Recombinant Viridovipera stejnegeri Snake venom serine protease KN2

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference during order placement for customized preparation.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: Standard shipping includes blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires advance notice and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to collect the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50% and can serve as a guideline.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized formulations have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquoting is essential for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during the manufacturing process.
The tag type is determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
; Snake venom serine protease KN2; SVSP; EC 3.4.21.-
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
25-257
Protein Length
Full Length of Mature Protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Trimeresurus stejnegeri (Chinese green tree viper) (Viridovipera stejnegeri)
Target Protein Sequence
VIGGHP CNINEHPFLV LVYHDGYQCG GTLINEEWVL TAAHCDGKKM KLQFGLHSKN VPNKDKQTRV PKEKFFCLSS KNFIKWGKDI MLIRLNRPVN NSTHIAPLSL PSSPPSQNTV CNIMGWGTIS PTKEIYPDVP HCANINILDH AVCRAFYPGL LEKSKTLCAG ILQGGKDICQ GDSGGPLICN GQIQGIVSVG GDPCAEPRVP AIYTKVFDHL DWIKSIIAGN TAATCPL
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function

Snake venom serine protease potentially involved in the prey's hemostasis system.

Protein Families
Peptidase S1 family, Snake venom subfamily
Subcellular Location
Secreted.
Tissue Specificity
Expressed by the venom gland.

Q&A

What is Viridovipera stejnegeri Snake venom serine protease KN2?

Viridovipera stejnegeri Snake venom serine protease KN2 is a specialized enzyme found in the venom of Viridovipera stejnegeri (Stejneger's bamboo pit viper). It belongs to the kininogenase (KN) subcategory of viper venom serine proteases (VVSPs). These enzymes are major components identified primarily in venoms from the Viperidae family and play crucial roles in disrupting normal hemostasis in envenomed victims. KN2 specifically falls within the category of snake venom serine proteases that affect various stages of the blood coagulation system, activate platelets, and act directly upon fibrinogen .

How does KN2 differ from other serine proteases in snake venoms?

While sharing common features with other serine proteases such as the C-terminal extension, GWG motif, and specific disulfide linkages, KN2 has distinct characteristics that differentiate it from other VVSPs. Snake venom serine proteases, including KN2, vary widely in features such as isoelectric points, potential N-glycosylation sites, and functional characteristics. Phylogenetic analysis has clustered viper venom serine proteases into three major groups, with KN2 likely falling into the category containing kininogenases based on its nomenclature . This protein may also contain specific substitutions in the catalytic triad or primary specificity pocket that affect its enzymatic activity and substrate specificity, though the exact details for KN2 specifically require further characterization.

Why is KN2 significant for research in toxinology and pharmacology?

KN2 represents an important research target due to its potential role in envenomation pathology and possible therapeutic applications. Snake venom serine proteases like KN2 contribute significantly to the estimated 1.8-2.7 million snakebite cases annually worldwide, which result in approximately 100,000 deaths and three times as many permanent disabilities . Understanding KN2's specific mode of action could contribute to developing more effective targeted antivenoms. Additionally, the potential pharmacological applications of snake venom components make KN2 a valuable subject for drug discovery research, particularly for conditions related to hemostasis and thrombosis.

What is the molecular structure of Viridovipera stejnegeri Snake venom serine protease KN2?

The molecular structure of Viridovipera stejnegeri Snake venom serine protease KN2 follows the typical serine protease fold consisting of two six-stranded β-barrels with the catalytic triad positioned at the junction between them. As with other snake venom serine proteases, KN2 likely contains:

  • A catalytic triad typically composed of His57, Asp102, and Ser195 (chymotrypsinogen numbering)

  • Specific disulfide bridges that stabilize the tertiary structure

  • A C-terminal extension characteristic of snake venom serine proteases

  • The conserved GWG motif found in most VVSPs

What specific enzymatic activities does KN2 exhibit?

Based on its classification as a kininogenase (KN), Viridovipera stejnegeri Snake venom serine protease KN2 likely exhibits the following enzymatic activities:

  • Kinin-releasing activity from kininogen substrates

  • Potential fibrinolytic activity

  • Possible effects on blood pressure regulation through kinin release

  • Disruption of hemostasis through interactions with coagulation factors

The specific activity profile of KN2 would need to be experimentally characterized, as snake venom serine proteases show significant functional diversity despite structural similarities .

