UPF0213 proteins are annotated as conserved hypothetical proteins due to their limited functional characterization. They are typically small (10–20 kDa) and lack homology to well-studied protein families, making their roles challenging to deduce. The designation "M6_Spy1178" likely refers to a strain-specific variant, such as those found in Streptococcus pyogenes (e.g., Spy1178 in serotype M6).
Recombinant UPF0213 proteins are produced using diverse expression platforms, as evidenced by commercial offerings. Key methods include:
Tags: His-tags enable affinity chromatography, while biotinylated Avi-tags facilitate interaction studies.
Purity: Commercial products typically report >80% purity by SDS-PAGE .
Stability: Lyophilized proteins require reconstitution in PBS with albumin for stability .
Recombinant UPF0213 proteins are used in:
Biomolecule Interactions: Studying binding partners via pull-down assays or biotin-avidin systems .
Structural Biology: X-ray crystallography or NMR to elucidate 3D structure.
Pathogenicity Studies: Investigating roles in bacterial virulence, particularly in Streptococcus pyogenes.
Note: We will prioritize shipping the format currently in stock. If you require a specific format, please specify this during order placement.
Note: Proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires prior arrangement and incurs additional charges.
The tag type is determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its use.
The structural confidence of recombinant UPF0213 protein M6_Spy1178 can be assessed through AlphaFold prediction metrics, similar to other UPF0213 family proteins. Based on comparable UPF0213 proteins from Streptococcus pyogenes, such as SpyM50708, the predicted structure typically demonstrates a global pLDDT (predicted Local Distance Difference Test) score between 75-95 . For reference, the UPF0213 protein from Vibrio campbellii (VIBHAR_05350) shows a high global pLDDT score of 94.36, indicating very high confidence in the predicted model .
When working with these models, researchers should be aware that:
Regions with pLDDT > 90 are considered very high confidence
Regions with 70 < pLDDT ≤ 90 are considered confident
Regions with 50 < pLDDT ≤ 70 have low confidence
Regions with pLDDT ≤ 50 have very low confidence and may be unstructured in isolation
Laboratory validation of these computational predictions is highly recommended for critical research applications.
UPF0213 proteins show variable sequence conservation across bacterial species while maintaining structural similarities. For comparative analysis, consider the following:
When designing experiments involving M6_Spy1178, researchers should conduct multiple sequence alignments to identify conserved domains that may be functionally significant. Particular attention should be paid to structural motifs rather than specific sequences, as UPF0213 proteins often maintain functional similarity despite sequence divergence.
The selection of an appropriate expression system for UPF0213 protein M6_Spy1178 should be based on project requirements regarding protein folding, post-translational modifications, and downstream applications. Multiple expression options are available:
E. coli expression systems: Preferred for high-yield production of UPF0213 proteins, as demonstrated by successful expression of related UPF0213 proteins including YPO3475/y0709/YP_0608 and yhbQ . These systems typically yield >85% purity by SDS-PAGE analysis.
Yeast expression systems: Provide eukaryotic folding machinery that may benefit certain structural confirmations, though yields are typically lower than bacterial systems .
Baculovirus expression: Offers advantages for proteins requiring complex folding or those that form inclusion bodies in bacterial systems .
Mammalian cell expression: Consider for applications requiring mammalian-specific post-translational modifications, though this is rarely necessary for bacterial proteins .
For robust expression of M6_Spy1178, our recommended protocol includes:
Using codon-optimized sequences for the expression host
Employing fusion tags (His, GST, or Avi-tag) to facilitate purification
Expression temperature optimization, typically 18°C for improved folding
Inducer concentration titration to balance yield and solubility
Purification of recombinant UPF0213 protein M6_Spy1178 requires a strategic approach to maintain structural integrity and functional activity:
Initial capture: Immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) is effective for His-tagged constructs, while glutathione affinity chromatography works well for GST-fusion proteins.
