Fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase (FBPase) catalyzes the hydrolysis of fructose-1,6-bisphosphate (FBP) to fructose-6-phosphate and inorganic phosphate, a key step in gluconeogenesis and the Calvin cycle . Vibrio vulnificus FBPase class 1 (Uniprot ID: Q7MPD0) belongs to the sugar phosphatase-fold family, sharing structural homology with other FBPases across domains . This enzyme is distinct from aldolases, which cleave FBP into triose phosphates .
The enzyme’s sequence aligns with conserved motifs in FBPases, including regions critical for substrate binding and catalysis . While metal dependency is a feature of some FBPases (e.g., Mg²⁺ or Mn²⁺), Vibrio vulnificus FBPase class 1’s cofactor requirements remain uncharacterized in available data .
Recombinant Vibrio vulnificus FBPase is produced via heterologous expression in yeast, yielding a protein with high purity (>85%) . Key production parameters include:
Reconstitution: Suggested in deionized sterile water with 0.1–1.0 mg/mL concentration, supplemented with 5–50% glycerol for stability .
No functional activity data (e.g., catalytic efficiency) are explicitly provided in the available literature, though the enzyme’s structural integrity is validated via SDS-PAGE .
KEGG: vvy:VV0434
Fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase (Fbp) is a crucial enzyme in V. vulnificus that catalyzes the conversion of fructose 1,6-bisphosphate to fructose 6-phosphate in gluconeogenesis. This reaction is essential for carbohydrate metabolism, particularly when the bacteria must synthesize glucose from non-carbohydrate precursors. In V. vulnificus, Fbp has been demonstrated to be indispensable for growth on certain carbon sources.
Research has shown that the deletion of the fbp gene significantly reduces bacterial cellulose production. In a comparative study, the BC (bacterial cellulose) yield of the wild-type strain reached 6.61 g/L after 7 days, while the Δfbp mutant strain produced only 3.72 g/L, demonstrating the enzyme's importance in carbohydrate metabolism . Complementation studies with recombinant fbp restored approximately 81% of the BC production capacity, confirming the critical role of this enzyme.
The regulation of fbp in Vibrio species appears to involve both carbon source-dependent and nitrogen-dependent regulatory mechanisms. In related Vibrio species such as V. cholerae, transcriptional regulation of metabolic genes is often controlled by global regulators. For instance, FruR acts as a transcriptional activator of the fru operon in V. cholerae and is essential for growth on fructose as a carbon source .
In V. vulnificus, the expression of fbp is influenced by different promoter systems:
| Promoter System | Relative Expression Level | BC Production (g/L) |
|---|---|---|
| PLacO1-lacIq promoter | High | 6.61 |
| Native promoter | Medium | 5.36 |
| Wild-type | Low (baseline) | 3.72 |
These data indicate that optimizing promoter selection is crucial for recombinant expression studies of V. vulnificus fbp .
The effectiveness of expression systems for V. vulnificus Fbp production depends on research objectives. Current evidence suggests:
Heterologous Expression in E. coli: The pBD31 vector system has been successfully used for Fbp expression, with the enzyme effectively expressed as demonstrated by SDS-PAGE analysis showing a distinct band at 36.94 kDa .
Inducible Promoter Systems: The PLacO1-lacIq promoter system demonstrates superior expression compared to the native promoter. This IPTG-inducible system allows for controlled expression timing and higher protein yields.
Broad-Host-Range Plasmids: For expression within Vibrio species, broad-host-range plasmids containing replication origins from pBBR1 have been effective, allowing for both complementation studies and overexpression experiments.
The most efficient protocol involves:
Cloning the fbp gene (GenBank: AMO50847.1) into an appropriate expression vector
Transformation into the expression host
Induction with 1 mM IPTG
Cell harvesting after overnight induction
Protein purification via affinity chromatography
This approach has yielded functional recombinant Fbp that can restore the defects observed in fbp deletion mutants.
Accurate measurement of recombinant V. vulnificus Fbp activity requires specific assay conditions that account for its unique properties. A standard protocol includes:
Spectrophotometric Assay: Coupling the Fbp reaction with phosphoglucose isomerase and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, monitoring NADPH formation at 340 nm.
