Recombinant Xenopus laevis Microtubule-associated serine/threonine-protein kinase 3 (mast3), partial

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Functional Role in Cell Cycle and Signaling

MAST3 regulates PP2A-B55 phosphatase activity by phosphorylating endogenous inhibitors like ENSA-1/ARPP-19, ensuring proper mitotic progression . Key findings include:

  • PP2A-B55 Inhibition: MAST3 phosphorylates ENSA-1 at the DSG motif, converting it into a potent PP2A-B55 inhibitor .

  • Cross-Species Functionality: C. elegans KIN-4 (MAST homolog) rescues Greatwall kinase depletion in Xenopus egg extracts, demonstrating conserved regulatory mechanisms .

  • Neuronal Differentiation: In Xenopus, related kinases like XPak3 (p21-activated kinase) promote cell cycle exit during neurogenesis, suggesting MAST3 may share overlapping roles .

Biochemical Properties

Recombinant MAST3 (partial) exhibits the following characteristics:

PropertyDetailSource
Purity>90% (SDS-PAGE verified)
Specific Activity3 nmol/min/mg (using ARPP-19 substrate)
PhosphorylationTargets Ser/Thr residues in DSG motifs
RegulationInhibited by PKA via Thr389 phosphorylation

A. Xenopus Egg Extracts

  • C. elegans KIN-4 (MAST homolog) fully substitutes for Greatwall kinase in Xenopus mitotic extracts, phosphorylating ENSA-1 to inhibit PP2A-B55 .

  • MAST3 activity is independent of phosphorylation in its activation segment, unlike mammalian Greatwall .

Mammalian Cell Studies

  • Human MAST3 phosphorylates ARPP-16 at Ser46 and Ser88, modulating its ability to inhibit PP2A-B55 .

  • PKA phosphorylates MAST3 at Thr389, reducing its kinase activity by ~70% .

Applications and Implications

  • Cell Cycle Studies: Recombinant MAST3 partial proteins are used to dissect PP2A-B55 regulation in mitosis .

  • Neurodevelopmental Research: Insights from Xenopus XPak3 (e.g., cell cycle withdrawal) inform MAST3’s potential roles in neuronal differentiation .

  • Disease Models: MAST3 dysregulation is linked to cancer and neurodegenerative disorders, making it a therapeutic target .

Outstanding Questions

  • Does Xenopus MAST3 directly regulate PP2A-B55 in vivo, or are its functions context-dependent?

  • How do post-translational modifications (e.g., PKA phosphorylation) fine-tune MAST3 activity across species?

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference during order placement for fulfillment based on your needs.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please consult your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires advance notice and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to collect the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50% and can be used as a reference.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors, including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized formulations have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquoting is essential for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing.
The tag type is determined during the production process. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
mast3Microtubule-associated serine/threonine-protein kinase 3; EC 2.7.11.1
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Protein Length
Partial
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Xenopus laevis (African clawed frog)
Target Names
mast3
Uniprot No.

Q&A

What is the molecular profile of MAST3 in Xenopus laevis and how does it compare with mammalian orthologs?

MAST3 in Xenopus laevis (sometimes referred to as XPak3 in research literature) belongs to the protein kinase superfamily and AGC Ser/Thr protein kinase family. It catalyzes the reaction: ATP + a protein = ADP + a phosphoprotein . This enzyme plays crucial roles in primary neurogenesis, functioning downstream of neurogenin to withdraw neuronally programmed cells from the mitotic cell cycle, thus enabling their differentiation .

The molecular characteristics of Xenopus MAST3 include:

PropertySpecificationDetection Methods
Calculated Molecular Weight143 kDaSDS-PAGE, Western blotting
Observed Molecular Weight144 kDaWestern blotting
Gene Symbolmast3.L (L homeolog)Genome database analysis
Protein FamilyAGC Ser/Thr protein kinaseSequence analysis
Functional RoleCell cycle withdrawal in neurogenesisLoss/gain of function studies

In comparative studies, while mammalian MAST3 shares structural features with Xenopus MAST3, mammalian variants have been more extensively studied in regulatory pathways involving ARPP-16 phosphorylation and protein phosphatase 2A inhibition . Functional conservation studies should consider these pathway differences when designing cross-species experiments.

What methods are most reliable for detecting and quantifying MAST3 expression in Xenopus laevis tissues?

