Recombinant UPF0233 membrane protein MAP_0013c (MAP_0013c)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Overview of Recombinant UPF0233 Membrane Protein MAP_0013c (MAP_0013c)

Recombinant UPF0233 membrane protein MAP_0013c (MAP_0013c) is a full-length (1–93 amino acids) membrane protein derived from Mycobacterium paratuberculosis, a pathogen linked to Johne’s disease in ruminants . It belongs to the UPF0233 protein family, which has conserved roles in bacterial cell division. The protein is expressed in E. coli with an N-terminal His-tag for purification and stability .

Key identifiers:

  • Gene name: crgA (cell division protein CrgA)

  • Synonyms: MAP_0013c, UPF0233 membrane protein

  • UniProt ID: Q744R9

Table 1: Physicochemical and Functional Characteristics

PropertyValue/DescriptionSource
Source organismMycobacterium paratuberculosis
Expression hostE. coli
Tag typeN-terminal His-tag
Protein lengthFull-length (1–93 amino acids)
Purity>90% (SDS-PAGE verified)
Storage conditions-20°C/-80°C (long-term); 4°C for working aliquots (up to 1 week)
Storage bufferTris/PBS-based buffer, 6% trehalose, pH 8.0
ReconstitutionDeionized sterile water (0.1–1.0 mg/mL); 5–50% glycerol recommended

Amino acid sequence:
MPKSKVRKKNDFTVSAVSRTPVKVKVGPSSVWFVALFIGLMLIGLVWLMVFQLAAVGSQA PTALNWMAQLGPWNYAIAFAFMITGLLLTMRWH

Role in Bacterial Cell Division

MAP_0013c is hypothesized to participate in cell division machinery, acting as a critical component in the membrane remodeling processes of Mycobacterium species . Homologs in Mycobacterium tuberculosis (e.g., MRA_0013) and Mycobacterium bovis (e.g., Mb0011c) share structural similarities, suggesting conserved evolutionary roles .

Applications in research:

  • Antibody development: Used as an antigen in ELISA kits for detecting anti-M. paratuberculosis antibodies .

  • Membrane protein studies: Serves as a model for understanding mycobacterial membrane dynamics and drug targeting .

  • Cross-species comparative studies: Comparisons with homologs in M. tuberculosis and M. avium aid in elucidating pathogenicity mechanisms .

Table 2: UPF0233 Homologs in Mycobacterium Species

SpeciesProtein ID/NameSequence IdentityFunctional RoleSource
M. tuberculosisMRA_0013 (Rv0011c)~85%Cell division
M. bovisMb0011c~90%Membrane remodeling
M. aviumMAV_0015~75%Pathogenicity studies
M. marinumMMAR_0013~80%Virulence research

Handling and Stability Considerations

  • Freeze-thaw cycles: Repeated cycles degrade protein integrity; aliquot storage is mandatory .

  • Endotoxin control: Low-endotoxin versions are available for sensitive assays .

  • Sterility: Filter-sterilized options are provided upon request .

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: We prioritize shipping the format currently in stock. However, if you have specific format requirements, please specify them in your order notes. We will accommodate your request as best as possible.
Lead Time
Delivery time may vary depending on the purchase method and location. Please consult your local distributors for specific delivery estimates.
Note: All our proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. If you require dry ice shipping, please contact us in advance for arrangement and associated fees.
Notes
Repeated freeze-thaw cycles are not recommended. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
We recommend centrifuging the vial briefly before opening to collect the contents at the bottom. Reconstitute the protein in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50% and can be used as a reference.
Shelf Life
Shelf life is influenced by various factors, including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and the inherent stability of the protein.
Generally, liquid forms have a shelf life of 6 months at -20°C/-80°C. Lyophilized forms have a shelf life of 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt, aliquoting is recommended for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during the manufacturing process.
The tag type is determined during production. If you have a specific tag type requirement, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
crgA; MAP_0013c; Cell division protein CrgA
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-93
Protein Length
full length protein
Species
Mycobacterium paratuberculosis (strain ATCC BAA-968 / K-10)
Target Names
crgA
Target Protein Sequence
MPKSKVRKKNDFTVSAVSRTPVKVKVGPSSVWFVALFIGLMLIGLVWLMVFQLAAVGSQA PTALNWMAQLGPWNYAIAFAFMITGLLLTMRWH
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
This protein is involved in cell division.
Database Links
Protein Families
CrgA family
Subcellular Location
Cell membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is the function of UPF0233 membrane protein MAP_0013c?

