Recombinant Xylella fastidiosa Methionine import ATP-binding protein MetN (metN)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference during order placement for customized preparation.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchase method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires prior arrangement and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to collect the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50% and can serve as a reference.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors, including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized forms have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquot for multiple uses to prevent repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing.
The tag type is determined during the production process. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
metN; PD_1804Methionine import ATP-binding protein MetN; EC 7.4.2.11
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-335
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Xylella fastidiosa (strain Temecula1 / ATCC 700964)
Target Names
metN
Target Protein Sequence
MIQFKDSYKH YGANGREVTA LQPLNLEIRA GEVFGIIGHS GAGKSTMLRM INRLEEPSGG HLLINGQDIT VLDRMGLRAL RRQIGMIFQH FNLLSSYTVA GNVAFPLKLT GASDAKINAR VAELLAWVGL EAHANTYPAQ LSGGQKQRVG IARALATRPQ ILLCDEVTSA LDPQTTSTVL QLLARINREL GLTIVLITHE MDVIRRICDR VAVLDTGRLV EIGLVTDVFL HPQHPTTRSF VMETEHIDTS ALDQDFALVK GRIVRLTFIG TDTYLPLLGR VARETGVDYN ILSGRIDRIK ETPYGQLTVA LSGGDPVAAQ AAFAAAGIHI EELRA
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
MetN is a component of the MetNIQ ABC transporter complex, responsible for methionine import. It plays a critical role in energy coupling to the transport system.
Database Links

KEGG: xft:PD_1804

Protein Families
ABC transporter superfamily, Methionine importer (TC 3.A.1.24) family
Subcellular Location
Cell inner membrane; Peripheral membrane protein.

Q&A

What is the primary function of Methionine import ATP-binding protein MetN in Xylella fastidiosa?

MetN functions as the ATP-binding component of the methionine ABC transporter complex in Xylella fastidiosa. This protein plays a critical role in bacterial metabolism by hydrolyzing ATP to provide energy for active transport of methionine across the cell membrane. The protein contains highly conserved Walker A and Walker B motifs characteristic of ABC transporters, which are essential for nucleotide binding and subsequent ATP hydrolysis. In the context of Xylella fastidiosa's lifestyle as a plant pathogen, MetN's function in methionine uptake is particularly important since methionine availability can significantly impact bacterial growth and virulence. Research approaches to studying this function typically involve gene knockout studies, complementation assays, and comparative genomics between different strains to assess functional conservation.

What approaches should be used for optimizing MetN gene expression analysis in Xylella fastidiosa?

When analyzing MetN gene expression in Xylella fastidiosa, researchers should implement a comprehensive experimental design that accounts for the specific challenges of working with bacterial RNA. Begin with careful sample handling and preparation, as RNA degrades easily and poor sample processing can significantly impact results . Implement a robust reverse transcription strategy, as differences in reverse transcriptase enzymes and RNA template quality can introduce bias .

For qPCR analysis, design primers that target specific regions of the metN gene, avoiding areas with SNPs or secondary structures that could interfere with primer annealing . Consult databases like Ensembl to understand transcript variants and exon organization data to design optimal assays . Always include multiple biological replicates (different bacterial cultures) to account for biological variability, as analyzing one sample once can indicate a certain process is occurring but doesn't show reliable trends .

The choice of reference genes is particularly crucial - avoid using traditional reference genes like GAPDH without validation, as expression levels of reference genes can vary considerably under different experimental conditions . Instead, evaluate multiple reference genes for stability in your specific experimental context.

How does genetic diversity among Xylella fastidiosa strains affect MetN protein sequence and function?

Genetic diversity among Xylella fastidiosa strains can significantly impact the MetN protein sequence and function. Based on genomic analyses, Xylella fastidiosa demonstrates considerable genetic diversity across its subspecies and isolates . This diversity likely extends to the metN gene, potentially resulting in amino acid substitutions that may affect protein structure, ATP-binding efficiency, and ultimately transporter function.

When studying MetN across different strains, researchers should be aware that sequence variations may occur in critical functional domains. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) can affect primer and probe annealing during experimental analysis, polymerase extension efficiency, and possibly target specificity . Therefore, when designing experiments to study MetN across strains, it's essential to account for these variations by carefully evaluating SNP positioning and ensuring primer specificity.

The impact of these variations may manifest as differences in methionine uptake efficiency, which could influence bacterial fitness and potentially pathogenicity in different plant hosts. To properly assess these functional differences, comparative biochemical analyses of purified MetN variants are necessary, coupled with growth assays under methionine-limited conditions.