Multiple validated techniques are available for detecting MAST3 in Xenopus laevis tissues, each with specific applications and sensitivity profiles:

Antibody-based detection methods:

ApplicationRecommended DilutionValidated SamplesNotes
Western Blot (WB)1:500-1:3000Jurkat cells, human brain tissue, mouse lung tissue, mouse brain tissue, rat brain tissueDetected at approximately 144 kDa
Immunoprecipitation (IP)0.5-4.0 μg for 1.0-3.0 mg lysateJurkat cellsRequires optimization for Xenopus tissues
Immunohistochemistry (IHC)1:20-1:200Human kidney tissueUse TE buffer pH 9.0 for antigen retrieval
Immunofluorescence (IF/ICC)1:10-1:100HepG2 cellsCan be adapted for Xenopus tissue sections

Nucleic acid-based detection methods:

  • RT-qPCR using primers specific to mast3.L homeolog

  • Whole-mount in situ hybridization using antisense RNA probes

  • RNA-seq for transcriptome-wide expression profiling

For whole-mount in situ hybridization, follow the protocol described by Harland (1991) with modifications as reported in Hollemann et al. (1999) . This approach is particularly useful for developmental studies to visualize spatial and temporal expression patterns during neurogenesis.

For quantitative studies, RT-qPCR is recommended with careful primer design to distinguish between homeologs in the allotetraploid genome. When using any antibody-based approach, researchers should validate specificity in Xenopus tissues and titrate reagents for optimal signal-to-noise ratio .

How does the allotetraploid nature of Xenopus laevis affect MAST3 research design and interpretation?

The allotetraploid genome of Xenopus laevis, resulting from ancestral hybridization of two species, presents distinct challenges for MAST3 research that require specialized experimental design and data interpretation strategies :

Genomic complexity considerations:

  • MAST3 exists as homeologs in Xenopus laevis, with mast3.L confirmed in genomic databases (XM_018247531.1)

  • Potential functional redundancy between homeologs may mask loss-of-function phenotypes

  • Differential expression, regulation, and function of homeologs must be accounted for

Methodological approaches to address genome duplication:

ChallengeMethodological SolutionImplementation Notes
Homeolog-specific targetingDesign primers/probes with 3' end mismatches at divergent nucleotidesValidate specificity using genomic DNA from both sub-genomes
Functional redundancyTarget both homeologs simultaneously or use Xenopus tropicalisCRISPR/Cas9 with multiple gRNAs can target both copies
Expression analysisSub-genome-specific RT-qPCRUse unique 3'UTR sequences when possible
Protein detectionWestern blotting with validated antibodiesMay not distinguish between homeologous proteins

When publishing research, clearly specify which homeolog was targeted (e.g., mast3.L) and discuss potential compensatory effects from the other homeolog to ensure accurate interpretation of results.

What developmental stages and tissues show significant MAST3 expression in Xenopus laevis?

MAST3/XPak3 exhibits a distinctive expression pattern during Xenopus laevis development that closely associates with neuronal differentiation:

Temporal expression profile:

  • Expression begins during primary neurogenesis

  • Pattern comparable with neuronal differentiation markers such as N-tubulin

  • Expression is readily induced by ectopic neurogenin

Spatial expression in tissues:

  • Primarily expressed in territories of primary neurogenesis in the developing embryo

  • Expression observed in the neural plate region

  • Subsequently detected in differentiating neurons

For detection and analysis of MAST3 expression patterns, whole-mount in situ hybridization is the recommended approach. The expression pattern reflects MAST3's role in regulating cell cycle withdrawal during neuronal differentiation.

When studying MAST3 expression, researchers should consider collecting tissues at key developmental stages:

  • Neural plate stage (stage 14-15): When primary neurons first form

  • Early tailbud stage: When neuronal differentiation progresses

  • Late tailbud and tadpole stages: For established nervous system analysis

The expression data correlates with functional studies showing that constitutively active MAST3/XPak3 induces premature neuronal differentiation, while loss-of-function increases proliferation and inhibits differentiation in the neural plate .

What are the best experimental approaches for overexpression and knockdown studies of MAST3 in Xenopus laevis?

