Recombinant Xenopus laevis Cyclic AMP-responsive element-binding protein 3-like protein 2 (creb3l2)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Production and Purification

Recombinant CREB3L2 is expressed in heterologous systems for research applications:

Key Production Systems

  • Escherichia coli: Used for cost-effective, high-yield production (≥85% purity) ( ).

  • Yeast: Alternative system for eukaryotic post-translational modifications ( ).

  • HEK293 Cells: Employed for mammalian-specific studies, yielding >90% purity ( ).

Purification Workflow

  1. Lysis: Cells are lysed using RIPA buffer or similar detergents.

  2. Affinity Chromatography: His-tag binding to nickel columns ( ).

  3. Quality Control: Validated via SDS-PAGE and Western blot ( ).

Functional Insights

CREB3L2 plays critical roles in cellular stress responses and development:

ER Stress and Unfolded Protein Response (UPR)

  • Retained in ER membranes under basal conditions, CREB3L2 is proteolytically activated during ER stress to regulate COPII vesicle components (sec23a, sec23b, sec24d) essential for collagen trafficking ( ).

  • Unlike canonical UPR pathways, CREB3L2 activation does not induce ER stress markers like BiP/GRP78 ( ).

Developmental Roles

  • In zebrafish, CREB3L2 dysfunction causes skeletal malformations due to defective chondrocyte maturation and collagen retention in the ER ( ).

  • In Xenopus, muscle-specific Cre recombinase strains enable conditional gene activation, highlighting CREB3L2’s utility in developmental models ( ).

Disease Relevance

  • Overexpression in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) promotes immune evasion by modulating Hedgehog signaling in CD8+ T cells ( ).

  • Its C-terminal fragment directly suppresses T cell cytotoxicity, suggesting oncogenic potential ( ).

Applications in Research

ApplicationUse Case
ELISAQuantifying protein interactions or antibody binding ( ).
Western Blot (WB)Detecting endogenous or recombinant CREB3L2 in lysates ( ).
Transcriptional StudiesAnalyzing promoter activation via luciferase assays ( ).
Structural BiologyInvestigating DNA-binding domains using crystallography or NMR (implied by sequence data).

Comparative Analysis

Studies comparing CREB3L2 with related proteins reveal distinct regulatory mechanisms:

FeatureCREB3L2CREB3
ERAD RegulationDegraded via SEL1L-dependent ER-associated degradation (ERAD) ( ).Less sensitive to SEL1L knockout ( ).
Stress ResponseActivated by brefeldin A and monensin, but not tunicamycin ( ).Abolished by tunicamycin treatment ( ).
Tissue SpecificityCritical in chondrocytes and cancer cells ( ).Broadly expressed, including liver and pancreas.

Future Directions

  • Mechanistic Studies: Elucidate how CREB3L2’s C-terminal fragment modulates immune cells in TNBC ( ).

  • Therapeutic Targeting: Develop inhibitors against its proteolytic activation for cancer therapy.

  • Evolutionary Analysis: Compare CREB3L2 orthologs across vertebrates to identify conserved functional domains.

