KEGG: mpa:MAP_0643c
STRING: 262316.MAP0643c
UPF0678 fatty acid-binding protein-like protein MAP_0643c belongs to the UPF0678 protein family found in Mycobacterium species. Similar to other members of this family, such as MAP_2833c, it likely plays a role in the intracellular transport of hydrophobic ligands . The protein consists of approximately 160-165 amino acids with a molecular weight of around 17-18 kDa, comparable to the 17.4 kDa of the related MAP_2833c protein .
Members of the UPF0678 family typically feature hydrophobic binding pockets capable of accommodating fatty acids and similar hydrophobic molecules. Based on sequence analysis and structural predictions for related proteins like MAP_2833c, these proteins likely possess a compact globular structure with beta-sheets arranged in a barrel-like configuration with the hydrophobic binding pocket positioned centrally. The primary function appears to be intracellular transport of hydrophobic ligands, which is critical for bacterial metabolism, particularly in mycobacterial species .
For efficient recombinant production of MAP_0643c, E. coli-based expression systems have proven most effective. Researchers should consider two primary approaches:
Cytoplasmic expression: Using vectors with strong promoters like T7 can yield high protein amounts but may require optimization to prevent inclusion body formation.
Periplasmic expression: A tunable rhamnose promoter-based system targeting the protein to the periplasm can significantly enhance proper folding and stability . This approach allows researchers to precisely control expression rates to match the cell's translocation capacity, which has been shown to improve yields for secretory recombinant proteins .
The table below compares expression systems based on extrapolated data from similar proteins:
| Expression System | Relative Yield | Solubility | Functional Activity |
|---|---|---|---|
| T7 promoter (cytoplasmic) | High | Moderate | Moderate |
| T7 promoter (periplasmic) | Low | High | High |
| Rhamnose promoter (periplasmic) | Medium | Very High | Very High |
| Arabinose promoter (periplasmic) | Medium | High | High |
The rhamnose promoter-based expression system offers several advantages for MAP_0643c production:
Tunable expression: The rhamnose promoter allows precise control of expression rates by varying inducer concentration, helping match protein production to the cell's translocation capacity .
Cellular adaptation: Research has shown that E. coli can adapt its protein translocation machinery when using a rhamnose promoter system, increasing levels of key translocation components including SecA, LepB, and YidC . This adaptation enhances the cell's capacity to process secretory proteins.
Stress reduction: Unlike T7 promoter systems that can trigger stress responses leading to mutations, the rhamnose system appears to operate through regulatory adaptation mechanisms that are reversible .
The choice of signal peptide significantly affects translocation efficiency for periplasmic expression. Based on studies with other recombinant proteins, several signal peptides should be evaluated:
DsbA signal peptide: Often provides efficient translocation and has shown favorable results with the rhamnose promoter system .
PelB signal peptide: Works well for many heterologous proteins.
OmpA signal peptide: Generally suitable for smaller proteins.
PhoA signal peptide: Typically yields lower periplasmic accumulation levels .
The effectiveness of each signal peptide varies between proteins, and researchers should systematically test multiple options. When using the rhamnose promoter-based system, the DsbA signal peptide has been demonstrated to enhance periplasmic protein production yields .
A multi-step purification protocol is recommended for recombinant MAP_0643c:
Affinity chromatography: Initial capture using His-tag or other fusion tags
Size exclusion chromatography: For polishing and ensuring protein homogeneity
Ion exchange chromatography: If additional purity is required
The expected purification results can be estimated using the following table:
| Purification Step | Expected Purity | Yield Recovery | Major Contaminants Removed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cell lysis and clarification | 5-10% | 90-95% | Cell debris, insoluble proteins |
| Affinity chromatography | 70-80% | 70-80% | Majority of host proteins |
| Size exclusion | 85-90% | 80-90% | Aggregates, dimers |
| Ion exchange | >95% | 70-80% | Charged contaminants, endotoxins |
Multiple complementary techniques should be employed to verify proper folding and function:
Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy: To assess secondary structure elements
Thermal shift assays: To evaluate protein stability and ligand binding
Functional binding assays: Using fluorescent hydrophobic probes like ANS or DAUDA
Size exclusion chromatography with multi-angle light scattering (SEC-MALS): To confirm monomeric state and absence of aggregation
A systematic approach to verifying protein quality includes data collection in a format similar to:
| Analytical Method | Parameter Measured | Expected Result | Acceptance Criteria |
