Molecular Weight: ~7.6 kDa (predicted), though migration patterns in SDS-PAGE may show slight variations (~10 kDa) .
Function: Participates in ribosome biogenesis and stress response modulation .
Commercial Availability: Sold for research purposes (e.g., catalog number MBS20003226 at $550.00) .
While rpmG is non-essential in some bacteria like E. coli, studies suggest it contributes to ribosomal stability under stress conditions. In V. vulnificus, L33 may act redundantly with other ribosomal proteins, ensuring robust translation during environmental fluctuations .
Though direct evidence in V. vulnificus is limited, homologs in other bacteria indicate that ribosomal proteins like L33 interact with stressosomes—sensory complexes that regulate stress adaptation (e.g., oxygen sensing in V. vulnificus) .
Stringent Response: In E. coli, rpmG operons are regulated by ppGpp/DksA during amino acid starvation, a mechanism likely conserved in V. vulnificus .
Autogenous Regulation: Unlike rplM-rpsI (regulated by L13), rpmB-rpmG lacks translational feedback control, suggesting post-transcriptional mechanisms dominate rpmG expression .
Ribosomal proteins, including L33, are implicated in aminoglycoside tolerance. Metabolic disruptions (e.g., TCA cycle mutations) alter ribosomal protein levels, indirectly affecting antibiotic survival .
V. vulnificus clinical strains show high antibiotic resistance to carbapenems and vancomycin, potentially linked to regulatory proteins like CRP .
Iron Metabolism: Stressosomes in V. vulnificus modulate iron uptake, critical for survival in host environments .
Toxin Regulation: RpoS, a global regulator repressed by cAMP-CRP, controls virulence factors like RtxA1 toxin .
| Protein | Operon | Regulatory Mechanism | Stress Response Role |
|---|---|---|---|
| L33 | rpmB-rpmG | ppGpp/DksA-dependent transcription | Redundant ribosomal stability |
| L13 | rplM-rpsI | Autogenous repression by L13 | 50S assembly checkpoint |
Direct Functional Studies: Limited data on V. vulnificus L33 specifically; most insights extrapolated from E. coli.
Host-Pathogen Interactions: Role of L33 in V. vulnificus virulence (e.g., septicemia) remains unexplored .
Therapeutic Targeting: Ribosomal proteins like L33 could inform antibiotic design against multidrug-resistant strains .
Vibrio vulnificus 50S ribosomal protein L33 (rpmG) is a component of the large subunit (50S) of the bacterial ribosome in V. vulnificus. This protein plays a crucial structural role in maintaining ribosomal stability and function during protein synthesis. As a ribosomal protein, rpmG interacts with ribosomal RNA and neighboring proteins to maintain the complex architecture of the ribosomal subunit. Ribosomal proteins in V. vulnificus are particularly important as they may influence both virulence factor expression and stress responses, similar to the global regulator rpoS gene product that helps the bacterium acquire resistance against various environmental stresses .
Ribosomal proteins like rpmG typically show high conservation patterns within bacterial species due to their fundamental role in the essential process of protein synthesis. Within V. vulnificus strains, rpmG demonstrates high sequence conservation, similar to what has been observed with other conserved genes like empV (encoding extracellular metalloproteinase), which shows strong evolutionary conservation among V. vulnificus strains . While moderate sequence variation occurs across different Vibrio species, the core functional domains of rpmG remain highly conserved. This conservation pattern makes rpmG useful for phylogenetic analysis to determine evolutionary relationships between bacterial strains. Despite sequence variations, the functional role of rpmG is preserved across species, reflecting its critical importance in maintaining ribosome structure and function during protein synthesis.
The 50S ribosomal protein L33 (rpmG) from Vibrio vulnificus is a small protein with a molecular weight of approximately 5-6 kDa. The structure typically includes:
Primary structure: Approximately 45-55 amino acid residues with a high proportion of basic amino acids (lysine and arginine) that facilitate interactions with negatively charged ribosomal RNA.