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: We prioritize shipping the format currently in stock. However, if you have a specific format requirement, please include this information in your order notes. We will fulfill your request if possible.
Lead Time
Delivery time may vary depending on the purchase method and location. For specific delivery times, please consult your local distributor.
Note: All our proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. If you require dry ice shipping, please inform us in advance. Additional fees may apply.
Notes
Repeated freezing and thawing is not recommended. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
We recommend briefly centrifuging the vial before opening to ensure the contents are settled at the bottom. Reconstitute the protein in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our default glycerol concentration is 50%. Customers can use this as a reference.
Shelf Life
The shelf life depends on several factors, including storage conditions, buffer ingredients, storage temperature, and the inherent stability of the protein.
Generally, the shelf life for liquid form is 6 months at -20°C/-80°C. For lyophilized form, the shelf life is 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquoting is necessary for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type will be determined during the manufacturing process.
The tag type is determined during production. If you have a specific tag type requirement, please inform us, and we will prioritize developing the specified tag.
Synonyms
creb3l2; Cyclic AMP-responsive element-binding protein 3-like protein 2; cAMP-responsive element-binding protein 3-like protein 2
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-525
Protein Length
full length protein
Species
Xenopus laevis (African clawed frog)
Target Names
Target Protein Sequence
MEIMESGDPVIQWDRKLSELSEAAESDSLYNNTPFSELLDDSALLDVLGQLMGDPFLTEKYEMMEVEMNPSSPSPMIKAEHSYSLCGDSRPQSPFTHASSDDNFSDTDLTGDDWCLNGELTATTPTTKIKVEIPLEETPGLTPSVTLATSAVSASPEVGVSSQLPVPEQVKLLSPVALPQIKLEPHEVDQFLNLCPKEVAPTEALQMPPTPPSSHGSDSEGGQSPTRSLPPSSPVQSQAGGKMAARSPSALSNSPLLTAPHKLQGSGPLMLTEEEKRTLVAEGYPIPTKLPLTKAEEKALKKIRRKIKNKISAQESRRKKKEYMDSLEKRVENSSSENSELRKKVEVLESTNRTLLQQLQRLQAMVTGKVTRSCKAAGTQTGTCLMMVVLCFAVIFGSFTQNLDMYSSSSKTIHEPSQYSAPESYAASIVRSRKLLIFEEHQAVEELHSSAVMLETQDTWEVQADTISKQQAALLEELHLSQEKPFSLSNDSSSDMPVRHRFTSEFGHNDTTKVIELDRTVNTTS
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
This transcription factor is involved in the unfolded protein response (UPR). In the absence of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, it is inserted into ER membranes with its N-terminal DNA-binding and transcription activation domains facing the cytosolic side of the membrane. In response to ER stress, it is transported to the Golgi apparatus, where it is cleaved by resident proteases S1P/mbtps1 and S2P/mbtps2 in a site-specific manner. The released N-terminal cytosolic domain is translocated to the nucleus to regulate the transcription of specific target genes. It plays a crucial role in chondrogenesis and may protect neuroblastoma cells from ER stress-induced death. In vitro, it activates transcription of target genes by directly binding to the CRE site.
Database Links

KEGG: xla:100037168

UniGene: Xl.9410

Protein Families
BZIP family, ATF subfamily
Subcellular Location
Endoplasmic reticulum membrane; Single-pass type II membrane protein.; [Processed cyclic AMP-responsive element-binding protein 3-like protein 2]: Nucleus.

Q&A

What is CREB3L2 and what are its primary functions in Xenopus laevis?

CREB3L2, also known as BBF2H7, is a transcription factor that plays a critical role in the activation of secretory pathway genes during the unfolded protein response (UPR). In Xenopus laevis embryos, CREB3L2 is preferentially expressed in the developing notochord and is essential for proper notochord development. The protein functions by regulating genes involved in the secretory pathway, allowing cells to respond to stress caused by unfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) . CREB3L2 is structurally characterized as an ER-anchored transmembrane protein that can be cleaved into N-terminal and C-terminal fragments upon activation .

How is CREB3L2 activated during embryonic development?

CREB3L2 activation in Xenopus embryos occurs through proteolytic processing, resulting in the release of its N-terminal domain, which then translocates to the nucleus to function as a transcription factor. This activation appears to be regulated by developmental cues rather than differential activation between tissue types. Interestingly, while CREB3L2 protein activation levels (measured by proteolytic processing) appear similar across different regions of the embryo, the expression levels of CREB3L2 mRNA are significantly enriched in the developing notochord . This suggests that the primary regulatory mechanism for CREB3L2 function during notochord development is at the transcriptional level rather than through differential post-translational activation .

How does CREB3L2 contribute to notochord development in Xenopus laevis?

CREB3L2 plays a critical role in notochord development in Xenopus laevis by coordinating the activation of secretory pathway genes. The notochord, a rod-like structure that serves as a signaling center and provides structural support in developing embryos, requires intensive secretory activity to produce the extracellular matrix components necessary for its function. Studies have shown that when CREB3L2 expression is reduced using antisense morpholinos, severe deficits in notochord development occur, while somitic muscle development remains largely unaffected . This indicates that CREB3L2 specifically regulates the secretory machinery required for the proper formation and function of the notochord, likely by enabling the efficient secretion of extracellular matrix proteins essential for notochord integrity and structure.

