KEGG: vvy:VV3133
The expression of acsA in V. vulnificus is primarily regulated by AcsR, a LuxR-type transcriptional regulator. Research has demonstrated that AcsR functions as a positive regulator of acsA gene expression . This regulatory relationship was established by comparing acsA expression levels between wild-type and ΔacsR mutant strains using an acsA::luxAB transcriptional reporter fusion. The results showed that the ΔacsR mutant strain exhibited luciferase activity levels that were 50-100 times lower than the wild-type strain, confirming AcsR's role as an activator .
Furthermore, AcsR itself is regulated by the VarS/VarA two-component system, which controls diverse aspects of metabolism and virulence in pathogenic Vibrio species . Studies comparing transcript levels in wild-type and ΔvarA mutant strains revealed that the VarS/VarA system plays an important role in V. vulnificus metabolism by regulating AcsR, which in turn controls acetate metabolism through activation of acsA transcription .
Experimental approaches to study this regulation typically include:
Transcriptional reporter fusions (e.g., acsA::luxAB)
Quantitative RT-PCR to measure transcript levels
Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) to demonstrate direct binding of AcsR to the upstream region of the acsA ORF
DNase I footprinting to precisely map regulatory binding sites
Recombinant expression of V. vulnificus acsA typically follows these methodological steps:
Cloning strategy:
PCR amplification of the acsA gene from V. vulnificus genomic DNA using high-fidelity DNA polymerase
Addition of appropriate restriction sites via primer design
Restriction digestion and ligation into an expression vector (commonly pET series vectors for E. coli expression)
Transformation into a cloning strain (e.g., E. coli DH5α)
Sequence verification of the cloned construct
Expression optimization:
Transform verified construct into an expression host (commonly E. coli BL21(DE3) or derivatives)
Test expression under various conditions:
Induction temperature (typically 16-37°C)
Inducer concentration (e.g., IPTG at 0.1-1.0 mM)
Duration of induction (2-24 hours)
Media composition (LB, TB, auto-induction media)
For challenging expression, alternative strategies include:
Fusion tags (His6, GST, MBP) to enhance solubility
Codon optimization for the expression host
Co-expression with chaperones
Use of specialized E. coli strains designed for improved expression of potentially toxic proteins
Several complementary approaches can verify recombinant V. vulnificus acsA activity:
Spectrophotometric coupled assays:
Measure AMP production using coupling enzymes (myokinase, pyruvate kinase, and lactate dehydrogenase)
Monitor NADH oxidation at 340 nm, which corresponds to acetyl-CoA formation
Direct product detection:
HPLC analysis of acetyl-CoA formation
LC-MS/MS for definitive identification and quantification of reaction products
Activity verification protocol:
Incubate purified acsA with acetate, ATP, CoA, and Mg2+ in appropriate buffer
Stop reaction at defined time points with acid or heat denaturation
Analyze reaction products using methods above
Calculate specific activity (μmol product/min/mg enzyme)
Control reactions (omitting substrate, using heat-inactivated enzyme) are essential to verify that the observed activity is enzyme-specific.
While acsA itself has not been directly implicated as a virulence factor in V. vulnificus, its regulation is integrated into wider regulatory networks that influence bacterial pathogenesis. The VarS/VarA system that regulates AcsR (and subsequently acsA) has been shown to regulate diverse aspects of metabolism and virulence in pathogenic Vibrio species .
Experimental approaches to investigate this relationship include:
Comparative transcriptomics: RNA-seq analysis comparing wild-type, ΔacsR, and ΔacsA mutants under infection-relevant conditions can reveal co-regulated virulence factors
Infection models: Testing virulence of ΔacsA mutants in appropriate animal models (mouse models are commonly used for V. vulnificus )
Stress response experiments: Examining acsA expression under various environmental stresses that mimic conditions encountered during infection:
Acidic pH
Oxidative stress (H2O2 exposure)
Iron limitation
Hyperosmotic conditions
Research has shown that V. vulnificus contains stress response regulators such as rpoS and toxR that coordinate environmental adaptations and virulence . The potential connection between these stress regulators and acsA expression represents an important area for further investigation, particularly considering the role of acetate metabolism in bacterial adaptation to changing nutritional environments.
