Recombinant Vulpes vulpes Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 2 (MT-CO2)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Overview of Recombinant Vulpes vulpes MT-CO2

MT-CO2 encodes subunit 2 of cytochrome c oxidase (COX), the terminal enzyme in the mitochondrial electron transport chain responsible for reducing oxygen to water . The recombinant form is expressed in E. coli systems, enabling large-scale production for research applications. Key features include:

PropertySpecification
Host organismVulpes vulpes (Red fox)
Expression systemE. coli
TagN-terminal 10xHis (Vulpes vulpes) ; N-terminal His (Vulpes corsac variant)
Protein lengthFull-length (1-227 amino acids)
Purity>90% (SDS-PAGE)

Genomic Context

  • Gene Name: MT-CO2 (Mitochondrially Encoded Cytochrome C Oxidase II)

  • Synonyms: COII, COX2, COXII

  • UniProt ID:

    • Vulpes vulpes: O47681

    • Vulpes corsac: Q539C6

Role in Mitochondrial Respiration

MT-CO2 facilitates electron transfer from cytochrome c to molecular oxygen, driving ATP synthesis via oxidative phosphorylation . Mutations in MT-CO2 are linked to:

  • Mitochondrial Complex IV deficiency

  • Sensorineural hearing loss and retinitis pigmentosa

Pathogenic Variants

  • A frameshift mutation (m.8156delG) causes truncated COX2, leading to COX-deficient fibers and multisystem mitochondrial disorders .

Disease Modeling

Used to study:

  • COX Deficiency: Correlates with heteroplasmic mtDNA mutation loads .

  • Neurodegenerative Pathologies: Associated with cognitive decline and epilepsy in mitochondrial diseases .

Assay Development

  • ELISA: Commercial kits utilize recombinant MT-CO2 for antibody validation .

  • Structural Studies: Facilitates analysis of COX assembly and function .

Cross-Species Conservation

SpeciesSequence IdentityKey Differences
Vulpes vulpes100%Reference standard
Vulpes corsac99.6%Uncharacterized residue at position 10
Mus musculus89%C-terminal 6xHis tag in recombinant form

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference in order notes for customized preparation.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs unless dry ice shipping is specifically requested and agreed upon in advance. Additional fees apply for dry ice shipping.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to settle the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50% and may serve as a reference.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized forms have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquoting is essential for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing.
The tag type is determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
MT-CO2; COII; COX2; COXII; MTCO2; Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 2; Cytochrome c oxidase polypeptide II
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-227
Protein Length
full length protein
Species
Vulpes vulpes (Red fox)
Target Names
Target Protein Sequence
MAYPFQLGLQDATSPIMEELLHFHDHTLMIVFLISSLVLYIITLMLTTKLTHTSTMDAQE VETVWTILPAIILILIALPSLRILYMMDEINNPSLTVKTMGHQWYWSYEYTDYEDLNFDS YMIPTQELKPGELRLLEVDNRVVLPMEMTVRMLISSEDVLHSWAVPSLGLKTDAIPGRLN QTTLMAMRPGLYYGQCSEICGSNHSFMPIVLEMVPLSYFETWSAVMV
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function

Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 2 (MT-CO2) is a component of cytochrome c oxidase (Complex IV), the terminal enzyme in the mitochondrial electron transport chain responsible for oxidative phosphorylation. This chain comprises three multi-subunit complexes: succinate dehydrogenase (Complex II), ubiquinol-cytochrome c oxidoreductase (Complex III), and cytochrome c oxidase (Complex IV). These complexes cooperate to transfer electrons from NADH and succinate to molecular oxygen, generating an electrochemical gradient across the inner mitochondrial membrane. This gradient drives transmembrane transport and ATP synthase activity. Cytochrome c oxidase catalyzes the reduction of oxygen to water. Electrons from reduced cytochrome c in the intermembrane space are transferred via the copper A center (CuA) of subunit 2 and heme A of subunit 1 to the active site (a binuclear center, BNC) in subunit 1, comprising heme A3 and copper B (CuB). The BNC reduces molecular oxygen to two water molecules, utilizing four electrons from cytochrome c and four protons from the mitochondrial matrix.

Protein Families
Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 2 family
Subcellular Location
Mitochondrion inner membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is the structure and function of Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 2 in Vulpes vulpes?

Cytochrome c oxidase subunit II (COX II or MT-CO2) in Vulpes vulpes is one of the core subunits of mitochondrial Cytochrome c oxidase (CCO), which serves as complex IV in the respiratory chain. The protein contains a dual core CuA active site and plays a critical role in electron transfer from cytochrome c to molecular oxygen coupled to proton pumping. In mammalian species like the red fox, MT-CO2 typically features two transmembrane domains (TMS1 and TMS2) with an N-out-C-out topology within the inner mitochondrial membrane. The C-terminal hydrophilic domain that faces the intermembrane space contains the binuclear copper center essential for catalytic activity .

Based on homology with other mammalian species, Vulpes vulpes MT-CO2 likely contains approximately 227 amino acid residues with a molecular mass of approximately 26 kDa. The protein's structure includes critical regions for interaction with other COX subunits, particularly COX I, which is necessary for the stabilization of heme binding .