What are the critical quality control considerations for MetN gene expression studies in Xylella fastidiosa?

When conducting MetN gene expression studies in Xylella fastidiosa, several critical quality control measures must be implemented to ensure valid and reproducible results. First, RNA quality assessment is paramount—degraded RNA will yield unreliable expression data . Implement rigorous RNA extraction protocols designed for bacteria, followed by quality assessment using RNA integrity metrics.

Second, complete removal of genomic DNA contamination from RNA samples is essential for accurate cDNA quantification . This requires thorough DNase treatment followed by verification of DNA absence through control reactions without reverse transcriptase.

Third, proper reference gene selection is crucial. Historical reference genes like GAPDH and ACTB have been shown to vary considerably under different experimental conditions . Instead, evaluate multiple potential reference genes for expression stability specifically in Xylella fastidiosa under your experimental conditions.

Fourth, include appropriate controls in every experiment: no-template controls to detect contamination, positive controls with known expression patterns, and inter-run calibrators if performing multiple qPCR runs . For amplification efficiency, develop standard curves using serial dilutions of cDNA or plasmid standards containing the target sequence.

Finally, follow the MIQE guidelines (Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments) to ensure your experiment meets minimum quality standards and can be reproduced by other laboratories . These guidelines provide a framework for quality assurance throughout the workflow, from sample preparation to data analysis.

What strategies are recommended for optimizing recombinant MetN protein expression systems?

When optimizing recombinant MetN protein expression from Xylella fastidiosa, researchers should consider a multilayered approach addressing both host selection and expression conditions. Begin by evaluating multiple expression systems: while E. coli is the most common, alternative hosts like Pseudomonas species might provide a more compatible cellular environment for a plant pathogen protein.

Expression vector design is critical—consider using vectors with tightly regulated promoters to control expression levels, as membrane-associated proteins like MetN can be toxic when overexpressed . Incorporate affinity tags that minimally impact protein folding and function, preferably at the C-terminus to avoid interfering with potential N-terminal signal sequences.

Optimizing codon usage for the expression host is essential, particularly for AT-rich Xylella fastidiosa genes expressed in GC-biased hosts like E. coli. To enhance solubility, consider fusion partners such as MBP (maltose-binding protein) or SUMO that can improve folding of challenging proteins.

For expression conditions, a factorial experimental design should systematically evaluate temperature (typically lower temperatures improve folding), inducer concentration, and expression duration . Supplementing the growth medium with additional ATP or methionine may help stabilize the protein during expression.

During purification, implement a two-step chromatography approach with appropriate detergents if the protein associates with membranes. Quality assessment should include size-exclusion chromatography to verify proper oligomeric state and functional assays measuring ATP binding and hydrolysis to confirm activity.

How can researchers effectively analyze contradictions in experimental data regarding MetN function?

When faced with contradictory results in MetN function studies, researchers should apply a systematic approach to identify the source of discrepancies. Begin by recognizing that contradictions, as conceptualized in activity theory, represent "historically accumulating structural tensions within and between activity systems" . In scientific research, these contradictions can emerge from variations in experimental conditions, genetic backgrounds, or methodological differences.

First, categorize the contradictions according to Engeström's framework: primary contradictions (within components like inconsistent protein purification), secondary contradictions (between components like gene sequence and expression levels), tertiary contradictions (between different research objectives), and quaternary contradictions (between your research and related fields) .

Methodologically, implement the following steps:

  • Perform a detailed comparison of experimental conditions across studies, particularly focusing on strain differences, growth conditions, and environmental factors.

  • Assess the impact of experimental design variations, as even small differences in protocols can significantly affect results . For instance, if one study used qPCR while another used RNA-seq for expression analysis, reconcile the methodological differences.

  • Consider biological variability by examining sufficient biological replicates to establish statistical significance . Lack of replicates is a common source of apparent contradictions.

  • Evaluate the reference genes used for normalization, as unstable reference genes can lead to substantial differences in results .

  • When appropriate, design critical experiments that directly test competing hypotheses, incorporating controls that can distinguish between alternative explanations.

By systematically analyzing contradictions rather than dismissing them, researchers can often uncover important biological insights about MetN function that might otherwise remain hidden.

What bioinformatic approaches are most effective for comparative analysis of MetN across Xylella fastidiosa strains?

For comparative analysis of MetN across Xylella fastidiosa strains, researchers should implement a multi-layered bioinformatic pipeline that integrates sequence analysis with structural and functional predictions. Begin with comprehensive sequence alignment of metN genes and proteins from diverse strains, particularly leveraging the 72-genome dataset mentioned in the literature as the largest assembled dataset for this bacterial species .