How does the primary specificity pocket of KN2 determine its substrate selectivity?

The primary specificity pocket (S1 binding site) of KN2, like other serine proteases, is critical for accommodating the side chain of the P1 residue of substrates and conferring specificity. In typical serine proteases, specificity is determined by residues at positions 189, 216, and 226 (chymotrypsinogen numbering). For instance, trypsin-like enzymes have D189 in their specificity pocket, conferring preference for basic residues (Arg/Lys) at the P1 position.

KN2, being a kininogenase, likely has a specificity pocket optimized for cleaving kininogen at specific sites to release kinins. Any substitutions in this pocket would significantly alter its substrate specificity and function. Phylogenetic analysis has shown that VVSPs with substituted primary specificity pockets cluster together in distinct phylogenetic groups, suggesting evolutionary specialization . A detailed analysis of KN2's specificity pocket would require sequence analysis and functional characterization.

What are the recommended protocols for expressing and purifying recombinant KN2?

For efficient expression and purification of recombinant Viridovipera stejnegeri Snake venom serine protease KN2, researchers should consider the following protocol framework:

  • Expression System Selection: Escherichia coli, Pichia pastoris, or mammalian cell systems (HEK293 or CHO cells) depending on post-translational modification requirements.

  • Vector Design:

    • Include appropriate affinity tags (His-tag or GST-tag) for purification

    • Consider codon optimization for the expression host

    • Include appropriate signal peptides for secretory expression if needed

  • Expression Conditions:

    • For E. coli: Typically IPTG induction at lower temperatures (16-25°C) to enhance proper folding

    • For yeast/mammalian systems: Follow standard protocols with optimized media and growth conditions

  • Purification Strategy:

    • Initial affinity chromatography using the fusion tag

    • Secondary purification via ion-exchange chromatography

    • Final polishing step using size-exclusion chromatography

    • Special consideration for maintaining disulfide bridges during purification

  • Activity Verification:

    • Enzymatic assays using chromogenic or fluorogenic substrates

    • Functional assays measuring kininogenase activity

This protocol framework should be optimized for KN2 specifically, as snake venom serine proteases can vary in their expression efficiency and folding properties in heterologous systems.

What methodologies are most effective for studying the enzymatic activity of KN2?

To effectively study the enzymatic activity of KN2, researchers should employ a combination of the following methodologies:

  • Chromogenic/Fluorogenic Substrate Assays:

    • Using p-nitroanilide (pNA) or aminomethylcoumarin (AMC) conjugated peptide substrates

    • Monitoring reaction kinetics through spectrophotometric or fluorometric detection

    • Determining kinetic parameters (Km, kcat, kcat/Km)

  • Specific Activity Assays:

    • Kininogenase activity: Measuring bradykinin release from kininogen substrates

    • Coagulation assays: Prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)

    • Fibrinogenolytic activity: SDS-PAGE analysis of fibrinogen degradation products

  • Inhibitor Screening:

    • Testing various serine protease inhibitors (e.g., PMSF, benzamidine)

    • Calculating IC50 and Ki values

    • Structure-activity relationship studies with different inhibitors

  • Substrate Specificity Profiling:

    • Peptide substrate libraries to determine preferred cleavage sites

    • Mass spectrometry-based identification of cleavage products

    • Positional scanning synthetic combinatorial libraries

These methodologies should be validated with appropriate controls and compared with other well-characterized snake venom serine proteases to establish reliable experimental protocols.

How can researchers effectively conduct structure-function relationship studies for KN2?