How does MT-CO2 interact with other subunits in the cytochrome c oxidase complex?

MT-CO2 forms crucial structural and functional associations with other subunits in the cytochrome c oxidase complex. The most significant interaction occurs between MT-CO2 and COX I, which is essential for stabilizing the binding of heme a3 to COX I. This interaction creates a foundation for the complex's catalytic activity .

Research demonstrates that mutations in MT-CO2 can significantly impact the stability of other subunits. For instance, a missense mutation in the first transmembrane domain of human COX II not only reduced the levels of COX II itself but also led to severe reductions in COX III and nuclear-encoded subunits Vb, VIa, VIb, and VIc. Even COX I, which showed only mild reduction in protein levels, displayed dramatically decreased heme a3 binding capacity .

The interaction with subunit COX12 (VIb) is particularly important for the delivery and assembly of the copper center in MT-CO2. This association involves a network of proteins including Sco proteins and Coa6, which collectively facilitate copper insertion into the binuclear CuA site .

What are the key differences between MT-CO2 from Vulpes vulpes and other mammalian species?

While specific comparative data for Vulpes vulpes MT-CO2 is limited in the provided search results, inferences can be made based on studies of other species. Mammalian MT-CO2 proteins typically show high conservation across species, particularly in the copper-binding domains and transmembrane regions.

Multiple sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis methods, similar to those performed for Sitophilus zeamais COXII, would reveal the degree of sequence identity between Vulpes vulpes MT-CO2 and that of other mammalian species . Conservation analysis would likely show high similarity in functional domains while species-specific differences might appear in less functionally constrained regions.

What expression systems are most effective for recombinant production of Vulpes vulpes MT-CO2?

Several expression systems can be utilized for recombinant production of Vulpes vulpes MT-CO2, each with specific advantages depending on research objectives:

2. Allotopic Expression in Yeast:
For functional studies, an allotopic expression system in Saccharomyces cerevisiae can be particularly valuable. This approach involves nuclear expression of the normally mitochondria-encoded MT-CO2 gene. For successful import into mitochondria, the construct should include:

  • A mitochondrial targeting sequence (MTS)

  • The natural leader peptide (for red fox MT-CO2)

  • Modifications to reduce hydrophobicity of TMS1 (such as W56R, W56K, W56Q substitutions)

3. Mammalian Cell Expression:
For studies requiring post-translational modifications similar to those in vivo, mammalian cell lines may be preferred, though these systems typically yield lower protein amounts compared to bacterial systems.

The choice depends on whether the goal is structural studies (where E. coli may suffice) or functional studies (where yeast allotopic expression may be more appropriate).

What purification strategy yields the highest purity of recombinant Vulpes vulpes MT-CO2?

A multi-step purification strategy typically yields the highest purity of recombinant Vulpes vulpes MT-CO2:

1. Affinity Chromatography:

  • Express the protein with a 6-His tag for purification using Ni²⁺-NTA agarose affinity chromatography

  • This typically allows recovery of fusion protein at concentrations of approximately 50 μg/mL

  • Western blotting with anti-His antibodies can confirm successful purification

2. Detergent Solubilization (for membrane proteins):

  • Mild detergents such as n-dodecyl-β-D-maltoside (DDM) or digitonin effectively solubilize membrane proteins while preserving structure

  • Detergent selection is critical for maintaining protein stability and activity

3. Size Exclusion Chromatography:

  • Further purification via gel filtration separates protein aggregates and contaminants based on size

  • Allows verification of the oligomeric state of purified MT-CO2

4. Ion Exchange Chromatography:

  • Based on the theoretical pI value (approximately 6.37 for similar COX II proteins), anion or cation exchange can be employed for additional purification

Purification Validation:

  • SDS-PAGE analysis to assess purity (expect band at approximately 26-30 kDa for the native protein or 44 kDa for fusion constructs)

  • Mass spectrometry to confirm protein identity

  • UV-visible spectroscopy to verify presence of copper centers

How can I verify the proper folding and activity of recombinant Vulpes vulpes MT-CO2?

Verifying proper folding and activity of recombinant Vulpes vulpes MT-CO2 requires multiple complementary approaches:

Structural Integrity Assessment:

  • Spectroscopic Methods:

    • Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy to assess secondary structure elements

    • Fluorescence spectroscopy to evaluate tertiary structure integrity

    • UV-visible spectroscopy to detect characteristic absorption peaks associated with copper centers

  • Limited Proteolysis:

    • Properly folded proteins typically show resistance to limited proteolytic digestion compared to misfolded variants

    • Digestion patterns can be compared with native MT-CO2 isolated from fox mitochondria

Functional Activity Verification:

  • Enzymatic Activity Assays:

    • Measure the ability to catalyze oxidation of reduced cytochrome c

    • UV-spectrophotometric methods can track the oxidation of substrate cytochrome c

    • Polarographic methods to measure oxygen consumption

  • Metal Content Analysis:

    • Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) to quantify copper content

    • EPR spectroscopy to examine the CuA center environment

  • CO Binding Assays:

    • CO flash-photolysis and recombination signals can be monitored to assess heme a3 levels and functionality

    • Comparison with control samples helps detect abnormalities

MethodParameter MeasuredExpected Result for Properly Folded MT-CO2
CD SpectroscopySecondary structureHigh α-helical content (transmembrane domains)
UV-Vis SpectroscopyCopper center integrityCharacteristic absorption peaks
Cytochrome c OxidationCatalytic activityConcentration-dependent oxidation rate
ICP-MSCopper content2 copper atoms per MT-CO2 molecule
CO BindingHeme a3 interactionCharacteristic slow recombination kinetics

What techniques are available for analyzing the copper binding sites in MT-CO2?

