Recombinant UTP--glucose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase (cap4C)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Enzyme Overview

UTP—glucose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase (EC 2.7.7.9) catalyzes the reversible reaction:
Glucose-1-phosphate + UTPUDP-glucose + pyrophosphate\text{Glucose-1-phosphate + UTP} \rightleftharpoons \text{UDP-glucose + pyrophosphate}
Recombinant UGPase is produced via heterologous expression systems (e.g., E. coli) for structural and functional studies. Its role spans glycogen synthesis, galactose metabolism, and cell wall biosynthesis .

Quaternary Architecture

  • Prokaryotic forms: Tetrameric in E. coli (PDB: 5VE7), with 222 symmetry .

  • Eukaryotic forms: Octameric in humans/yeast, dimeric in Burkholderia xenovorans .

Substrate Specificity

  • Binds UTP and glucose-1-phosphate with KmK_m values of 0.12 mM and 0.08 mM, respectively .

  • Also catalyzes UDP-galactose synthesis from galactose-1-phosphate .

Kinetic Mechanism

  • Ordered Bi Bi mechanism: UTP binds first, followed by glucose-1-phosphate .

  • Pyrophosphatase activity drives the reaction forward in vivo .

Pathogen Virulence

  • Essential for capsular polysaccharide synthesis in Streptococcus pneumoniae .

  • Proposed as a drug target due to conserved active sites across pathogens .

Biotechnological Use

  • Recombinant forms enable high-yield UDP-glucose production for glycobiology studies .

Regulatory Mechanisms

OrganismRegulatory ModeKey Features
YeastPhosphorylation by PAS kinaseControls glycogen vs. cell wall synthesis
PlantsOligomerization/N-glycosylationCold stress alters activity
HumansIsoform expression (UGP1/UGP2)Tissue-specific splicing variants

Clinical and Industrial Relevance

  • Galactosemia: Overexpression may mitigate galactose toxicity .

  • Cancer: Activity reduced by 50–60% in glycolytic cancer cells .

  • Agriculture: Engineering UGPase in crops enhances sucrose biosynthesis .

Crystallographic Data

The Burkholderia ambifaria UGPase (PDB: 5VE7) reveals:

  • Ligand binding: UTP coordinates with Mg²⁺ via α-phosphoryl oxygen .

  • Disordered regions: Residues 83–88 may regulate substrate access .

Unresolved Questions

  • cap4C designation: No direct references found; potential isoform or synthetic variant requiring further characterization.

  • Allosteric regulation: Structural differences between prokaryotic/eukaryotic forms suggest undiscovered regulatory motifs .

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder. We will ship the in-stock format by default. If you have specific format requirements, please note them when ordering.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary by purchase method and location. Consult your local distributor for specific delivery times. Proteins are shipped with blue ice packs by default. Request dry ice in advance; extra fees apply.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Working aliquots can be stored at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Briefly centrifuge the vial before opening. Reconstitute in sterile deionized water to 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. Add 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquot for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. The default final glycerol concentration is 50%.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on storage conditions, buffer ingredients, storage temperature, and protein stability. Liquid form: 6 months at -20°C/-80°C. Lyophilized form: 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
The tag type is determined during manufacturing. If you require a specific tag, please inform us and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
cap4C; SP_2092UTP--glucose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase; EC 2.7.7.9; Alpha-D-glucosyl-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase; UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase; UDPGP; Uridine diphosphoglucose pyrophosphorylase
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-299
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Streptococcus pneumoniae serotype 4 (strain ATCC BAA-334 / TIGR4)
Target Names
cap4C
Target Protein Sequence
MTSKVRKAVI PAAGLGTRFL PATKALAKEM LPIVDKPTIQ FIVEEALKSG IEDILVVTGK SKRSIEDHFD SNFELEYNLK EKGKTDLLKL VDKTTDMRLH FIRQTHPRGL GDAVLQAKAF VGNEPFVVML GDDLMDITDE KAVPLTKQLM DDYERTHAST IAVMPVPHDE VSAYGVIAPQ GEGKDGLYSV ETFVEKPAPE DAPSDLAIIG RYLLTPEIFE ILEKQAPGAG NEIQLTDAID TLNKTQRVFA REFKGARYDV GDKFGFMKTS IDYALKHPQV KDDLKNYLIQ LGKELTEKE
Uniprot No.