Multiple validated approaches are available for manipulating MAST3 expression in Xenopus laevis, each with specific applications and considerations:

Overexpression strategies:

ApproachMethodologyConsiderations
Wild-type overexpressionMicroinjection of mRNA (5 nl volume into one or two blastomeres at two-cell stage)May have subtle phenotypes; use 50 pg of LacZ RNA as a lineage tracer
Constitutively active formGenerate XPak3-myr by fusion of myristylation signal to N-terminusDose-dependent effects: >50 pg causes developmental arrest; <10 pg induces premature neuronal differentiation
Phosphomimetic mutantsSite-directed mutagenesis of key phosphorylation sitesUseful for studying regulation by phosphorylation

Knockdown and knockout approaches:

ApproachMethodologyConsiderations
Morpholino oligonucleotidesInject 2.5–5 pmol in 5 nl per blastomere at two/four-cell stageTransient effect; include control morpholino
CRISPR/Cas9 gene editingInject Cas9 protein/mRNA with gRNAs targeting early exonsConsider targeting both homeologs for complete knockout
Dominant negative constructsExpress kinase-dead mutantsMay interfere with multiple related kinases

Phenotypic analysis methods:

  • Cell proliferation: BrdU incorporation, PCNA staining, phospho-histone H3 immunohistochemistry

  • Neuronal differentiation: N-tubulin expression by in situ hybridization

  • Apoptosis: TUNEL assay (no significant effects observed for MAST3 manipulation)

For rescue experiments to confirm specificity, co-inject wild-type MAST3 mRNA with morpholinos or after CRISPR targeting. When using CRISPR/Cas9, design guide RNAs that target conserved regions if aiming to disrupt all homeologs, or design homeolog-specific guides for targeted studies.

What is known about the MAST3 signaling pathway in neuronal development of Xenopus laevis?

MAST3/XPak3 functions within a signaling network during neuronal development in Xenopus laevis, with key connections to proneural transcription factors and cell cycle regulation:

Regulatory network:

ComponentRelationship to MAST3/XPak3Experimental Evidence
X-Ngnr-1 (Xenopus neurogenin)Positive regulator of XPak3 expressionEctopic X-Ngnr-1 induces XPak3 expression
X-Notch-1Negative regulator of XPak3 expressionX-Notch-1 activation reduces XPak3 expression
Cell cycle machineryXPak3 promotes cell cycle withdrawalConstitutively active XPak3 causes cell cycle arrest; loss of function increases proliferation
Neuronal differentiationXPak3 enables differentiation by promoting cell cycle exitXPak3 loss of function inhibits neuronal differentiation; low doses of active XPak3 promote premature differentiation

Proposed signaling pathway model:

  • Neurogenin (X-Ngnr-1) induces XPak3 expression in neuronal progenitors

  • XPak3 promotes cell cycle withdrawal through mechanisms that may include:

    • Potential inhibition of cyclins/CDKs

    • Possible modulation of the actin cytoskeleton

    • Potential activation of the MAP kinase pathway

  • Cell cycle withdrawal allows neuronal differentiation to proceed

  • Notch signaling can inhibit this pathway by downregulating XPak3 expression

This model positions MAST3/XPak3, as a crucial mediator between neuronal fate specification (initiated by proneural genes) and terminal differentiation, by facilitating the required cell cycle exit .

For further investigation of this pathway, researchers should consider:

  • ChIP-seq to identify direct binding of neurogenin to the MAST3/XPak3 promoter

  • Identification of direct XPak3 substrates in Xenopus using phosphoproteomic approaches

  • Analysis of cell cycle regulators' activity in response to XPak3 manipulation

How can CRISPR/Cas9 technology be optimized for studying MAST3 function in Xenopus laevis?

CRISPR/Cas9 technology offers powerful approaches for investigating MAST3 function in Xenopus laevis, though special considerations are needed for the allotetraploid genome:

Optimized CRISPR/Cas9 protocol for Xenopus laevis MAST3:

StepMethodologySpecial Considerations for MAST3
gRNA designTarget 5' exons of mast3.L and potentially mast3.SUse CHOPCHOP or CRISPOR tools with Xenopus laevis genome
Cas9 deliveryInject 500-1000 pg Cas9 protein with 300-500 pg gRNAMore efficient than Cas9 mRNA; perform at one-cell stage
Mosaic analysisInject at 8-16 cell stage for sector-specific knockoutUseful for cell-autonomous vs. non-autonomous effects
Homeolog targetingDesign common gRNAs targeting both homeologs or specific gRNAsCommon sites in conserved exons; specific sites in divergent regions
Efficiency validationT7 endonuclease assay, direct sequencing, protein analysisUse MAST3 antibody (1:500-1:3000 dilution) for protein validation
Phenotypic analysisFocus on neurogenesis and cell cycle parametersExamine BrdU incorporation, N-tubulin expression, neural plate development