|---|---|---|---|
| CD Spectroscopy | Secondary structure | β-sheet predominance | Consistent with homology model |
| Thermal Shift | Melting temperature | 45-55°C | ≥5°C increase with ligand |
| Fluorescent Probe Binding | Kd for ANS | 1-5 μM range | Displacement by fatty acids |
| SEC-MALS | Molecular weight | 17-18 kDa | >90% monomeric |
Optimization requires a systematic approach testing multiple parameters:
E. coli strain selection: Compare BL21(DE3), Rosetta, Origami, and C41/C43 strains
Induction parameters: Test various inducer concentrations (0.1-1.0 mM IPTG or 0.2-0.5% rhamnose)
Growth temperature: Evaluate low (16-18°C), medium (25°C), and standard (37°C) temperatures
Media composition: Compare rich (LB, TB) versus defined media (M9) with supplements
The experimental design should follow a factorial approach to identify optimal conditions and potential interactions between variables. Data should be organized as shown below:
| Strain | Temperature (°C) | Inducer Concentration | Media Type | Yield (mg/L) | Solubility (%) | Activity (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BL21(DE3) | 16 | 0.2% Rhamnose | LB | TBD | TBD | TBD |
| BL21(DE3) | 25 | 0.2% Rhamnose | LB | TBD | TBD | TBD |
| BL21(DE3) | 37 | 0.2% Rhamnose | LB | TBD | TBD | TBD |
| Rosetta | 16 | 0.2% Rhamnose | LB | TBD | TBD | TBD |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
Since MAP_0643c likely functions in binding hydrophobic ligands, functional assays should be designed around this property:
Fluorescent ligand displacement assay: Using environment-sensitive fluorescent probes (ANS, DAUDA) that exhibit enhanced fluorescence when bound to the protein. Displacement by potential natural ligands causes quantifiable fluorescence decrease.
Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC): For quantitative measurement of binding affinities with various fatty acids and hydrophobic compounds.
Microscale thermophoresis (MST): For measuring interactions in solution with minimal protein consumption.
Data analysis should include determination of dissociation constants (Kd) and binding stoichiometry through appropriate curve fitting. Results can be presented as follows:
| Ligand | Fluorescence Assay Kd (μM) | ITC Kd (μM) | ΔH (kJ/mol) | ΔS (J/mol·K) | Stoichiometry |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Palmitic acid | TBD | TBD | TBD | TBD | TBD |
| Stearic acid | TBD | TBD | TBD | TBD | TBD |
| Oleic acid | TBD | TBD | TBD | TBD | TBD |
| Mycolic acid | TBD | TBD | TBD | TBD | TBD |
Research on E. coli protein translocation machinery has revealed an important adaptation mechanism applicable to MAP_0643c production:
When using the rhamnose promoter-based system for periplasmic protein production, E. coli adapts by increasing the accumulation levels of at least three key players in protein translocation :
SecA: The peripheral ATP-dependent motor of the Sec-translocon that pushes secretory proteins through the translocon channel .
Leader peptidase (LepB): Cleaves signal peptides from secretory proteins upon their translocation across the cytoplasmic membrane .
YidC: A cytoplasmic membrane protein integrase/chaperone that assists in membrane protein biogenesis both in association with the Sec-translocon and independently .
This adaptation is reversible—when inducer is removed, the levels of these components decrease again . This indicates that E. coli can modulate its protein translocation machinery in response to secretory protein loads, which can be exploited to enhance periplasmic recombinant protein production.
Addressing protein aggregation requires a multi-faceted approach:
Co-expression with chaperones: Co-expressing with folding assistants such as GroEL/ES, DnaK/J, or Trigger Factor can improve folding.
Fusion tags: Solubility-enhancing tags like MBP, SUMO, or Thioredoxin can be employed, with subsequent removal via specific proteases.
Periplasmic expression: Targeting the protein to the periplasm using the rhamnose promoter system allows E. coli to adapt its translocation machinery , potentially reducing aggregation due to improved folding conditions.
Optimized buffer conditions: Screening various buffer compositions with additives like glycerol, arginine, or low concentrations of detergents.
The effectiveness of these approaches can be systematically evaluated and presented in a comparative table:
| Anti-aggregation Strategy | Implementation | Solubility Improvement | Activity Retention | Purification Complexity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chaperone co-expression | GroEL/ES system | TBD | TBD | Medium |
| MBP fusion | N-terminal fusion | TBD | TBD | High |
| Periplasmic expression | DsbA signal peptide | TBD | TBD | Medium |
| Buffer optimization | 10% glycerol, 50 mM arginine | TBD | TBD | Low |
Development of selective assays for MAP_0643c requires:
Structure-based design: Using homology modeling and structural predictions to identify unique features of the binding pocket.
Fluorophore selection and modification: Choosing environmentally sensitive fluorophores that can be conjugated to known ligands.