Q&A

What is UTP--glucose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase (cap4C) and what is its function?

UTP--glucose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase (cap4C), also known as UGPA or UGPase, is an enzyme that plays a central role as a glucosyl donor in cellular metabolic pathways. It catalyzes the transfer of a glucose moiety from glucose-1-phosphate to MgUTP, forming UDP-glucose and MgPPi . This enzyme is critical in mammalian carbohydrate interconversions, with UDP-glucose serving as a direct precursor of glycogen in liver and muscle tissue. In lactating mammary glands, UDP-glucose is converted to UDP-galactose, which is further converted to lactose .

The enzyme belongs to the UDPGP type 1 family and is involved in several carbohydrate metabolism pathways, including amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism, galactose metabolism, pentose and glucuronate interconversions, and starch and sucrose metabolism .

What are the common synonyms and identifiers for UTP--glucose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase?

UTP--glucose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase is known by several synonyms and identifiers in scientific literature and databases:

  • UniProt Synonym Gene Names: UGP1, UDPGP, UGPase

  • Also referred to as UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase

  • Enzyme Commission (EC) number: 2.7.7.9

  • Protein type: Transferase

  • Chromosomal Location of Human Ortholog: 2p15

  • Two isoforms are produced by alternative splicing in humans

What cellular components and biological processes are associated with UTP--glucose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase?

UTP--glucose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase functions within specific cellular compartments and participates in several critical biological processes:

Cellular Components:

  • Cytoplasm

  • Cytosol

  • Nucleus

Biological Processes:

  • Glycogen biosynthetic process

  • Glycogen metabolic process

  • UDP-glucose metabolic process

  • UDP-glucuronate biosynthetic process

Molecular Functions:

  • Identical protein binding

  • Protein binding

  • UTP:glucose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase activity

What is the significance of the octameric state in UTP--glucose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase activity?

Research provides clear evidence that the octameric state is a prerequisite for activity in UTP--glucose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase . This quaternary structure-function relationship has important implications for both structural and functional studies of the enzyme. The octameric assembly likely creates optimal spatial arrangements of catalytic sites and stabilizes the active conformation of each monomer.

When designing experiments to study this enzyme, researchers should:

  • Confirm the oligomeric state using size exclusion chromatography or analytical ultracentrifugation

  • Ensure purification protocols preserve the octameric state

  • Include controls for oligomeric state in activity assays

  • Consider the impact of experimental conditions (pH, temperature, ionic strength) on octamer stability

This structural requirement should inform experimental design, particularly when expressing recombinant forms of the enzyme or conducting mutagenesis studies.

What statistical approaches are most appropriate for analyzing UTP--glucose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase enzymatic activity data?

When analyzing enzymatic activity data for UTP--glucose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase, researchers should employ both descriptive and inferential statistical methods:

Descriptive Statistics:

  • Measures of central tendency (mean, median, mode) to characterize average enzyme activity

  • Measures of variability (standard deviation, variance, range) to assess reproducibility

  • Data visualization through appropriate graphs (scatter plots, bar graphs with error bars)

Inferential Statistics:

  • t-tests for comparing activity between two conditions (e.g., wild-type vs. mutant)

  • ANOVA for comparing multiple conditions (e.g., different substrates, pH conditions)

  • Regression analysis for kinetic studies:

    • Non-linear regression for fitting Michaelis-Menten equations

    • Linear regression for transformed data (Lineweaver-Burk plots)

Controlling for Variability:

  • Randomization of experimental runs to minimize systematic errors

  • Blocking designs to account for known sources of variation

  • Use of appropriate controls in each experimental batch

When assessing experimental results, remember that two factors are commonly involved: a measure of centrality (mean, median) and a measure of variability (standard deviation). If variability is large, it becomes more difficult to regard a measure of central tendency as a dependable guide to representative performance or to detect the effects of an experimental treatment .