Secondary structure: Contains alpha-helical regions and beta-sheet elements that form the core structural framework.
Tertiary structure: Features compact folding with strategically exposed RNA-binding surfaces that enable proper positioning within the ribosome.
Zinc-binding motif: Some L33 proteins contain a zinc-binding motif (CxxC-x₁₀-CxxC), though this varies among bacterial species and strains.
By comparison, the related 50S ribosomal protein L35 (rpmI) from V. vulnificus shares similar structural characteristics as both proteins function within the complex architecture of the bacterial ribosome.
The 50S ribosomal protein L33 (rpmG) contributes to ribosomal function through several mechanisms:
Structural integrity: rpmG forms specific interactions with ribosomal RNA and neighboring proteins to help maintain the tertiary structure of the 50S ribosomal subunit.
Translation efficiency: As an integral part of the ribosomal complex, rpmG affects the efficiency of protein synthesis by supporting optimal ribosome conformation during the translation process.
Ribosome assembly: rpmG participates in the ordered assembly of the 50S subunit, which is crucial for producing functional ribosomes capable of protein synthesis.
Antibiotic interaction: Some ribosomal proteins in the 50S subunit are involved in antibiotic binding or resistance mechanisms, which is particularly relevant for V. vulnificus given its increasing resistance to various antibiotics including cephalosporins and tetracyclines .
Stress response: Similar to other ribosomal components, rpmG may play a role in adapting translation machinery to function under stress conditions encountered during infection processes.
The optimal expression systems for recombinant Vibrio vulnificus 50S ribosomal protein L33 (rpmG) depend on experimental objectives and downstream applications. The following expression strategies provide effective options:
E. coli expression systems:
BL21(DE3): Offers high expression levels with reduced protease activity
Rosetta or CodonPlus strains: Beneficial if codon usage differs significantly between V. vulnificus and E. coli
SHuffle or Origami strains: Recommended if rpmG contains disulfide bonds
Expression vectors and conditions:
| Vector Type | Advantages | Recommended Induction Parameters |
|---|---|---|
| pET series | Tight control under T7 promoter | 0.1-0.5 mM IPTG, 16-25°C, 4-16 hours |
| pGEX vectors | GST-fusion for improved solubility | 0.1 mM IPTG, 18°C, overnight |
| pMAL system | MBP-fusion enhances solubility | 0.3 mM IPTG, 25°C, 6-8 hours |
Affinity tags:
His6-tag: Most common for simplified purification using IMAC
FLAG or Strep-tag: Alternatives for specific applications requiring high purity
Cleavable tags: TEV or PreScission protease sites for tag removal after purification
When designing expression systems for rpmG, consider that ribosomal proteins naturally interact with RNA and other proteins, potentially affecting solubility when expressed recombinantly. This often requires optimization of expression conditions or the inclusion of solubility-enhancing fusion partners.
Verifying the structural integrity of recombinant Vibrio vulnificus 50S ribosomal protein L33 (rpmG) requires a multi-faceted approach to ensure the protein maintains its native conformation:
Biophysical characterization:
Circular Dichroism (CD) spectroscopy: Evaluates secondary structure content and folding
Thermal shift assays: Assesses protein stability and proper folding through melt curve analysis
Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS): Determines size distribution and detects potential aggregation
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR): Provides atomic-level structural information (particularly useful for small proteins like rpmG)
Functional verification:
RNA binding assays: Confirms ability to interact with ribosomal RNA fragments
Ribosome reconstitution assays: Tests incorporation into partially assembled ribosomal particles
In vitro translation assays: Evaluates function in reconstituted translation systems
Structural analysis:
Limited proteolysis: Properly folded proteins show characteristic resistance patterns
Mass spectrometry with hydrogen-deuterium exchange: Identifies exposed versus protected regions
Comparative analysis with native protein: When possible, compare properties with protein extracted from V. vulnificus
For initial screening, a combination of CD spectroscopy, thermal shift assays, and RNA binding tests provides an effective approach to confirm proper folding before proceeding to more specialized experimental applications.
