Recombinant Vibrio vulnificus Acetate kinase 2 (ackA2)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference during order placement for customized preparation.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchase method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates. Note: Standard shipping includes blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires advance notification and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to consolidate the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50% and serves as a reference.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on several factors, including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized forms have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during the manufacturing process. The tag type will be determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
ackA2; VVA0658Acetate kinase 2; EC 2.7.2.1; Acetokinase 2
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-397
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Vibrio vulnificus (strain YJ016)
Target Names
ackA2
Target Protein Sequence
MSNSFVLVIN SGSSSLKFAV INSVTGEAVL SGLGECFGLE DARMGWKYSG EKTEIAIEGE DNHHKIAIGK LVGLTEELGL TKDIVAVGHR IVHGGEKFTS TVRINEEVTA EIEKLADLAP LHNPAGAIGI RAAMEAFPAL PQFAVFDTAF HQTMPKRAFT GAIANELYTD FGIRRYGFHG TSHYFVSREA AKMLNKPIEE SSFISVHLGN GASVCAINNG ESVDTSMGFT PLSGLMMGTR CGDLDPGIIE YLLKKGWSQE KVFNSLNKAS GFLGVSGLTS DARGILEAME QGHEGATLAF QVFTYRVAKY IASYLAALDS FDGIIFTGGI GENSLPIRRE ILKNLKLLGF VEDEKGNEDA RFGNAGVIAT SALLNAVAMV IPTNEEFVIA QQSVELL
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Catalyzes the reversible interconversion of acetyl phosphate and acetate using ATP.
Database Links

KEGG: vvy:VVA0658

Protein Families
Acetokinase family
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm.

Q&A

What is the basic function of Acetate Kinase 2 (ackA2) in Vibrio vulnificus?

Acetate Kinase 2 (ackA2) in Vibrio vulnificus likely functions similarly to other bacterial acetate kinases, catalyzing the reversible conversion between acetate and acetyl-phosphate. This enzyme plays a critical role in acetate metabolism, allowing bacteria to either produce acetate (generating ATP) or consume acetate as a carbon source depending on metabolic requirements. Based on studies of similar systems, ackA2 likely has specialized kinetic properties compared to other acetate kinase isozymes in the same organism. For example, in Lactococcus lactis, AckA2 demonstrates a significantly higher affinity for acetate than AckA1, suggesting a specialized role in acetate uptake particularly at low environmental acetate concentrations .

How does Vibrio vulnificus ackA2 differ structurally and functionally from ackA1?

While specific comparative data for Vibrio vulnificus isozymes is limited in the provided sources, insights can be drawn from studies of other bacterial species. In Lactococcus lactis, AckA1 and AckA2 share significant sequence similarity but exhibit marked differences in kinetic properties. AckA2 typically demonstrates a much higher affinity for acetate (significantly lower Km value) compared to AckA1, while AckA1 shows a higher turnover number (kcat) . Structurally, both proteins appear to function as homodimers, with molecular weights approximately double that of their monomeric forms . These differences likely reflect evolutionary adaptation to optimize acetate metabolism under varying environmental conditions.

What is the molecular weight and quaternary structure of recombinant V. vulnificus ackA2?

Based on comparable acetate kinases studied in other bacteria, recombinant V. vulnificus ackA2 likely exists as a homodimer. In Lactococcus lactis, gel filtration analysis revealed that His-tagged AckA2 has a molecular weight of approximately 84 kDa, which is close to double the monomer size of 43 kDa . This strongly indicates a homodimeric structure. While specific data for V. vulnificus is not provided in the search results, the conservation of acetate kinase structure across bacterial species suggests a similar quaternary arrangement would be expected for V. vulnificus ackA2.

What are the optimal conditions for expressing recombinant V. vulnificus ackA2 in E. coli?