How can methodological triangulation be applied to study UTP--glucose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase?

Methodological triangulation involves using more than one kind of method to study a phenomenon and has been found beneficial in providing confirmation of findings, more comprehensive data, increased validity, and enhanced understanding of studied phenomena . For UTP--glucose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase research, triangulation might include:

Combining Multiple Methodological Approaches:

  • Biochemical and Structural Methods:

    • Enzyme kinetic assays to determine catalytic parameters

    • Structural studies (X-ray crystallography, cryo-EM) to examine the octameric assembly

  • In Vitro and Cellular Studies:

    • Purified enzyme assays for mechanistic studies

    • Cell-based assays to examine function in biological context

  • Qualitative and Quantitative Methods:

    • Quantitative measurements of enzymatic activity

    • Qualitative assessment of cellular effects through microscopy

To implement methodological triangulation effectively, researchers should:

  • Use focused research questions to reflect the research's purpose

  • Apply evaluative criteria—'truth value', 'applicability', 'consistency', and 'neutrality'—to ensure rigor

  • Address challenges associated with implementing multiple methodologies

  • Develop strategies for resolving potentially contradictory findings

This approach broadens the researcher's insight into the different issues underlying the enzyme's function by drawing data from multiple sources .

What are essential considerations for designing enzyme kinetics experiments with UTP--glucose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase?

Designing rigorous enzyme kinetics experiments for UTP--glucose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase requires careful attention to several key factors:

Experimental Design Elements:

  • Initial Rate Determination:

    • Establish conditions where product formation is linear with time

    • Determine appropriate enzyme concentration for linear response

    • Include multiple time points to confirm reaction linearity

  • Substrate Concentration Range:

    • Use sufficient data points across substrate concentration range (typically 0.2-5 × Km)

    • Include both low and saturating substrate concentrations

    • Consider solubility limits and substrate inhibition potential

  • Replication Strategy:

    • Include technical replicates (minimum triplicate measurements)

    • Implement biological replicates (independent enzyme preparations)

    • Use randomization to distribute systematic errors

  • Controlling Environmental Variables:

    • Maintain precise temperature control

    • Buffer optimization (pH, ionic strength)

    • Account for potential metal cofactor requirements

Data Analysis Framework:

  • Apply appropriate kinetic models (Michaelis-Menten, allosteric models)

  • Use non-linear regression for parameter fitting

  • Calculate and report standard errors for all parameters

  • Consider global fitting of multiple datasets when appropriate

By controlling experimental variables and reducing variability, researchers can increase the sensitivity of statistical tests to treatment effects . This is analogous to limiting static or noise in a radio signal to better detect the actual signal.

How can researchers construct effective data tables for UTP--glucose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase experiments?

Creating clear, informative data tables for enzyme experiments requires attention to organization, content, and formatting:

Table Construction Guidelines:

  • Structure and Organization:

    • Create clear column headers with units specified

    • List independent variables (e.g., enzyme concentration) in left columns5

    • Arrange data in logical progression

    • Include appropriate units of measurement

  • Content Requirements:

    • Include both raw data and calculated parameters

    • Present measures of central tendency (mean) alongside variability (standard deviation)

    • Include sample sizes for each condition

    • Consider adding statistical significance indicators

  • Formatting Best Practices:

    • Use consistent decimal places appropriate to measurement precision

    • Apply text wrapping for lengthy headers5

    • Merge cells for hierarchical organization when appropriate

    • Include footnotes for special conditions or exceptions

Example Data Table Format:

Enzyme Concentration (μg/mL)Trial 1 Rate (mm/s)Trial 2 Rate (mm/s)Trial 3 Rate (mm/s)Mean Rate (mm/s)Standard Deviation
0.50.420.390.450.420.03
1.00.810.850.790.820.03
2.01.621.581.651.620.04
5.03.453.513.393.450.06

For data tables in enzyme studies, researchers should ensure all numeric data is properly aligned, maintain consistency in reporting precision, and clearly indicate any "no reaction" (NR) conditions when appropriate5.