Achieving high purity recombinant Vibrio vulnificus 50S ribosomal protein L33 (rpmG) requires a strategic multi-step purification approach:
Initial capture:
Immobilized Metal Affinity Chromatography (IMAC): For His-tagged rpmG constructs
Glutathione-Sepharose chromatography: For GST-fusion proteins
Amylose resin chromatography: For MBP-fusion constructs
Intermediate purification:
Ion Exchange Chromatography: rpmG typically has a basic pI, making cation exchange (e.g., SP Sepharose) particularly effective
Heparin affinity chromatography: Exploits the RNA-binding properties inherent to ribosomal proteins
Tag removal: Protease treatment followed by reverse IMAC to separate the tag from the target protein
Polishing step:
Size Exclusion Chromatography (SEC): Separates monomeric protein from aggregates and other contaminants
Hydroxyapatite chromatography: Provides separation based on both charge and hydrophobic interactions
Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography (HIC): Useful for removing contaminating proteins with different surface hydrophobicity
Specific challenges and solutions:
| Challenge | Solution | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Nucleic acid contamination | Benzonase treatment, high-salt washes (500-1000 mM NaCl) | Disrupts electrostatic interactions with RNA |
| Protein aggregation | Add reducing agents (5 mM DTT or 2 mM βME) | Prevents disulfide bond formation if cysteine residues are present |
| Co-purifying bacterial proteins | Include additional orthogonal purification steps | Exploits different physicochemical properties |
A typical optimized protocol might involve IMAC capture, followed by ion exchange chromatography, and final polishing by size exclusion chromatography, yielding >95% pure protein suitable for structural and functional studies.
Assessing the functionality of recombinant Vibrio vulnificus 50S ribosomal protein L33 (rpmG) requires approaches that evaluate its core ribosomal roles:
RNA binding assays:
Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA): Detects complex formation between rpmG and ribosomal RNA
Fluorescence anisotropy: Quantifies binding kinetics using fluorescently labeled RNA fragments
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR): Provides real-time binding data and affinity constants
Filter binding assays: Measures interaction with specific rRNA fragments using radiolabeled RNA
Ribosome assembly participation:
In vitro reconstitution: Tests incorporation into partially assembled 50S subunits
Sucrose gradient centrifugation: Monitors association with ribosomal complexes
Cryo-EM analysis: Visualizes structural integration into ribosomal particles
Translation-related functions:
In vitro translation systems: Measures restoration of activity in L33-depleted ribosomes
Polysome profile analysis: Evaluates impact on translation efficiency
tRNA binding and positioning assays: Assesses effects on tRNA interactions
When designing functionality assays, it's important to include appropriate controls:
L33-depleted ribosomes (negative control)
Native L33 protein (positive control)
Mutated L33 variants (to map functional domains)
A comprehensive functionality assessment would typically begin with RNA binding assays to confirm basic molecular interactions, followed by more complex ribosome assembly and translation assays to evaluate physiological relevance.
Recombinant Vibrio vulnificus 50S ribosomal protein L33 (rpmG) offers valuable approaches for studying antibiotic resistance mechanisms, particularly relevant given the increasing antibiotic resistance observed in V. vulnificus to commonly used antibiotics such as cephalosporins and tetracyclines :
Structural studies of antibiotic binding:
Co-crystallization with antibiotics targeting the 50S subunit
NMR studies to map antibiotic interaction sites
Molecular dynamics simulations to analyze binding mechanisms
Site-directed mutagenesis to identify critical residues for antibiotic interactions
Ribosomal protection mechanisms:
In vitro translation assays comparing wild-type and mutant rpmG effects on antibiotic susceptibility
Competition binding assays between antibiotics and rpmG variants
Conformational change analysis in the presence of antibiotics
Evolutionary approaches:
Comparison of rpmG sequences from resistant versus sensitive V. vulnificus strains
Directed evolution experiments to identify resistance-conferring mutations
Phylogenetic analysis across Vibrio species with varying antibiotic resistance profiles
V. vulnificus isolates have been found to harbor numerous antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) such as PBP3, parE, adeF, varG, and CRP, which confer resistance to beta-lactams, fluoroquinolones, and carbapenem antibiotics . Studying how rpmG interacts with these resistance mechanisms could provide insights into novel therapeutic approaches that might circumvent or overcome these resistance mechanisms.
