Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your preferred format in order notes for customized fulfillment.
Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires prior arrangement and incurs additional charges.
Tag type is determined during production. To ensure a specific tag, please inform us in advance, and we will prioritize its development.
KEGG: xla:380017
UniGene: Xl.23752
Xenopus laevis 40S ribosomal protein S3a-A (rps3a-a) is a component of the small 40S ribosomal subunit in X. laevis. Like other ribosomal proteins, it contributes to the structural integrity of the ribosome and participates in protein synthesis. Characterization typically involves sequence analysis, expression profiling, and comparative genomics.
Methodological answer: To characterize rps3a-a, researchers should:
Isolate poly-A+ mRNA from X. laevis oocytes
Generate cDNA using reverse transcription
Clone the cDNA into an appropriate vector (such as pBR322)
Verify the clone by sequencing and comparison with known ribosomal protein sequences
Analyze gene copy number using Southern blotting (typical ribosomal proteins in X. laevis have 2-5 gene copies per haploid genome)
While specific differences between X. laevis rps3a-a and human RPS3A need further characterization, we can draw parallels based on the human RPS3A data. The human RPS3A belongs to the S3AE family and functions as a component of the 40S ribosomal subunit.
Methodological answer: To perform comparative analysis:
Conduct sequence alignment using tools like BLAST or Clustal Omega
Analyze conserved domains, particularly the functional regions
Examine phylogenetic relationships
Compare genomic organization, noting that human RPS3A contains small nucleolar RNA genes (U73A and U73B) in its introns
Assess similarities in extraribosomal functions, particularly in cellular processes like DNA repair and apoptosis
Methodological answer: The isolation and purification of recombinant rps3a-a typically follows these steps:
Prepare a cDNA library from X. laevis oocytes enriched for r-protein coding capacity
Clone the rps3a-a sequence into an expression vector
Transform into an appropriate expression system (bacterial, insect, or mammalian cells)
Induce expression under optimized conditions
Lyse cells and perform initial purification using affinity chromatography
Further purify using ion exchange and size exclusion chromatography
Verify purity using SDS-PAGE and Western blotting
Based on studies of related ribosomal proteins like RPS3, rps3a-a might have significant extraribosomal functions beyond protein synthesis.
Methodological answer: To investigate potential extraribosomal functions:
Examine DNA repair capabilities using in vitro assays with damaged DNA substrates
Assess potential anti-apoptotic or pro-apoptotic roles using cell viability assays
Investigate potential involvement in inflammatory signaling pathways
Study protein-protein interactions using co-immunoprecipitation or yeast two-hybrid screens
Analyze subcellular localization under various cellular stresses using immunofluorescence
Determine if rps3a-a interacts with transcription factors or other nuclear proteins
Phosphorylation likely regulates rps3a-a function, as observed with other ribosomal proteins like RPS3.
Methodological answer: To analyze phosphorylation:
Employ mass spectrometry to identify phosphorylation sites
Use phospho-specific antibodies for Western blotting
Perform in vitro kinase assays with potential kinases (consider investigating PKCδ, ERK, Akt, and IKKβ as potential kinases based on RPS3 studies)
Create phosphomimetic (S/T to D/E) and phosphodeficient (S/T to A) mutants to assess functional consequences
Use phosphatase inhibitors during protein extraction to preserve in vivo phosphorylation states
Analyze nuclear versus cytoplasmic distribution of phosphorylated forms
Methodological answer: To identify protein-protein interactions:
Perform co-immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry
Use yeast two-hybrid screens with rps3a-a as bait
Employ proximity-dependent biotin identification (BioID) or APEX techniques
Conduct pull-down assays with recombinant rps3a-a
Perform FRET or BRET assays for direct interaction studies
Use protein microarrays to screen for interactions
Consider potential interactions with DNA repair proteins, transcription factors, and components of the NF-κB pathway based on RPS3 studies
Based on studies of ribosomal protein S3, rps3a-a might play roles in DNA repair processes.