For comprehensive structure-function relationship studies of KN2, researchers should implement the following methodological approach:

  • Structural Analysis:

    • X-ray crystallography or cryo-EM to determine 3D structure

    • Homology modeling based on closely related serine proteases if experimental structures are unavailable

    • Molecular dynamics simulations to understand dynamic properties

    • In silico docking studies with potential substrates and inhibitors

  • Mutagenesis Studies:

    • Site-directed mutagenesis of catalytic triad residues (His57, Asp102, Ser195)

    • Mutations in specificity pocket residues (particularly at positions 189, 216, 226)

    • Mutations in substrate binding regions

    • Generation of chimeric proteins with other snake venom serine proteases

  • Functional Characterization of Mutants:

    • Enzymatic activity assays comparing wild-type and mutant proteins

    • Substrate specificity profiling

    • Stability and folding analyses (circular dichroism, thermal shift assays)

    • Binding affinity measurements (isothermal titration calorimetry, surface plasmon resonance)

  • Correlation Analysis:

    • Systematic correlation of structural features with functional properties

    • Comparison with other snake venom serine proteases

    • Development of predictive models for structure-function relationships

This integrated approach allows for comprehensive understanding of how specific structural elements contribute to KN2's enzymatic activity and substrate specificity.

How does post-translational modification affect KN2 function?

Post-translational modifications (PTMs) significantly impact the function of snake venom serine proteases including KN2. The most critical considerations include:

  • N-glycosylation:

    • Snake venom serine proteases vary widely in their potential N-glycosylation sites

    • N-glycosylation can affect enzyme stability, solubility, and resistance to proteolysis

    • May influence substrate recognition and catalytic efficiency

    • Could protect the enzyme from neutralization by inhibitors

  • Disulfide Bond Formation:

    • Proper disulfide bridge formation is essential for structural integrity and function

    • Misfolded disulfide patterns can drastically reduce enzymatic activity

    • The conserved disulfide pattern in VVSPs is crucial for maintaining their functional conformation

  • Other Modifications:

    • Potential phosphorylation sites may regulate activity

    • C-terminal processing may influence localization or binding properties

    • Proteolytic processing of zymogens to active forms

Researchers investigating KN2 should carefully consider the expression system used for recombinant production, as E. coli lacks the machinery for glycosylation and proper disulfide bond formation, potentially necessitating eukaryotic expression systems for fully functional enzyme production.

What are the challenges in developing inhibitors specific to KN2?

Developing specific inhibitors for KN2 presents several significant challenges:

  • Structural Similarity to Other Serine Proteases:

    • High structural conservation of the catalytic domain among serine proteases

    • Difficulty in achieving selectivity over mammalian serine proteases

    • Potential cross-reactivity with other snake venom serine proteases

  • Dynamic Binding Sites:

    • Flexibility of loops surrounding the active site

    • Induced-fit mechanisms during substrate binding

    • Multiple binding modes for different substrates

  • Species Variation:

    • Evolutionary differences between related snake venom serine proteases

    • Need for cross-species activity when developing therapeutic inhibitors

    • Variations in the primary specificity pocket that affect inhibitor binding

  • Stability and Bioavailability:

    • Peptide-based inhibitors face degradation challenges in vivo

    • Small molecule inhibitors may lack specificity

    • Delivery challenges for targeting venom components in envenomation scenarios

Successful inhibitor development requires integrated approaches combining structural biology, medicinal chemistry, and computational design with rigorous validation using both in vitro and in vivo models.

How can computational approaches enhance our understanding of KN2 evolutionary history?

Computational approaches offer powerful tools for understanding the evolutionary history of KN2 within the broader context of snake venom serine proteases:

  • Phylogenetic Analysis:

    • Construction of maximum likelihood or Bayesian phylogenetic trees

    • Analysis of clustering patterns relative to the three major VVSP groups identified in previous studies

    • Determination of evolutionary relationships with other kininogenases

    • Identification of key ancestral sequences and divergence points

  • Sequence-Structure-Function Relationships:

    • Mapping of conserved residues across evolutionary time

    • Identification of positively selected sites indicating adaptive evolution

    • Correlation of substitutions in catalytic triad or specificity pocket with functional divergence

    • Analysis of coevolving residue networks

  • Molecular Evolution Simulation:

    • Reconstruction of ancestral sequences

    • Simulation of evolutionary trajectories

    • Prediction of functional shifts based on sequence changes

    • Testing evolutionary hypotheses through ancestral protein resurrection

  • Comparative Genomics:

    • Analysis of gene structure and organization

    • Identification of potential gene duplication or trans-splicing events

    • Investigation of regulatory elements affecting expression

    • Examination of possible horizontal gene transfer or convergent evolution

These computational approaches, when integrated with experimental data, provide a comprehensive framework for understanding how KN2 evolved its specialized function within the Viridovipera stejnegeri venom arsenal.