For optimal expression of recombinant V. vulnificus ackA2 in E. coli, researchers should consider several key parameters based on protocols used for similar enzymes. Expression should typically be performed in BL21(DE3) or a similar strain designed for high-level protein expression. Induction with 0.5-1.0 mM IPTG when cultures reach OD600 of 0.6-0.8, followed by expression at lower temperatures (16-25°C) for 16-18 hours, often yields better results for maintaining protein solubility. The addition of a His-tag facilitates purification while generally preserving enzymatic activity. Studies on other acetate kinases have shown that N-terminal His-tagging is typically preferred as the N-terminal residues are usually positioned outside the catalytic core, minimizing interference with enzyme function .

What purification strategy yields the highest purity and activity for recombinant V. vulnificus ackA2?

A multi-step purification approach is recommended for obtaining high-purity, active recombinant V. vulnificus ackA2. For His-tagged constructs, initial purification using Ni-NTA affinity chromatography with imidazole gradient elution (typically 20-250 mM) provides good preliminary purification. This should be followed by size exclusion chromatography to separate the homodimeric active enzyme from aggregates and monomers. Buffer conditions should be optimized to maintain stability, typically including 50 mM Tris-HCl or phosphate buffer (pH 7.4-8.0), 100-300 mM NaCl, and potentially 5-10% glycerol to enhance stability. Including protease inhibitors and maintaining temperatures below 4°C throughout purification helps preserve enzyme activity. Performing activity assays at each purification step can confirm the retention of catalytic function .

What are the key kinetic parameters (Km, kcat) for V. vulnificus ackA2 and how do they compare to ackA1?

While specific kinetic parameters for V. vulnificus acetate kinases are not provided in the search results, data from comparable systems like Lactococcus lactis offer valuable insights. In L. lactis, AckA2 demonstrates a significantly lower Km for acetate (1.87 mM) compared to AckA1 (22.07 mM), indicating a much higher affinity for acetate . Conversely, AckA1 exhibits a substantially higher kcat in both directions - approximately 8-fold higher for acetate production and 4-fold higher for acetate consumption .

A comparative table of kinetic parameters based on the L. lactis model would likely appear as follows:

ParameterAckA1AckA2Significance
Km for acetate~22 mM~1.9 mMAckA2 has ~12× higher affinity for acetate
kcat (acetate production)HighLow (⅛ of AckA1)AckA1 has higher capacity for acetate production
kcat (acetate consumption)HighLow (¼ of AckA1)AckA1 has higher turnover rate

Similar patterns might be expected for V. vulnificus isozymes, with ackA2 potentially specialized for acetate uptake at low concentrations .

How does pH affect the activity and stability of recombinant V. vulnificus ackA2?

The pH dependence of V. vulnificus ackA2 activity would likely follow a bell-shaped curve typical of many enzymes. Based on studies of acetate kinases from other organisms, optimal activity would be expected in the range of pH 7.0-8.5. The directionality of the reaction (acetate production versus consumption) may show different pH optima, reflecting the physiological conditions under which each direction predominates in vivo.

To properly characterize pH effects, researchers should:

  • Test activity across a range from pH 5.0 to 9.0 using appropriate buffer systems with consistent ionic strength

  • Monitor both initial reaction rates and stability over time at each pH

  • Distinguish between effects on substrate binding (Km) versus catalytic rate (kcat)

  • Consider physiological relevance of pH conditions to Vibrio vulnificus environmental niches

Long-term stability studies at different pH values would also be valuable for storage recommendations and understanding the enzyme's resilience in various experimental conditions.

What is the substrate specificity of V. vulnificus ackA2 beyond acetate?

While acetate is the primary physiological substrate for acetate kinases, characterizing the activity of V. vulnificus ackA2 with alternative substrates provides valuable insights into enzyme specificity and potential physiological roles. Researchers should test a panel of short-chain carboxylic acids including propionate, butyrate, and formate to determine relative activity compared to acetate. Additionally, testing nucleotide triphosphate specificity beyond ATP (such as GTP, CTP, or UTP) would reveal cofactor preferences.