What genes are regulated by CREB3L2 during embryonic development?

CREB3L2 regulates a coordinated set of genes involved in the secretory pathway during Xenopus development. The table below summarizes key target genes and their functions:

Target GeneFunctionRegulatory Relationship
Sec23aCOPII vesicle formationDirectly activated by CREB3L2
Sec24dCOPII coat proteinUpregulated by CREB3L2
Sec13COPII vesicle componentRegulated by CREB3L2
Sec31aCOPII outer coat proteinRegulated by CREB3L2
Tango1Facilitates collagen exportUnder CREB3L2 control
SedlinTrafficking proteinRegulated by CREB3L2
KLHL12Enlargement of COPII vesiclesCREB3L2-dependent

These genes are essential for the enlargement of COPII vesicles to accommodate large cargo such as type II collagen for export from the ER . Morpholino-mediated knockdown of CREB3L2 in Xenopus embryos results in decreased expression of these secretory pathway genes, highlighting CREB3L2's role as a master regulator of secretory capacity during notochord development .

How do defects in CREB3L2 function affect Xenopus embryonic development?

Reduction of CREB3L2 expression in Xenopus embryos through antisense morpholino injection leads to significant developmental defects, particularly in the notochord. When CREB3L2 function is impaired, embryos exhibit:

  • Strong deficits in notochord development

  • Disrupted secretory pathway function

  • Reduced expression of secretory protein genes

  • Impaired export of extracellular matrix components

Importantly, these defects are specific to the notochord, as somitic muscle development remains largely unaffected by CREB3L2 knockdown . The phenotype observed in Xenopus is consistent with findings in other vertebrates, such as zebrafish, where mutations in CREB3L2 (like the "feelgood" mutation) disrupt head skeleton and notochord development through loss of secretory capacity . This evolutionary conservation underscores the fundamental importance of CREB3L2 in the proper development of axial structures across vertebrate species.

What are the most effective methods for studying CREB3L2 activation in Xenopus embryos?

Several complementary techniques can be employed to effectively study CREB3L2 activation in Xenopus embryos:

  • Western Blotting for Proteolytic Processing: Using antibodies that specifically recognize either the N-terminal or C-terminal fragments of CREB3L2 allows researchers to assess the activation status of the protein. The N-terminal fragment (N-CREB3L2) can be detected using antibodies that recognize the N-terminal peptide sequence, while the C-terminal fragment (C-CREB3L2) requires antibodies specific to that region . This technique can determine whether CREB3L2 is being cleaved and activated in specific tissues or developmental stages.

  • mRNA Expression Analysis: Quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) using CREB3L2-specific primers allows for precise measurement of CREB3L2 transcript levels across different tissues and developmental stages . This is particularly important since CREB3L2 regulation in Xenopus notochord appears to occur primarily at the transcriptional level rather than through differential activation.

  • In Situ Hybridization: This technique provides spatial information about CREB3L2 expression patterns in intact embryos, revealing tissue-specific expression domains that are critical for understanding CREB3L2's developmental roles.

  • Epitope Tagging and Subcellular Localization: By injecting mRNA encoding epitope-tagged CREB3L2 into embryos, researchers can track the subcellular localization of both full-length and processed forms of the protein, providing insights into activation dynamics .

These methods can be combined to provide a comprehensive understanding of both the expression and activation patterns of CREB3L2 during Xenopus development.

How can antisense morpholinos be optimized for CREB3L2 knockdown studies?

Optimizing antisense morpholinos for CREB3L2 knockdown requires careful consideration of several factors:

  • Target Site Selection: Design morpholinos that target either the translation start site or splice junctions of CREB3L2 mRNA. Translation-blocking morpholinos should be designed to bind the region spanning the start codon, while splice-blocking morpholinos should target exon-intron boundaries to disrupt proper splicing.

