VCP is a conserved ATPase with two ATPase domains (D1 and D2) and an N-terminal ubiquitin-binding domain. Recombinant partial constructs of X. laevis VCP often include specific functional domains (e.g., N-terminal or ATPase domains) to dissect their roles in:
Key structural features of VCP include:
VCP collaborates with cofactors Ufd1-Npl4 to extract ubiquitinated proteins from the ER for proteasomal degradation .
Partial VCP constructs lacking ATPase activity (e.g., D1D2 mutants) dominantly inhibit ERAD, leading to accumulation of ubiquitinated substrates .
In X. laevis egg extracts, VCP-Ufd1-Npl4 and Ubxn7 disassemble replisomes during replication termination. Depleting Ubxn7 or inhibiting VCP ATPase activity stalls CMG helicase unloading .
ATPase-inactive VCP mutants (e.g., R155C) cause dominant-negative effects, including chromatin retention of ubiquitinated proteins and impaired histone deposition .
VCP and syntaxin 5 regulate tER formation by mediating fusion of smooth ER tubules. ATP depletion or N-terminal domain mutations disrupt this process .
The X. laevis VCF1 cofactor binds VCP’s N-terminal domain with a dissociation constant (K<sub>d</sub>) of ~10 nM, substantially tighter than other cofactors like p47 (K<sub>d</sub> ~200–500 nM) .
Mutations in VCP’s N-terminal residues (e.g., Y143A) or VCF1’s C-terminal VRM motif (e.g., N167A) abolish binding .
Pathogenic VCP variants (e.g., R155C) exhibit altered ATP hydrolysis kinetics, leading to defective substrate processing. Supplemental ATP partially rescues histone loading defects in X. laevis chromatin assays .
Dominant-negative VCP mutants accumulate on DNA with ubiquitinated proteins, highlighting roles in genome stability .
Structural Studies: Partial VCP constructs enable cryo-EM analysis of cofactor binding and ATPase conformational changes .
Disease Modeling: X. laevis VCP mutants replicate pathologies seen in multisystem proteinopathy (MSP), aiding mechanistic studies .
Drug Screening: ATPase inhibitors (e.g., NMS-873) tested in X. laevis systems reveal impacts on replication and ER stress responses .
KEGG: xla:380491
UniGene: Xl.8775
Vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein/p97 (VCP) is an AAA-ATPase that plays essential roles in multiple cellular processes, particularly endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation (ERAD). Xenopus laevis serves as an excellent model for VCP research due to its phylogenetically intermediate position between aquatic vertebrates and land tetrapods, allowing researchers to distinguish between species-specific adaptations and conserved features of biological systems . The Xenopus model enables both in vivo studies and the preparation of cell-free extracts that maintain many physiological functions, facilitating detailed biochemical analyses of VCP's molecular interactions and functions.
VCP functions through its central pore, where specific residues mediate its ATPase activity and substrate interactions. Critical structural elements include:
The D2 pore containing residues Trp551 and Phe552, which are important for substrate interactions
His317, which serves as an interaction nexus
Prominent loops within the D2 pore including residues Arg586 and Arg599 that are essential for substrate binding and ERAD function
This hexameric AAA-ATPase utilizes ATP hydrolysis to generate mechanical force that facilitates protein dislocation during ERAD processes.
Transitional endoplasmic reticulum (tER) consists of confluent rough and smooth endoplasmic reticulum domains that serve as exit sites for secretory proteins . VCP/p97 plays a critical role in the assembly and maintenance of tER structure by:
Facilitating membrane fusion processes required for tER domain formation
Interacting with Syntaxin 5, a SNARE protein involved in vesicular trafficking
Contributing to the extraction of misfolded proteins from the ER membrane during quality control processes
Maintaining ER homeostasis through regulation of protein degradation pathways
These functions highlight VCP's importance in early secretory pathway organization and function.
Expression System Selection:
| Expression System | Advantages | Limitations |
|---|---|---|
| E. coli | High yield, cost-effective, rapid growth | Potential misfolding, lack of post-translational modifications |
| Baculovirus/insect cells | Proper folding, post-translational modifications | Higher cost, longer production time |
| Mammalian cells | Native-like modifications, proper assembly | Highest cost, complex protocols, lower yield |
Purification Protocol:
Transform expression vector containing Xenopus VCP cDNA into the chosen expression system
Induce protein expression under optimized conditions (temperature, induction time)
Lyse cells using appropriate buffer (typically containing 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT, 5% glycerol, protease inhibitors)
Perform initial purification using affinity chromatography (typically His-tag or GST-tag)
Apply size exclusion chromatography to isolate properly assembled hexameric VCP
Confirm purity using SDS-PAGE and activity using ATPase assays
The purification protocol should be optimized to maintain the native hexameric structure of VCP, which is essential for its ATPase activity.