Optimal Reaction Conditions:
Temperature: 30-37°C (V. vulnificus optimal growth temperature)
pH: 7.0-8.0 (marine environment pH range)
Buffer: HEPES or Tris-HCl with Mg²⁺ as a cofactor
Substrate concentration: 0.1-1.0 mM fructose 1,6-bisphosphate
Activity Calculation:
Enzyme activity (U) = (ΔA340/min) × reaction volume × dilution factor / (6.22 × enzyme volume)
Specific activity = U/mg protein
Important Considerations:
Include phosphatase inhibitors to prevent non-specific hydrolysis
Test for allosteric regulation by AMP and fructose 2,6-bisphosphate
Assess the effects of salt concentration, as V. vulnificus is halophilic
Research has shown that inorganic phosphate can affect enzyme-substrate interactions in Vibrio species, as demonstrated in studies with related enzymes .
To investigate fbp's role in V. vulnificus virulence, a systematic approach is necessary:
Generate a precise fbp deletion mutant using homologous recombination or CRISPR-Cas9
Confirm deletion via PCR and sequencing
Verify protein absence via Western blot
Clone the wild-type fbp gene into a broad-host-range vector (e.g., pBD31-fbp)
Transform the construct into the Δfbp mutant
Confirm expression via RT-PCR and Western blot
Compare growth rates in different carbon sources
Assess biofilm formation capacity
Measure exopolysaccharide production
Evaluate adherence to epithelial cells
Test cytotoxicity using human cell lines
Measure virulence in mouse models
This approach has been successful in related studies examining the role of NtrC-regulated exopolysaccharides in V. vulnificus biofilm formation and pathogenicity . Similarly structured experiments showed that mutations in genes involved in exopolysaccharide production resulted in decreased EPS production, attenuated biofilm formation, and lowered cytoadherence to human epithelial cells.
Understanding the interaction between V. vulnificus Fbp and other metabolic enzymes requires multiple complementary approaches:
Protein-Protein Interaction Studies:
Pull-down assays with tagged recombinant Fbp
Bacterial two-hybrid system
Co-immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry
Metabolic Flux Analysis:
¹³C-labeled substrate tracing
Quantification of glycolytic and gluconeogenic intermediates
Comparison between wild-type and Δfbp strains
Structural Studies:
X-ray crystallography of Fbp alone and in complex with interacting proteins
Molecular docking simulations
Site-directed mutagenesis of potential interaction sites
Research with related enzymes in V. vulnificus has revealed important metabolic interactions. For example, studies have shown that histidine phosphocarrier protein (HPr) interacts with pyruvate kinase A (PykA) in V. vulnificus, regulating glycolytic activity in response to glucose availability . This interaction was strictly dependent on inorganic phosphate, and only dephosphorylated HPr interacted with PykA. Similar mechanisms might regulate Fbp activity.
A particularly interesting experiment showed that dephosphorylated HPr decreased the Km of PykA for phosphoenolpyruvate by approximately fourfold without affecting Vmax, demonstrating how protein-protein interactions can fine-tune metabolic enzyme kinetics in Vibrio species .
V. vulnificus Fbp shows both conservation and divergence when compared to homologous enzymes in other pathogens:
V. vulnificus Fbp is approximately 36.94 kDa , similar to other bacterial Fbps
Sequence analysis reveals key catalytic residues are conserved
Unique surface residues may reflect adaptation to marine environments
Metal ion requirements may differ from terrestrial pathogens
Allosteric regulation patterns show adaptation to fluctuating marine conditions
Temperature and salt optima reflect V. vulnificus' halophilic nature
Evolutionary Context:
Phylogenetic analysis of Fbp sequences from various Vibrio species shows clustering that reflects evolutionary relationships within the genus. V. vulnificus Fbp is more closely related to those from other marine Vibrios than to enzymes from enteric pathogens like E. coli.
Studies of other metabolic enzymes in V. vulnificus provide context for these differences. For example, the fermentation-respiration switch (FrsA) protein in V. vulnificus was incorrectly reported to catalyze cofactor-independent decarboxylation of pyruvate, but subsequent quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical calculations demonstrated that its catalytic properties are distinct from those predicted . This highlights the importance of rigorous biochemical characterization of V. vulnificus enzymes rather than relying solely on homology-based predictions.
Fbp plays a critical role in V. vulnificus adaptation to changing environments, particularly in transitioning between nutrient-rich and nutrient-poor conditions:
Nutrient Switching: Fbp enables growth on non-carbohydrate carbon sources when glucose is unavailable, critical for survival in diverse marine and host environments.
Biofilm Formation: Fbp contributes to exopolysaccharide production, which is essential for biofilm development. Studies have shown that EPS production by V. vulnificus is crucial for biofilm formation and pathogenic interaction .