Intermediate purification: Ion exchange chromatography to separate based on charge properties. For UPF0213 proteins, anion exchange columns (e.g., Q Sepharose) typically provide better resolution than cation exchangers.
Polishing step: Size exclusion chromatography to achieve >90% purity and remove aggregates.
Recommended buffer conditions based on related UPF0213 proteins:
Lysis buffer: 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 10 mM imidazole, 1 mM DTT, protease inhibitors
Elution buffer: 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 250 mM imidazole
Storage buffer: 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT, 10% glycerol
For long-term storage, add 5-50% glycerol and store at -20°C/-80°C in small aliquots to avoid freeze-thaw cycles. The general shelf life in liquid form is approximately 6 months at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized preparations can maintain stability for up to 12 months .
The biological function of UPF0213 protein M6_Spy1178 remains partially characterized, requiring multiple experimental approaches:
Comparative genomic analysis: Identify syntenic relationships and gene neighborhood conservation across Streptococcus species to infer potential function.
Protein-protein interaction studies:
Pull-down assays using recombinant M6_Spy1178 as bait
Yeast two-hybrid screening against Streptococcus pyogenes library
Proximity-dependent biotin identification (BioID) using M6_Spy1178-BirA fusion
Gene knockout/knockdown experiments:
CRISPR-Cas9 mediated gene deletion in S. pyogenes
Antisense RNA approaches for transient depletion
Analysis of resulting phenotypes for growth, morphology, and virulence alterations
Structural biology approaches:
X-ray crystallography or cryo-EM to validate and refine AlphaFold predictions
Molecular dynamics simulations to identify potential binding pockets
Biochemical activity assays:
Testing for potential enzymatic activities (hydrolase, transferase, etc.)
In vitro RNA binding assays, particularly given the role of other UPF proteins in RNA metabolism
Investigations should consider potential relationships to nonsense-mediated mRNA decay pathways, as other UPF family proteins like UPF1 are involved in these processes .
Differential scanning fluorimetry (DSF) provides critical insights into the thermal stability and buffer optimization for UPF0213 protein M6_Spy1178. For robust implementation:
Sample preparation optimization:
Protein concentration: Test range of 0.1-0.5 mg/mL (typically 0.2 mg/mL is optimal)
Dye selection: SYPRO Orange at 5-10X final concentration is recommended
Buffer screening: Test multiple buffers (MES, HEPES, Tris) at pH 6.0-8.0
Experimental parameters:
Temperature range: 25-95°C
Ramp rate: 1°C/min for highest resolution
Filter settings: Excitation ~490 nm, emission ~575 nm (SYPRO Orange)
Data analysis approach:
Calculate Tm using first derivative method (inflection point of melting curve)
Assess curve shape for indications of multiple domains or aggregation
Buffer optimization matrix:
| Buffer Component | Range to Test | Typical Optimal Range |
|---|---|---|
| pH | 5.5-9.0 (0.5 increments) | 7.0-8.0 |
| NaCl | 0-500 mM (50 mM increments) | 100-200 mM |
| Glycerol | 0-20% (5% increments) | 5-10% |
| Reducing agents | 0-5 mM DTT or TCEP | 1 mM |
Ligand screening: Test potential ligands/cofactors at 1-10 mM to identify stabilizing compounds, which may indicate biological binding partners.
When interpreting DSF data for UPF0213 proteins, compare results with known proteins in the same family to identify patterns in stabilizing conditions, providing insights into potential shared functional characteristics.
While sharing the UPF designation, UPF0213 proteins and UPF1 represent distinct protein families with different evolutionary origins and functions:
Evolutionary divergence:
Structural domains:
Functional mechanisms:
UPF1 functions through alternating conformations between "open" and "closed" states, regulated by an 11-amino acid insertion in the regulatory loop (353-GNEDLVIIWLR-363) that enhances its translocation and ATPase activities
UPF0213 protein functions remain largely uncharacterized but appear to be distinct from UPF1's role in RNA surveillance
Molecular partners:
Despite sharing the "UPF" designation, researchers should not assume functional similarity between UPF0213 and UPF1 proteins. The UPF (UP-Frameshift) nomenclature often indicates historical classification rather than functional relationships.