Understanding the structure-function relationship of V. vulnificus acsA requires a combination of structural biology approaches and enzyme kinetics. Though specific structural data for V. vulnificus acsA is limited, insights can be gained from related acetyl-CoA synthetases from other organisms.
Key methodological approaches include:
Site-directed mutagenesis:
Create point mutations in conserved residues predicted to be involved in substrate binding or catalysis
Express and purify mutant proteins
Compare kinetic parameters (Km, kcat, kcat/Km) with wild-type enzyme
Structural biology techniques:
X-ray crystallography of the purified recombinant enzyme (with and without substrates/substrate analogs)
Cryo-EM for visualization of different conformational states
Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) to identify regions with conformational flexibility
Domain analysis:
Generate truncated versions of the enzyme to determine the minimal catalytic domain
Create chimeric proteins with domains from related acetyl-CoA synthetases to explore specificity determinants
Acetyl-CoA synthetases typically function through a two-step reaction mechanism:
Formation of an acetyl-AMP intermediate with release of pyrophosphate
Transfer of the acetyl group to CoA with release of AMP
Understanding which residues are involved in each step can provide insights into the evolution of substrate specificity and potential for enzyme engineering.
Recombinant V. vulnificus acsA serves as a valuable tool for investigating metabolic adaptations in marine bacteria, particularly in response to changing environmental conditions.
Methodological approaches include:
Comparative enzyme kinetics:
Determine kinetic parameters of recombinant acsA under varying conditions that mimic marine environments:
Different salt concentrations
Temperature ranges (10-40°C)
pH variations
Compare with acsA enzymes from other marine and non-marine bacteria
Metabolic flux analysis:
Use 13C-labeled acetate to trace carbon flow in V. vulnificus
Compare wild-type and ΔacsA mutants to determine the contribution of acsA to central metabolism
Analyze metabolite profiles using GC-MS or LC-MS
Environmental simulation experiments:
Monitor acsA expression and enzyme activity during transitions between nutrient-rich and nutrient-poor conditions
Examine adaptation to fluctuating oxygen levels
Study competitive fitness in mixed microbial communities
The adaptive significance of acetate metabolism for V. vulnificus must be considered in the context of its natural habitat. As a marine bacterium that can colonize shellfish and cause human infections, V. vulnificus encounters diverse environments with varying carbon sources . Understanding how acsA activity contributes to survival in these different niches can provide insights into the ecology and pathogenicity of this organism.
Purification of recombinant V. vulnificus acsA with preserved enzymatic activity requires careful consideration of buffer conditions and purification techniques. Based on protocols used for similar enzymes, the following methodological approach is recommended:
Expression and lysis:
Express recombinant acsA with an affinity tag (His6 tag is commonly used)
Harvest cells by centrifugation (5,000 × g, 10 min, 4°C)
Resuspend in lysis buffer containing:
50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0
300 mM NaCl
10% glycerol
1 mM DTT
Protease inhibitor cocktail
Lyse cells by sonication or pressure homogenization
Clear lysate by centrifugation (20,000 × g, 30 min, 4°C)
Purification protocol:
Immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC):
Load clarified lysate onto Ni-NTA column equilibrated with lysis buffer
Wash with lysis buffer containing 20-40 mM imidazole
Elute with lysis buffer containing 250 mM imidazole
Ion exchange chromatography:
Dialyze IMAC-purified protein against buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 50 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1 mM DTT
Apply to Q-Sepharose column
Elute with linear NaCl gradient (50-500 mM)
Size exclusion chromatography:
Apply concentrated protein to Superdex 200 column equilibrated with 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1 mM DTT
Collect fractions containing purified acsA
Throughout purification, enzyme activity should be monitored using the spectrophotometric assay described earlier. Addition of stabilizing agents (glycerol, reducing agents) and maintaining low temperature (4°C) throughout the purification process are critical for preserving enzymatic activity.