Host Interaction: The ability to utilize host-derived nutrients depends on gluconeogenic enzymes including Fbp. During infection, V. vulnificus must adapt to varying nutrient conditions within the host.
Experimental Evidence:
Research has demonstrated that NtrC-regulated exopolysaccharides, which depend on proper carbohydrate metabolism, are crucial for V. vulnificus biofilm formation. Biofilm formation and EPS production increased dramatically in media containing tricarboxylic acid cycle intermediates as carbon sources . Given Fbp's central role in gluconeogenesis, it likely contributes significantly to this phenotype.
Regulatory Networks:
The regulation of fbp gene expression appears to be integrated with sensing environmental nitrogen and carbon availability. This is similar to the regulation observed in the fru operon in V. cholerae, where FruR acts as a transcriptional activator in response to metabolic signals .
Structural information about V. vulnificus Fbp provides valuable insights for inhibitor design strategies:
Catalytic Site Targeting:
Identify unique features of the V. vulnificus Fbp active site
Design transition-state analogs specific to V. vulnificus Fbp
Focus on competitive inhibitors that mimic substrate or product
Allosteric Site Targeting:
Identify regulatory sites unique to V. vulnificus Fbp
Design molecules that lock the enzyme in inactive conformation
Target species-specific protein-protein interaction interfaces
Computational Methods:
Homology modeling based on related Fbp structures
Virtual screening of compound libraries
Molecular dynamics simulations to identify flexible regions
In vitro enzyme inhibition assays
Cellular assays measuring effects on V. vulnificus growth
Cytotoxicity testing against human cells
Animal model efficacy testing
This approach has been successful with other V. vulnificus targets. For example, researchers have utilized structural information for the development of glycoconjugate vaccines against V. vulnificus, targeting the tetrasaccharide repeating units of V. vulnificus capsular polysaccharides . Similar principles could be applied to Fbp inhibitor design.
When facing contradictory data on V. vulnificus Fbp function, a systematic approach to interpretation and resolution is essential:
Strain Variations: V. vulnificus is known to have significant genetic diversity. Studies have identified different biotypes and genotypes with varying virulence properties .
Experimental Conditions: Different buffer compositions, salt concentrations, and pH can significantly affect enzyme activity measurements.
Recombinant Protein Production Methods: Expression systems, purification protocols, and protein tags can influence enzyme properties.
Standardize Methodologies:
Use the same buffer systems, pH, and temperature
Employ identical assay methods for enzyme activity
Standardize protein purification protocols
Cross-Laboratory Validation:
Exchange strains and plasmids between laboratories
Perform blinded experiments to reduce bias
Collaborate on joint publications to resolve discrepancies
Advanced Characterization:
Perform comprehensive kinetic analyses
Determine the effects of all potential regulators
Conduct structural studies to identify conformational states
Case Example:
A similar approach was used to resolve contradictions regarding V. vulnificus FrsA function. Initial reports suggested it functioned as a cofactor-independent pyruvate decarboxylase, but subsequent quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical calculations contradicted this assignment. Further experimental validation confirmed that the initial functional annotation was incorrect . This case demonstrates the importance of combining computational, structural, and kinetic evidence to resolve contradictory findings.
Comprehensive bioinformatic analysis can identify potential regulatory elements controlling V. vulnificus fbp expression:
Promoter Analysis:
Identify -10 and -35 regions upstream of the fbp gene
Search for binding sites of known transcription factors
Compare promoter sequences across Vibrio species
Transcription Factor Binding Site Prediction:
Use position weight matrices of known bacterial regulators
Apply machine learning algorithms trained on validated binding sites
Perform comparative genomics across related species
RNA Structure Analysis:
Predict secondary structures in the 5' UTR of fbp mRNA
Identify potential riboswitches or attenuators
Analyze for sRNA binding sites
RNA-seq data to identify co-regulated genes
ChIP-seq for direct identification of transcription factor binding
EMSA to validate predicted binding sites
Example Analysis Workflow:
In V. cholerae, researchers identified that FruR acts as a transcriptional activator of the fru operon . A similar approach combining computational predictions with experimental validation could be applied to V. vulnificus fbp regulation. The native promoter of fbp (285 bp) has been successfully isolated and characterized in previous studies , providing a starting point for regulatory element analysis.
The recent advances in rapid detection methods for V. vulnificus, such as CRISPR-based approaches and real-time recombinant polymerase amplification , can be adapted to study gene expression in response to different environmental conditions, providing validation for bioinformatic predictions.