  • Dosage Titration: Establish a dose-response curve by injecting varying concentrations of morpholinos (typically 2-20 ng) into Xenopus embryos at the two-cell stage. This helps determine the minimum effective dose that produces a specific phenotype while minimizing off-target effects .

  • Control Morpholinos: Always include appropriate controls, such as a standard control morpholino or a 5-base mismatch morpholino, to distinguish specific effects from non-specific toxicity.

  • Rescue Experiments: Validate morpholino specificity by co-injecting morpholino-resistant CREB3L2 mRNA (containing silent mutations in the morpholino binding site) to rescue the knockdown phenotype .

  • Assessment Methods: Use both molecular readouts (RT-qPCR of CREB3L2 and its target genes) and phenotypic analysis (notochord development) to comprehensively evaluate knockdown efficiency .

Research has shown that effective CREB3L2 knockdown in Xenopus embryos leads to strong deficits in notochord development without affecting somitic muscle, providing a clear phenotypic readout for successful targeting .

What experimental approaches can be used to study the differential roles of N-terminal and C-terminal CREB3L2 fragments?

To investigate the distinct functions of N-terminal and C-terminal CREB3L2 fragments, researchers can employ several strategic approaches:

  • Domain-Specific Expression Constructs: Generate expression constructs containing either the N-terminal fragment (N-CREB3L2, containing the transcription factor domain) or the C-terminal fragment (C-CREB3L2) of CREB3L2. These constructs can be injected as mRNA into Xenopus embryos to assess their individual functions .

  • Domain-Specific Rescue Experiments: In CREB3L2-depleted embryos, attempt rescue with either N-CREB3L2 or C-CREB3L2 to determine which domain is sufficient to restore normal development or specific molecular functions .

  • Transcriptional Activity Assays: Use reporter gene assays with promoters of known CREB3L2 target genes to assess the transcriptional activity of the N-terminal fragment in isolation.

  • Co-Immunoprecipitation (Co-IP): Perform Co-IP experiments to identify specific protein interaction partners of either the N-terminal or C-terminal fragments, providing insights into their distinct molecular mechanisms .

  • Secretion Assays: Since the C-terminal fragment of CREB3L2 has been reported to be secreted and affect signaling pathways such as Hedgehog signaling, use conditioned medium experiments to study its non-cell-autonomous effects .

Research in other systems has shown that while the N-terminal fragment of CREB3L2 functions as a transcription factor promoting secretion of extracellular matrix proteins through induction of Sec23a expression, the C-terminal fragment has been implicated in promoting chondrocyte proliferation and inhibiting hypertrophic differentiation via the Indian hedgehog signaling pathway .

How can recombinant Xenopus laevis CREB3L2 be efficiently expressed and purified for in vitro studies?

Efficient expression and purification of recombinant Xenopus laevis CREB3L2 requires careful optimization of several parameters:

For the C-terminal fragment specifically, which has been shown to have signaling functions, expression in mammalian cells followed by purification from the culture medium has been successfully employed in research contexts .

What are the key considerations for designing RNA extraction and RT-qPCR experiments to study CREB3L2 expression?

Designing robust RNA extraction and RT-qPCR experiments for CREB3L2 expression analysis requires attention to several critical factors:

  • Sample Preparation:

    • For spatial expression analysis, dissect Xenopus embryos into specific regions (e.g., notochord vs. other tissues)

    • Flash-freeze samples immediately to prevent RNA degradation

    • Use consistent developmental stages for temporal expression studies

  • RNA Extraction Method:

    • TRIzol-based extraction provides good yields from embryonic tissues

    • Alternatively, column-based methods (e.g., RNeasy Kit) offer high purity

    • Include DNase treatment to eliminate genomic DNA contamination

  • cDNA Synthesis:

    • Use high-quality reverse transcriptase (e.g., iScript cDNA Synthesis Kit)

    • Include both oligo(dT) and random primers for comprehensive representation

    • Maintain consistent input RNA amounts across samples

  • Primer Design for CREB3L2:

    • Design primers that span exon-exon junctions to avoid genomic DNA amplification

    • Verify primer specificity through BLAST analysis

    • Optimize primer concentration and annealing temperature

    • Consider designing primers that can distinguish different CREB3L2 isoforms if relevant

  • Reference Gene Selection:

    • Use multiple reference genes (e.g., GAPDH, actin, elongation factor) for normalization

    • Verify stability of reference genes across experimental conditions

  • Data Analysis:

    • Use the comparative Ct method (2^-ΔΔCt) for relative quantification

    • Include appropriate statistical tests for significance assessment

    • Report both biological and technical replicates

This methodological approach has been successfully applied in studies examining CREB3L2 expression in Xenopus embryos, revealing its enrichment in notochord tissue and regulation during development .

How can the interaction between CREB3L2 and the Hedgehog signaling pathway be investigated in Xenopus laevis?

Investigating the interaction between CREB3L2 and the Hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathway in Xenopus laevis requires a multi-faceted experimental approach:

  • Expression Analysis:

    • Use RT-qPCR to measure expression of Hh pathway components (Ptch1, Smo, Gli1, Gli2, FoxM1) in embryos with modulated CREB3L2 levels

    • Perform in situ hybridization to determine spatial co-expression of CREB3L2 and Hh pathway genes

  • Functional Studies:

    • Manipulate CREB3L2 levels through morpholino knockdown or overexpression

    • Specifically overexpress the C-terminal fragment, which has been implicated in Hh signaling

    • Assess effects on Hh target gene expression and embryonic phenotypes

  • Biochemical Interaction Assays:

    • Perform co-immunoprecipitation experiments to detect physical interactions between C-CREB3L2 and Hh pathway components

    • Use proximity ligation assays to visualize interactions in situ

    • Investigate whether C-CREB3L2 can bind to Hh ligands and promote Hh ligand-Ptch1 interaction

  • Reporter Assays:

    • Utilize Gli-responsive luciferase reporters to measure Hh pathway activation

    • Compare reporter activity in the presence of full-length CREB3L2 versus its cleaved fragments

  • Rescue Experiments:

    • In CREB3L2-depleted embryos, test whether direct activation of the Hh pathway can rescue developmental phenotypes

    • Conversely, in embryos overexpressing C-CREB3L2, test whether Hh pathway inhibitors can reverse any observed effects

Research has shown that the C-terminal fragment of CREB3L2 can promote Hedgehog signaling, suggesting a mechanism by which CREB3L2 influences developmental processes beyond its direct transcriptional targets . This interaction appears to be particularly important in the context of chondrocyte development and may have parallel functions in notochord formation.

How do the functions of CREB3L2 differ across vertebrate species, and what are the evolutionary implications?

CREB3L2 functions show both conservation and divergence across vertebrate species, with important evolutionary implications:

  • Conserved Developmental Roles:

    • In Xenopus laevis, CREB3L2 is critical for notochord development through regulation of the secretory pathway

    • In zebrafish, the "feelgood" mutation in CREB3L2 disrupts head skeleton and notochord development through similar mechanisms

    • In medaka fish, CREB3L2 regulates genes essential for COPII vesicle enlargement to accommodate type II collagen export

    • In mammals, CREB3L2 plays crucial roles in chondrocyte differentiation and cartilage formation

This functional conservation suggests that CREB3L2's role in regulating secretory capacity for extracellular matrix production represents an ancient mechanism essential for proper development of skeletal and supporting tissues across vertebrates.

  • Species-Specific Adaptations:

    • Different vertebrates show variations in the tissue-specific expression patterns of CREB3L2

    • The downstream targets of CREB3L2 may vary somewhat between species, reflecting adaptation to specific developmental programs

    • The relative importance of the N-terminal versus C-terminal fragments may differ across species and developmental contexts

  • Evolutionary Significance:

    • The conservation of CREB3L2 function in notochord and cartilage development suggests it played a critical role in the evolution of the vertebrate body plan

    • The dual functionality of CREB3L2 (transcription factor and signaling molecule) represents an efficient evolutionary solution to coordinate tissue formation

    • The link between CREB3L2 and the Hedgehog pathway suggests co-evolution of these developmental regulatory systems

Comparative studies across species can provide deeper insights into how CREB3L2 functions have been conserved or modified throughout vertebrate evolution, potentially revealing fundamental principles of developmental regulation.

