KEGG: xla:447238
UniGene: Xl.51587
Phytanoyl-CoA hydroxylase-interacting protein-like (PHYHIPL) is a protein that appears to play significant roles in cellular metabolism. Studying PHYHIPL in Xenopus laevis provides unique advantages due to this amphibian's position as a well-established model organism. Xenopus offers evolutionary proximity to higher vertebrates in terms of physiology, gene expression, and organ development, while maintaining experimental advantages such as year-round breeding capability, external development, and transparent embryos . The PHYHIPL gene has been implicated in critical cellular functions including metabolism regulation and potentially neuroprotective effects, making its study in a vertebrate model system particularly valuable .
For recombinant expression of Xenopus PHYHIPL, researchers should consider several expression systems based on experimental needs:
E. coli-based expression: Suitable for basic structural studies, using pET vector systems with BL21(DE3) strains. Optimal induction typically occurs with 0.5-1.0 mM IPTG at 18°C overnight to reduce inclusion body formation.
Baculovirus expression system: Preferred for functional studies requiring post-translational modifications. This system more accurately replicates the native protein's modifications.
Cell-free systems: Useful for rapid, small-scale expression of potentially toxic proteins.
Xenopus oocyte expression: Particularly valuable when studying PHYHIPL in its native cellular context, using microinjection of mRNA.
The choice between these systems should be guided by research objectives, with consideration of protein folding requirements, post-translational modifications, and downstream applications.
Validation of recombinant Xenopus PHYHIPL requires a multi-faceted approach:
SDS-PAGE and Western blotting: Primary verification using anti-PHYHIPL antibodies or against epitope tags (His, FLAG, etc.)
Mass spectrometry analysis: For definitive protein identification and post-translational modification mapping
Functional assays: To verify biological activity based on known metabolic functions of PHYHIPL
Structural validation: Circular dichroism or thermal shift assays to confirm proper protein folding
Verification should include comparison with native PHYHIPL from Xenopus tissue extracts when possible. Protein identity confirmation via mass spectrometry is particularly crucial when antibody availability is limited.
Purification of recombinant Xenopus PHYHIPL typically employs a sequential multi-step approach:
Initial capture: Affinity chromatography using His-tag or GST-tag systems (Ni-NTA or glutathione columns)
Intermediate purification: Ion exchange chromatography (typically anion exchange with Q or DEAE resins)
Polishing step: Size exclusion chromatography (Superdex 200 or similar)
Key buffer considerations include:
Maintaining pH 7.0-8.0 throughout purification
Including reducing agents (1-5 mM DTT or 0.5-2 mM TCEP)
Adding 10% glycerol for stability
Using protease inhibitor cocktails during initial extraction
For challenging preparations, detergent screening (with mild non-ionic detergents like 0.03% DDM or 0.1% Triton X-100) may improve solubility while maintaining functionality.
Solubility challenges with recombinant PHYHIPL can be addressed through:
Expression optimization:
Reducing expression temperature to 16-18°C
Using specialized E. coli strains (Rosetta, ArcticExpress)
Co-expressing with chaperones (GroEL/GroES, trigger factor)
Buffer optimization:
Screening various pH conditions (typically 6.5-8.5)
Testing different ionic strengths (150-500 mM NaCl)
Adding stabilizing agents (10-20% glycerol, 0.5-2 M urea, 50-200 mM arginine)
Fusion tag approaches:
Using solubility-enhancing tags (MBP, SUMO, TRX)
Testing various tag positions (N-terminal vs. C-terminal)
Refolding strategies:
Rapid dilution from denaturant
Step-wise dialysis
On-column refolding
Empirical screening of these conditions is essential as PHYHIPL solubility characteristics may differ from predictions based on primary sequence.
PHYHIPL appears to play important roles in cellular metabolism based on protein-protein interaction networks . Effective methods for studying these functions include:
Metabolic flux analysis:
Isotope labeling (13C-glucose, 13C-glutamine) to track metabolic pathways
Seahorse XF analysis for measuring oxygen consumption and extracellular acidification rates
NMR-based metabolomics to identify altered metabolites
Proteomics approaches:
Proximity labeling (BioID, APEX) to identify interacting proteins in Xenopus cells
Co-immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry
Yeast two-hybrid screening with Xenopus cDNA libraries
Subcellular localization:
Fluorescent protein fusions in Xenopus cell lines or embryos
Immunofluorescence in tissue sections
Subcellular fractionation and Western blotting
Loss/gain-of-function studies:
CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in Xenopus embryos
Morpholino knockdown
Overexpression via microinjection
These methodologies should be combined to build a comprehensive understanding of PHYHIPL's metabolic functions.
