays
Development of specific antibodies or detection methods
Design of relevant phenotypic screens
Addressing these challenges requires innovative approaches combining computational prediction, high-throughput screening, and targeted biochemical characterization within physiologically relevant contexts.