Recombinant Ustilago maydis C-8 sterol isomerase (ERG2)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference during ordering. We will accommodate your request whenever possible.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs unless dry ice shipping is specifically requested in advance. Additional fees apply for dry ice shipments.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to settle the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50%, but this can be adjusted per customer requirements.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on several factors, including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and the protein's inherent stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized formulations have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquoting is essential for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
The tag type is determined during the manufacturing process.
The tag type will be determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
ERG2; UMAG_01934; C-8 sterol isomerase; Delta-8--delta-7 sterol isomerase
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-241
Protein Length
full length protein
Species
Ustilago maydis (strain 521 / FGSC 9021) (Corn smut fungus)
Target Names
ERG2
Target Protein Sequence
MASHRPRSNKAANGASTSPKRSWIIVSAALVGFCALIAALDSIRSSFYIFDHKAIYKIAS TAVANHPGNATAIFDDVLDNLRADPKLAPYINKNHFSDESEWMFNNAGGAMGSMFIIHAS VTEYLIFFGTPVGTEGHTGRHTADDYFNILTGNQYAFPAGALKAEHYPAGSVHHLRRGTV KQYMMPEDGCWALELAQGWIPPMLPFGLADVLSSTLDLPTFGITVWITAREMVGNLLIGK F
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Catalyzes the introduction of unsaturation at the C-7 position in the B ring of sterols.
Database Links
Protein Families
ERG2 family
Subcellular Location
Endoplasmic reticulum membrane; Single-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is the ERG2 gene in Ustilago maydis and what function does it encode?

The ERG2 gene in Ustilago maydis encodes delta 8-->delta 7 sterol isomerase, an essential enzyme in the ergosterol biosynthesis pathway. This enzyme catalyzes the conversion of delta 8 sterols to delta 7 sterols, a critical step in the production of membrane sterols in fungi. The gene's product is functionally conserved across various fungal species, showing similarity to ERG2 gene products from other fungi such as Magnaporthe grisea and Saccharomyces cerevisiae, particularly in the central regions of the proteins . The enzyme plays a crucial role in maintaining proper membrane structure and function in fungal cells.

How is the ERG2 gene structured in Ustilago maydis?

Based on comparative analysis with other fungal species, the Ustilago maydis ERG2 gene likely contains a coding region interrupted by introns. For instance, in the related fungus Magnaporthe grisea, the ERG2 gene contains a reading frame of 745 bp encoding a protein of 221 amino acids, with a single putative 79-bp-long intron interrupting the coding region . The ERG2 protein in fungi typically features a strongly hydrophobic NH2-terminal region, which is believed to anchor the protein to membrane surfaces, facilitating its enzymatic function in sterol biosynthesis .

What is the evolutionary conservation pattern of ERG2 across fungal species?

ERG2 shows significant evolutionary conservation across diverse fungal species. Sequence analysis reveals that the deduced amino acid sequences exhibit notable similarity between U. maydis, M. grisea, and S. cerevisiae ERG2 proteins, particularly in the central regions . This conservation suggests critical functional domains essential for delta 8-->delta 7 sterol isomerase activity. The hydrophobic NH2-terminal region appears to be a conserved structural feature across multiple fungal species, indicating its importance for proper localization and function of the enzyme .

What expression systems are optimal for producing recombinant U. maydis ERG2?

For recombinant expression of U. maydis ERG2, researchers have successfully employed both homologous and heterologous expression systems. Homologous expression in U. maydis itself can be achieved using vectors such as the p123 plasmid system, which has been used for other U. maydis proteins with the otef promoter driving expression . For heterologous expression, S. cerevisiae systems have proven effective for expressing fungal sterol biosynthesis enzymes. When designing expression constructs, it's crucial to consider that ERG2 contains membrane-anchoring hydrophobic domains that may affect protein folding and localization. For functional studies, complementation assays in ERG2-deletion mutants provide an excellent system to verify activity of the recombinant protein .

What purification strategies yield highest activity for recombinant ERG2?

