The recombinant UU064 protein is derived from the Ureaplasma parvum serovar 3 genome, which encodes 571 predicted coding sequences, including virulence factors like urease, multiple-banded antigen (MBA), and hemolysin . Key attributes include:
Recombinant UU064 is typically produced via:
Cloning: The gene is amplified by PCR and inserted into plasmids like pTrcHis TOPO .
Expression: Transformed E. coli cultures are induced to express the His-tagged protein.
Purification: Affinity chromatography isolates the His-tagged protein to >90% purity .
This method mirrors protocols for producing Ureaplasma antigens, such as MBA, used in serological assays .
Despite genomic sequencing of U. parvum serovar 3 , UU064’s role remains uncharacterized. Limited data suggest potential involvement in:
Pathogenesis: Similar to virulence factors like urease or hemolysin, but no direct evidence exists.
Antigenicity: Recombinant proteins like UU064 may serve as diagnostic targets, though specific interactions with antibodies or host cells are unexplored .
Pathway and Interaction Data:
No pathways or interacting proteins are currently annotated for UU064 in public databases .
Recombinant UU064 is primarily used in:
Below is a comparison of UU064 with other Ureaplasma proteins:
| Protein | Function | Expression Host | Key Features |
|---|---|---|---|
| UU064 | Uncharacterized | E. coli | His-tagged, 88 aa, >90% purity |
| MBA (Multiple-Banded Antigen) | Serological marker, pathogenesis | E. coli | Repeat-rich, antigenic |
| Urease | Urea hydrolysis, pH regulation | Native Ureaplasma | Enzymatic activity |
| Hemolysin | Host cell lysis | Native Ureaplasma | Cytotoxic activity |
Functional Elucidation: High-throughput screening or knockout studies are needed to determine UU064’s role.
Diagnostic Utility: Validation in clinical samples to assess cross-reactivity with other Ureaplasma serovars.
Therapeutic Potential: Exploration as a target for antimicrobial agents or vaccines.
KEGG: uur:UU064
STRING: 273119.UU064
For recombinant expression of Ureaplasma parvum proteins, including UU064, Escherichia coli remains the most commonly utilized system due to its efficiency and cost-effectiveness. The methodology typically involves PCR amplification of the target gene followed by cloning into expression vectors like pTrcHis TOPO, which has been successfully used for MBA proteins from U. parvum serotypes 3 and 6 . For optimal expression:
Amplify the UU064 gene using PCR with primers designed from the U. parvum serovar 3 genome sequence
Clone the amplified fragment into a suitable expression vector with a His-tag for purification
Transform into competent E. coli cells
Induce expression using IPTG (isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside)
Purify using nickel affinity chromatography
For proteins that are difficult to express in E. coli, alternative bacterial systems like Vibrio natriegens may prove beneficial, as this organism offers faster growth rates (≤10 min doubling time) and can sometimes produce higher levels of properly folded proteins than E. coli .
Verification of recombinant UU064 should follow a multi-step process:
SDS-PAGE analysis: Assess protein size and initial purity
Western blotting: Confirm identity using anti-His antibodies or specific antibodies if available
Mass spectrometry: Verify the exact molecular weight and sequence coverage
N-terminal sequencing: Confirm the correct protein sequence
Size exclusion chromatography: Assess homogeneity and oligomeric state
Researchers should aim for >90% purity as determined by densitometry analysis of SDS-PAGE gels, similar to standards used for other recombinant proteins in structural and functional studies . Dynamic light scattering can provide additional information about protein homogeneity and potential aggregation issues.
Production of soluble UU064 protein may face several challenges:
Protein aggregation: As an uncharacterized protein, UU064 may form inclusion bodies in E. coli. This can be addressed by:
Lowering expression temperature (16-25°C)
Using specialized strains like Origami or SHuffle that enhance disulfide bond formation
Co-expressing with chaperones like GroEL/GroES
Codon bias: Ureaplasma has different codon usage than E. coli, which may be addressed by:
Codon optimization of the UU064 gene
Using E. coli strains supplemented with rare tRNAs (e.g., Rosetta)
Protein toxicity: If UU064 is toxic to the host, consider:
Characterizing UU064's role in pathogenicity requires a comprehensive approach:
Experimental design strategy:
Protein interaction studies:
Yeast two-hybrid or pull-down assays to identify host protein interactions
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) to measure binding kinetics with potential host targets
Co-immunoprecipitation experiments with host cell lysates
Cell-based assays:
Incubate recombinant UU064 with relevant human cell types (e.g., urogenital epithelial cells, immune cells)
Measure cytokine/chemokine production in response to UU064 stimulation
Assess cellular morphological changes and adhesion properties
In vitro models:
For immune response studies, isolate CD45+ cells and treat with 1×10^5 DNA copies/mL of U. parvum (as a basis for comparison with UU064 protein treatment), following methods described in ascending infection models .
