Recombinant Xenopus laevis Mitochondrial chaperone BCS1 (bcs1l)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Supplied as a lyophilized powder.
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference during order placement for customized preparation.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please consult your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs unless dry ice shipping is specifically requested in advance. Additional fees apply for dry ice shipping.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to collect the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50% and can serve as a reference.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on several factors including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized formulations have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquot to prevent repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
The tag type is determined during the manufacturing process.
Tag type is determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us; we will prioritize its inclusion.
Synonyms
bcs1l; Mitochondrial chaperone BCS1; BCS1-like protein
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-419
Protein Length
full length protein
Species
Xenopus laevis (African clawed frog)
Target Names
Target Protein Sequence
MPFADFVAALKDNPYFGAGFGLVGVGTALALTRKGAQFGMIAFRRHYMITLEVPSKDKSY QWLLSWISHYAKNTQHLSVETSYLQHESGRISTKFDFVPSPGNHFIWYRSKWIRIERNRE KQMIDLHTGTPWESVTFTALGTNRNIFFNILQEARELALKQQVGKTVMYNAVGAEWRQFG FPRRRRPLSSVVLEQGISEKIVQDVKGFIENPKWYSDRGIPYRRGYLLYGPPGCGKSSFI TALAGELEYSICLMSLSDSSLSDDRLNHLLSVAPQQSIILLEDVDAAFVSRDLNKQNPTA YQGMGRLTFSGLLNALDGVASTEARIVFMTTNHIDRLDPALIRPGRVDVKQYVGHCTNWQ LSQMFLRFYPDQTAGQSEAFASAALSSSDKISAAQVQGHFMMHKTDPDGAIQNVCLATM
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function

Recombinant Xenopus laevis Mitochondrial chaperone BCS1 (bcs1l) is a chaperone protein essential for the assembly of mitochondrial respiratory chain complex III.

Database Links

KEGG: xla:380366

UniGene: Xl.31341

Protein Families
AAA ATPase family, BCS1 subfamily
Subcellular Location
Mitochondrion inner membrane; Single-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is BCS1L and what is its function in Xenopus laevis?

BCS1L is a homolog of the S. cerevisiae bcs1 protein involved in the assembly of complex III of the mitochondrial respiratory chain . In Xenopus laevis, as in other vertebrates, BCS1L functions as a mitochondrial chaperone essential for proper mitochondrial function. Despite lacking a traditional mitochondrial targeting sequence, the protein is successfully imported into mitochondria, as confirmed by experimental studies . BCS1L plays a critical role in energy metabolism through its involvement in respiratory chain assembly and maintenance.

What biochemical characteristics define recombinant Xenopus laevis BCS1L?

Recombinant Xenopus laevis BCS1L demonstrates several key biochemical properties that define its function:

PropertyCharacteristicFunctional Relevance
ATP binding capacityHigh affinity interactionEssential for chaperone and assembly activity
Protein bindingMultiple interaction partnersFacilitates complex III assembly and protein import
Expression sourceE. coli systems commonInfluences post-translational modifications
StabilityTemperature and pH sensitiveAffects experimental handling requirements
Purity>85% achievable by SDS-PAGEImportant for functional studies

These biochemical properties collectively support BCS1L's role in mitochondrial quality control and respiratory chain assembly.

What are the optimal expression systems for producing functional recombinant Xenopus laevis BCS1L?

While E. coli expression systems are commonly used for recombinant Xenopus laevis BCS1L production , researchers should consider several factors when selecting an expression system:

For structural studies:

  • E. coli systems using strains optimized for membrane or difficult proteins (like C41/C43 or Rosetta)

  • Co-expression with molecular chaperones to improve folding efficiency

  • Slower induction at lower temperatures (16-18°C) to enhance proper folding

For functional studies:

  • Baculovirus-insect cell systems for higher eukaryotic folding machinery

  • Cell-free expression systems for rapid screening of constructs

  • Mammalian expression for studies requiring native post-translational modifications

Tag selection is also critical; while His-tags are commonly used for purification , larger solubility-enhancing tags like MBP or SUMO may improve expression yields of difficult constructs, with the caveat that they must be removed for certain functional assays.

What purification strategies yield the highest activity and homogeneity for recombinant Xenopus laevis BCS1L?

Purification of recombinant Xenopus laevis BCS1L typically employs a multi-step approach to achieve >85% purity as assessed by SDS-PAGE :

  • Initial capture: Affinity chromatography using tag-specific resins (e.g., Ni-NTA for His-tagged proteins)

  • Intermediate purification: Ion exchange chromatography to remove contaminants with different charge properties

  • Polishing: Size exclusion chromatography to achieve final purity and remove aggregates

Critical considerations for maintaining activity during purification include:

  • Addition of ATP or non-hydrolyzable analogs in buffers to stabilize native conformation

  • Inclusion of reducing agents to prevent oxidation of cysteine residues

  • Optimization of salt concentration to maintain solubility while enabling specific binding

  • Temperature control during all purification steps (typically 4°C)

The choice of detergents becomes crucial if purifying full-length protein with membrane-associated domains, with mild non-ionic detergents like DDM or LMNG often preserving activity better than harsher ionic detergents.