For sequence analysis, employ both nucleotide and amino acid alignments to identify conservation patterns and potential subspecies-specific variations. When examining coding sequences, analyze synonymous versus non-synonymous substitution rates (dN/dS) to detect signatures of selection pressure on MetN. For protein sequences, focus particularly on the ATP-binding motifs (Walker A and Walker B) and substrate-binding regions to determine functional conservation.

Structure prediction should incorporate homology modeling based on crystallized bacterial ABC transporters, with special attention to how strain-specific amino acid substitutions might affect ATP binding or protein-protein interactions within the transporter complex. Molecular dynamics simulations can further predict how these variations might impact protein flexibility and substrate transport efficiency.

For regulatory analysis, examine the upstream regions of metN across strains to identify conserved and variable regulatory elements that might explain expression differences. Additionally, implement coevolutionary analysis to identify proteins that show coordinated evolutionary patterns with MetN, potentially revealing functional partners within transport systems.

Finally, integrate these analyses with phenotypic data on methionine utilization and virulence across strains to establish correlations between sequence variations and functional outcomes. This comprehensive approach provides mechanistic insights into how genomic diversity influences MetN function across the Xylella fastidiosa phylogenetic spectrum .

How should researchers design experiments to investigate MetN's role in Xylella fastidiosa pathogenicity and host adaptation?

Designing experiments to investigate MetN's role in Xylella fastidiosa pathogenicity requires a multifaceted approach that connects molecular function to ecological significance. Begin with genetic manipulation strategies, constructing both knockout mutants (ΔmetN) and complemented strains to establish causality. For precision, use markerless deletion techniques to avoid polar effects on adjacent genes.

Implementation of plant infection assays using both wild-type and ΔmetN strains across multiple host plants is essential for understanding host-specific effects. Design these experiments to measure key pathogenicity parameters: bacterial population dynamics within plant tissues, symptom development timelines, and systemic movement through the xylem. Importantly, include complementation with both native metN and variants from other strains to examine host-specificity mechanisms.

For molecular mechanistic insights, design methionine uptake assays comparing wild-type and mutant strains under conditions mimicking plant xylem sap. Combine these with transcriptomic and proteomic analyses to identify pathways affected by methionine limitation. When designing these experiments, carefully consider technical and biological replicates to account for variability .

To address potential contradictions between in vitro and in planta results, design experiments that bridge these contexts, such as growth in extracted xylem sap followed by targeted metabolomic analysis. Additionally, implement competition assays between wild-type and ΔmetN strains during plant colonization to quantify fitness effects under realistic conditions.

Throughout experimental design, anticipate tensions between different objectives (e.g., molecular detail versus ecological relevance) and explicitly address these by designing experiments that connect phenotypes across scales, from protein function to whole-organism interactions .

What are the most significant challenges and solutions in developing functional assays for recombinant MetN protein?

Developing functional assays for recombinant Xylella fastidiosa MetN protein presents several significant challenges requiring specialized solutions. The primary challenge lies in maintaining the native conformation and activity of this ATP-binding protein outside its natural membrane-associated complex. To address this, researchers should design assays that account for the protein's natural context by either co-expressing MetN with its transport complex partners or creating a simplified system that mimics the essential interactions.

ATP binding and hydrolysis assays represent the foundation of functional testing, but traditional assays may require optimization for MetN's specific biochemical properties. Implement fluorescent ATP analogs or radioisotope approaches to directly measure binding kinetics, and couple these with ATPase activity assays using malachite green phosphate detection or coupled enzyme systems to monitor ATP hydrolysis rates.

A significant methodological challenge involves establishing the connection between ATP hydrolysis and methionine transport. To address this, consider reconstituting the complete transport system in proteoliposomes with fluorescently labeled methionine to directly correlate ATP consumption with substrate movement. Alternative approaches include isothermal titration calorimetry to measure binding energetics of both ATP and methionine to the reconstituted complex.

Experiment design must address variability by including multiple technical replicates and appropriate controls . For instance, include ATP-binding deficient mutants (modifications in Walker A motif) as negative controls and comparative analyses with MetN proteins from related bacteria as reference points.

Finally, consider the impact of experimental conditions on protein stability and function. Systematically test buffer compositions, salt concentrations, pH levels, and the presence of stabilizing agents to identify conditions that maximize protein activity while maintaining physiological relevance. Through careful optimization of these parameters, researchers can develop robust assays that accurately reflect the native function of MetN in Xylella fastidiosa.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.