The relationship between 50S ribosomal protein L33 (rpmG) and Vibrio vulnificus virulence involves several potential mechanisms:
Translational regulation of virulence factors:
rpmG may influence the translation efficiency of specific virulence-associated mRNAs
Differential expression of rpmG during infection could modulate virulence gene expression
Specialized ribosomes containing modified rpmG might preferentially translate virulence factor mRNAs
Stress adaptation mechanisms:
Similar to how RpoS functions as a global regulator helping V. vulnificus acquire resistance against various stresses and express virulence factors , ribosomal proteins may have regulatory roles
rpmG might contribute to translation under stress conditions encountered during host infection
Environmental signals such as temperature, pH, and nutrient availability may influence rpmG function
Interaction with virulence regulation networks:
V. vulnificus strains carry various virulence factors, including capsular polysaccharide (CPS), lipopolysaccharide (LPS), iron acquisition systems, flagella, pili, hemolysin/cytolysin, metalloprotease, and repeats-in-toxin (RTX) . While direct evidence for rpmG involvement with these specific factors is limited, ribosomal proteins potentially influence their expression through translational control mechanisms.
Structural studies of Vibrio vulnificus 50S ribosomal protein L33 (rpmG) can significantly contribute to antibiotic development through several approaches:
Identification of novel binding pockets:
High-resolution structures reveal potential antibiotic binding sites unique to bacterial ribosomes
Molecular docking studies can identify cavities suitable for small molecule binding
Comparison with rpmG from non-pathogenic species highlights target-specific features
Analysis of conserved versus variable regions guides selective targeting
Structure-guided drug design:
Fragment-based screening against structural models of rpmG
Structure-activity relationship (SAR) studies of compounds interacting with rpmG
Rational modification of existing antibiotics to improve rpmG interactions
Design of peptide mimetics that disrupt rpmG-rRNA or rpmG-protein interactions
Resistance mechanism insights:
Structural comparison between wild-type and resistance-associated rpmG variants
Molecular dynamics simulations to understand conformational changes affecting antibiotic binding
Identification of allosteric sites that could be targeted to overcome resistance
Analysis of compensatory mutations that maintain function while conferring resistance
The increasing antibiotic resistance of V. vulnificus to commonly used antibiotics underscores the importance of developing novel antimicrobial strategies. Structural studies of ribosomal proteins like rpmG can reveal unique features that distinguish them from human ribosomal proteins, enabling the design of selective inhibitors with reduced side effects.
Research on ribosomal protein interactions in Vibrio vulnificus faces several significant challenges:
Technical limitations:
Difficulty obtaining high-resolution structures of complete V. vulnificus ribosomes
Challenges in producing recombinant ribosomal proteins in their native conformation
Complexity of reconstituting functional ribosomal subunits in vitro
Limited availability of V. vulnificus-specific antibodies for ribosomal proteins
Biological complexity:
Dynamic nature of ribosome assembly and protein interactions
Potential strain-specific variations in ribosomal protein sequences and functions
Environmental regulation of ribosomal protein expression and modification
Possible moonlighting functions of ribosomal proteins outside the ribosome
Experimental design issues:
Distinguishing direct effects of rpmG from secondary consequences of ribosome disruption
Developing appropriate in vivo models to study ribosomal protein functions
Difficulty in isolating intact ribosomes without disrupting native interactions
Challenges in studying translation under conditions mimicking infection environments
Integration with other regulatory networks:
Addressing these challenges requires interdisciplinary approaches combining structural biology, genetics, biochemistry, and computational modeling. Recent advances in cryo-electron microscopy have improved our ability to visualize ribosomal complexes, while techniques like ribosome profiling can provide insights into the functional consequences of ribosomal protein variations.