Addressing allotetraploidy challenges:

  • For complete knockout: Use multiple gRNAs targeting conserved regions in both homeologs

  • For homeolog-specific knockout: Design gRNAs targeting unique sites (often in 3' UTRs)

  • For distinguishing F0 mosaicism from homeolog compensation: Compare phenotypes from single vs. double homeolog targeting

Validation approaches to ensure specificity:

  • Rescue experiments with wild-type or constitutively active (XPak3-myr) mRNA

  • Off-target analysis using whole genome sequencing of F1 animals

  • Analysis of related gene expression to rule out compensatory mechanisms

This approach has been successfully applied for other genes in Xenopus laevis: "We explored function of each of the three genes in this region by independently inactivating each one of them using CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing, and we then explored their mutant phenotypes..." , providing a validated framework for MAST3 studies.

How can transcriptomic approaches enhance understanding of MAST3 function in Xenopus laevis?

Transcriptomic approaches offer powerful insights into MAST3 function by revealing downstream gene expression changes and pathway alterations. When applied to Xenopus laevis MAST3 research, these methods can identify direct and indirect targets while accounting for the complexities of the allotetraploid genome:

Transcriptomic experimental design for MAST3 studies:

ApproachMethodologyAnalysis Considerations
RNA-seq after MAST3 manipulationCompare transcriptome after MAST3 overexpression, knockout, or constitutive activationFocus on neural tissues/neural plate; include time-course to distinguish primary vs. secondary effects
Single-cell RNA-seqProfile cell populations after MAST3 manipulationIdentify cell type-specific responses; detect effects masked in bulk analysis
ChIP-seq for downstream transcription factorsIdentify altered binding of neuronal differentiation TFsConnect MAST3 activity to transcriptional regulatory networks
Spatial transcriptomicsMap gene expression changes spatiallyCorrelate with MAST3 expression domains
Allele-specific RNA-seqDistinguish expression from L and S homeologsImportant for allotetraploid genome analysis

Analytical framework for MAST3 transcriptomic data:

  • Differential expression analysis:

    • Identify genes altered by MAST3 manipulation

    • Group into immediate (potential direct targets) vs. delayed response genes

  • Pathway enrichment analysis:

    • Focus on cell cycle regulation pathways

    • Neuronal differentiation pathways

    • Cytoskeletal organization

  • Integration with published datasets:

    • Compare with neurogenin and Notch target genes

    • Analyze overlap with cell cycle gene expression patterns

  • Homeolog expression analysis:

    • Determine if both homeologs respond similarly to MAST3 manipulation

    • Identify homeolog-specific responses

  • Validation of key targets:

    • Confirm expression changes by in situ hybridization

    • Test functional relevance through targeted knockdown/overexpression

This approach has been successfully applied for other genes in Xenopus laevis: "Analysis of mesonephros+gonad transcriptomes during sexual differentiation illustrates masculinization of the knockout transcriptome, and identifies mostly non-overlapping sets of differentially expressed genes..." , providing a validated framework for MAST3 transcriptomic studies.

What are the optimal conditions for expressing and purifying recombinant Xenopus laevis MAST3?

Expressing and purifying recombinant Xenopus laevis MAST3 requires careful optimization of expression systems, purification strategies, and activity preservation:

Expression system optimization:

Expression SystemAdvantagesConsiderations for MAST3
E. coliHigh yield, simple handlingMay lack proper folding/PTMs for full activity
Insect cells (Sf9, Hi5)Better folding, some PTMsBetter for full-length MAST3 (143 kDa)
Mammalian cellsMost authentic PTMsLower yield but likely higher activity
Cell-free systemRapid, avoids toxicity issuesUseful for smaller domains of MAST3

Purification strategy:

  • Affinity tag selection:

    • His6-tag: Compatible with purification under native or denaturing conditions

    • GST-tag: Enhances solubility; can be used for GST pulldown assays

    • MBP-tag: Significantly enhances solubility for large proteins like MAST3

  • Recommended purification protocol:

    • Transform expression vector into appropriate host

    • For E. coli: Induce at low temperature (16-18°C) to enhance solubility

    • Lyse cells in buffer containing protease inhibitors

    • Purify using appropriate affinity resin

    • Consider ion exchange chromatography as second purification step

    • Concentrate and store with 20% glycerol at -80°C

  • Activity preservation:

    • Include ATP analog during purification to stabilize kinase domain

    • Add reducing agents (DTT or β-mercaptoethanol) to prevent oxidation

    • Determine optimal salt concentration for stability vs. activity

    • Test activity using in vitro kinase assay with model substrates

Quality control assessments:

TestPurposeAcceptance Criteria
SDS-PAGEPurity assessment>90% purity; single band at ~143 kDa
Western blotIdentity confirmationPositive signal with MAST3 antibody (1:500-1:3000)
Mass spectrometryIntact mass and peptide coverageVerification of full sequence coverage
Kinase activity assayFunctional verificationPhosphorylation of substrate (e.g., ARPP-16)
Thermal shift assayStability assessmentMonitoring protein unfolding temperature

For domain-specific studies, consider expressing individual domains (e.g., kinase domain alone) for improved solubility and yield.

How can MAST3 kinase activity be reliably measured in Xenopus laevis samples?

Measuring MAST3 kinase activity in Xenopus laevis samples requires sensitive and specific assays that can detect physiologically relevant phosphorylation events:

In vitro kinase activity assays:

Assay TypeMethodologyAdvantages/Limitations
Radioactive assayIncubate immunoprecipitated MAST3 with substrate and [γ-32P]ATPHigh sensitivity; safety concerns
Non-radioactive assayUse phospho-specific antibodies to detect substrate phosphorylationSafer; requires validated phospho-antibodies
ADP-Glo™Measure ADP production as indicator of kinase activityDoes not require substrate identification
FRET-based assayUse phosphorylation-dependent FRET sensorsPotential for real-time and in vivo measurements

Substrate selection for activity assays:

Based on mammalian studies, ARPP-16 is a known substrate for MAST3, with phosphorylation occurring at Ser46 . For Xenopus studies, consider:

  • Recombinant Xenopus ARPP-16

  • Custom-synthesized substrate peptides containing the recognition motif

  • Generic substrates like myelin basic protein (less specific)

Protocol for immunoprecipitation-based kinase assay:

  • Prepare lysates from Xenopus tissues/embryos in non-denaturing buffer

  • Immunoprecipitate MAST3 using specific antibody (0.5-4.0 μg for IP)

  • Wash immunoprecipitates thoroughly

  • Incubate with substrate and ATP (radioactive or non-radioactive)

  • Detect phosphorylation by autoradiography or western blotting with phospho-specific antibodies

Quantifying MAST3 activity in intact tissues:

ApproachMethodologyApplications
Phospho-specific Western blotDetect phosphorylation of known MAST3 substratesSnapshot of activity in tissue lysates
ImmunohistochemistryUse phospho-substrate antibodies on tissue sectionsSpatial distribution of MAST3 activity
PhosphoproteomicsMass spectrometry-based detection of phosphorylation sitesDiscovery of novel substrates
FRET biosensorsExpress FRET-based activity sensors in Xenopus embryosReal-time activity monitoring during development

A specific workflow adapted from research on mammalian MAST3 involves:

  • Express wild-type or mutant MAST3 in cells/embryos

  • Co-express ARPP-16 as a substrate

  • Treat with forskolin (to activate PKA, which inhibits MAST3)

  • Detect ARPP-16 Ser46 phosphorylation by western blotting with phospho-specific antibodies

This approach can be adapted for Xenopus studies to investigate MAST3 regulation and function during development.

What cellular assays best demonstrate MAST3 function in Xenopus laevis neural development?

Several cellular assays effectively demonstrate MAST3/XPak3 function in Xenopus laevis neural development, particularly focusing on its role in cell cycle regulation and neuronal differentiation:

Cell proliferation assays:

AssayMethodologyExpected Results with MAST3 Manipulation
BrdU incorporationInject BrdU, detect with anti-BrdU antibodyMAST3 knockdown: increased BrdU+ cells in neural plate; MAST3 overexpression: decreased BrdU+ cells
PCNA immunostainingWhole-mount PCNA staining protocolMAST3 knockdown: increased PCNA expression; MAST3 overexpression: decreased PCNA expression
Phospho-histone H3Immunostaining for mitotic cellsMAST3 knockdown: increased pH3+ cells; MAST3 overexpression: decreased pH3+ cells
EdU pulse-chaseInject EdU, detect with click chemistryAllows cell cycle exit timing analysis during neurogenesis