Purification of recombinant ERG2 requires strategies optimized for membrane-associated proteins. A recommended approach involves:

  • Cell disruption using mechanical methods (e.g., glass beads for yeast cells)

  • Membrane fraction isolation through differential centrifugation (10,000-100,000g)

  • Solubilization using mild detergents (0.5-1% Triton X-100 or n-dodecyl-β-D-maltoside)

  • Affinity chromatography using His-tag or other fusion tags

  • Ion exchange chromatography for further purification

Activity assays should be performed throughout purification to monitor enzyme stability, as membrane proteins often lose activity during purification. Maintaining temperature at 4°C and including glycerol (10-20%) in buffers helps preserve enzyme function .

How can researchers accurately measure ERG2 enzymatic activity?

The enzymatic activity of ERG2 can be measured using several complementary approaches:

MethodPrincipleAdvantagesLimitations
HPLC/GC-MSDirect quantification of substrate depletion and product formationProvides definitive evidence of catalytic activity; allows kinetic parameter determinationRequires specialized equipment; time-consuming
Complementation assayRestoration of normal sterol profile in ERG2-deficient cellsBiological validation of activity; works with unpurified enzymeQualitative rather than quantitative; indirect measure
Radiolabeled substrate conversionTracking conversion of 14C-labeled sterolsHigh sensitivity; enables precise kinetic studiesRequires radioisotope handling facilities; specialized safety procedures

For kinetic characterization, researchers should determine Km and Vmax parameters under varying substrate concentrations using Michaelis-Menten analysis. Typical Km values for fungal ERG2 enzymes range from 5-50 μM for Δ8-sterol substrates .

What methods are most effective for generating ERG2 deletion mutants in U. maydis?

For generating ERG2 deletion mutants in U. maydis, homologous recombination is the method of choice. The procedure typically involves:

  • Construction of a deletion cassette containing a selectable marker (typically antibiotic resistance) flanked by 1-2 kb homologous sequences from the 5' and 3' regions of the ERG2 gene

  • Transformation of U. maydis protoplasts using polyethylene glycol (PEG)-mediated transformation

  • Selection on appropriate antibiotic media

  • PCR verification of gene deletion

  • Southern blot analysis to confirm single integration at the correct locus

The transformation efficiency for gene deletion in U. maydis is typically around 20-50 transformants per μg of DNA. For higher efficiency, techniques such as CRISPR-Cas9 can be employed, although homologous recombination remains the standard approach for U. maydis genetic manipulation .

How do mutations in ERG2 affect sterol composition and antifungal susceptibility?

Mutations in ERG2 significantly alter sterol composition and can modify antifungal susceptibility profiles. In ERG2 mutants:

Sterol Composition ChangePhenotypic EffectAntifungal Implications
Accumulation of Δ8-sterols (>90% of total sterols)Altered membrane fluidity and permeabilityReduced susceptibility to amphotericin B (MIC increase to 8 μg/ml)
Reduction in ergosterol contentImpaired membrane function; potential growth defectsPotential hypersensitivity to azole antifungals
Presence of abnormal sterol intermediatesCell wall stress; morphological abnormalitiesPossible synergistic effects with echinocandins

These alterations stem from the essential role of ERG2 in sterol biosynthesis, where its inactivation blocks the conversion of Δ8-sterols to Δ7-sterols. The accumulation of these intermediates changes membrane properties, which in turn affects drug-membrane interactions .

What phenotypic assays best characterize ERG2 mutants in U. maydis?

To effectively characterize ERG2 mutants in U. maydis, researchers should employ the following phenotypic assays:

  • Growth rate analysis under different temperatures (20°C, 28°C, 37°C) to assess thermal stress response

  • Sterol profile analysis using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry to confirm accumulation of Δ8-sterols

  • Microscopic examination of cell morphology to identify potential defects in cell division or morphogenesis

  • Antifungal susceptibility testing using broth microdilution method (CLSI M27-A3 protocol)

  • Host infection assays using maize plants to evaluate pathogenicity (especially important as U. maydis is a plant pathogen)

  • Membrane integrity assays using fluorescent dyes like propidium iodide

These assays collectively provide a comprehensive phenotypic profile of ERG2 mutants, revealing how the enzyme influences various cellular processes beyond just sterol biosynthesis .

