GTPase playing a crucial role in the late stages of ribosome biogenesis.
KEGG: vvy:VV0770
While Der GTPase itself has not been directly implicated in V. vulnificus pathogenicity in the available research, V. vulnificus employs multiple GTPase-targeting mechanisms during infection. The bacterium produces toxins that interact with host GTPases:
The MARTX toxin contains multiple effector domains that target host GTPases including Rho family members and Ras/Rap1
The Makes Caterpillars Floppy-like (MCF) domain of MARTX toxin cleaves and degrades Rab GTPases, contributing to cellular destruction
The Domain X (DmX) effector binds ARFs (ADP ribosylation factors), which are GTPases
Understanding Der GTPase function may provide insights into bacterial survival mechanisms that support virulence, though direct links to pathogenicity require further investigation .
Recombinant V. vulnificus Der GTPase can be produced using several expression systems, each with advantages depending on research requirements:
Expression System | Advantages | Considerations | Applications |
---|---|---|---|
E. coli | High yield, cost-effective, rapid expression | May lack post-translational modifications | Structural studies, antibody production |
Yeast | Eukaryotic post-translational modifications | Lower yield than E. coli | Functional studies requiring modifications |
Baculovirus | High-level expression of complex proteins | More time-consuming and costly | Complex functional assays |
Mammalian cells | Native-like folding and modifications | Most expensive, lower yields | Studies of protein interactions with mammalian factors |
For most biochemical and structural studies, E. coli-expressed Der GTPase provides sufficient quantity and quality. For functional studies investigating interactions with host factors, yeast or mammalian expression systems may be preferable to ensure proper protein folding and modification.
Optimal purification of recombinant Der GTPase typically employs the following methodology:
Affinity chromatography using His-tag (if incorporated) as the primary capture step
Ion exchange chromatography as an intermediate purification step
Size exclusion chromatography for final polishing and buffer exchange
Storage in a stabilizing buffer containing:
20-50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5-8.0)
100-150 mM NaCl
5-10% glycerol
1-5 mM DTT or 2-ME
Optional: 1 mM MgCl₂ to stabilize nucleotide binding
To preserve activity, avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles and store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week. For long-term storage, maintain at -80°C in small aliquots.
Der GTPase can serve as an important research tool for understanding V. vulnificus pathogenesis through several experimental approaches:
Comparative GTPase studies: Investigating how V. vulnificus Der GTPase function compares to the host GTPases targeted by virulence factors like MARTX toxin
Stress response analysis: Examining Der's role under conditions mimicking host environments (oxidative stress, limited nutrients, temperature shifts)
Ribosome assembly inhibition studies: Using Der GTPase inhibitors to disrupt bacterial protein synthesis while studying virulence factor production
Integration with toxin research: Combining Der GTPase studies with MARTX toxin and VVH (Vibrio vulnificus hemolysin) research to understand the broader molecular basis of infection
Such approaches help elucidate how various bacterial mechanisms collectively contribute to the rapid progression of V. vulnificus infections, which are becoming increasingly frequent due to climate change .
Researchers investigating Der GTPase interactions with host components face several methodological challenges:
Distinguishing bacterial vs. host GTPase activities: Developing assays that can differentiate between similar GTPase activities from different sources
Creating physiologically relevant conditions: Replicating the environment of V. vulnificus infection in experimental settings:
pH variations similar to intestinal or wound environments
Appropriate ion concentrations, particularly iron
Presence of relevant host defense factors
Temporal dynamics: Capturing the rapid kinetics of GTPase activity in real-time during infection progress
Structural analysis complexity: Der contains multiple domains with potential conformational changes upon GTP binding/hydrolysis
Overcoming these challenges typically requires combining multiple methodologies such as fluorescence-based GTPase assays, crystallography or cryo-EM for structural determination, and advanced microscopy techniques for localization studies .
Der GTPase is highly conserved across bacterial species but exhibits important variations that may reflect pathogen-specific adaptations:
Bacterial Species | Der Homolog Features | Potential Functional Implications |
---|---|---|
V. vulnificus | Two GTPase domains (G1, G2) | Coordinated regulation of ribosome assembly |
V. cholerae | Highly similar to V. vulnificus Der | Similar function but may interact differently with host factors |
E. coli | Well-characterized EngA | Serves as reference model for Der function |
Other pathogens | Varying KH domains | Different RNA binding specificities |
Understanding these differences provides insight into bacterial adaptation strategies. Unlike toxins such as VVH and MARTX, which directly target host cells, Der GTPase functions primarily in bacterial physiology, yet may indirectly contribute to pathogenesis by supporting bacterial survival under stress conditions encountered during infection .
While Der GTPase and MARTX toxin function through different mechanisms, understanding both provides a more complete picture of V. vulnificus pathogenesis:
Complementary roles:
Der GTPase supports bacterial survival and protein synthesis
MARTX toxin directly damages host cells by targeting Rab GTPases
Evolutionary significance: V. vulnificus has evolved to both utilize GTPases for its own physiology (Der) while simultaneously targeting host GTPases (via MARTX)
Research implications: Studying both systems reveals potential for dual-targeting therapeutic approaches:
Inhibitors of bacterial Der GTPase to compromise bacterial survival
Inhibitors of MARTX toxin processing to prevent host GTPase degradation
The MCF domain of MARTX toxin selectively cleaves host Rab GTPases based on structural composition rather than sequence, causing organelle destruction and cell death. This specificity contrasts with the more general function of Der in bacterial ribosome assembly .
Accurate measurement of Der GTPase activity requires careful attention to several technical factors:
Buffer composition:
Mg²⁺ concentration (typically 1-5 mM) is critical for GTP binding and hydrolysis
pH optimum (typically 7.5-8.0) affects catalytic efficiency
Ionic strength influences protein stability and substrate accessibility
Temperature control:
Activity measurements at 37°C reflect physiological conditions
Temperature stability studies (25-42°C) reveal thermal tolerance
Nucleotide purity:
High-purity GTP without GDP contamination is essential
Defined GTP:GDP ratios for studying nucleotide exchange
Detection methods:
Malachite green assay for phosphate release
HPLC analysis of nucleotide conversion
Fluorescently labeled GTP analogs for real-time monitoring
Standardization across these parameters is essential for reproducible research and valid comparisons between studies.
Several experimental approaches enable the study of Der GTPase in infection contexts:
Gene deletion/silencing studies:
Conditional knockdown systems to study Der essentiality
Point mutations in GTP-binding domains to create attenuated strains
Analysis of virulence factor production in Der-depleted conditions
Infection models:
Mouse intestinal infection models to study Der regulation during pathogenesis
Ex vivo human blood survival assays to assess Der contribution to septicemia
Tissue culture systems to analyze Der localization during cellular infection
Comparative proteomics/transcriptomics:
Changes in Der expression under host-mimicking conditions
Ribosome profiling to identify Der-dependent translation during infection
Small molecule approach:
Selective Der inhibitors to assess impacts on bacterial survival
Combined treatment with MARTX inhibitors to evaluate synergistic effects
These approaches can help determine whether Der contributes to the increasing frequency of life-threatening V. vulnificus infections attributed to climate change .