UPF0233 membrane protein MAP_0013c belongs to a family of membrane proteins with poorly characterized functions. Based on studies of related membrane proteins like Ros3p, it likely plays a role in phospholipid organization and translocation across plasma membranes. Membrane proteins of this class typically contain transmembrane domains that anchor them within the lipid bilayer, allowing them to facilitate the movement of phospholipids between membrane leaflets. Understanding their function requires specialized techniques for membrane protein isolation, purification, and functional characterization .

What techniques are commonly used to study membrane protein localization?

Membrane protein localization studies typically employ immunochemical analyses combined with subcellular fractionation techniques. For proteins like Ros3p (which serves as a model for understanding proteins like MAP_0013c), researchers use glycosylation analysis to confirm protein processing through the secretory pathway. Fluorescence microscopy with tagged proteins allows visualization of membrane protein distribution within living cells. Additionally, detergent fractionation techniques, such as isolation of detergent-insoluble glycolipid-enriched complexes, help determine association with specific membrane microdomains. These approaches provide insights into protein trafficking and functional organization within cellular membranes .

How can I design experiments to investigate phospholipid translocation activity?

Designing robust experiments to investigate phospholipid translocation requires careful consideration of variables and controls. Begin by clearly defining your independent variable (e.g., protein expression levels) and dependent variable (e.g., phospholipid translocation rate). A typical experimental design includes:

  • Hypothesis formulation: Develop a specific, testable hypothesis about how your protein affects phospholipid movement

  • Treatment design: Create experimental conditions that manipulate protein expression (knockout, overexpression, or mutation)

  • Control selection: Include both positive controls (known translocation proteins) and negative controls (inactive mutants)

  • Measurement protocol: Establish quantitative assays using fluorescent phospholipid analogs

The most effective experimental designs incorporate fluorescence-labeled analogs of phospholipids to track their movement across membranes. When studying proteins like MAP_0013c, it's crucial to distinguish between effects on specific phospholipid types (e.g., phosphatidylethanolamine versus phosphatidylcholine) .

What are the challenges in resolving contradictory findings in membrane protein research?

When facing contradictory results in membrane protein studies, a systematic approach is essential. Begin by examining methodology differences that might explain discrepancies:

  • Experimental conditions: Compare protein purification methods, buffer compositions, and lipid environments

  • Measurement techniques: Assess differences in assay sensitivity, time points, and data collection methods

  • Statistical approaches: Evaluate statistical methods used for data analysis and significance determination

Collaboration with colleagues is vital when resolving contradictions. Share raw data, methodological details, and engage in open discussions about potential sources of variation. Remember that contradictions often reveal important biological nuances rather than experimental errors. For example, a membrane protein might behave differently depending on lipid composition or cellular context, leading to apparently contradictory results that actually reflect complex biological reality .

How can computational modeling enhance membrane protein functional studies?

Computational modeling serves as a powerful complement to experimental approaches in membrane protein research. For proteins like MAP_0013c with limited structural information, homology modeling based on related proteins can predict structural features and guide experimental design. Molecular dynamics simulations can reveal how these proteins might interact with phospholipids and respond to changes in membrane composition.

When integrating computational approaches:

  • Validate computational predictions with experimental data

  • Use multiple modeling approaches to strengthen confidence in predictions

  • Combine structural modeling with sequence-based functional predictions

  • Employ data visualization techniques to communicate complex spatial relationships

These computational strategies help formulate more precise hypotheses about protein function and mechanism, ultimately accelerating experimental progress and understanding .

What controls are essential when studying recombinant membrane protein function?

Control TypePurposeExample
Negative controlsEstablish baseline and detect false positivesEmpty vector, inactive mutant
Positive controlsValidate assay performanceWell-characterized related protein
Expression controlsVerify protein expression levelsWestern blot with standardized loading
Specificity controlsConfirm assay specificityMultiple phospholipid types
Environmental controlsAccount for membrane environmentConsistent lipid composition

When studying MAP_0013c or similar proteins, it's particularly important to include controls for protein glycosylation status and membrane localization. Researchers should also control for potential indirect effects on ATP-binding cassette transporters, as these can confound interpretations of phospholipid movement assays .

How should I optimize extraction and purification of recombinant membrane proteins?

Membrane protein extraction and purification presents unique challenges due to their hydrophobic nature. An optimized protocol typically includes:

  • Selection of expression system: Evaluate prokaryotic versus eukaryotic systems based on glycosylation requirements

  • Membrane isolation: Use differential centrifugation to isolate membrane fractions

  • Detergent selection: Test multiple detergents (e.g., DDM, CHAPS) for extraction efficiency

  • Purification strategy: Implement affinity chromatography with tags designed for minimal functional interference

  • Quality assessment: Verify protein integrity using size exclusion chromatography and functional assays

For glycosylated membrane proteins like those in the UPF0233 family, mammalian or insect cell expression systems often provide appropriate post-translational modifications. When designing purification strategies, consider that membrane proteins frequently require specific lipids to maintain their native conformation and function .