What are the most reliable assays for measuring V. vulnificus ackA2 activity in both directions?

Several complementary methods are recommended for comprehensive characterization of V. vulnificus ackA2 activity:

  • Coupled spectrophotometric assay: This approach links acetate kinase activity to NADH oxidation or NAD+ reduction (depending on reaction direction) through coupling enzymes. For the acetate-producing direction, couple with pyruvate kinase and lactate dehydrogenase to monitor NADH oxidation at 340 nm. For the acetate-consuming direction, couple with phosphotransacetylase and monitor CoA-SH formation using DTNB (Ellman's reagent) at 412 nm.

  • Direct measurement of acetyl phosphate: Use hydroxylamine to convert acetyl phosphate to acetyl hydroxamate, which forms a colored complex with ferric ions that can be measured at 540 nm.

  • Radioisotope-based assay: Use 14C-labeled acetate to directly measure substrate conversion with high sensitivity.

For enzyme characterization, activity should be measured across a range of substrate concentrations (typically 0.1-10× the expected Km) to generate Michaelis-Menten kinetic plots. When comparing results between studies, researchers should standardize conditions and include appropriate enzyme standards to account for inter-laboratory variation .

How should researchers design experiments to distinguish between the physiological roles of ackA1 and ackA2 in V. vulnificus?

To elucidate the distinct physiological roles of acetate kinase isozymes in V. vulnificus, a multi-faceted experimental approach is recommended:

This comprehensive approach allows for functional differentiation while controlling for potential indirect effects of gene disruption .

What is the appropriate fractional factorial design for optimizing multiple parameters affecting recombinant ackA2 expression?

For optimizing recombinant ackA2 expression, researchers must balance thoroughness with experimental feasibility. A fractional factorial design can efficiently identify key parameters and interactions while reducing the total number of experimental conditions needed.

Consider these key parameters for optimization:

  • Induction temperature (T): 16°C vs 37°C

  • IPTG concentration (I): 0.1 mM vs 1.0 mM

  • Expression time (E): 4h vs 18h

  • Media composition (M): Standard LB vs Enriched media

A full factorial design would require 2⁴ = 16 conditions. Instead, a 2⁴⁻¹ fractional factorial design requires only 8 conditions while still providing valuable information about main effects, though some interactions will be aliased (combined).

ExperimentTemperatureIPTGTimeMediaYield
1LowLowShortStandardY₁
2HighLowShortEnrichedY₂
3LowHighShortEnrichedY₃
4HighHighShortStandardY₄
5LowLowLongEnrichedY₅
6HighLowLongStandardY₆
7LowHighLongStandardY₇
8HighHighLongEnrichedY₈

In this design, each main effect is aliased with a three-way interaction (e.g., T is aliased with I×E×M), which is typically acceptable as higher-order interactions are often negligible. This approach allows researchers to identify the most influential parameters affecting ackA2 expression while conducting fewer experiments than a complete factorial design .

After identifying significant factors, researchers can conduct follow-up experiments focusing on those parameters with more levels to refine optimal conditions.

How should researchers interpret contradictory kinetic data for recombinant V. vulnificus ackA2?

When faced with contradictory kinetic data for recombinant V. vulnificus ackA2, researchers should systematically evaluate several potential sources of variation:

  • Enzyme preparation differences: Variations in purification methods, protein tags, or storage conditions can significantly impact enzyme activity. For example, the positioning of His-tags can affect enzyme function, though studies on other acetate kinases suggest that N-terminal tags generally have minimal impact as these residues are typically outside the catalytic core .

  • Assay condition variations: Small differences in buffer composition, pH, ionic strength, or temperature can dramatically alter kinetic parameters. For acetate kinases, the concentration of acetate used in assays is particularly important given the typically high Km values, which can range from 1.87 mM to 300 mM depending on the specific isozyme and organism .

