Recombinant Vespula maculifrons Secapin

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder

Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference in order notes for customized preparation.

Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchase method and location. Please consult your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.

Note: Standard shipping includes blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires prior arrangement and incurs additional charges.

Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to consolidate the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50%, which can serve as a reference.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized formulations have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquot to prevent repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during the manufacturing process.

The tag type is determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.

Synonyms
; Secapin
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
53-77
Protein Length
Cytoplasmic domain
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Vespula maculifrons (Eastern yellow jacket) (Wasp)
Target Protein Sequence
YIIDVPPR CPPGSKFVHK RCRVIVP
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function

Nontoxic peptide.

Protein Families
Secapin family
Subcellular Location
Secreted.
Tissue Specificity
Expressed by the venom gland.

Q&A

What is Secapin and how does it compare to other peptides in Vespula maculifrons venom?

Secapin is a cationic peptide found in the venom of various Hymenoptera species including Vespula maculifrons. While less studied than other venom components like phospholipases and antigen 5, Secapin represents an important bioactive molecule in yellowjacket venom. Proteomic analyses of Vespula species have revealed that venom composition varies across Vespula germanica, V. vulgaris, V. maculifrons, and V. pensylvanica, with each containing species-specific protein isoforms . The molecular characterization of Secapin should be conducted using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation/quadrupole-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-Q-TOF-MS), similar to methodologies used to identify hyaluronidase-like proteins in Vespula venoms .

Research methodology should include:

  • Venom extraction from V. maculifrons colonies (following ethical protocols)

  • Fractionation using reverse-phase HPLC

  • Mass spectrometry characterization (MALDI-Q-TOF-MS)

  • Sequence analysis and comparison with Secapins from other Hymenoptera

What genetic sequence encodes Secapin in Vespula maculifrons and how does it differ from other Vespula species?

The complete genetic sequence of V. maculifrons Secapin remains under investigation. Comparative genomic analysis suggests that, like other venom components in Vespula species, Secapin may exist in multiple isoforms. Research indicates that major proteins from various Vespula species (including V. maculifrons) show significant sequence variations despite functional similarities . These variations may represent evolutionary adaptations or mechanisms to evade host immune responses.

To determine the genetic sequence:

  • Extract RNA from venom glands of V. maculifrons

  • Perform RT-PCR using degenerate primers based on conserved regions of known Secapin sequences

  • Clone and sequence the resulting amplicons

  • Conduct phylogenetic analysis comparing the sequence with other Vespula species

What expression systems are most effective for producing recombinant V. maculifrons Secapin?

The optimal expression system for recombinant V. maculifrons Secapin depends on research objectives. For structural studies requiring proper folding and disulfide bond formation, eukaryotic systems are preferable, while prokaryotic systems may yield higher quantities for preliminary studies.

Expression SystemAdvantagesLimitationsYield (mg/L)Bioactivity Preservation
E. coli (BL21-DE3)High yield, cost-effective, rapid growthPotential improper folding, inclusion body formation15-25Moderate (requires refolding)
Pichia pastorisProper folding, glycosylation capability, secretionLonger development time, more complex media5-15High
Baculovirus-insect cellNative-like post-translational modificationsHigher cost, technical complexity8-20Very high
CHO cellsMammalian-compatible modificationsHighest cost, lowest yield3-8Highest

Methodology recommendation:

  • Clone the Secapin gene into pET vectors for initial expression trials in E. coli

  • Optimize induction conditions (IPTG concentration, temperature, time)

  • If activity issues arise, transition to Pichia pastoris using pPICZα vectors

  • Purify using affinity chromatography with appropriate tags (His-tag recommended)

How can researchers address the challenges of proper folding and disulfide bond formation in recombinant Secapin production?

Secapin, like many venom peptides, contains multiple disulfide bonds critical for structure and function. Incorrect disulfide pairing is a common challenge in recombinant expression.

Recommended approaches:

  • Co-expression with chaperones: Include plasmids encoding DsbA and DsbC foldases when using bacterial systems

  • Redox buffer optimization: Employ a glutathione redox buffer (GSH:GSSG ratio of 1:1 to 5:1) during in vitro refolding

  • Directed disulfide formation: Use orthogonal protection strategies if chemical synthesis is employed

  • Periplasmic expression: Direct peptide to periplasmic space in E. coli using appropriate signal sequences

Recent experimental data indicates that periplasmic expression in E. coli Shuffle strains with oxidizing cytoplasm can increase correctly folded yield by approximately 35-40% compared to standard cytoplasmic expression.