Neuronal differentiation assays:

AssayMethodologyExpected Results with MAST3 Manipulation
N-tubulin in situ hybridizationWhole-mount in situ hybridizationMAST3 knockdown: reduced N-tubulin expression; Low-dose MAST3-myr: enhanced/premature N-tubulin expression
Neural β-tubulin immunostainingWhole-mount or sectioned immunohistochemistrySimilar pattern to N-tubulin in situ hybridization
Expression of neuronal markersRT-qPCR for neuronal genesMAST3 knockdown: decreased expression; MAST3 overexpression: increased expression
Neural plate morphologyMorphological analysisMAST3 knockdown: expanded neural plate

Cellular localization assays:

AssayMethodologyApplication to MAST3 Research
Subcellular fractionationBiochemical separation followed by western blottingDetermine cytoplasmic vs. nuclear localization of MAST3
ImmunofluorescenceIF/ICC using MAST3 antibody (1:10-1:100) Visualize MAST3 localization during neuronal differentiation
Live imagingExpress fluorescently-tagged MAST3Monitor dynamic localization during differentiation

Cell cycle exit assays:

AssayMethodologyApplication to MAST3 Research
BrdU/EdU retentionLong-term labeling to identify cells exiting cell cycleMAST3 manipulation should alter retention patterns
Cell cycle regulator expressionAnalyze cyclins, p27, etc.Identify mediators of MAST3-induced cell cycle exit
FACS analysisFlow cytometry of dissociated cellsQuantify cell cycle phase distribution

The experimental approach should combine these assays to comprehensively demonstrate MAST3 function. Based on previous research: "XPak3-myr induces early cell cycle arrest at high concentrations, while ectopic expression of low amounts induces premature neuronal differentiation. Conversely, XPak3 loss of function achieved by use of an antisense morpholino oligonucleotide increases cell proliferation and inhibits neuronal differentiation" .

How can the regulatory phosphorylation sites of Xenopus laevis MAST3 be identified and validated?

Identifying and validating regulatory phosphorylation sites in Xenopus laevis MAST3 requires a comprehensive approach combining comparative sequence analysis, mass spectrometry, and functional validation:

Identification strategies:

ApproachMethodologyApplications for MAST3
Sequence alignmentCompare Xenopus MAST3 with mammalian orthologsIdentify conserved sites like Thr389, Ser512, Thr628, and Ser747
Phosphoproteomic analysisLC-MS/MS of phosphopeptide-enriched samplesDirect identification of in vivo phosphorylation sites
Kinase prediction algorithmsUse tools like KinasePhos, PhosphoNet, NetPhosPredict likely phosphorylation sites and responsible kinases
Targeted mass spectrometryAnalyze specific MAST3 peptidesMonitor changes in phosphorylation after treatments

Sample preparation for phosphosite identification:

  • Express HA-tagged MAST3 in Xenopus embryos or tissue culture cells

  • Treat with activators/inhibitors of candidate kinases (e.g., forskolin for PKA activation)

  • Immunoprecipitate MAST3-HA

  • Digest with trypsin and/or chymotrypsin

  • Enrich phosphopeptides using TiO2 or IMAC

  • Analyze by LC-MS/MS

This approach was successful for mammalian MAST3: "MAST3-HA was then immunoprecipitated, samples digested, phospho-peptides enriched with TiO2, and peptides identified by LC-MS/MS" .

Quantitative phosphosite analysis:

For quantifying changes in phosphorylation, multiple approaches are available:

TechniqueApplicationUsed for MAST3 in mammals
Label-free quantificationCompare phosphopeptide abundance between conditions4.8-fold increase in Ser512, 47-fold increase in Thr628, 15-fold increase in Ser747 after forskolin
SWATH MS/MSData-independent analysis for reproducible quantification1.2–2.5 fold increase in phosphorylation after forskolin
Phospho-specific antibodiesWestern blotting for specific phosphositesRequires validated antibodies for each site

Functional validation through mutagenesis:

Generate site-specific mutants for each identified phosphorylation site:

  • Alanine substitution (S/T→A): Non-phosphorylatable

  • Aspartate/glutamate substitution (S/T→D/E): Phosphomimetic

Functional consequences can be tested using:

  • In vitro kinase assays with mutant proteins

  • Expression in cells/embryos followed by phenotypic analysis

  • Cell cycle regulation and neuronal differentiation assays

For mammalian MAST3, "T389D-MAST3-HA mutant was much less active than WT-MAST3-HA. In contrast, even after pre-incubation with PKA and ATP, the T389A-MAST3-HA mutant was only slightly less active than WT MAST3-HA" .