VCP ATPase activity can be measured using several complementary approaches:
Colorimetric Phosphate Detection:
Incubate purified VCP (0.5-1 μg) in reaction buffer (typically 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 20 mM MgCl₂, 1 mM DTT) with ATP (2-5 mM)
Terminate reaction at various time points using malachite green or similar phosphate detection reagent
Measure absorbance at 620-640 nm to quantify released phosphate
Calculate enzyme activity as μmol phosphate released/min/mg protein
Substrate-Induced Activity Enhancement:
VCP shows approximately 4-fold increased ATPase activity in the presence of specific substrates like synaptotagmin I, which can be used to verify functional activity . Comparing basal vs. substrate-stimulated activity provides important information about the functional state of recombinant VCP.
ATP Consumption Assay:
Set up reaction with VCP, ATP, and an ATP regeneration system
Monitor NADH oxidation spectrophotometrically at 340 nm
Calculate ATP consumption rate from the decrease in NADH concentration
Xenopus egg extracts provide powerful cell-free systems for studying VCP functions:
Interphase Cytosolic Extract:
Useful for studying VCP's role in membrane fusion, ERAD, and protein quality control
Prepare by crushing dejellied Xenopus eggs in buffer, followed by centrifugation to remove yolk and membranes
Membrane Fractions:
Can be isolated from Xenopus eggs to study VCP's interaction with tER and other membrane systems
Separate by density gradient centrifugation to obtain distinct membrane populations
Nuclear Assembly Extract:
Allows study of VCP's role in nuclear envelope formation and nuclear protein import/export
Prepared by supplementing cytosolic extract with membrane fractions and an energy regeneration system
These cell-free systems maintain many physiological functions and allow direct biochemical manipulations not possible in intact cells.
Strategic mutation of specific VCP domains provides insights into structure-function relationships:
When designing mutation studies, it's critical to assess both ATPase activity and specific functional outcomes (e.g., ERAD substrate processing) to fully understand the impact of the mutations.
Comparative interactomics between Xenopus VCP and other species provides evolutionary insights:
Affinity Purification-Mass Spectrometry (AP-MS):
Express tagged VCP from different species in the same cellular background
Purify protein complexes and identify interacting partners by MS
Compare interaction networks to identify conserved vs. species-specific partners
Proximity Labeling Approaches:
Fuse VCP to BioID or APEX2 enzymes to biotinylate proximal proteins
Identify labeled proteins by streptavidin pulldown and MS
Map species-specific "proximity interactomes"
Crosslinking Mass Spectrometry:
These approaches help distinguish fundamental VCP functions from species-specific adaptations.
To study VCP's role in tER assembly in Xenopus:
In vitro Reconstitution:
Dominant Negative Approaches:
Express ATPase-deficient VCP mutants in Xenopus oocytes or early embryos
Analyze tER morphology using immunofluorescence for tER markers
Assess secretory pathway function through cargo trafficking assays
Proteomics Analysis:
Isolate tER-enriched fractions under control and VCP-inhibited conditions
Perform comparative proteomics to identify VCP-dependent protein associations
Map changes in membrane protein composition to understand VCP's impact on tER organization
Inconsistent ATPase activity is a common challenge when working with recombinant VCP. Here are methodological solutions:
Hexamer Stability Assessment:
Analyze preparation by native PAGE or size exclusion chromatography
Ensure >90% hexameric assembly for reliable activity
Add ATP (0.1-0.5 mM) to stabilize hexameric structure during purification
Cofactor Requirements:
Supplement assays with physiological cofactors (e.g., Mg²⁺, specific lipids)
Test different ATP concentrations (1-5 mM range)
Consider adding low concentrations of adaptor proteins that may enhance activity
Storage Optimization:
Determine optimal buffer conditions (typically 25-50 mM Tris pH 7.5-8.0, 100-150 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT, 10% glycerol)
Test stability at different temperatures (-80°C, -20°C, 4°C)
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles by preparing single-use aliquots
Standardization Controls:
Include positive control (commercial mammalian VCP) in each assay
Normalize activities to positive control to account for inter-assay variation
Develop a standard curve relating protein concentration to activity
When conducting comparative studies of VCP across species, researchers should consider:
Expression System Bias:
Different species' VCP may express/fold with varying efficiency in heterologous systems
Solution: Express all orthologs in the same system; confirm proper folding and assembly before functional comparisons