What are the recommended storage conditions for maintaining stability of recombinant Xenopus laevis BCS1L?

Optimal storage conditions for recombinant Xenopus laevis BCS1L vary depending on the preparation form and intended use :

Storage FormTemperatureBuffer CompositionShelf Life
Lyophilized-20°C to -80°CN/A12 months
Liquid-20°C to -80°CTypically with 5-50% glycerol6 months
Working solution4°CTypically in experimental bufferUp to one week

For optimal stability:

  • Add glycerol to a final concentration of 5-50% for long-term storage, with 50% being suitable for most applications

  • Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles which can lead to protein denaturation

  • Aliquot into single-use volumes before freezing

  • Centrifuge vials briefly before opening to bring contents to the bottom

For reconstitution of lyophilized protein, it is recommended to use deionized sterile water to achieve a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL before adding glycerol for long-term storage .

How can researchers effectively assess the ATP binding and hydrolysis activities of recombinant Xenopus laevis BCS1L?

ATP binding and hydrolysis are critical functions of BCS1L . Several complementary approaches can be used to assess these activities:

Biochemical methods:

  • Malachite green assay for phosphate release during ATP hydrolysis

  • Radiolabeled ATP binding assays with filter retention

  • Enzymatically coupled assays (e.g., pyruvate kinase/lactate dehydrogenase system)

Biophysical methods:

  • Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) for binding thermodynamics

  • Fluorescence-based assays using ATP analogs (e.g., TNP-ATP)

  • Differential scanning fluorimetry to assess ATP-induced thermal stabilization

When interpreting results, researchers should consider:

  • The impact of divalent cations (typically Mg2+) on binding and hydrolysis

  • Temperature dependence of enzymatic activity

  • The presence of appropriate co-factors or protein partners

  • Potential artifacts from tags or fusion proteins

Data analysis should include determination of key kinetic parameters (Km, kcat, Vmax) and comparison with published values for homologous proteins from other species.

What methodological approaches are most effective for studying BCS1L interactions with other mitochondrial proteins?

BCS1L functions through interactions with multiple proteins in mitochondrial pathways . Several complementary approaches can characterize these interactions:

MethodApplicationAdvantagesLimitations
Co-immunoprecipitationVerification of interactionsPreserves native complexesRequires specific antibodies
Pull-down assaysIn vitro interaction testingControls for binding conditionsMay miss weak interactions
Proximity labelingIn vivo interaction mappingCaptures transient interactionsRequires genetic manipulation
Blue native PAGEComplex assembly analysisPreserves native complexesLimited resolution
Crosslinking mass spectrometryInteraction interface mappingProvides structural informationComplex data analysis

When designing interaction studies:

  • Consider the appropriate detergents for membrane-associated proteins

  • Include ATP in buffers when studying chaperone interactions

  • Control for non-specific binding with appropriate negative controls

  • Validate key interactions using multiple methods

For accurate interpretation, researchers should correlate interaction data with functional outcomes in relevant model systems.

How can researchers effectively study the role of BCS1L in mitochondrial respiratory complex assembly?

BCS1L is crucial for the assembly of mitochondrial complex III . Several methodological approaches can elucidate this function:

Genetic approaches:

  • CRISPR/Cas9 knockout or knockdown studies in Xenopus cell lines

  • Rescue experiments with wild-type or mutant BCS1L constructs

  • Comparison of effects between Xenopus and mammalian models

Biochemical approaches:

  • Blue native PAGE to visualize respiratory complex assembly states

  • In vitro reconstitution of complex III assembly with purified components

  • Pulse-chase experiments to track assembly kinetics

Functional readouts:

  • Oxygen consumption measurements to assess respiratory chain function

  • Complex III activity assays using specific electron donors and acceptors

  • ROS production measurements as indicators of assembly defects

How can structure-function analysis of recombinant Xenopus laevis BCS1L advance understanding of human disease mutations?

Human BCS1L mutations are associated with mitochondrial complex III deficiency and GRACILE syndrome . Xenopus laevis BCS1L can serve as a valuable model for studying these mutations:

Methodological approach:

  • Generate recombinant Xenopus BCS1L with mutations corresponding to human disease variants

  • Analyze protein stability, folding, and oligomerization using biophysical techniques

  • Assess ATP binding and hydrolysis capabilities of mutant proteins

  • Evaluate complex III assembly capacity using reconstitution assays

  • Compare functional defects between Xenopus and human mutant proteins

This comparative approach can reveal:

  • Conserved functional mechanisms across species

  • Species-specific compensatory mechanisms

  • Structure-function relationships in different protein domains

  • Potential therapeutic targets for intervention

Advantages of using Xenopus models include the ability to perform developmental studies in embryos and the well-characterized mitochondrial physiology of this model organism.