How does KN2 compare functionally with other snake venom serine proteases?

The following table presents a functional comparison between KN2 and other well-characterized snake venom serine proteases:

Snake Venom Serine ProteasePrimary FunctionCatalytic Efficiency (kcat/Km)SpecificityTaxonomic Source
V. stejnegeri KN2Kininogenase activityData requires experimental determinationLikely prefers basic residues at P1 positionViridovipera stejnegeri
AncrodFibrinogenolytic2.5 × 10^5 M^-1s^-1Cleaves Aα chain of fibrinogenCalloselasma rhodostoma
BatroxobinThrombin-like1.8 × 10^4 M^-1s^-1Cleaves fibrinopeptide ABothrops atrox
PA-BJPlasminogen activator9.1 × 10^4 M^-1s^-1Activates plasminogenBothrops jararaca
RVV-VFactor V activator3.6 × 10^5 M^-1s^-1Activates Factor VDaboia russelii

KN2, as a kininogenase, likely functions to release kinins from kininogen, potentially causing vasodilation and hypotension in envenomed victims. The exact enzymatic parameters would need experimental determination for definitive comparison. Based on phylogenetic clustering patterns of VVSPs, KN2 would likely group with other kininogenases in phylogenetic analyses, though some kininogenases have been shown to form distinct subcategories .

What potential therapeutic applications exist for KN2 in biomedical research?

Viridovipera stejnegeri Snake venom serine protease KN2 holds several promising therapeutic applications:

  • Cardiovascular Drug Development:

    • As a kininogenase, KN2 may have applications in treating hypertension through controlled kinin release

    • Potential for developing anti-thrombotic agents based on its hemostatic disruption properties

    • Structure-based design of novel cardiovascular drugs targeting similar pathways

  • Diagnostic Tools:

    • Development of specific substrates for measuring serine protease activity in clinical samples

    • Potential biomarkers for coagulation disorders

    • Research tools for studying kinin system function

  • Antivenomics:

    • Design of specific inhibitors against KN2 could inform broader antivenom development strategies

    • Target for recombinant antivenom approaches using AI-designed proteins similar to those developed for three-finger toxins

    • Component in next-generation polyvalent antivenoms with improved specificity

  • Protein Engineering Platform:

    • Modified KN2 variants with altered specificity for industrial or research applications

    • Scaffold for directed evolution experiments to create novel enzymatic functions

    • Model system for studying structure-function relationships in serine proteases

These applications require thorough characterization of KN2's biochemical properties and careful assessment of potential immunogenicity and off-target effects.

What experimental approaches can resolve conflicting data about KN2 activity?

When faced with conflicting data about KN2 activity in the scientific literature, researchers should implement the following systematic approach to resolve discrepancies:

  • Standardization of Experimental Conditions:

    • Control for buffer composition, pH, temperature, and ionic strength

    • Standardize enzyme concentration and purity assessment methods

    • Establish common substrate preparation protocols

    • Use identical activity units and calculation methods

  • Multi-laboratory Validation:

    • Conduct parallel experiments in different laboratories using identical protocols

    • Perform blind testing when appropriate

    • Establish reference standards for activity measurements

    • Statistical analysis of inter-laboratory variation

  • Multiple Methodological Approaches:

    • Employ orthogonal techniques to measure the same parameter

    • Combine enzymological, structural, and computational approaches

    • Use both in vitro and in vivo systems when applicable

    • Develop new methodologies specifically designed to address contradictions

  • Systematic Variable Isolation:

    • Investigate effects of post-translational modifications

    • Test influence of different recombinant expression systems

    • Examine effects of storage conditions and protein aging

    • Assess impact of contaminants or co-purifying factors

  • Meta-analysis Framework:

    • Develop a systematic review of existing literature

    • Weight studies based on methodological rigor

    • Identify patterns in conflicting results

    • Propose unified models that accommodate apparently contradictory findings

This comprehensive approach allows researchers to resolve contradictions and develop a more accurate understanding of KN2's activity profile and biological roles.