Methodological answer: To investigate DNA repair functions:
Perform electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) to assess binding to damaged DNA
Analyze endonuclease activity using DNA substrates containing apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) sites
Test for 8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG) DNA lesion recognition
Investigate potential interactions with base excision repair (BER) enzymes
Assess nuclear translocation following DNA damage
Perform knockdown and rescue experiments to evaluate the impact on DNA repair efficiency
Consider testing complementation in bacterial mutants sensitive to oxidative damage
Methodological answer: Different expression systems offer distinct advantages:
Bacterial expression (E. coli):
Advantages: High yield, cost-effective, rapid expression
Limitations: May lack proper post-translational modifications
Optimization strategies: Use specialized strains (BL21, Rosetta), cold-shock induction, fusion tags
Insect cell expression:
Advantages: Better post-translational modifications, proper folding
Systems: Baculovirus expression vector system (BEVS)
Considerations: Monitor for proteolytic degradation
Mammalian cell expression:
Advantages: Native-like modifications, proper folding
Systems: HEK293, CHO cells
Considerations: Lower yield, higher cost
Cell-free expression:
Advantages: Rapid, avoids toxicity issues
Considerations: May require supplementation with chaperones
Methodological answer: To analyze subcellular localization:
Perform subcellular fractionation followed by Western blotting
Use immunofluorescence microscopy with specific antibodies
Create GFP or other fluorescent protein fusions for live-cell imaging
Employ proximity ligation assays to detect interactions in specific cellular compartments
Use phosphorylation-specific antibodies to track modified forms
Analyze changes in localization following cellular stresses (oxidative stress, DNA damage)
Consider both fixed and live-cell imaging approaches
Methodological answer: To use gene editing for functional studies:
Design CRISPR/Cas9 guide RNAs targeting rps3a-a exons
Introduce mutations to create knockouts or specific amino acid changes
Use homology-directed repair to introduce tags or reporter genes
Deliver components via microinjection into Xenopus embryos
Verify edits by sequencing and protein expression analysis
Assess phenotypic consequences during development
Create inducible or tissue-specific knockouts to bypass early lethality
Consider redundancy with other ribosomal proteins in the experimental design
Based on the extraribosomal functions of RPS3, rps3a-a might also influence NF-κB signaling.
Methodological answer: To investigate NF-κB pathway interactions:
Perform co-immunoprecipitation to detect potential interactions with NF-κB subunits
Use chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) to identify binding to NF-κB target promoters
Employ luciferase reporter assays with NF-κB response elements
Analyze nuclear translocation of NF-κB components and rps3a-a following stimulation
Create phosphorylation site mutants to assess the impact on signaling
Use RNA-seq to profile gene expression changes following rps3a-a manipulation
Consider interactions with kinases like IKKβ that might phosphorylate rps3a-a
Methodological answer: When addressing conflicting data:
Carefully distinguish between ribosomal and extraribosomal functions
Consider cell type-specific effects and developmental stage variations
Account for potential redundancy with other ribosomal proteins
Separate direct versus indirect effects using appropriate controls
Validate findings across multiple experimental systems
Use complementary techniques to confirm key observations
Consider post-translational modifications that might explain context-dependent functions
Verify antibody specificity, particularly for phospho-specific detection
Methodological answer: For computational prediction of functional domains:
Employ sequence alignment tools to identify conserved regions
Use structure prediction algorithms (AlphaFold, I-TASSER) to model protein structure
Apply motif recognition software to identify potential functional domains
Predict post-translational modification sites using tools like NetPhos, GPS
Use molecular dynamics simulations to study structural flexibility
Identify potential DNA/RNA binding domains through specialized prediction tools
Analyze conservation patterns across species to identify functionally important residues
Predict potential protein-protein interaction interfaces
Methodological answer: Future research directions may include:
Investigating developmental stage-specific expression and function
Exploring tissue-specific roles beyond translation
Examining potential contributions to cellular stress responses
Analyzing consequences of mutations or altered expression in disease models
Investigating interactions with non-coding RNAs and potential regulatory functions
Studying evolutionary conservation of extraribosomal functions across species
Developing therapeutic approaches targeting specific functions while preserving others
Exploring connections between ribosomal function and extraribosomal activities
Methodological answer: Emerging technologies likely to impact rps3a-a research include:
Cryo-EM for high-resolution structural analysis in different functional states
Single-cell transcriptomics to study expression heterogeneity
Proximity labeling techniques for comprehensive interaction mapping
Optogenetic approaches for spatial and temporal control of protein function
Mass spectrometry innovations for detecting and quantifying post-translational modifications
Nanobodies and intrabodies for functional interrogation in live cells
RNA-protein interaction mapping using CLIP-seq techniques
Advanced gene editing approaches for precise genomic manipulation