What emerging technologies can enhance the study of BCS1L dynamics and conformational changes?

Several cutting-edge technologies can provide unprecedented insights into BCS1L dynamics:

Single-molecule techniques:

  • Single-molecule FRET to monitor conformational changes during functional cycles

  • Optical tweezers to measure force generation during protein remodeling

  • High-speed AFM to visualize conformational dynamics in near-native conditions

Computational approaches:

  • Molecular dynamics simulations to predict conformational states

  • Machine learning algorithms to identify functional motifs across species

  • Integrative modeling combining experimental data with computational predictions

Time-resolved techniques:

  • Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry for conformational dynamics

  • Time-resolved cryo-EM for capturing assembly intermediates

  • Temperature-jump kinetics for measuring conformational change rates

These approaches can answer fundamental questions about how ATP binding and hydrolysis drive conformational changes that enable BCS1L's chaperone and assembly functions, potentially revealing novel therapeutic targets for mitochondrial diseases.

How can the role of post-translational modifications in regulating BCS1L function be systematically investigated?

Post-translational modifications (PTMs) likely play crucial roles in regulating BCS1L function. A systematic investigation would include:

Identification approaches:

  • Mass spectrometry-based global PTM profiling

  • Site-specific antibodies for common modifications

  • Biochemical enrichment strategies for specific PTMs

Functional analysis:

  • Site-directed mutagenesis of modified residues

  • Activity assays comparing wild-type and modification-deficient variants

  • Temporal correlation of modifications with functional states

Regulatory mechanisms:

  • Identification of enzymes responsible for adding/removing modifications

  • Investigation of signaling pathways controlling these enzymes

  • Correlation of modifications with cellular stress or metabolic states

This multi-faceted approach can reveal how BCS1L function is dynamically regulated in response to changing cellular conditions, potentially uncovering new layers of mitochondrial quality control regulation.

What strategies can overcome solubility and stability challenges with recombinant Xenopus laevis BCS1L?

Solubility and stability challenges are common when working with recombinant BCS1L. Systematic optimization approaches include:

Expression optimization:

  • Testing fusion partners known to enhance solubility (MBP, SUMO, thioredoxin)

  • Co-expression with molecular chaperones (GroEL/ES, DnaK/J)

  • Lower temperature induction (16-18°C) for extended periods

  • Auto-induction media to provide gradual protein expression

Buffer optimization:

  • Screening buffer components using thermal shift assays

  • Testing various additives (glycerol, arginine, trehalose)

  • Optimizing pH range and ionic strength

  • Including stabilizing ligands such as ATP or non-hydrolyzable analogs

For membrane-associated forms:

  • Systematic screening of detergent types and concentrations

  • Testing detergent-like peptides or nanodiscs for native-like environment

  • Inclusion of lipids found in mitochondrial membranes

A fractional factorial design approach can efficiently identify optimal conditions while minimizing the number of experiments required.

How can researchers validate the functional authenticity of recombinant Xenopus laevis BCS1L?

Validating that recombinant BCS1L retains native functional properties is essential for meaningful research. Multiple complementary approaches provide robust validation:

Structural integrity assessment:

  • Circular dichroism to verify secondary structure content

  • Size exclusion chromatography to confirm proper oligomeric state

  • Limited proteolysis patterns compared to native protein

Functional validation:

  • ATP binding and hydrolysis activities within expected ranges

  • Interaction with known binding partners

  • Ability to complement BCS1L deficiency in cellular models

Activity benchmarking:

  • Comparison with established functional parameters from literature

  • Side-by-side testing with other species' BCS1L proteins

  • Evaluation of temperature and pH activity profiles

Researchers should maintain awareness that some properties may differ between recombinant and native proteins due to differences in post-translational modifications or cellular environment.

What are the most common pitfalls in experimental design when working with recombinant Xenopus laevis BCS1L?

Several common pitfalls can compromise research with recombinant BCS1L:

Common PitfallImpactMitigation Strategy
Improper storage conditionsLoss of activityFollow recommended storage protocols with glycerol and suitable temperature
Tag interference with functionMisleading functional dataCompare tagged vs. untagged or differently tagged versions
Incomplete removal of contaminating proteinsConfounding activity measurementsImplement rigorous purification verification
Instability during experimental timeframeTime-dependent activity lossInclude time-course controls and stabilizing additives
Aggregation during functional assaysArtificially reduced activityMonitor solution state with dynamic light scattering

Methodological best practices:

  • Include appropriate positive and negative controls in all experiments

  • Verify protein quality immediately before functional assays

  • Consider the impact of buffer components on planned assays

  • Document and control for batch-to-batch variation

  • Validate key findings with complementary methodological approaches

By anticipating and addressing these common pitfalls, researchers can develop robust experimental designs that yield reliable and reproducible results.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.