Computational analysis of UPF0213 protein M6_Spy1178's structure reveals potential interaction surfaces that should be experimentally validated:
Electrostatic surface analysis: Using molecular visualization tools and the AlphaFold predicted structure, researchers can identify charged patches that may serve as protein-protein or protein-nucleic acid interaction sites.
Conservation mapping: By aligning UPF0213 sequences across bacterial species and mapping conservation onto the structural model, evolutionarily conserved surface residues likely indicate functional binding interfaces.
Molecular docking predictions: Computational docking with potential binding partners including:
Small molecules
Peptides
Nucleic acids (particularly RNA given the relationship of other UPF proteins to RNA processing)
Cavity detection algorithms: Software tools like CASTp, POCASA, or fpocket can identify potential binding pockets within the UPF0213 structure.
Molecular dynamics simulations: Analysis of conformational flexibility can reveal transient binding pockets not evident in static structures.
For experimental validation of these predictions, site-directed mutagenesis of predicted interface residues followed by functional assays would provide crucial insights into the protein's biological role. Additionally, hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) can experimentally verify predicted binding interfaces by measuring changes in solvent accessibility upon binding partner interaction.
Deploying CRISPR-Cas9 for UPF0213 protein M6_Spy1178 functional studies in S. pyogenes requires specific optimization strategies:
Guide RNA design considerations:
Target sequences with NGG PAM sites within the M6_Spy1178 gene
Perform off-target analysis specific to S. pyogenes genome
Design multiple gRNAs targeting different regions to ensure success
Consider targeting regions away from predicted functional domains
Delivery methods for S. pyogenes:
Electroporation of ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes
Plasmid-based delivery systems using compatible origins of replication
Phage-based delivery systems for difficult-to-transform strains
Editing strategies:
Complete gene knockout via non-homologous end joining (NHEJ)
Domain-specific mutations via homology-directed repair (HDR)
CRISPRi for transient knockdown via dCas9 fused to repressor domains
CRISPRa for overexpression studies
Phenotypic analysis pipeline:
Growth curve analysis under various stress conditions
Transcriptomic profiling (RNA-seq) of knockout vs. wild-type
Metabolomic analysis to identify pathway alterations
Virulence assays in appropriate infection models
Complementation strategies:
Trans-complementation with inducible expression vectors
Cis-complementation by reintegration at native or ectopic loci
Expression of tagged versions for localization studies
For S. pyogenes specifically, consider using modified CRISPR systems that avoid interference with the endogenous CRISPR-Cas9 machinery, as S. pyogenes is the source organism for the most commonly used Cas9 enzyme.
Addressing inconsistencies between computational predictions and experimental observations requires systematic investigation:
When computational predictions conflict with experimental results, consider:
The possibility of condition-specific functions not captured in standard assays
Potential moonlighting functions beyond the primary predicted role
Post-translational modifications affecting function but not primary structure
Protein-protein interactions that modify the function in vivo
The choice of expression host significantly impacts post-translational modifications (PTMs) of recombinant UPF0213 protein M6_Spy1178, affecting both structural and functional properties:
Co-expression strategies with PTM-specific enzymes in E. coli
Cell-free systems supplemented with PTM enzymes
Site-specific mutation of PTM sites to either mimic (phosphomimetic) or prevent modification
Mass spectrometry analysis of natively expressed M6_Spy1178 from S. pyogenes would provide definitive insights into the natural PTM landscape to guide expression system selection.