Common expression issues with recombinant Vibrio vulnificus 50S ribosomal protein L33 (rpmG) can be addressed through systematic troubleshooting:
Low expression levels:
Optimize codon usage for the expression host
Try different promoter systems (T7, tac, araBAD)
Increase plasmid copy number or switch to a different vector
Optimize induction conditions (temperature, inducer concentration, timing)
Use richer media formulations (TB, 2xYT) instead of standard LB
Insoluble protein formation:
Lower induction temperature (16-25°C)
Reduce inducer concentration
Co-express with chaperones (GroEL/ES, DnaK/J)
Add solubility tags (MBP, SUMO, GST, Thioredoxin)
Include stabilizing agents in lysis buffer (glycerol, arginine, low concentrations of urea)
Data-driven optimization table for expression conditions:
| Parameter | Test Range | Optimal Condition for rpmG | Measure of Success |
|---|---|---|---|
| Temperature | 15-37°C | Usually 18-25°C | Soluble protein yield |
| IPTG concentration | 0.1-1.0 mM | Typically 0.2-0.5 mM | Total expression level |
| Induction time | 3-24 hours | 16-20 hours at lower temperatures | Balance of yield vs. degradation |
| Media composition | LB, TB, 2xYT, M9 | Often TB or 2xYT | Cell density and protein yield |
| Host strain | BL21(DE3), C41/C43, Rosetta | Strain-dependent | Expression level and solubility |
Protein degradation solutions:
Add protease inhibitors during purification
Use protease-deficient host strains (BL21)
Reduce expression time
Purify at lower temperatures
Include stabilizing ligands or binding partners
When troubleshooting, implement changes systematically and assess results quantitatively through SDS-PAGE and Western blotting to determine the most effective optimization strategy for your specific experimental conditions.
Robust experimental design for Vibrio vulnificus 50S ribosomal protein L33 (rpmG) functional assays requires comprehensive controls:
Positive controls:
Native V. vulnificus rpmG protein (if available)
Well-characterized orthologous L33 proteins from related species
Reconstituted ribosomes containing authentic rpmG
Previously validated rpmG batches with confirmed activity
Negative controls:
Inactive rpmG mutants (with known critical residues altered)
Heat-denatured rpmG
Buffer-only conditions
Unrelated ribosomal proteins of similar size/charge
L33-depleted ribosomes or extracts
System-specific controls for different assay types:
| Assay Type | Essential Controls | Validation Method |
|---|---|---|
| RNA binding | Non-specific RNA competitor, No-protein control | EMSA, filter binding |
| Ribosome assembly | L33-depleted ribosomes, Assembly with unrelated protein | Sucrose gradients, light scattering |
| In vitro translation | Translation without rpmG, Translation with scrambled rpmG sequence | Luciferase activity, radiolabeled amino acid incorporation |
| Structural studies | Proper folding controls, Buffer-matched samples | CD spectroscopy, thermal shift assays |
| Antibiotic resistance | Known resistant and sensitive strains, Antibiotic-free conditions | MIC determination, growth curves |
Technical controls:
Internal standards for quantification
Multiple biological and technical replicates
Time-course measurements to establish kinetics
Sample processing controls to account for experimental variations
These comprehensive control strategies help distinguish true functional effects from artifacts and enable confident interpretation of results, especially when integrating findings with other aspects of V. vulnificus research such as virulence mechanisms and regulatory pathways .