How can ERG2 be utilized as a target for developing selective antifungal compounds?

ERG2 represents a promising target for selective antifungal development due to several advantageous characteristics:

  • Essential role in fungal sterol biosynthesis

  • Structural differences from mammalian counterparts

  • Established druggability with compounds like tridemorph

To develop selective inhibitors:

  • Perform structural analysis of U. maydis ERG2 through homology modeling based on related crystallized proteins

  • Identify catalytic residues through site-directed mutagenesis (focus on the conserved central region)

  • Conduct high-throughput screening of chemical libraries against recombinant ERG2

  • Evaluate hits for selectivity between fungal ERG2 and human counterparts

  • Assess structure-activity relationships of promising scaffolds

  • Test compounds against whole cells and in infection models

The sensitivity of ERG2 to morpholine antifungals like tridemorph provides a starting point for structure-based drug design. Researchers should focus on exploiting differences in the catalytic site between fungal and mammalian enzymes to achieve selectivity .

What role does ERG2 play in U. maydis pathogenicity and host-pathogen interactions?

ERG2's influence on U. maydis pathogenicity involves multiple mechanisms:

  • Membrane integrity maintenance during host colonization

  • Stress response during infection process

  • Potential role in signaling pathways critical for pathogenicity

Research indicates that proper sterol composition is essential for U. maydis to undergo dimorphic transition from yeast to filamentous growth, a prerequisite for plant infection . ERG2 disruption likely affects this process through altered membrane properties that influence cell signaling pathways involved in pathogenicity.

The interaction between sterol biosynthesis and pathogenicity regulatory networks appears complex, potentially involving sirtuins and other transcriptional regulators that control infection-specific gene expression . Experimental evidence suggests that the precise timing of ERG2 expression may be coordinated with other virulence factors during the infection process .

How does ERG2 interact with other enzymes in the sterol biosynthetic pathway in U. maydis?

ERG2 functions within a coordinated enzyme network in the sterol biosynthetic pathway:

Upstream EnzymesERG2 InteractionsDownstream Enzymes
ERG1 (Squalene epoxidase)Provides distant precursorsERG3 (C-5 sterol desaturase)
ERG7 (Lanosterol synthase)No direct interactionERG5 (C-22 sterol desaturase)
ERG11 (Lanosterol 14α-demethylase)No direct interactionERG4 (C-24 sterol reductase)
ERG24 (C-14 sterol reductase)Provides Δ8-sterol substratesERG6 (C-24 sterol methyltransferase)

Research suggests that these enzymes may form functional complexes within the endoplasmic reticulum membrane, facilitating efficient substrate channeling between consecutive enzymes. Disruption of ERG2 not only blocks its specific reaction but may also affect the organization of this enzyme complex, potentially explaining some of the pleiotropic effects observed in ERG2 mutants beyond simple accumulation of Δ8-sterols .

What are common pitfalls in heterologous expression of U. maydis ERG2 and how can they be overcome?

Researchers frequently encounter several challenges when expressing U. maydis ERG2 heterologously:

  • Low expression levels: Often caused by codon usage differences between U. maydis and the expression host. Solution: Optimize codons for the expression host or use a host with similar codon preference.

  • Protein misfolding/aggregation: The hydrophobic N-terminal region can cause aggregation in heterologous systems. Solution: Express truncated versions lacking the membrane anchor or use fusion partners like MBP (maltose-binding protein) to enhance solubility.

  • Lack of post-translational modifications: Some expression systems may not reproduce native modifications. Solution: Choose expression hosts phylogenetically closer to U. maydis (other fungi rather than E. coli).

  • Toxicity to host cells: Overexpression of membrane proteins can disrupt host cell membranes. Solution: Use inducible promoters with tight regulation to control expression levels.

  • Verification of functionality: Confirming that the recombinant protein is functional. Solution: Use complementation assays in ERG2-deficient yeast strains to verify activity .

How can researchers differentiate between direct and indirect effects of ERG2 mutations in phenotypic studies?