To analyze UU064's immunomodulatory properties:
Antigen presentation assays:
Incubate UU064 with dendritic cells and measure maturation markers
Assess MHC-II presentation using T-cell activation assays
Cytokine profiling:
Measure pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine production in response to UU064 using multiplex assays
Compare cytokine profiles from cells exposed to different U. parvum serovars to identify serovar-specific responses
Antibody response characterization:
| Immune Parameter | UU064 Exposure | Control (No UU064) | MBA (for comparison) |
|---|---|---|---|
| IL-6 production | TBD | Baseline | Elevated (expected) |
| IL-8 production | TBD | Baseline | Elevated (expected) |
| TNF-α production | TBD | Baseline | Variable by serovar |
| Dendritic cell maturation | TBD | Minimal | Moderate |
| T-cell proliferation | TBD | Minimal | Serovar-dependent |
Cross-reactivity analysis should employ:
Western blotting:
Test recombinant UU064 against serotype-specific monoclonal antibodies
Assess recognition of UU064 by antibodies raised against other U. parvum serovars
ELISA-based approaches:
Develop a cross-reactivity matrix testing UU064 against antibodies from different serovars
Compare binding patterns to those observed with MBA proteins, which show specific cross-reactivity patterns (e.g., U. parvum serotype 3 MBA shows cross-reactivity with antibodies from other U. parvum serotypes)
Epitope mapping:
Identify immunodominant epitopes using peptide arrays
Compare conserved regions between UU064 and proteins from other serovars
Look for similarities to known patterns, such as:
MBA from serotype 3 cross-reacts with antibodies from other U. parvum serotypes
MBA from serotype 6 shows cross-reaction primarily with antibodies from U. parvum serotype 1
UU064 may serve as a potential diagnostic target through:
Serological assay development:
Develop ELISA-based tests using purified recombinant UU064
Establish baseline reactivity in control populations versus patients with confirmed infections
Compare sensitivity and specificity to existing MBA-based assays, which have shown that approximately 51% of sera from culture-positive women react with recombinant MBA antigens
Multiplex PCR approaches:
Antigen detection strategies:
Develop lateral flow assays using antibodies against UU064
Create protein microarrays incorporating UU064 and other U. parvum antigens
Validation studies should include specimens from patients with microscopic hematuria and urethral pain, as U. parvum serotype 3 has been associated with these conditions (hazard ratio 1.354, P value 0.018) .
Pregnancy-related research requires specialized approaches:
Placental models:
Timing considerations:
Design longitudinal studies collecting specimens across trimesters
Correlate UU064 antibody levels with pregnancy outcomes
Compare early versus late gestational responses to UU064
Integrative analysis:
Combine protein expression, antibody response, and clinical outcome data
Consider maternal immune status as a confounding variable
Account for polymicrobial interactions that may influence U. parvum pathogenicity
Research should consider that U. parvum has been associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes in approximately 40% of spontaneous preterm births linked to ascending bacterial infections .
For uncharacterized proteins like UU064, structure-function analysis should proceed as follows:
Computational approaches:
Utilize AlphaFold or RoseTTAFold for ab initio structural prediction
Perform homology modeling using structurally characterized bacterial proteins
Identify conserved domains and motifs through bioinformatic analysis
Experimental structure determination:
Structure-guided functional studies:
Design site-directed mutagenesis of predicted functional residues
Create truncated variants to test domain-specific functions
Develop conformation-specific antibodies to probe structural states
Post-translational modification (PTM) analysis requires:
PTM prediction and detection:
Use mass spectrometry (MS/MS) to identify modifications
Apply specific staining methods (e.g., Pro-Q Diamond for phosphorylation)
Compare recombinant UU064 with native protein isolated from U. parvum
Functional impact assessment:
Generate UU064 variants with mutated modification sites
Compare wild-type and mutant proteins in binding and activity assays
Determine if modifications affect protein stability and half-life
Host-induced modifications:
Expose UU064 to host cell extracts to identify potential host-mediated modifications
Compare modifications in different tissue environments
Assess temporal changes in modification patterns during infection
Future therapeutic strategies might include:
Antibody-based approaches:
Develop neutralizing antibodies against UU064
Test therapeutic potential in cellular and animal models
Assess antibody efficacy against different U. parvum strains
Small molecule inhibitors:
Immune modulation strategies:
Design peptide vaccines based on immunogenic epitopes
Develop adjuvanted formulations to enhance immune responses
Assess impact on preventing ascending infections in appropriate models
To reconcile potentially contradictory findings:
Standardized protocols:
Develop consensus methods for UU064 detection and characterization
Establish reference materials for antibody testing
Create standardized reporting formats for clinical correlations
Meta-analysis approaches:
Compile data from multiple studies using rigorous inclusion criteria
Analyze subgroup differences based on patient demographics and comorbidities
Control for variability in detection methods and sampling techniques
Integrative data analysis:
Combine genomic, proteomic, and clinical data in systems biology approaches
Account for strain variations in UU064 sequence and expression
Consider host genetic factors that may influence response to UU064