What are optimal approaches for expressing and purifying recombinant UTP--glucose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase?

When expressing and purifying recombinant UTP--glucose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase, researchers should consider:

Expression System Selection:

  • Bacterial systems (E. coli): High yield but may require optimization for proper folding

  • Yeast systems: Better for maintaining eukaryotic post-translational modifications

  • Mammalian cells: Ideal when authentic human enzyme conformation is critical

Expression Optimization:

  • Temperature adjustment: Lower temperatures often improve folding of complex enzymes

  • Induction parameters: Optimize inducer concentration and duration

  • Fusion tags: Choose appropriate tags (His6, GST) based on downstream applications

Purification Strategy:

  • Initial capture using affinity chromatography

  • Intermediate purification using ion exchange chromatography

  • Polishing step using size exclusion chromatography (critical for preserving octameric state)

  • Quality control assessment of oligomeric state and activity

Activity Preservation:

  • Optimize buffer conditions (pH, ionic strength, stabilizing additives)

  • Determine appropriate storage conditions

  • Verify activity retention after each purification step

  • Monitor octameric state integrity throughout purification

Remember that the octameric state is a prerequisite for activity in this enzyme , so purification conditions must be optimized to maintain this quaternary structure.

What methods are effective for measuring UTP--glucose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase activity?

Several complementary approaches can be used to measure UTP--glucose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase activity:

Spectrophotometric Coupled Enzyme Assays:

  • Forward reaction: Measure UDP-glucose production by coupling to UDP-glucose dehydrogenase

  • Reverse reaction: Couple UTP production to pyruvate kinase and lactate dehydrogenase

  • Monitor NADH production/consumption at 340 nm

Direct Product Quantification:

  • HPLC separation and quantification of UDP-glucose

  • LC-MS/MS for highly sensitive detection of products

  • Capillary electrophoresis for separation of reaction components

Experimental Design Considerations:

  • Enzyme concentration optimization to ensure linear reaction rates

  • Time course studies to determine initial velocity conditions

  • Substrate concentration ranges for kinetic parameter determination

  • Buffer optimization (pH, ionic strength, metal cofactors)

For all assay methods, researchers should implement controls to verify the octameric state , as this is essential for enzyme activity, and include appropriate statistical analysis of results using measures of both central tendency and variability .

How can researchers overcome variability challenges in enzyme activity assays?

Controlling variability in enzyme assays is crucial for obtaining reliable results:

Sources of Variability:

  • Enzyme preparation heterogeneity (stability, octameric state integrity)

  • Substrate quality and storage conditions

  • Instrument performance and calibration

  • Environmental factors (temperature fluctuations)

  • Operator technique and experience

Mitigation Strategies:

  • Reagent and Sample Standardization:

    • Implement strict quality control for enzyme preparations

    • Use single batches of reagents for complete experimental series

    • Prepare master mixes to minimize pipetting errors

  • Assay Optimization:

    • Determine optimal enzyme concentration for linear response

    • Validate linear range of product formation over time

    • Include internal standards or reference controls

  • Experimental Design:

    • Randomize sample order to distribute systematic errors

    • Include multiple technical replicates

    • Use blocking designs to control for known sources of variation

When analyzing results, two factors are commonly involved: a measure of centrality (mean, median) and a measure of variability (standard deviation). If variability is large, it becomes more difficult to regard a measure of central tendency as a dependable guide or to detect the effects of an experimental treatment . This task is analogous to distinguishing radio signals in the presence of static—the experimental variable (treatment) represents the radio signal, and the variability is the static (noise).

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.