Navigating contradictory results in Vibrio vulnificus 50S ribosomal protein L33 (rpmG) research requires systematic analysis:
Methodological sources of variation:
Differences in protein preparation (tags, purification methods, storage conditions)
Variations in experimental conditions (buffer composition, temperature, pH)
Diverse assay systems measuring different aspects of function
Technical limitations of detection methods
Batch-to-batch variability in reagents
Biological sources of variation:
Strain-specific differences in rpmG sequence or expression
Context-dependent functions of rpmG in different cellular environments
Interactions with strain-specific binding partners
Adaptations to different environmental niches
Post-translational modifications affecting function
Systematic approach to resolving contradictions:
a. Methodological standardization:
Directly compare protocols between studies
Replicate contradictory experiments under identical conditions
Introduce controlled variations to identify critical parameters
Develop consensus protocols for key assays
b. Hypothesis refinement:
Formulate hypotheses that could explain apparently contradictory results
Design experiments specifically to test reconciliation hypotheses
Consider more complex models incorporating context-dependency
Examine whether contradictions reflect different aspects of a multifunctional protein
Interpretation framework:
| Type of Contradiction | Possible Explanation | Resolution Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Function in different strains | Strain-specific adaptations | Comparative genomics and functional studies across strains |
| In vitro vs. in vivo results | Missing cellular context | Develop more complex reconstitution systems |
| Structure-function discrepancies | Dynamic conformational states | Combined structural biology approaches (X-ray, NMR, cryo-EM) |
| Expression-phenotype inconsistencies | Compensatory mechanisms | Systems biology approaches examining networks |
| Antibiotic sensitivity variations | Resistance mechanism differences | Detailed mechanism studies with controlled genetic backgrounds |
This approach to contradiction analysis is particularly relevant given the complexity of V. vulnificus pathogenicity and the multiple regulatory systems involved in virulence and stress adaptation .
Comprehensive bioinformatic analysis of Vibrio vulnificus 50S ribosomal protein L33 (rpmG) conservation requires multiple computational approaches:
Sequence-based analyses:
Multiple sequence alignment (MSA): Using tools like MUSCLE, MAFFT, or Clustal Omega
Phylogenetic tree construction: Maximum likelihood, Bayesian, or Neighbor-joining methods
Sequence logo generation: For visualizing conserved motifs and variable regions
Conservation scoring: Using methods like Jensen-Shannon divergence or Evolutionary Trace
Structure-based approaches:
Homology modeling: Building structural models based on known ribosomal structures
Structural alignment: Comparing predicted or experimental structures
Molecular dynamics simulations: Assessing structural stability of conserved regions
Contact map analysis: Identifying conserved interaction networks
Evolutionary analysis:
dN/dS ratio calculation: Identifying selection pressures on rpmG
Coevolutionary analysis: Finding correlated mutations with interaction partners
Ancestral sequence reconstruction: Tracing evolutionary history of rpmG
Population genetics approaches: Analyzing within-species variation
Analytical framework for conservation studies:
| Analysis Level | Methods | Tools | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary sequence | MSA, Conservation scoring | Jalview, ConSurf | Identify functional residues, binding sites |
| Secondary structure | Structure prediction, Conservation mapping | PSIPRED, JPred | Relate sequence conservation to structural elements |
| Tertiary structure | Homology modeling, Structural superposition | MODELLER, PyMOL | Visualize 3D conservation patterns |
| Genomic context | Synteny analysis, Operon prediction | MicrobesOnline, SyntTax | Understand functional associations |
| Evolutionary history | Phylogenetic analysis, Selection analysis | PAML, HyPhy | Identify evolutionary constraints and adaptation |
This approach is similar to methods used to analyze the evolutionary conservation of other V. vulnificus genes, such as empV, which demonstrated strong conservation within V. vulnificus strains while remaining distinct from other Vibrio species . Such conservation analysis provides insights into the evolutionary constraints on rpmG and potential species-specific adaptations that may relate to pathogenicity.