Based on findings suggesting PHYHIPL may have neuroprotective functions in human studies , several approaches can be used to assess similar functions in Xenopus:
Neurodevelopmental analysis:
PHYHIPL knockdown/knockout followed by neural marker analysis
Time-lapse imaging of neural development in PHYHIPL-modified embryos
Assessment of axon guidance and synapse formation
Neuroprotection assays:
Exposure of PHYHIPL-overexpressing tadpoles to neurotoxins
Analysis of neuronal survival after oxidative stress induction
Evaluation of neurite outgrowth in primary neuronal cultures
Electrophysiological assessment:
Patch-clamp recordings from Xenopus neurons with altered PHYHIPL expression
Field potential recordings from intact neural circuits
Behavioral analyses:
Vision-guided behavior assays in tadpoles
Swimming performance metrics
Startle response quantification
These methods leverage the transparency of Xenopus tadpoles and the accessibility of their nervous system for in vivo imaging and manipulation .
Comparative analysis of Xenopus and human PHYHIPL provides valuable evolutionary insights:
| Feature | Xenopus PHYHIPL | Human PHYHIPL | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sequence identity | Reference | ~70-75% | Moderate conservation suggests conserved functions with species-specific adaptations |
| Domain architecture | Contains PHY-like domain | Contains PHY-like domain | Core functional domains are conserved |
| Expression pattern | Neural tissues, developing organs | Brain, CNS tissues | Similar tissue tropism suggests conserved roles |
| Subcellular localization | Cytoplasmic, mitochondrial association | Primarily mitochondrial | Potential differences in metabolic regulation mechanisms |
| Phylogenetic distribution | Present in amphibians | Conserved in mammals | Evolutionary significance in vertebrate metabolism |
The structural similarities between Xenopus and human PHYHIPL make the amphibian model valuable for studying functions potentially relevant to human health, particularly regarding neurological conditions and metabolic regulation .
Comparative studies of PHYHIPL across vertebrate models offer several key insights:
Evolutionary conservation of function:
Analysis of conserved domains and motifs across species
Identification of selective pressure on different protein regions
Correlation between conservation patterns and known functional sites
Species-specific adaptations:
Identification of unique structural features in Xenopus PHYHIPL
Correlation of these features with environmental or physiological adaptations
Analysis of expression differences across developmental stages compared to mammals
Disease relevance:
Understanding how variations in PHYHIPL structure relate to disease susceptibility
Identification of conserved interacting partners across species
Assessment of functional conservation in metabolic and neurological contexts
The amphibian model provides a unique evolutionary perspective, representing a transitional form between aquatic and terrestrial vertebrates, making comparative PHYHIPL studies particularly valuable for understanding the evolution of metabolic regulation systems.
PHYHIPL has been identified as a potentially protective gene in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), where its downregulation correlates with poor survival outcomes . Recombinant Xenopus PHYHIPL offers several approaches to study this connection:
Comparative oncology models:
Expression of Xenopus PHYHIPL in human GBM cell lines to assess tumor suppressor activity
Evaluation of cell cycle effects, apoptosis resistance, and metabolic reprogramming
Analysis of migration and invasion capabilities
Pathway analysis:
Metabolic studies:
Analysis of how PHYHIPL affects mitochondrial function in GBM models
Assessment of changes in energy metabolism pathways
Evaluation of oxidative stress responses
Xenopus tadpole models:
These approaches leverage both the recombinant protein and the unique advantages of the Xenopus model system for studying complex disease mechanisms.
Recent advances in neuroscience techniques offer powerful approaches to study PHYHIPL's role in neural circuits using the Xenopus model:
Recombinant rabies virus applications:
Optogenetic approaches:
Expression of channelrhodopsin or halorhodopsin in PHYHIPL-positive neurons
Precise manipulation of neuronal activity in intact circuits
Correlation between circuit manipulation and behavioral outcomes
Calcium imaging:
GCaMP expression in PHYHIPL neurons for activity monitoring
Whole-brain imaging in transparent tadpoles
Activity correlation with environmental stimuli or behaviors
CRISPR-based approaches:
Precise genome editing to create PHYHIPL variants
CRISPRi/CRISPRa for temporal control of expression
Base editing for introduction of specific mutations
These approaches can leverage the transparency of Xenopus tadpoles and the accessibility of their nervous system for in vivo imaging and manipulation, providing insights that would be difficult to obtain in mammalian models .
Based on current knowledge and methodological capabilities, several promising research directions emerge:
Integration of multi-omics approaches:
Combining transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics to understand PHYHIPL's systems-level impacts
Correlation of expression patterns with developmental stages and tissue specialization
Identification of regulatory networks controlling PHYHIPL expression
Developmental neurobiology applications:
Detailed analysis of PHYHIPL's role in neural circuit formation
Correlation with regenerative capabilities at different developmental stages
Investigation of metamorphosis-related changes in expression and function
Translational research connections:
Development of PHYHIPL-based interventions for metabolic or neurological conditions
Screening platforms using Xenopus embryos for compounds affecting PHYHIPL function
Validation of GBM-related findings from human studies in Xenopus models
Technical innovations:
Development of PHYHIPL-specific tools for Xenopus research
Creation of reporter lines for in vivo monitoring
Application of spatial transcriptomics to understand regional variation in expression
The versatility of the Xenopus model combined with advances in recombinant protein technology positions PHYHIPL research at the intersection of fundamental biology and translational applications, offering significant potential for future discoveries.