Establishing rigorous quality control parameters is essential for reproducible research with recombinant UPF0213 protein M6_Spy1178:
Identity verification:
Mass spectrometry (MS/MS) peptide mapping against theoretical sequence
N-terminal sequencing for first 5-10 amino acids
Western blot with specific antibodies (if available)
Purity assessment:
Structural integrity:
Circular dichroism to verify secondary structure elements
Intrinsic fluorescence for tertiary structure assessment
Differential scanning fluorimetry for thermal stability
Functional activity:
Binding assays with identified interaction partners
Enzymatic activity assays (if applicable)
Cell-based functional assays relevant to biological context
Stability monitoring:
Accelerated stability studies at elevated temperatures
Real-time stability testing under storage conditions
Freeze-thaw stability over multiple cycles
Critical specifications for research-grade M6_Spy1178 preparations:
Purity: >85% by SDS-PAGE
Endotoxin: <1.0 EU per μg protein (for in vitro/in vivo experiments)
Aggregation: <5% by SEC-HPLC
Bioactivity: Within 20% of reference standard in applicable assays
Implement acceptance criteria for each parameter and maintain detailed batch records including expression conditions, purification protocols, and quality control results to ensure reproducibility across experiments.
Recombinant UPF0213 protein M6_Spy1178 presents potential opportunities for structural vaccinology against Streptococcus pyogenes, requiring a systematic research approach:
Antigenic potential assessment:
Epitope prediction using computational tools (BepiPred, Ellipro)
Surface accessibility analysis based on AlphaFold structural models
Conservation analysis across S. pyogenes strains to identify invariant regions
Cross-reactivity assessment with human proteins to avoid autoimmunity
Immunogenicity evaluation:
Antibody generation in animal models using purified recombinant M6_Spy1178
T-cell epitope identification through stimulation assays
Cytokine profiling to characterize immune response quality
Assessment of antibody functionality (opsonization, neutralization)
Structure-based design approaches:
Generation of structure-guided M6_Spy1178 fragments focusing on antigenic regions
Design of chimeric constructs with known immunogenic carrier proteins
Surface re-engineering to enhance stability and immunogenicity
Multimerization strategies to increase epitope density
Formulation considerations:
Adjuvant selection based on desired immune response profile
Stability studies under vaccine formulation conditions
Delivery vehicle optimization (liposomes, virosomes, nanoparticles)
Drawing from related coronavirus membrane protein research, 3D model prediction comparison analysis can identify structural features that correlate with immunogenicity . When designing M6_Spy1178-based vaccine components, ensure structural integrity of key epitopes through circular dichroism and epitope-specific antibody recognition assays post-formulation.
Optimizing recombinant UPF0213 protein constructs for protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analysis requires targeted design strategies:
Fusion tag selection and positioning:
N-terminal vs. C-terminal tag positioning based on structural predictions
Tag options for affinity purification (His, GST, MBP)
Fluorescent protein fusions (GFP, mCherry) for localization and FRET studies
Proximity labeling tags (BirA*, APEX2) for in vivo interaction mapping
Consideration for tag removal via protease cleavage sites
Construct design strategies:
Full-length protein with flexible linkers to tags
Domain-specific constructs to map interaction interfaces
Surface residue mutations to validate computational binding predictions
Expression of orthologous UPF0213 proteins for evolutionary comparison
Bacterial two-hybrid system optimization:
BACTH (Bacterial Adenylate Cyclase Two-Hybrid) system adaptation
Split-protein complementation assays (split-GFP, split-luciferase)
Gateway-compatible construct libraries for high-throughput screening
In vitro interaction analysis techniques:
Bio-layer interferometry with biotinylated constructs
Surface plasmon resonance with various immobilization strategies
Isothermal titration calorimetry for thermodynamic parameters
Microscale thermophoresis for solution-based interaction studies
In vivo validation approaches:
Co-immunoprecipitation with epitope-tagged constructs
Fluorescence microscopy to assess co-localization
FRET/BRET assays for direct interaction detection
Crosslinking mass spectrometry for interaction interface mapping