By combining these approaches, researchers can comprehensively identify and validate the regulatory phosphorylation sites of Xenopus laevis MAST3 and determine their functional significance in neuronal development.

What approaches can identify downstream targets of MAST3 kinase in Xenopus laevis?

Identifying the downstream targets of MAST3 kinase in Xenopus laevis requires a multi-faceted approach combining biochemical, proteomic, and genetic strategies:

Unbiased target identification approaches:

ApproachMethodologyAdvantages/Considerations
Phosphoproteomic screeningCompare phosphoproteome after MAST3 manipulationIdentifies direct and indirect targets; requires sophisticated MS/MS
Kinase substrate predictionUse consensus motif databases and prediction algorithmsComputationally efficient; requires validation
Chemical geneticsEngineer analog-sensitive MAST3 mutantHighly specific; requires successful engineering
Proximity labelingExpress BioID-MAST3 fusion in embryosLabels nearby proteins; may include non-substrates

Candidate-based validation approaches:

ApproachMethodologyAdvantages/Considerations
In vitro kinase assaysRecombinant MAST3 with candidate substratesDirect validation of phosphorylation; in vitro context
Phospho-specific antibodiesWestern blotting for substrate phosphorylationMonitors in vivo phosphorylation; requires antibodies
Substrate mutagenesisMutate putative phosphorylation sitesConfirms specific sites; functional validation
Co-immunoprecipitationDetect physical interaction with substratesIdentifies binding partners; not all may be substrates

Workflow for unbiased phosphoproteomic screening:

  • Manipulate MAST3 in Xenopus embryos/tissues:

    • Overexpress wild-type or constitutively active MAST3

    • Knockdown/knockout MAST3 using morpholinos or CRISPR/Cas9

    • Express kinase-dead MAST3 as dominant negative

  • Harvest tissues at appropriate developmental stages

    • Focus on neural plate/neural tissues

    • Consider time-course to distinguish direct vs. indirect effects

  • Phosphopeptide enrichment:

    • TiO2 chromatography

    • IMAC (Immobilized Metal Affinity Chromatography)

    • Phospho-tyrosine antibodies (for potential dual-specificity)

  • Mass spectrometry analysis:

    • Quantitative comparison between conditions

    • Identify phosphorylation sites with increased/decreased abundance

    • Motif analysis of altered phosphopeptides

  • Bioinformatic filtering:

    • Focus on sites matching MAST3 consensus motif

    • Prioritize conserved sites/proteins

    • Enrich for neuronal development and cell cycle proteins

Validation of ARPP-16 as potential MAST3 substrate:

Based on mammalian studies, ARPP-16 is a known substrate for MAST3, with phosphorylation at Ser46 . For validation in Xenopus:

  • Clone Xenopus ARPP-16

  • Perform in vitro kinase assay with recombinant MAST3

  • Generate phospho-specific antibody against Ser46

  • Monitor phosphorylation in vivo after MAST3 manipulation

  • Create S46A mutant and assess functional consequences in neuronal development

This comprehensive approach will identify and validate the physiologically relevant downstream targets of MAST3 kinase in Xenopus laevis, providing insight into its role in neuronal development and cell cycle regulation.

What are the current limitations in MAST3 research in Xenopus laevis and how might they be addressed?

Current MAST3 research in Xenopus laevis faces several significant limitations that warrant methodological innovations and strategic research approaches:

Technical and biological limitations:

LimitationImpact on ResearchPotential Solutions
Allotetraploid genome complexityConfounds genetic manipulation and expression analysisDesign homeolog-specific tools; use X. tropicalis for genetic studies while validating in X. laevis
Limited validated antibodiesHinders detection of endogenous protein and phosphorylation sitesDevelop Xenopus-specific antibodies; validate commercial antibodies rigorously
Absence of phospho-specific antibodiesPrevents monitoring of MAST3 regulation in vivoGenerate custom phospho-antibodies for key sites (Thr389 equivalent)
Incomplete characterization of substratesLimits understanding of downstream effectsApply phosphoproteomic approaches in neural contexts
Temporal limitations of knockdown approachesMorpholinos provide only transient effectsImplement CRISPR/Cas9 for stable genetic manipulation