Several sophisticated techniques can be employed to analyze the copper binding sites in MT-CO2, each providing complementary information:

Spectroscopic Techniques:

  • Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) Spectroscopy:

    • Provides detailed information about the electronic structure of the binuclear CuA center

    • Different copper coordination states produce distinct EPR signatures

    • Can detect changes in copper oxidation states during catalytic cycling

  • X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy (XAS):

    • Extended X-ray Absorption Fine Structure (EXAFS) analysis reveals precise copper-ligand distances

    • X-ray Absorption Near Edge Structure (XANES) provides information about oxidation states

    • Particularly valuable for determining coordination geometry of copper centers

  • Resonance Raman Spectroscopy:

    • Identifies vibrational modes associated with copper-ligand interactions

    • Helps characterize metal-ligand bond strengths and coordination environment

Structural Methods:

  • X-ray Crystallography:

    • If crystals of recombinant MT-CO2 can be obtained, provides atomic-level resolution of copper centers

    • Reveals precise coordination geometry and surrounding protein environment

  • Cryo-Electron Microscopy:

    • Recent advances allow near-atomic resolution without crystallization

    • Particularly useful for membrane proteins like MT-CO2 that may be difficult to crystallize

Biochemical Approaches:

  • Site-Directed Mutagenesis:

    • Systematic mutation of putative copper-binding residues

    • Functional assays after mutation can confirm the importance of specific residues

    • Similar to studies showing AITC interaction with specific residues (e.g., Leu-31)

  • Chelator Sensitivity:

    • Copper-specific chelators can selectively remove copper from binding sites

    • Measuring activity loss during chelation provides insight into copper's role in catalysis

  • Metal Substitution:

    • Replacement of copper with other metals can probe binding site specificity

    • Activity measurements with substituted metals reveal functional requirements

How does pH affect the structure and function of recombinant Vulpes vulpes MT-CO2?

pH significantly influences both the structural stability and catalytic function of recombinant Vulpes vulpes MT-CO2 through multiple mechanisms:

Structural Effects:

The protein structure of MT-CO2 is sensitive to pH variations, particularly in regions involved in copper binding. At extreme pH values (below 5.0 or above 9.0), conformational changes may occur that disrupt the precise geometry required for copper coordination in the CuA center. The transmembrane domains may also experience altered interactions with membrane mimetics or detergent micelles at different pH values.

Functional Effects:

pH affects multiple aspects of MT-CO2 function:

  • Catalytic Activity Profile:

    • Cytochrome c oxidase activity typically shows a bell-shaped pH dependence curve

    • Optimal activity usually occurs in the pH range of 7.0-7.5, corresponding to physiological conditions

    • Activity decreases sharply at pH values below 6.0 or above 8.5

  • Electron Transfer Kinetics:

    • pH affects the redox potentials of the copper centers

    • At low pH, protonation of histidine residues surrounding the copper centers may alter electron transfer rates

    • High pH can deprotonate key residues, potentially disrupting the proton pumping mechanism

  • Substrate Binding:

    • The interaction between MT-CO2 and cytochrome c is electrostatically driven

    • pH changes alter surface charge distributions, affecting binding affinity and orientation

    • Optimal cytochrome c binding typically occurs near physiological pH

  • Proton Channel Function:

    • As part of cytochrome c oxidase, MT-CO2 contributes to proton translocation pathways

    • pH gradients are essential for proper function of these channels

    • Experimental evidence suggests altered protonation states at different pH values affect proton movement through the complex

pH RangeEffect on MT-CO2 StructureEffect on Catalytic Activity
<5.0Partial unfolding, potential copper lossSevere activity reduction (>80%)
5.0-6.5Minor conformational changesReduced activity (50-80% of maximum)
6.5-8.0Native conformation maintainedOptimal activity (80-100%)
8.0-9.0Minor conformational changesGradually declining activity
>9.0Significant structural alterationsMinimal activity (<20%)

What computational methods can be used to predict interactions between MT-CO2 and potential inhibitors or substrates?

Advanced computational methods offer powerful approaches for predicting interactions between MT-CO2 and potential inhibitors or substrates:

Molecular Docking:

Molecular docking simulates the binding of small molecules to proteins to predict favorable binding modes and affinities. For MT-CO2:

  • Rigid docking can identify potential binding pockets on the protein surface

  • Flexible docking allows for conformational changes in both the protein and ligand during binding

  • Ensemble docking using multiple protein conformations captures protein flexibility effects

This approach was successfully demonstrated with allyl isothiocyanate (AITC), revealing a specific interaction where a sulfur atom of AITC formed a 2.9 Å hydrogen bond with Leu-31 . Similar approaches could identify binding sites for other substrates or inhibitors of Vulpes vulpes MT-CO2.