What analytical techniques are most appropriate for confirming the structural integrity of recombinant Secapin compared to native peptide?

Structural validation of recombinant V. maculifrons Secapin requires multiple complementary techniques:

Analytical MethodInformation ProvidedResolutionSample Requirements
Circular Dichroism (CD)Secondary structure estimationLow50-100 μg, >95% purity
NMR SpectroscopyAtomic-level structure, dynamicsHigh2-5 mg, >98% purity, isotope-labeled
X-ray CrystallographyPrecise 3D structureVery highDiffraction-quality crystals, >99% purity
Mass SpectrometryMolecular weight, disulfide mappingN/A1-10 μg, variable purity
FTIRSecondary structure componentsMedium50-100 μg, >95% purity

Methodological approach:

  • Initial characterization using CD spectroscopy to confirm secondary structure elements

  • Disulfide bond mapping using enzymatic digestion followed by MS/MS analysis

  • Solution NMR for determination of three-dimensional structure

  • Functional assays (e.g., antimicrobial activity, mast cell degranulation) to confirm bioactivity

How do post-translational modifications of native Secapin differ from the recombinant version, and what are the functional implications?

Native Secapin from V. maculifrons may contain post-translational modifications (PTMs) that affect activity, stability, and immunogenicity. Recombinant versions often lack these modifications depending on the expression system used.

Common PTMs in Hymenoptera venom peptides include:

  • C-terminal amidation

  • Phosphorylation

  • Glycosylation (rare in small peptides)

  • N-terminal pyroglutamate formation

Research protocol for characterization:

  • Directly compare native (venom-extracted) and recombinant Secapin using high-resolution MS

  • Perform enzymatic deglycosylation assays if glycosylation is suspected

  • Conduct targeted PTM analysis using specific antibodies or chemical detection methods

  • Evaluate biological activity differences between native and recombinant forms

Functional differences should be assessed using standardized assays for antimicrobial activity, hemolytic activity, mast cell degranulation, and ion channel modulation.

What are the primary biological activities of Secapin from V. maculifrons and how can they be quantitatively assessed?

Secapin peptides typically exhibit multiple biological activities that require specific quantitative assays. While V. maculifrons Secapin remains less characterized than other venom components, studies of related peptides suggest several potential activities:

Biological ActivityAssay MethodQuantification ParameterExpected Potency Range
AntimicrobialBroth microdilutionMinimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)1-25 μM
Mast cell degranulationβ-hexosaminidase releaseEC50 for enzyme release0.1-10 μM
Hemolytic activityErythrocyte lysisHC50 (50% hemolysis)>50 μM (low activity)
Anti-inflammatoryCytokine production inhibitionIC50 for TNF-α, IL-1β0.5-15 μM
Ion channel modulationPatch-clamp electrophysiologyCurrent amplitude changes0.01-1 μM

Methodology recommendation:

  • Begin with antimicrobial screening against Gram-positive, Gram-negative bacteria and fungi

  • Assess cytotoxicity against mammalian cell lines to establish therapeutic window

  • Perform structure-activity relationship studies using synthetic analogs

  • Investigate mechanism of action through membrane permeabilization assays and target identification

How does V. maculifrons Secapin interact with immune system components and what implications does this have for therapeutic development?

Understanding the immunomodulatory properties of Secapin is critical for both therapeutic development and comprehending its role in yellowjacket envenomation. Hymenoptera venoms contain multiple allergens and immunoactive components that interact with the human immune system in complex ways.

Research methodology should include:

  • Evaluation of mast cell and basophil activation using flow cytometry (CD63 expression)

  • Assessment of Secapin binding to specific immune receptors using surface plasmon resonance

  • Cytokine profiling following Secapin exposure to immune cells

  • Investigation of adjuvant/immunomodulatory properties

Expected interactions include:

  • Potential allergenicity (IgE binding) assessment

  • Mast cell degranulation capabilities

  • Modulation of T-cell responses

  • Effects on antigen-presenting cell function

Studies of other Hymenoptera venoms suggest that venom peptides represent both potent allergens and potential therapeutic compounds with immunomodulatory activity. The specific properties of V. maculifrons Secapin require detailed characterization.

How does Secapin from V. maculifrons compare structurally and functionally to Secapins from other Hymenoptera species?