Distinguishing direct from indirect effects of ERG2 mutations requires multiple complementary approaches:

  • Complementation assays: Reintroduce wild-type ERG2 to determine which phenotypes are rescued. Complete rescue indicates direct effects.

  • Sterol supplementation experiments: Supply downstream sterols exogenously to see if phenotypes are reversed. Reversal suggests direct sterol-dependent effects.

  • Time-course analysis: Monitor how rapidly different phenotypes develop after conditional ERG2 inactivation. Immediate effects are likely direct, while delayed effects may be secondary.

  • Targeted analysis of specific cellular processes: Use specific assays for membrane fluidity, cell wall integrity, and signal transduction to identify primary cellular systems affected.

  • Synthetic lethality/suppressor screens: Identify genetic interactions that enhance or suppress ERG2 mutation phenotypes to map cellular pathways influenced by ERG2 function .

What considerations are critical when analyzing transcriptomic data from ERG2 mutants?

When analyzing transcriptomic data from ERG2 mutants, researchers should consider:

  • Separating stress responses from specific ERG2-related changes: Many gene expression changes may represent general cellular stress responses rather than specific ERG2-related effects. Compare with transcriptomic profiles of other stress conditions to identify ERG2-specific signatures.

  • Temporal dynamics: Gene expression changes evolve over time following ERG2 disruption. Early responses (0-6 hours) likely represent direct consequences, while later changes may reflect adaptive responses.

  • Context dependence: Expression patterns may differ dramatically between axenic culture and in planta growth conditions. In U. maydis, which shows distinct infection-specific gene expression modules (like the cyan and magenta modules described in literature), ERG2 disruption may differentially affect these modules .

  • Integration with other omics data: Complement transcriptomics with proteomics, lipidomics, and metabolomics to understand the full impact of ERG2 disruption on cellular physiology.

  • Bioinformatic analysis strategies: Use clustering analysis to identify genes with similar expression profiles, as done for the cyan and magenta gene modules in U. maydis, which can reveal functional relationships between seemingly unrelated genes .

How might CRISPR-Cas9 technologies advance functional studies of ERG2 in U. maydis?

CRISPR-Cas9 technologies offer several advantages for studying ERG2 function in U. maydis:

  • Precise genome editing: Create point mutations that alter specific functional domains rather than complete gene deletions, allowing structure-function analysis of ERG2.

  • Multiplex gene editing: Simultaneously modify ERG2 and other sterol biosynthesis enzymes to study pathway interactions and compensatory mechanisms.

  • Conditional expression systems: Develop CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) systems to achieve tunable downregulation of ERG2 expression, avoiding lethality issues associated with complete deletion.

  • Tagged endogenous ERG2: Insert epitope or fluorescent tags at the endogenous locus without disrupting function, enabling studies of native protein localization and interactions.

  • Promoter modifications: Alter ERG2 expression patterns by modifying its endogenous promoter to understand the importance of expression timing during infection processes .

What approaches can reveal the three-dimensional structure of U. maydis ERG2?

Determining the three-dimensional structure of U. maydis ERG2 presents significant challenges due to its membrane-associated nature. Researchers should consider:

  • X-ray crystallography: Requires generation of protein crystals, which is challenging for membrane proteins. Success may depend on:

    • Removal or replacement of the hydrophobic N-terminal domain

    • Use of lipidic cubic phase crystallization methods

    • Addition of stabilizing mutations

  • Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM): Increasingly successful for membrane proteins, allowing visualization in a more native-like environment.

  • Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR): Suitable for determining dynamic regions and ligand binding, particularly if combined with selective isotopic labeling.

  • Computational approaches: Homology modeling based on related proteins with known structures, followed by molecular dynamics simulations to refine models.

  • Hybrid approaches: Integrating low-resolution structural data from techniques like small-angle X-ray scattering with computational modeling .

How can systems biology approaches integrate ERG2 function into broader cellular networks?

Systems biology offers powerful frameworks to contextualize ERG2 function within broader cellular networks:

These approaches can reveal how ERG2 function integrates with pathogenicity, stress response, and developmental networks in U. maydis, potentially identifying novel intervention points for antifungal development .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.