  • Directional bias: Acetate kinases catalyze reversible reactions, so apparent discrepancies may result from studying different reaction directions. Compare forward (acetate production) and reverse (acetate consumption) reaction data separately.

  • Data fitting approaches: Review how kinetic parameters were derived from raw data. Different mathematical models (Lineweaver-Burk, Eadie-Hofstee, non-linear regression) can yield slightly different parameter estimates.

  • Enzyme stability issues: Check if enzyme activity decays during assays, which can lead to underestimation of activity. Time-course measurements can reveal stability issues.

When presenting seemingly contradictory findings, researchers should clearly describe all methodological details and directly address potential sources of variation rather than simply reporting discrepant values .

What are the common problems in purifying active recombinant V. vulnificus ackA2 and how can they be addressed?

Common challenges in purifying active recombinant V. vulnificus ackA2 include:

  • Poor solubility and inclusion body formation:

    • Solution: Lower expression temperature (16-20°C), reduce inducer concentration, use solubility-enhancing fusion tags (SUMO, MBP), or co-express with chaperones.

    • Include low concentrations (1-5%) of mild solubilizing agents like glycerol or non-ionic detergents in lysis buffers.

  • Loss of activity during purification:

    • Solution: Add stabilizing agents to all buffers (5-10% glycerol, 1-5 mM DTT or β-mercaptoethanol).

    • Include substrate analogs or product mimics at low concentrations to stabilize the active site.

    • Minimize purification time and maintain low temperature (4°C) throughout.

  • Heterogeneity in quaternary structure:

    • Solution: Include a size exclusion chromatography step to separate monomers, dimers, and aggregates. Based on studies of similar acetate kinases, the active form is likely a homodimer with approximately twice the molecular weight of the monomer .

    • Verify the quaternary structure using dynamic light scattering or analytical ultracentrifugation.

  • Co-purifying contaminants:

    • Solution: Include an ion exchange chromatography step after initial affinity purification.

    • Consider adding a low concentration of imidazole (10-20 mM) in binding buffers to reduce non-specific binding.

  • Metal-dependent activity loss:

    • Solution: Include low concentrations of divalent metals (Mg²⁺, Mn²⁺) in purification buffers if the enzyme requires metal cofactors.

    • Avoid metal chelators like EDTA unless specifically needed for a purification step.

Thorough activity testing at each purification step can identify where activity losses occur, allowing targeted optimization of problematic steps .

How can researchers validate that phenotypic changes in V. vulnificus ackA2 mutants are specifically due to the loss of ackA2 function?

Validating that phenotypic changes in V. vulnificus ackA2 mutants are specifically attributable to the loss of ackA2 function requires a comprehensive set of controls and complementary approaches:

  • Genetic complementation: Reintroduce the wild-type ackA2 gene on a plasmid into the ackA2 mutant strain. Complete reversal of the mutant phenotype provides strong evidence that observed changes are specifically due to ackA2 loss. In studies with Lactococcus lactis, this approach confirmed the specific roles of ackA isozymes in acetate metabolism .

  • Multiple independent mutants: Generate and characterize multiple independent ackA2 mutant strains to ensure consistent phenotypes, ruling out secondary mutations or polar effects.

  • Domain-specific mutations: Instead of complete gene deletion, introduce specific mutations in catalytic residues to distinguish between enzymatic and potential structural roles of the protein.

  • Biochemical validation: Measure acetate kinase activity in cell extracts to confirm the expected changes in enzyme activity. In L. lactis, researchers showed additivity of activities in wild-type and mutant strains, supporting the distinct roles of each isozyme .

  • Comparative mutant analysis: Create and characterize ackA1 single mutants and ackA1ackA2 double mutants to distinguish unique versus overlapping functions. In L. lactis, this approach revealed distinct growth advantages for strains containing either ackA1 or ackA2 under different acetate concentrations .