Comparative analysis of V. vulnificus acsA with homologs from other pathogenic bacteria provides insights into evolutionary relationships and potential functional differences. Methodological approaches for such comparative studies include:
Sequence analysis:
Multiple sequence alignment of acsA proteins from diverse bacterial species
Phylogenetic tree construction to visualize evolutionary relationships
Identification of conserved domains and catalytic residues
Enzymatic characterization:
Side-by-side comparison of kinetic parameters
Substrate specificity profiles (testing various short-chain fatty acids)
Inhibitor sensitivity patterns
Expression pattern analysis:
Compare regulation of acsA genes across different pathogens
Identify species-specific regulatory mechanisms
Particularly informative comparisons would include:
Vibrio cholerae (another human pathogen in the Vibrio genus)
Vibrio parahaemolyticus (seafood-associated pathogen)
Escherichia coli (well-characterized model organism)
Other marine pathogens with similar ecological niches
Research has shown that V. vulnificus contains significant genomic plasticity, as evidenced by genetic variation in virulence factors like the MARTX toxin . Similar variation might exist in metabolic enzymes like acsA, potentially conferring adaptations to specific environmental niches or host environments.
CRISPR-Cas genome editing offers powerful approaches for investigating acsA function in V. vulnificus. While traditional methods rely on homologous recombination for gene deletion, CRISPR-Cas systems provide more precise and efficient genetic manipulation.
Methodological framework for CRISPR-based studies of acsA:
CRISPR-Cas9 knockout strategy:
Design sgRNAs targeting the acsA gene
Clone sgRNAs into a suitable vector for expression in V. vulnificus
Provide a repair template for precise gene deletion or modification
Transform into V. vulnificus and select for successful editing
Confirm edits by sequencing
CRISPRi for conditional knockdown:
Express catalytically inactive Cas9 (dCas9) fused to a transcriptional repressor
Target dCas9 to the acsA promoter to reduce expression
Advantage: allows study of essential genes and titration of expression levels
CRISPR-based transcriptional activation:
Use dCas9 fused to transcriptional activators to upregulate acsA
Study effects of overexpression on metabolism and stress response
Recent developments in CRISPR technologies for Vibrio species can be adapted for V. vulnificus. For example, the RAA-CRISPR/Cas12a system has been successfully used for detection of V. vulnificus and could potentially be modified for genome editing applications.
The efficiency of CRISPR systems in V. vulnificus must be optimized, considering factors such as:
Delivery method (electroporation, conjugation)
Promoter selection for Cas9 and sgRNA expression
PAM site availability in the target gene
Potential off-target effects
The potential connection between acetate metabolism, biofilm formation, and virulence in V. vulnificus represents an important area of investigation. While direct evidence linking acsA to these processes in V. vulnificus is limited, several methodological approaches can be employed to explore these relationships:
Biofilm formation assays:
Compare biofilm formation between wild-type and ΔacsA mutants using:
Crystal violet staining in microplates
Flow cell systems with confocal microscopy
Scanning electron microscopy for detailed structural analysis
Examine biofilm formation under different carbon source conditions
Virulence assessment:
Gene expression studies:
RNA-seq comparing wild-type and ΔacsA mutants during:
Biofilm growth
Infection of host cells
Growth in infection-relevant conditions
qRT-PCR validation of differentially expressed virulence genes
Research on other Vibrio species suggests potential connections between metabolism and virulence regulation. For example, in V. vulnificus, the VarS/VarA system that regulates AcsR has been shown to control other important factors including flagellins, RpoS, RtxA1, and VvpE . The MARTX(Vv) toxin, encoded by the rtxA1 gene, is a significant virulence factor in V. vulnificus , and understanding potential metabolic influences on its expression could provide valuable insights into virulence regulation.