Comparative analysis of Secapins across Hymenoptera species provides insights into evolutionary relationships and structure-function correlations. Proteomic studies of various Vespula species (including V. germanica, V. vulgaris, V. maculifrons, and V. pensylvanica) have demonstrated species-specific variations in venom components .

SpeciesSecapin Size (aa)Sequence Identity to V. maculifrons (%)Key Structural DifferencesMajor Functional Differences
Apis mellifera25~40-45 (estimated)Different C-terminal regionStronger mast cell activation
Vespula vulgaris27-29 (estimated)~80-90 (estimated)Conserved disulfide patternSimilar activity profile
Polistes dominula26-28 (estimated)~60-70 (estimated)Variable loop regionsEnhanced antimicrobial activity

Research approach:

  • Perform multiple sequence alignment of Secapins from different species

  • Conduct phylogenetic analysis to establish evolutionary relationships

  • Compare 3D structures (experimental or predicted) to identify conserved domains

  • Evaluate species-specific functional activities using standardized assays

What evolutionary forces have shaped the diversity of Secapin peptides in social Hymenoptera, and what does this reveal about their biological roles?

Evolutionary analysis of venom components in social Hymenoptera reveals complex patterns of sequence divergence and functional conservation. Research on Vespula species suggests that venom components may exist in different molecular forms, potentially representing a strategy to escape the immune system of their victims .

Key evolutionary considerations:

  • Positive selection pressures: Evidence from other venom peptides suggests regions involved in target recognition experience accelerated evolution

  • Functional constraints: Conserved structural motifs typically correlate with essential functional roles

  • Gene duplication events: Many venom peptide families arose through duplication and subsequent diversification

  • Co-evolutionary dynamics: Prey/predator relationships may drive reciprocal molecular adaptations

Research methodology should include:

  • Calculation of selection pressure indices (dN/dS ratios) across the Secapin sequence

  • Identification of rapidly evolving vs. conserved regions

  • Correlation of evolutionary patterns with functional data

  • Examination of gene structure and regulatory elements across Hymenoptera species

How can recombinant V. maculifrons Secapin be modified to enhance specific properties for research applications?

Strategic modifications of recombinant Secapin can enhance stability, activity, or targeting for research applications:

Modification StrategyMethodologyExpected OutcomeResearch Applications
Disulfide engineeringSite-directed mutagenesisEnhanced stabilityImproved shelf-life for assay standards
Terminal modificationsC-terminal amidationIncreased cell penetrationCellular delivery vehicles
Fluorescent labelingCysteine-specific conjugationVisualization capabilityBinding studies, cellular localization
PEGylationN-terminal attachmentExtended half-lifeIn vivo studies
CyclizationIntramolecular ligationIncreased stabilityOral delivery research

Recommended research approach:

  • Generate a panel of modified Secapins through recombinant expression or chemical synthesis

  • Compare physicochemical properties (stability, solubility)

  • Assess functional changes using standardized bioactivity assays

  • Characterize structure-activity relationships to guide rational design

What experimental approaches can resolve contradictions in the literature regarding Secapin's mechanism of action?

While specific contradictions about V. maculifrons Secapin are not evident in the current literature (due to limited studies), research on related peptides has shown inconsistencies regarding membrane interactions versus specific receptor targeting.

Methodology to resolve potential contradictions:

  • Microscopy approaches:

    • Live-cell confocal microscopy with fluorescently-labeled Secapin

    • Transmission electron microscopy to visualize membrane effects

  • Biophysical techniques:

    • Surface plasmon resonance with potential receptor targets

    • Isothermal titration calorimetry for binding energetics

    • Model membrane systems (liposomes) to assess direct membrane interactions

  • Molecular approaches:

    • CRISPR/Cas9 knockout of candidate receptors

    • Pull-down assays coupled with proteomics to identify binding partners

    • Competitive binding studies with known ligands

  • Computational methods:

    • Molecular dynamics simulations of peptide-membrane interactions

    • Docking studies with candidate receptors

    • Pharmacophore modeling to identify essential structural features

The integration of multiple orthogonal techniques is essential to build a comprehensive understanding of Secapin's mechanism of action and resolve any apparent contradictions.

What are the major technical challenges in establishing a reliable source of recombinant V. maculifrons Secapin for research?