What techniques can assess membrane protein-lipid interactions?

Understanding membrane protein-lipid interactions is essential for characterizing proteins like MAP_0013c. Several complementary techniques provide insights into these interactions:

  • Fluorescence spectroscopy: Monitors changes in protein fluorescence upon lipid binding

  • Surface plasmon resonance: Measures binding kinetics and affinity constants

  • Liposome binding assays: Assesses protein interaction with model membranes

  • Lipid overlay assays: Identifies specific lipid binding partners

  • Crosslinking studies: Captures transient protein-lipid interactions

When interpreting results, remember that membrane protein function is often sensitive to lipid composition. For phospholipid translocators, assays using fluorescent phospholipid analogs can directly measure translocation activity while distinguishing between different phospholipid classes. This approach revealed that Ros3p specifically affects PE and PC internalization but not PS uptake, a finding that might be relevant to understanding MAP_0013c specificity .

How should I address contradictory results in phospholipid translocation experiments?

When faced with contradictory results in phospholipid translocation studies, implement a systematic troubleshooting approach:

  • Replicate the experiments: Ensure that both contradictory results are reproducible

  • Analyze methodological differences: Compare experimental conditions, reagents, and protocols

  • Test intermediate conditions: Design experiments that bridge the gap between contradictory conditions

  • Consider biological variables: Examine cell type, growth conditions, and membrane composition differences

  • Collaborate with colleagues: Share protocols and samples to eliminate lab-specific variables

Document all findings meticulously, including seemingly minor protocol differences. In membrane protein research, contradictions often arise from differences in membrane composition or protein post-translational modifications. For instance, glycosylation status can significantly affect protein function and membrane localization, as observed with Ros3p and potentially relevant for MAP_0013c .

How can I verify the authenticity and functional integrity of recombinant membrane proteins?

Verifying the authenticity and functional integrity of recombinant membrane proteins like MAP_0013c requires a multi-faceted approach:

Verification MethodInformation ProvidedApplication
Mass spectrometryProtein identity, modificationsConfirm sequence and post-translational modifications
Circular dichroismSecondary structureVerify proper protein folding
Size exclusion chromatographyOligomeric state, aggregationAssess protein homogeneity
Western blottingExpression, glycosylationDetect protein and modifications
Functional assaysActivityConfirm biological function

For glycosylated membrane proteins like those in the UPF0233 family, glycosylation status is a critical quality indicator. Using glycosidase treatments followed by mobility shift assays can verify proper processing through the secretory pathway. Additionally, subcellular localization studies using fractionation or microscopy techniques confirm proper trafficking to target membranes .

What are common pitfalls in membrane protein research and how can they be avoided?

Membrane protein research presents several common challenges that can be mitigated with appropriate strategies:

  • Protein aggregation: Use mild detergents and optimize buffer conditions; consider protein stabilization with specific lipids

  • Low expression levels: Test multiple expression systems and optimize codon usage; use fusion partners to enhance expression

  • Loss of function during purification: Develop activity assays applicable to crude preparations; preserve native lipid environment when possible

  • Non-specific effects: Include appropriate controls for expression system and detergent effects

  • Artifactual localization: Verify localization using multiple approaches (tag-based and antibody-based)

When studying phospholipid translocation activities, be particularly cautious about indirect effects through other cellular systems. For instance, research on Ros3p demonstrated that its effects on phospholipid translocation were not related to changes in ABC transporter expression or activity, highlighting the importance of controlling for these potential confounding factors .

How can experimental design address reproducibility challenges in membrane protein research?

Enhancing reproducibility in membrane protein research requires thoughtful experimental design from the outset:

  • Precise variable definition: Clearly define independent and dependent variables

  • Power analysis: Determine appropriate sample sizes before beginning experiments

  • Blinding procedures: Implement blinding during data collection and analysis when possible

  • Standardized protocols: Develop detailed protocols with specified reagents and conditions

  • Data management plan: Establish systems for complete data recording, including negative results

Consider implementing a pre-registration protocol for key experiments, documenting hypotheses and analysis plans before data collection. This approach increases transparency and reduces the risk of unconscious bias in data interpretation. When working with membrane proteins like MAP_0013c, standardize critical factors such as membrane composition, protein glycosylation, and subcellular localization assessments .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.