Molecular Dynamics Simulations:

Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations can provide detailed insights into:

  • Conformational changes in MT-CO2 upon ligand binding

  • Stability of protein-ligand complexes over time

  • Water-mediated interactions that may not be captured by docking alone

  • Effects of membrane environment on protein-ligand interactions

For membrane proteins like MT-CO2, specialized membrane-embedded MD simulations are particularly valuable for realistic modeling of protein behavior.

Advanced Computational Approaches:

  • Quantum Mechanics/Molecular Mechanics (QM/MM):

    • Essential for studying electronic processes in the copper centers

    • Can accurately model electron transfer reactions between cytochrome c and MT-CO2

    • Provides insights into transition states during catalysis

  • Free Energy Calculations:

    • Methods like MM/PBSA (Molecular Mechanics/Poisson-Boltzmann Surface Area) or FEP (Free Energy Perturbation)

    • Provide quantitative binding affinity predictions

    • Allow ranking of multiple potential inhibitors

  • Machine Learning Approaches:

    • Deep learning models trained on protein-ligand interaction data

    • Can rapidly screen large virtual libraries for potential binders

    • Feature importance analysis can identify key structural elements for binding

  • Network Analysis:

    • Identify allosteric communication pathways within MT-CO2

    • Predict how distant mutations might affect substrate binding or catalysis

    • Map conformational changes induced by substrate binding

Computational predictions should always be validated experimentally, using methods such as site-directed mutagenesis of predicted binding residues followed by binding assays or activity measurements.

How can allotopic expression of MT-CO2 be optimized for functional studies?

Optimizing allotopic expression of Vulpes vulpes MT-CO2 requires addressing several critical factors to ensure proper import, processing, and assembly of the protein in mitochondria:

Key Optimization Strategies:

  • Vector Design and Sequence Modifications:

    • Include an appropriate mitochondrial targeting sequence (MTS) followed by the natural 15-residue leader peptide

    • Introduce amino acid substitutions that decrease the mean hydrophobicity of the first transmembrane domain (TMS1) to facilitate import through the TIM23 translocase

    • Effective substitutions may include W56R, W56K, W56Q, or double mutations like V49Q/L51G

    • Codon optimization for the expression host (typically yeast) can enhance translation efficiency

  • Co-expression with Enhancing Factors:
    Research has identified three genes whose overexpression facilitates the internalization of allotopically produced Cox2:

    • TYE7: Encodes a transcriptional factor that may influence expression of proteins involved in mitochondrial import

    • RAS2: Produces a GTP-binding protein that could affect signaling pathways related to mitochondrial biogenesis

    • COX12: Encodes a non-core subunit of cytochrome c oxidase that facilitates copper center assembly in Cox2

  • Copper Supplementation:

    • Supplementing growth media with copper can enhance the assembly of the CuA center

    • This is particularly important when co-expressing with factors like Cox12 that participate in copper delivery to Cox2

  • Expression Conditions:

    • Temperature modulation (typically lower temperatures of 18-25°C) during induction can improve proper folding

    • Carbon source selection affects mitochondrial biogenesis in yeast (non-fermentable carbon sources like glycerol or lactate enhance mitochondrial development)

    • Induction timing and duration optimization based on growth phase

Optimization FactorImplementation StrategyExpected Outcome
Hydrophobicity ReductionW56R mutation in TMS1Enhanced import through TIM23
Helper Protein Co-expressionCo-transform with COX12Improved copper center assembly
Copper Availability50-100 μM CuSO₄ supplementationHigher percentage of holo-enzyme
Growth Conditions20°C induction, glycerol mediaImproved folding and mitochondrial targeting

What role does MT-CO2 play in mitochondrial dysfunction and how can recombinant protein studies contribute to understanding pathological mechanisms?

MT-CO2 plays significant roles in mitochondrial dysfunction through multiple mechanisms, and recombinant protein studies provide valuable insights into these pathological processes:

MT-CO2's Role in Mitochondrial Pathology:

  • Energy Production Disruption:

    • As a core component of cytochrome c oxidase (Complex IV), MT-CO2 mutations directly impact oxidative phosphorylation

    • Even single missense mutations can dramatically reduce COX activity, as demonstrated in patients with proximal myopathy and lactic acidosis

    • The resulting energy deficit affects high-energy demanding tissues like muscle and nervous system

  • Structural Stability of Respiratory Complexes:

    • MT-CO2 mutations can destabilize the entire cytochrome c oxidase complex

    • Research shows that mutations not only reduce MT-CO2 levels but also affect other subunits including COX I, COX III, and nuclear-encoded subunits

    • This highlights MT-CO2's role in maintaining structural integrity of the complex

  • Heme and Copper Center Assembly:

    • MT-CO2's interaction with COX I is necessary to stabilize heme a3 binding

    • Mutations can disrupt this interaction, leading to dramatic decreases in heme a3 levels despite modest reductions in COX I protein

    • The CuA center in MT-CO2 itself is also vulnerable to assembly defects

Contributions of Recombinant Protein Studies:

  • Structure-Function Relationships:

    • Site-directed mutagenesis of recombinant MT-CO2 can systematically evaluate how specific residues contribute to function

    • Comparing wild-type and mutant proteins allows precise characterization of biochemical defects

  • Pathogenic Mutation Modeling:

    • Recombinant systems allow recreation of disease-associated mutations like the T7671A mutation (corresponding to M29K) identified in human patients

    • Biochemical and biophysical analysis can reveal mechanisms of pathogenicity

  • Therapeutic Development:

    • Recombinant MT-CO2 provides a platform for screening potential therapeutic compounds

    • High-throughput assays using purified protein can identify molecules that restore function to mutant variants

    • Allotopic expression studies provide insights into potential gene therapy approaches

  • Species-Specific Vulnerability:

    • Comparative studies of recombinant MT-CO2 from different species (including Vulpes vulpes) may reveal why certain mutations are more detrimental in some species than others

    • This could identify protective mechanisms that might be therapeutically relevant

  • Environmental Toxicology:

    • Recombinant MT-CO2 can be used to study direct effects of environmental toxicants on cytochrome c oxidase

    • Similar to studies showing allyl isothiocyanate (AITC) interaction with specific residues of COX II

How can recombinant Vulpes vulpes MT-CO2 be utilized in evolutionary studies of mitochondrial function?

Recombinant Vulpes vulpes MT-CO2 provides a powerful tool for evolutionary studies of mitochondrial function through multiple innovative approaches:

Comparative Biochemistry Across Species:

  • Kinetic Parameter Analysis:

    • Direct comparison of catalytic properties (Km, Vmax, catalytic efficiency) of recombinant MT-CO2 from different canid species

    • Correlation of biochemical differences with ecological adaptations (e.g., arctic foxes vs. desert foxes)

    • Identification of species-specific functional optimizations

  • Thermal and pH Stability Profiles:

    • Measurement of stability across temperature and pH ranges for MT-CO2 from different species

    • Correlation with physiological conditions and environmental pressures

    • Identification of molecular adaptations to extreme environments

Molecular Evolution Analysis:

  • Ancestral Sequence Reconstruction:

    • Computational reconstruction of ancestral canid MT-CO2 sequences

    • Recombinant expression of these ancestral proteins

    • Functional comparison with extant species to track evolutionary trajectories of mitochondrial function

  • Selection Pressure Mapping:

    • Identification of positively selected sites in MT-CO2 across the canid lineage

    • Recombinant expression of proteins with mutations at these sites

    • Functional characterization to determine the adaptive significance of these changes

  • Coevolution of Nuclear and Mitochondrial Genomes:

    • Study of compatibility between Vulpes vulpes MT-CO2 and nuclear-encoded subunits from related species

    • Insights into mitonuclear coevolution and species barriers

    • Understanding of compensatory mutations maintaining functional interactions

Experimental Evolution Approaches:

  • Directed Evolution:

    • Creation of MT-CO2 variant libraries through error-prone PCR

    • Selection for variants with enhanced properties (stability, activity, etc.)

    • Comparison of evolved sequences with natural variation to identify evolutionary constraints

  • Chimeric Proteins:

    • Engineering of chimeric proteins combining domains from MT-CO2 of different species

    • Functional characterization to identify which regions contribute to species-specific properties

    • Insights into modular evolution of protein domains

Evolutionary QuestionExperimental ApproachExpected Insight
Adaptive significance of sequence differencesSite-directed mutagenesis of divergent residuesIdentification of functionally important substitutions
Thermal adaptation mechanismsThermal stability assays of MT-CO2 from arctic vs. temperate foxesMolecular basis of cold adaptation
Coevolutionary constraintsCompatibility tests with nuclear subunits from different speciesMitonuclear coevolution patterns
Ancestral functionReconstruction and expression of ancestral sequencesEvolutionary trajectory of cytochrome c oxidase

What are common challenges in expressing recombinant MT-CO2 and how can they be addressed?

Researchers frequently encounter several challenges when expressing recombinant MT-CO2, each requiring specific troubleshooting approaches:

Challenge 1: Low Expression Yields

MT-CO2 is a membrane protein with hydrophobic domains, which often results in poor expression levels.

Solutions:

  • Optimize codon usage for the expression host (E. coli, yeast, etc.)

  • Test multiple expression vectors with different promoter strengths

  • Evaluate various fusion tags (His, GST, MBP) to improve solubility and expression

  • Reduce induction temperature (16-20°C) to slow protein synthesis and allow proper folding

  • Co-express with molecular chaperones (GroEL/GroES, DnaK/DnaJ) to assist folding

  • Use specialized E. coli strains designed for membrane protein expression (C41, C43)

Challenge 2: Protein Aggregation and Inclusion Body Formation

The hydrophobic nature of MT-CO2 often leads to aggregation during expression.

Solutions:

  • If inclusion bodies form, develop a refolding protocol:

    • Solubilize inclusion bodies in 8M urea or 6M guanidine-HCl

    • Gradually remove denaturant via dialysis in the presence of appropriate detergents

    • Add copper ions during refolding to assist in proper CuA center formation

  • Alternatively, optimize for direct soluble expression:

    • Express as fusion with highly soluble partners (MBP, NusA, etc.)