What is the relationship between CREB3L2 and other UPR transcription factors in regulating notochord development?

The relationship between CREB3L2 and other UPR transcription factors in notochord development involves complex regulatory interactions:

  • Regulatory Hierarchy:

    • XBP1, a canonical UPR transcription factor, appears to promote the expression of CREB3L2 in certain contexts

    • Unlike CREB3L1 (another CREB3 family member), CREB3L2 expression is not dependent on ATF4 or ATF6

    • This suggests a specific regulatory pathway where XBP1 acts upstream of CREB3L2 in the UPR cascade

  • Functional Specialization:

    • While both XBP1 and CREB3L2 are expressed in the developing notochord, CREB3L2 appears to have a more specialized role in regulating secretory pathway genes specifically required for notochord formation

    • XBP1 has broader roles, including regulating BMP signaling and mesoderm formation in Xenopus embryos

    • This specialization allows for fine-tuned regulation of different aspects of the UPR during development

  • Activation Mechanisms:

    • XBP1 is activated through unconventional splicing by IRE1

    • CREB3L2 is activated through proteolytic processing

    • These distinct activation mechanisms may allow for differential regulation in response to various developmental signals or stresses

  • Cooperative vs. Independent Functions:

    • The data suggest both cooperative and independent functions:

      • Cooperative: XBP1 may induce CREB3L2 expression as part of a coordinated UPR response

      • Independent: CREB3L2 knockdown specifically affects notochord but not somitic muscle development, indicating tissue-specific roles

Understanding these relationships is critical for deciphering how the UPR is deployed during normal development to handle the high secretory demands of specialized tissues like the notochord.

How might CREB3L2 be involved in notochord-related pathologies and potential therapeutic approaches?

CREB3L2's critical role in notochord development suggests potential involvement in notochord-related pathologies and offers insights for therapeutic approaches:

  • Potential Pathologies:

    • Chordomas: These rare tumors arise from notochord remnants. Given CREB3L2's role in notochord development, dysregulation might contribute to chordoma formation or progression.

    • Notochord-derived Disc Degeneration: Since the nucleus pulposus of intervertebral discs derives from the notochord, CREB3L2 dysfunction might contribute to degenerative disc diseases.

    • Skeletal Malformations: Based on the zebrafish "feelgood" mutation in CREB3L2 that disrupts head skeleton development , human CREB3L2 variants might be implicated in certain congenital skeletal disorders.

  • Diagnostic Applications:

    • CREB3L2 expression or activation status could potentially serve as a biomarker for notochord-derived pathologies.

    • Genetic screening for CREB3L2 mutations might identify individuals at risk for related developmental disorders.

  • Therapeutic Approaches:

    • Gene Therapy: For conditions involving CREB3L2 deficiency, delivery of functional CREB3L2 or its N-terminal transcription factor domain might restore proper development or function.

    • Small Molecule Modulators: Compounds that enhance CREB3L2 processing or activity could potentially improve secretory capacity in compromised tissues.

    • Targeting Downstream Pathways: Modulation of the Hedgehog signaling pathway, which interacts with the C-terminal fragment of CREB3L2 , represents another potential intervention point.

    • Recombinant C-CREB3L2: The C-terminal fragment could potentially be developed as a therapeutic agent to modulate Hedgehog signaling in specific contexts .

  • Regenerative Medicine Applications:

    • Understanding CREB3L2's role in notochord and cartilage development could inform strategies for directing stem cell differentiation toward these lineages for tissue engineering applications.

    • Modulating CREB3L2 activity might enhance the production of extracellular matrix in tissue-engineered cartilage or intervertebral disc constructs.

Research advancing our understanding of CREB3L2's precise functions and regulatory mechanisms will be essential for developing these potential diagnostic and therapeutic applications.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.