What are the most promising avenues for advanced KN2 research?

Future research on Viridovipera stejnegeri Snake venom serine protease KN2 should focus on several high-potential areas:

  • Structural Biology Advances:

    • Determination of high-resolution crystal structures in complex with substrates and inhibitors

    • Cryo-EM analysis of conformational states during catalysis

    • Time-resolved structural studies to capture catalytic intermediates

    • Investigation of potential allosteric regulation sites

  • Systems Biology Integration:

    • Comprehensive analysis of KN2's role in the entire venom proteome

    • Synergistic effects with other venom components

    • Network analysis of physiological pathways affected during envenomation

    • Multi-omics approaches to study systemic responses to KN2

  • Medicinal Chemistry Applications:

    • Structure-based design of specific inhibitors

    • Development of activity-based probes for serine proteases

    • Creation of modified KN2 variants with enhanced stability or altered specificity

    • Integration with AI-based drug design approaches similar to those used for three-finger toxins

  • Evolutionary Toxinology:

    • Comparative analysis with serine proteases from related Viridovipera species

    • Investigation of venom variation across different populations of V. stejnegeri

    • Study of coevolutionary dynamics between venom components and prey resistance

    • Reconstruction and characterization of ancestral enzyme forms

These research directions represent promising opportunities for advancing our understanding of KN2 while developing potential therapeutic applications.

How can emerging technologies enhance KN2 functional characterization?

Emerging technologies offer significant potential to revolutionize our understanding of KN2's function and applications:

  • Single-Molecule Enzymology:

    • Direct observation of KN2 catalytic cycles at the single-molecule level

    • Identification of rare or transient conformational states

    • Precise measurement of kinetic parameters without ensemble averaging

    • Detection of mechanistic heterogeneity in enzyme populations

  • Advanced Imaging Techniques:

    • Super-resolution microscopy to track KN2 localization in tissue samples

    • Label-free detection of enzymatic activity in complex biological systems

    • Real-time imaging of KN2 activity in vivo using activity-based probes

    • Correlative light and electron microscopy for multiscale analysis

  • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning:

    • Prediction of substrate specificity from sequence data

    • Virtual screening for novel inhibitors

    • Design of optimized KN2 variants with desired properties

    • Development of AI-designed neutralizing proteins similar to those created for three-finger toxins

  • Microfluidics and High-Throughput Screening:

    • Droplet-based assays for rapid screening of enzyme variants

    • Integrated systems for expression, purification, and characterization

    • Miniaturized enzyme kinetics with minimal sample consumption

    • Parallelized testing of inhibitor libraries

By integrating these emerging technologies, researchers can achieve unprecedented insights into KN2's function and develop novel applications in both basic research and therapeutic contexts.

How should researchers approach contradictory findings in the KN2 literature?

When confronting contradictory findings in the literature regarding KN2, researchers should adopt this structured approach:

  • Critical Evaluation of Methodology:

    • Assess experimental design rigor in conflicting studies

    • Examine differences in protein preparation methods

    • Consider variations in assay conditions (pH, temperature, buffer composition)

    • Evaluate statistical analysis approaches and sample sizes

  • Source Material Considerations:

    • Determine if studies used different regional variants of Viridovipera stejnegeri

    • Consider seasonal or age-related venom variations

    • Assess recombinant vs. native protein differences

    • Examine potential isoform confusion between closely related serine proteases

  • Resolution Strategies:

    • Design experiments specifically addressing points of contradiction

    • Perform side-by-side comparisons under identical conditions

    • Develop new methodologies that overcome limitations of previous approaches

    • Consider if contradictions might represent genuine biological variability rather than experimental error

  • Collaborative Approaches:

    • Establish multi-laboratory validation studies

    • Create standardized protocols and reference materials

    • Organize focused workshops or consortia to address specific contradictions

    • Develop shared databases of experimental conditions and results

This systematic approach not only helps resolve contradictions but also advances the entire field by improving experimental design and reporting standards for snake venom serine protease research.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.