    • Include detergents in lysis buffer (e.g., n-dodecyl-β-D-maltoside)

    • Use mild extraction conditions to preserve native-like structure

Challenge 3: Lack of Copper Integration

Without proper copper incorporation, MT-CO2 lacks functionality.

Solutions:

  • Supplement expression media with copper (50-100 μM CuSO₄)

  • Co-express with copper chaperones (similar to COX12 in yeast)

  • For in vitro reconstitution, develop copper insertion protocols using reducing agents and controlled copper addition

  • When expressing in yeast, consider overexpressing factors like COX12 that facilitate copper center assembly

Challenge 4: Improper Mitochondrial Import (for allotopic expression)

When expressing MT-CO2 from the nucleus, mitochondrial import can be inefficient.

Solutions:

  • Introduce mutations that decrease hydrophobicity of TMS1 (W56R, W56K, W56Q, or V49Q/L51G)

  • Optimize the mitochondrial targeting sequence

  • Co-express with factors that enhance import (TYE7, RAS2)

  • Supplement with copper to enhance assembly after import

How can researchers troubleshoot inactive recombinant MT-CO2 and identify the cause of activity loss?

When recombinant MT-CO2 shows reduced or absent activity, systematic troubleshooting can identify and address the underlying causes:

Step 1: Protein Integrity Assessment

First, verify that the protein is intact and properly folded:

  • SDS-PAGE and Western Blotting:

    • Confirm expected molecular weight and absence of degradation products

    • Use antibodies specific to MT-CO2 or fusion tags to verify identity

  • Circular Dichroism (CD) Spectroscopy:

    • Compare secondary structure profile with native or previously characterized samples

    • Major deviations suggest misfolding or denaturation

  • Size Exclusion Chromatography:

    • Analyze oligomeric state and detect potential aggregation

    • Properly folded MT-CO2 should elute at the expected molecular weight

Step 2: Metal Center Verification

The CuA center is essential for MT-CO2 function:

  • Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS):

    • Quantify copper content in purified protein

    • Expected stoichiometry is 2 copper atoms per MT-CO2 molecule

  • UV-Visible Spectroscopy:

    • Characteristic absorption peaks indicate properly formed copper centers

    • Absence of these peaks suggests defective metal incorporation

  • Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR):

    • Provides direct information on the electronic state of copper centers

    • Abnormal EPR signals can pinpoint specific defects in copper coordination

Step 3: Activity Assay Validation

Ensure that activity measurement conditions are optimal:

  • pH Optimization:

    • Test activity across pH range (typically 6.5-8.0)

    • Suboptimal pH can drastically reduce apparent activity

  • Detergent Selection:

    • For membrane proteins, detergent choice critically affects activity

    • Screen multiple detergents (DDM, digitonin, LMNG) to identify optimal conditions

  • Substrate Quality:

    • Verify that cytochrome c substrate is reduced and functional

    • Prepare fresh substrate before assays

Step 4: Systematic Mutational Analysis

If the protein appears structurally sound but remains inactive:

  • Design and express variants with point mutations in:

    • Copper-binding residues to verify their role

    • Substrate-binding regions to assess interaction defects

    • Transmembrane domains to evaluate structural integrity

  • Compare activity profiles to identify critical residues and functional domains

Decision Tree for Troubleshooting Inactive MT-CO2:

ObservationPotential CauseValidation MethodCorrective Action
No copper detected by ICP-MSFailed metal incorporationEPR spectroscopyReconstitute with Cu²⁺ under controlled conditions
Abnormal CD spectrumMisfoldingLimited proteolysisOptimize refolding protocol or expression conditions
Normal structure but no activityInhibitory compounds presentMass spectrometryAdditional purification steps
Activity only at non-physiological pHAltered protonation statespH activity profileBuffer optimization
Protein aggregationImproper detergentSize exclusion chromatographyScreen alternative detergents

How can researchers distinguish between MT-CO2-specific effects and general mitochondrial dysfunction in experimental systems?

Distinguishing between effects specifically attributable to MT-CO2 dysfunction and general mitochondrial impairment requires systematic approaches combining specific assays and appropriate controls:

Experimental Strategies for Specificity Determination:

  • Complementation Studies:

    • Express wild-type Vulpes vulpes MT-CO2 in systems with MT-CO2 dysfunction

    • If function is restored, the effect is MT-CO2-specific

    • For allotopic expression, use the approach demonstrated in yeast where nuclear expression of COX2 complemented a Δcox2 null mutant

  • Selective Inhibition:

    • Use MT-CO2-specific inhibitors (if available) or targeted antibodies

    • Compare effects with those observed in the experimental system

    • Similar patterns suggest MT-CO2 involvement

  • Respiratory Chain Complex Analysis:

    • Measure activities of all respiratory complexes (I-V) individually

    • MT-CO2-specific dysfunction should show predominant reduction in complex IV activity

    • Uniform reduction across all complexes suggests general mitochondrial dysfunction

  • Mitochondrial Morphology and Mass:

    • Assess mitochondrial network structure via fluorescence microscopy

    • Measure mitochondrial mass using MitoTracker dyes or porin immunoblotting

    • MT-CO2 dysfunction may not immediately affect these parameters, while general dysfunction often does