Cofactor Compatibility:
VCP functions through interactions with many adaptor proteins
Solution: Test activity with species-matched cofactors or use minimal systems with purified components
Substrate Specificity Differences:
Natural substrates may vary between species
Solution: Use conserved model substrates for direct comparisons or perform substrate profiling for each species
Assay Condition Optimization:
Temperature, pH optima, and salt preferences may differ between species
Solution: Perform activity profiles across relevant parameters for each ortholog to identify optimal and comparable conditions
Data Normalization Challenges:
Absolute activities may not reflect physiological differences
Solution: Compare relative responses to inhibitors, stimulators, or mutations rather than absolute activities
Differentiating direct from indirect effects requires careful experimental design:
Acute vs. Chronic Inhibition:
Compare rapid inhibition (specific inhibitors, 1-2 hours) with longer-term approaches
Immediate responses are more likely to represent direct VCP functions
Example protocol: Treat cells with CB-5083 (specific VCP inhibitor) at 5 μM for varying time periods (30 min, 2 hours, 24 hours) and analyze distinct cellular endpoints
Substrate-Specific Assays:
Monitor known direct VCP substrates as positive controls alongside your endpoints of interest
Correlation between substrate processing and phenotypic changes suggests direct linkage
Rescue Experiments:
Design rescue constructs resistant to your inhibition method (e.g., inhibitor-resistant mutants)
Selective rescue of some phenotypes but not others helps distinguish pathways
In Vitro Reconstitution:
Recapitulate the process with purified components
Establish minimum components needed for VCP's effect on your process of interest
Several cutting-edge approaches hold promise for VCP research:
Cryo-Electron Microscopy:
Capture VCP in different nucleotide states with Xenopus-specific substrates
Resolve conformational changes during the ATP hydrolysis cycle
Map species-specific interaction sites at near-atomic resolution
Genome Editing in Xenopus:
Generate VCP domain mutants in Xenopus using CRISPR/Cas9
Create reporter lines for visualizing VCP dynamics in vivo
Introduce patient-derived mutations to develop disease models
Organoid Systems:
Develop Xenopus organoid cultures to study tissue-specific VCP functions
Examine VCP's role in developmental processes in controlled 3D environments
Test therapeutic approaches in disease-relevant contexts
Integrative Multi-Omics:
Combine proteomics, metabolomics, and transcriptomics to build comprehensive models of VCP's impact on cellular networks
Apply systems biology approaches to predict emergent functions and regulatory mechanisms
Comparative studies between Xenopus and mammalian VCP can guide therapeutic strategies:
Conserved Functional Domains:
Identifying universally conserved residues/domains helps target core functions
Shared mechanisms between species likely represent essential processes that must be preserved in therapeutic targeting
Species-Specific Regulatory Mechanisms:
Differences in regulation may reveal alternative pathways for modulating VCP activity
Species-specific interactors could suggest accessory targets for therapeutic intervention
Differential Susceptibility to Inhibitors:
Comparative pharmacology across species helps predict off-target effects
Xenopus VCP responses to inhibitors can serve as a reference for evaluating specificity
Developmental Context Insights:
Xenopus's accessible developmental stages allow studies of VCP's changing roles throughout development
Understanding developmental regulation may suggest stage-specific therapeutic approaches for VCP-related diseases
Xenopus's remarkable regenerative abilities make it an excellent model for studying VCP in regeneration:
Regeneration Models:
Experimental Approaches:
Localized VCP inhibition in regenerating tissues using small molecule inhibitors or dominant-negative constructs
Spatio-temporal expression analysis during regeneration phases
Proteomics to identify regeneration-specific VCP substrates and interactors
Potential Mechanisms:
VCP may facilitate clearance of damaged proteins following injury
Potential roles in stem cell proliferation regulation
Involvement in tissue remodeling through regulation of ECM protein turnover
Research Protocol Design:
Stage 40-42 tadpoles can be subjected to partial tail amputation
VCP activity can be modulated through heat-shock inducible transgenes or pharmaceutical inhibitors
Regeneration outcomes can be quantified through morphological measurements and molecular markers of blastemal formation and differentiation
These investigations could reveal novel therapeutic targets for enhancing tissue regeneration in mammals based on mechanisms conserved from amphibians.