Assay optimization: Systematic variation of pH, ionic strength, and temperature to maximize signal-to-noise ratio.
Specificity testing: Validation against other UPF0678 family members to ensure selectivity.
This approach is conceptually similar to the development of selective fluorogenic substrates for other proteins , though the specific chemistry will differ based on MAP_0643c's unique binding properties.
For rigorous analysis of protein-ligand binding data:
Apply appropriate binding models: Single-site, multiple independent sites, or cooperative binding models depending on experimental data.
Thermodynamic analysis: Determine ΔH, ΔS, and ΔG values from ITC data to characterize the nature of binding interactions.
Structure-activity relationships: Correlate binding affinities with ligand structural features to map binding pocket specificity.
Data analysis can be approached using software packages like GraphPad Prism or R with specialized packages. Results should be presented with statistical measures of confidence and appropriate error analysis:
| Ligand | Binding Model | Kd (μM) | 95% CI | ΔG (kJ/mol) | R² of Fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Palmitic acid | One-site | TBD | TBD | TBD | TBD |
| Stearic acid | One-site | TBD | TBD | TBD | TBD |
| Oleic acid | One-site | TBD | TBD | TBD | TBD |
| Arachidonic acid | One-site | TBD | TBD | TBD | TBD |
When analyzing optimization experiments:
Factorial design analysis: Use multi-factor ANOVA to identify significant factors and interactions affecting expression.
Response surface methodology: Create predictive models for optimal conditions using quadratic response surfaces.
Principal component analysis: Useful for identifying patterns in large datasets with multiple variables.
For expression optimization experiments, the statistical approach would involve:
When faced with contradictory binding data:
Methodological considerations: Each technique (ITC, fluorescence, SPR) has inherent limitations and assumptions that must be addressed.
Buffer and condition effects: Binding can be significantly affected by pH, ionic strength, and temperature, requiring standardized conditions across methods.
Protein state assessment: Verify that protein preparations are homogeneous and properly folded for each experiment.
Orthogonal validation: Employ multiple independent techniques to build a consistent binding model, with results presented as in this example table:
| Method | Apparent Kd (μM) | Potential Artifacts | Corrective Measures | Adjusted Kd (μM) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fluorescence | TBD | Inner filter effect | Absorbance correction | TBD |
| ITC | TBD | Dilution heat | Control titrations | TBD |
| SPR | TBD | Mass transport limitation | Flow rate optimization | TBD |
| MST | TBD | Labeling interference | Label-free approach | TBD |
| Consensus value | - | - | - | TBD ± SD |
Future structural investigations should focus on:
Crystallization screening: Systematic testing of conditions for X-ray crystallography, potentially with bound ligands to stabilize the structure.
NMR spectroscopy: For solution structure determination and studying dynamics of ligand binding.
Cryo-electron microscopy: If protein complexes with binding partners are of interest.
Computational approaches: Refinement of homology models through molecular dynamics simulations.
A comprehensive structural biology workflow would include:
| Approach | Technical Requirements | Expected Outcome | Timeline Estimate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Homology modeling | Sequence alignments, template structures | Initial structural model | 1-2 months |
| Protein crystallization | Purified protein (>95%), crystallization screens | Diffraction-quality crystals | 3-12 months |
| X-ray diffraction | Synchrotron access | Atomic resolution structure | 6-18 months |
| NMR spectroscopy | 15N/13C-labeled protein | Solution structure, dynamics | 6-12 months |
| MD simulations | Computational resources | Refined models, binding predictions | 3-6 months |
Integration of MAP_0643c research with broader mycobacterial studies should address:
Metabolic profiling: Compare lipid profiles in wild-type vs. MAP_0643c-modified strains.
Systems biology approaches: Position MAP_0643c within metabolic networks through integration of transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic data.
Host-pathogen interaction: Investigate the role of MAP_0643c in mycobacterial survival within host cells, particularly related to fatty acid acquisition and metabolism.
Comparative genomics: Analyze conservation and variation of UPF0678 family proteins across mycobacterial species to infer functional importance.
Researchers working with MAP_0643c should:
Employ a tunable rhamnose promoter-based system for periplasmic expression, which allows E. coli to adapt its protein translocation machinery for enhanced production .
Consider the selection of signal peptides carefully, as this significantly impacts translocation efficiency .
Develop robust functional assays based on the protein's predicted role in hydrophobic ligand binding .
Implement a multi-method approach to protein characterization, addressing potential artifacts or limitations of individual techniques.
Apply appropriate statistical methods for experimental design and data analysis, particularly for optimization experiments.