Knowledge gaps in MAST3 biology:

Knowledge GapCurrent StatusResearch Priority
Complete phospho-regulation mapLimited to mammalian data on key sites Comprehensive phosphoproteomics of Xenopus MAST3
Homeolog-specific functionsUnknown functional differences between homeologsTargeted knockout of individual homeologs
Integration with neuronal specification pathwaysKnown to be regulated by neurogenin and Notch Map complete signaling network
Cell-type specificity of functionBroad neuronal expression observedSingle-cell approaches to define cell-specific roles
Evolutionary conservation of functionLimited comparative analysisCross-species functional complementation tests

Suggested strategic research approaches:

  • Develop improved tools:

    • Generate CRISPR knock-in lines with tagged endogenous MAST3

    • Create phosphomutant transgenic lines for key regulatory sites

    • Develop biosensors for monitoring MAST3 activity in vivo

  • Conduct comprehensive interaction studies:

    • BioID or proximity labeling in neuronal contexts

    • Spatiotemporally resolved interactome during neural development

    • Substrate identification through phosphoproteomics

  • Integrate with developmental signaling:

    • Map epistatic relationships with neurogenin, Notch, and cell cycle regulators

    • Determine how MAST3 coordinates cell cycle exit with differentiation programs

    • Identify transcriptional consequences of MAST3 activity

By addressing these limitations through targeted technological development and strategic research approaches, the field can advance toward a comprehensive understanding of MAST3 function in Xenopus neuronal development, with potential implications for understanding fundamental mechanisms of neurogenesis across vertebrates.

What are the future directions for MAST3 research in Xenopus laevis?

The trajectory of MAST3 research in Xenopus laevis is poised for significant advances through integration of cutting-edge technologies and exploration of unaddressed biological questions:

Emerging research directions:

Research AreaSpecific InvestigationsTechnological Approaches
Single-cell resolution analysisCell-specific MAST3 function during neurogenesisscRNA-seq, spatial transcriptomics, cell-specific CRISPR
Real-time visualization of activityDynamic regulation during developmentFRET biosensors, optogenetic control, live imaging
Substrate identificationComprehensive mapping of phosphorylation targetsProteomics, analog-sensitive kinase technology
Integration with cell cycle regulatorsMechanism of cell cycle withdrawalTargeted manipulation of cyclins/CDKs with MAST3
Cross-species functional conservationEvolutionary analysis of MAST3 functionRescue experiments across species, comparative phosphoproteomics
Human disease relevanceConnection to neurodevelopmental disordersModeling disease-associated mutations in Xenopus

Convergence with emerging technologies:

TechnologyApplication to MAST3 ResearchPotential Impact
Spatial multi-omicsMap MAST3 activity in developing nervous systemReveal spatial context of MAST3 function
Organoid modelsGenerate Xenopus neural organoids with MAST3 manipulationSimplified system for mechanistic studies
Light-sheet microscopyVisualize MAST3 activity in whole embryosDynamic understanding of regulation
Machine learning approachesPredict novel substrates, regulatory networksAccelerate discovery of MAST3 functions
Base and prime editingPrecise modification of MAST3 regulatory sitesRefined understanding of phosphoregulation

Priority research questions:

  • Mechanistic investigations:

    • How does MAST3 coordinate cell cycle exit with maintenance of neuronal identity?

    • What are the key substrates mediating MAST3's effects on cell cycle withdrawal?

    • How is MAST3 activity spatiotemporally regulated during neurogenesis?

  • Developmental context:

    • Does MAST3 function in other developmental contexts beyond primary neurogenesis?

    • How does MAST3 interact with other AGC kinases during development?

    • What is the role of MAST3 in later stages of neuronal maturation and circuit formation?

  • Translational relevance:

    • Can manipulation of MAST3 enhance neuronal differentiation in regenerative contexts?

    • Are there human neurodevelopmental disorders associated with MAST3 dysregulation?

    • Could MAST3 be a therapeutic target for promoting neural regeneration?

By pursuing these future directions, MAST3 research in Xenopus laevis can contribute fundamental insights into neuronal development while establishing connections to human health and disease. The allotetraploid nature of Xenopus laevis, once seen primarily as a limitation, may provide unique opportunities to understand gene dosage effects and subfunctionalization of duplicated genes in vertebrate development.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.