  • Transcriptional independence verification: Confirm that the mutation does not affect expression of nearby genes, particularly if ackA1 and ackA2 are in close proximity. In L. lactis, researchers used transcriptional fusions to demonstrate that ackA1 and ackA2 are independently transcribed despite their proximity in the genome .

This multi-faceted approach provides a robust framework for attributing phenotypic changes specifically to ackA2 function rather than secondary effects .

How conserved is ackA2 across Vibrio species and what does this suggest about its evolutionary significance?

The conservation of acetate kinase isozymes across bacterial species offers important evolutionary insights. While specific information about Vibrio vulnificus ackA2 conservation is not provided in the search results, broader patterns observed in acetate kinase evolution can inform our understanding.

Studies have revealed that approximately 45% of organisms with acetate kinase entries in UniProt possess multiple ACK isozymes, spanning more than 300 species . This widespread occurrence suggests that having multiple acetate kinases with complementary functions may be a common evolutionary strategy among bacteria that encounter varying environmental acetate concentrations.

When analyzing conservation patterns across Vibrio species, researchers should consider:

  • Sequence conservation in catalytic domains versus regulatory regions

  • Preservation of key kinetic differences between isozymes

  • Genomic context and organization of ackA genes

  • Co-evolution with other acetate metabolism genes like phosphotransacetylase

Phylogenetic analysis would likely reveal whether ackA2 arose from gene duplication within the Vibrio lineage or was acquired through horizontal gene transfer. The high conservation of this system across diverse bacterial phyla suggests strong selection pressure for maintaining multiple acetate kinase isozymes with complementary functions, likely reflecting the dual nature of acetate as both an essential substrate and potential growth inhibitor depending on environmental conditions .

How do the kinetic properties of V. vulnificus ackA2 compare with acetate kinases from other pathogenic bacteria?

A comparative analysis of acetate kinases across pathogenic bacteria reveals important patterns in enzyme specialization. While specific data for V. vulnificus ackA2 is not provided in the search results, we can draw insights from well-characterized systems.

Acetate kinases generally show considerable variation in their kinetic parameters, particularly in their affinity for acetate. The Km for acetate can range from extremely low values (as seen in L. lactis AckA2 at 1.87 mM) to remarkably high values (as in E. coli at 300 mM) . This wide range reflects different metabolic specializations and environmental adaptations.

A comparative table might appear as follows:

OrganismEnzymeKm for acetate (mM)kcat (s⁻¹)Specialized function
L. lactisAckA122.07HighAcetate production
L. lactisAckA21.87LowAcetate uptake at low concentrations
E. coliAckA~300ModeratePrimarily acetate production
V. vulnificusAckA2[Predicted low][Predicted low][Predicted: acetate uptake]

In pathogenic bacteria, including Vibrio species, the ability to efficiently use acetate from host environments could represent an important metabolic adaptation during infection. The specialized kinetic properties of different acetate kinase isozymes likely reflect adaptation to their ecological niches and metabolic requirements. For V. vulnificus, a facultative human pathogen that can also exist in marine environments, having multiple acetate kinases with different kinetic properties would provide metabolic flexibility across diverse environmental conditions .

What are the key unanswered questions about V. vulnificus ackA2 that merit further investigation?

Several critical research questions about V. vulnificus ackA2 remain unresolved and merit dedicated investigation:

Addressing these questions would significantly advance our understanding of both the basic biology of V. vulnificus and potential applications in combating this pathogen .

How might techniques from systems biology enhance our understanding of V. vulnificus ackA2 function in metabolic networks?

Systems biology approaches offer powerful tools for understanding V. vulnificus ackA2 within the broader context of cellular metabolism:

These systems-level approaches would move beyond the traditional reductionist view of enzyme function to understand how ackA2 contributes to the emergent properties of V. vulnificus metabolism, particularly in the context of environmental adaptation and host-pathogen interactions .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.