Biochemical Differentiation Approaches:

  • Heme a3 Levels:

    • MT-CO2 mutations can specifically affect heme a3 binding to COX I

    • CO flash-photolysis and recombination signals can specifically monitor heme a3 levels

    • This provides a selective measure of MT-CO2 function within the COX complex

  • Copper Center Analysis:

    • EPR spectroscopy can specifically examine the CuA center in MT-CO2

    • Alterations in this center would indicate MT-CO2-specific issues

  • Substrate-Specific Oxidation Assays:

    • Compare oxidation rates of cytochrome c (complex IV-specific) versus NADH and succinate

    • Selective reduction in cytochrome c oxidation suggests MT-CO2 involvement

Genetic and Molecular Approaches:

  • Targeted Gene Modification:

    • CRISPR/Cas9 or RNA interference specifically targeting MT-CO2

    • Compare phenotypes with those observed in the experimental system

    • Similar phenotypes support MT-CO2 involvement

  • Domain-Specific Mutations:

    • Generate MT-CO2 variants with mutations in specific functional domains

    • Analyze which mutations reproduce the observed phenotype

    • This can pinpoint which MT-CO2 function is responsible

ParameterMT-CO2-Specific DysfunctionGeneral Mitochondrial Dysfunction
Complex IV ActivitySelectively reducedMay be affected alongside other complexes
Copper ContentPotentially alteredUsually normal
Heme a3 BindingOften disruptedGenerally normal
ATP ProductionReduced but may be partially compensatedMore severely affected
ROS ProductionMay show specific patternsUsually elevated across sources
Complementation with WT MT-CO2Rescues phenotypePartial or no rescue

How does the structure and function of Vulpes vulpes MT-CO2 compare to that of other canids and mammals?

Comparative analysis of MT-CO2 across canids and other mammals reveals patterns of conservation and divergence that reflect both functional constraints and evolutionary adaptations:

Structural Conservation Patterns:

The core functional domains of MT-CO2 show high conservation across mammalian species due to their essential roles:

  • Copper-Binding Domains:

    • The CuA center residues (typically histidines and cysteines) are nearly invariant across mammals

    • These represent the most highly conserved regions of the protein due to their direct role in electron transfer

  • Transmembrane Domains:

    • TMS1 and TMS2 show high sequence conservation, particularly at positions facing the protein interior

    • Conservation reflects constraints on membrane integration and interactions with other subunits

    • Vulpes vulpes MT-CO2 likely maintains the N-out-C-out topology characteristic of mammalian MT-CO2

  • Interaction Surfaces:

    • Residues mediating interactions with COX I and other subunits show strong conservation

    • These interfaces are critical for complex assembly and stability

Species-Specific Variations:

  • Surface-Exposed Residues:

    • Greater variation occurs in surface-exposed regions, particularly in the intermembrane space domain

    • These variations may influence interactions with species-specific versions of other subunits or assembly factors

  • Thermal Adaptation Signatures:

    • Arctic species (including arctic fox variants) may show substitutions that enhance protein stability at low temperatures

    • These could include increased proline content in loops or substitutions that strengthen electrostatic interactions

  • Metabolic Rate Correlations:

    • Species with higher metabolic rates may show adaptations that enhance catalytic efficiency

    • This could manifest as substitutions that optimize substrate binding or electron transfer rates

Functional Implications:

Comparative functional studies suggest:

  • Catalytic Efficiency:

    • Core catalytic function is preserved across species

    • Subtle differences in activity may correlate with metabolic demands

    • Vulpes vulpes, as a mesopredator with variable activity patterns, likely shows intermediate catalytic properties compared to more specialized canids

  • Regulatory Differences:

    • Species may differ in how MT-CO2 activity responds to regulatory factors

    • These differences could reflect adaptations to different energy utilization patterns

FeatureConservation LevelFunctional SignificanceVulpes-specific Characteristics
CuA Binding SiteExtremely HighDirect role in electron transferIdentical to other canids
Transmembrane DomainsHighMembrane integration and stabilityMinor variations in exposed residues
Cytochrome c Binding InterfaceModerate-HighSubstrate recognitionMay show adaptations for efficiency
Surface LoopsLow-ModerateLess direct functional rolesGreatest species-specific variation

What insights can be gained from studying mutations in MT-CO2 across species and their effects on mitochondrial function?

Studying mutations in MT-CO2 across species provides valuable insights into fundamental aspects of mitochondrial function, evolutionary constraints, and disease mechanisms:

Natural Variation and Functional Constraints:

  • Conservation Hotspots:

    • Residues that remain invariant across diverse species represent essential functional sites

    • These include the copper-binding residues and key structural elements

    • Mutations in these regions typically have severe functional consequences across species

  • Permissive Variation:

    • Residues that show natural variation across species indicate positions where substitutions are tolerated

    • These regions often represent species-specific adaptations or neutral evolution

    • Experimental introduction of these natural variants into Vulpes vulpes MT-CO2 can reveal functional plasticity

Disease-Associated Mutations:

  • Cross-Species Pathogenicity:

    • Mutations like T7671A (M29K) identified in humans with mitochondrial myopathy can be introduced into recombinant Vulpes vulpes MT-CO2

    • Comparative analysis of the effects in different species can reveal why certain mutations are pathogenic in some species but not others

    • Identification of potential compensatory mechanisms in resistant species

  • Evolutionary Medicine Insights:

    • Some naturally occurring variants in one species may be disease-causing in humans

    • These "natural experiments" provide insights into pathogenic mechanisms

    • For example, studying how some species tolerate variants that are pathogenic in humans could reveal protective mechanisms

Adaptive Evolution:

  • Climate Adaptation:

    • Comparing MT-CO2 from arctic, temperate, and desert fox populations can reveal temperature adaptations

    • Functional characterization of these variants may identify mechanisms of thermal adaptation in mitochondrial proteins

    • These adaptations could involve stability-enhancing substitutions or activity-optimizing changes

  • Metabolic Adaptation:

    • Species with different metabolic demands may show adaptive changes in MT-CO2

    • Comparative analysis of MT-CO2 from sprinters (high peak power) versus endurance specialists (sustained output) can reveal activity-specific optimizations

Coevolutionary Dynamics:

  • Mitonuclear Coevolution:

    • MT-CO2 interacts with nuclear-encoded subunits, requiring coevolution

    • Species-specific MT-CO2 variants often function poorly with nuclear subunits from distant species

    • Experimental "mismatch" studies with recombinant proteins can map compatibility networks

  • Compensatory Mutations:

    • Potentially deleterious mutations in one region may be compensated by mutations elsewhere

    • Identifying these compensatory pairs provides insights into structural and functional relationships

    • Recombinant expression of proteins with individual versus paired mutations can verify compensatory effects

How can recombinant MT-CO2 be used to study the co-evolution of mitochondrial and nuclear genomes?

Recombinant MT-CO2 provides a powerful experimental platform for studying mitonuclear co-evolution through several innovative approaches:

Compatibility Testing with Chimeric Complexes:

One of the most direct applications is testing functional compatibility between MT-CO2 from one species and nuclear-encoded subunits from another:

  • Reconstitution Experiments:

    • Express and purify recombinant Vulpes vulpes MT-CO2 along with nuclear-encoded cytochrome c oxidase subunits from different species

    • Assess complex assembly, stability, and catalytic activity

    • Measure the "compatibility distance" as a function of evolutionary divergence

  • Domain Swap Analysis:

    • Create chimeric MT-CO2 proteins with domains from different species

    • Identify which regions are critical for compatible interactions with nuclear subunits

    • Map the molecular interfaces driving co-evolutionary constraints

  • Assembly Factor Studies:

    • Test whether assembly factors like COX12 from one species can facilitate the incorporation of MT-CO2 from another species

    • This reveals co-evolution of the assembly machinery with its substrates

Evolutionary Rate Correlation Analysis:

  • Substitution Rate Mapping:

    • Compare evolutionary rates of interacting regions between MT-CO2 and nuclear subunits

    • Correlated evolutionary rates suggest co-evolution

    • Recombinant proteins allow experimental validation of predicted co-evolving sites

  • Compensatory Evolution Testing:

    • Identify potential compensatory mutation pairs between MT-CO2 and nuclear subunits

    • Introduce these mutations into recombinant proteins to test their compensatory effects

    • Validate predicted evolutionary trajectories experimentally

Hybrid Dysfunction Models:

  • Reproductive Isolation Mechanisms:

    • Mitonuclear incompatibility can contribute to speciation

    • Recombinant MT-CO2 allows testing of incompatibilities between closely related species

    • For example, comparing compatibility between red fox and other canid nuclear components

  • Functional Thresholds:

    • Determine at what evolutionary distance mitonuclear incompatibilities become functionally significant

    • Establish whether incompatibilities accumulate gradually or suddenly across evolutionary time

Practical Experimental Designs:

  • Yeast Genetic System:

    • Utilize the allotopic expression system in yeast where the cox2 gene can be expressed from the nucleus

    • Replace the yeast COX2 gene with Vulpes vulpes MT-CO2 variants

    • Test complementation with nuclear subunits from different species

    • Measure respiratory growth as a direct readout of compatibility

  • In Vitro Reconstitution System:

    • Purify recombinant MT-CO2 and nuclear subunits from different species

    • Attempt reconstitution of functional complexes in defined conditions

    • Measure assembly efficiency and enzymatic activity

  • Cell Culture Complementation:

    • Introduce recombinant Vulpes vulpes MT-CO2 variants into cells with MT-CO2 dysfunction

    • Test whether MT-CO2 from different evolutionary distances can rescue function

    • Analyze patterns of rescue success/failure in relation to evolutionary divergence

Experimental ApproachKey Question AddressedMeasurable Outcome
Chimeric complex reconstitutionWhich interfaces drive co-evolution?Activity of mixed-species complexes
Allotopic expression in yeastHow does divergence affect compatibility?Respiratory growth rates with mixed components
Site-directed mutagenesisWhich residues are critical for compatibility?Effect of specific mutations on cross-species function
Assembly factor cross-complementationDo assembly pathways co-evolve with their substrates?Cross-species assembly efficiency

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.