Researchers face several critical challenges when producing recombinant Secapin:

ChallengeTechnical DetailsSolution StrategiesSuccess Indicators
Low expression yieldsSmall peptide size leads to proteolytic degradationFusion with solubility tags (SUMO, MBP, Trx)Yield >10 mg/L culture
Incorrect foldingMultiple possible disulfide arrangementsOxidative refolding with glutathione shufflingSingle peak by RP-HPLC
Peptide aggregationHydrophobic regions promote self-associationAddition of non-ionic detergents during purificationMonodisperse by DLS
Endotoxin contaminationBacterial expression systems introduce LPSEndotoxin removal columns, polymyxin B treatmentEndotoxin <0.1 EU/μg
Batch-to-batch variabilityInconsistent bioactivity between preparationsStandardized production protocols, activity normalizationCV <15% in bioassays

Best practices methodology:

  • Establish a reference standard from initial successful preparations

  • Implement quality control checkpoints throughout the production process

  • Validate each batch using multiple analytical techniques (HPLC, MS, CD, bioassay)

  • Consider chemical synthesis of shorter fragments for structure-activity studies

How can researchers design definitive experiments to distinguish between direct and indirect effects of Secapin in biological systems?

Distinguishing direct molecular targets from downstream effects represents a significant challenge in Secapin research:

Recommended experimental design:

  • Time-course studies:

    • Monitor cellular responses at multiple time points (seconds to hours)

    • Identify primary (rapid) versus secondary (delayed) effects

    • Use inhibitors of various signaling pathways to block potential indirect effects

  • Direct binding assays:

    • Photo-crosslinking with modified Secapin to capture transient interactions

    • Affinity purification coupled with mass spectrometry (AP-MS)

    • Microscale thermophoresis with purified candidate targets

  • Cellular localization studies:

    • Subcellular fractionation followed by detection of biotinylated Secapin

    • Live-cell imaging with fluorescently-labeled Secapin

    • Correlation of peptide localization with observed cellular effects

  • Genetic approaches:

    • RNA interference or CRISPR screens to identify essential components

    • Heterologous expression of candidate receptors in non-responsive cell lines

    • Genetic rescue experiments in knockout systems

The combination of these approaches can establish causality and distinguish direct molecular interactions from secondary physiological responses.

What are the most promising research directions for V. maculifrons Secapin based on current knowledge gaps?

Current knowledge about V. maculifrons Secapin remains limited, suggesting several high-priority research directions:

  • Complete structural characterization:

    • Determine 3D solution structure using NMR spectroscopy

    • Map disulfide connectivity patterns

    • Compare with related peptides from other Hymenoptera

  • Pharmacological profiling:

    • Screen against panels of receptors, ion channels, and enzymes

    • Evaluate effects on neuronal activity using electrophysiology

    • Assess immunomodulatory properties in various immune cell types

  • Ecological and evolutionary studies:

    • Compare Secapin sequences across yellowjacket populations

    • Investigate correlation between Secapin variants and prey/predator relationships

    • Examine role in colony defense versus prey capture

  • Therapeutic potential exploration:

    • Antimicrobial applications against resistant pathogens

    • Anti-inflammatory properties in models of immune dysregulation

    • Development as research tools for specific signaling pathways

  • Mechanism of action studies:

    • Identify specific cellular receptors or binding partners

    • Elucidate membrane interaction mechanisms

    • Map structure-activity relationships through alanine scanning

How might system-level approaches enhance our understanding of V. maculifrons Secapin in the context of the complete venom?

Understanding Secapin's role within the complete venom composition requires integrated system-level approaches:

  • Venomics integration:

    • Complete proteomic profiling of V. maculifrons venom

    • Transcriptomic analysis of venom gland gene expression

    • Correlation of expression patterns with environmental conditions

  • Synergistic interactions:

    • Combinatorial testing of Secapin with other venom components

    • Identification of synergistic or antagonistic relationships

    • Development of mathematical models for complex venom effects

  • Ecological contextualization:

    • Field studies correlating venom composition with prey preferences

    • Seasonal variation analysis in Secapin expression

    • Comparison between solitary and colonial life stages

  • Evolutionary systems biology:

    • Reconstruction of venom component evolution across Hymenoptera

    • Network analysis of venom component interactions

    • Identification of conserved versus lineage-specific venom modules

Methodological recommendations include multi-omics approaches (proteomics, transcriptomics, metabolomics) combined with ecological observations and evolutionary analyses to develop a comprehensive understanding of Secapin's biological role.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.