Recombinant Xylella fastidiosa UPF0350 protein PD_0354 (PD_0354) is a genetically engineered protein derived from the bacterium Xylella fastidiosa, a plant pathogen known for causing diseases such as Pierce's disease in grapevines and citrus variegated chlorosis . The UPF0350 protein is part of the uncharacterized protein family 0350, and its recombinant form is produced through biotechnological methods for research and potential applications.
| Host System | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| E. coli | High yield, cost-effective, fast production | Limited post-translational modifications |
| Yeast | High yield, fast production, some post-translational modifications | May not fully replicate mammalian modifications |
| Insect Cells | Provides complex post-translational modifications | Higher cost, slower production |
| Mammalian Cells | Offers most accurate post-translational modifications | Highest cost, slowest production |
Future studies should focus on characterizing the biological role of UPF0350 in X. fastidiosa and exploring its potential as a diagnostic marker or therapeutic target. Additionally, comparative analyses with other proteins from Xylella species could provide insights into the evolutionary conservation and functional diversity of these proteins across different strains and subspecies.
KEGG: xft:PD_0354
UPF0350 protein PD_0354 is a protein of unknown function (UPF) encoded by the PD_0354 gene in Xylella fastidiosa. As a gram-negative, xylem-limited plant pathogenic bacterium, X. fastidiosa causes economically important plant diseases including Pierce's disease in grapevines, citrus variegated chlorosis, and olive quick decline syndrome . The UPF0350 designation indicates that while the protein has been identified in genomic analyses, its specific biological function has not yet been characterized. Like many bacterial proteins, it may play roles in pathogenicity, cell-cell communication, or metabolic processes critical for X. fastidiosa's survival in plant hosts.
The recombinant UPF0350 protein PD_0354 can be expressed and purified from several host systems, each with distinct advantages:
| Expression System | Advantages | Yield | Processing Time | Post-translational Modifications |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E. coli | High yields, cost-effective, rapid | +++ | Short (2-3 days) | Limited |
| Yeast | Good yields, some eukaryotic PTMs | ++ | Medium (3-5 days) | Moderate |
| Insect cells (baculovirus) | Better folding, more PTMs | + | Longer (7-10 days) | Good |
| Mammalian cells | Most native-like folding and PTMs | + | Longest (10-14 days) | Excellent |
Xylella fastidiosa has been resolved into several subspecies that correlate with host specificity: X. fastidiosa subsp. fastidiosa (Pierce's disease in grapevine), X. fastidiosa subsp. multiplex (almond leaf scorch), X. fastidiosa subsp. pauca (citrus variegated chlorosis and olive quick decline), and X. fastidiosa subsp. sandyi (oleander leaf scorch) .
When studying a specific protein like PD_0354, researchers should consider:
Sequence conservation: Verify the degree of conservation of PD_0354 across subspecies
Strain selection: Choose the appropriate strain based on research objectives
Genomic context: Examine the genomic neighborhood of PD_0354 for potential functional relationships
Host-specific expression: Consider differential expression patterns in various hosts
Research has shown that intersubspecific homologous recombination occurs in X. fastidiosa and may contribute to host adaptation . Therefore, when studying PD_0354, researchers should determine which subspecies variant they are working with and how representative it is of the broader species.
When purifying recombinant PD_0354, consider the following methodological approach:
Expression optimization: Following the approach used in other X. fastidiosa protein studies, perform a factorial design experiment to optimize expression conditions. Key variables should include:
Purification protocol:
Initial capture: For His-tagged constructs, use immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC)
Intermediate purification: Ion exchange chromatography based on predicted pI
Polishing: Size exclusion chromatography for highest purity
Buffer optimization: Test multiple buffer conditions (pH 6.5-8.0) with various salt concentrations (100-500 mM NaCl)
Quality assessment:
SDS-PAGE for purity evaluation
Western blot for identity confirmation
Circular dichroism for secondary structure analysis
Dynamic light scattering for aggregation assessment
The experimental design methodology should follow the approach used for other X. fastidiosa proteins, where high levels (250 mg/L) of soluble functional protein have been achieved through systematic optimization .
Since PD_0354 is a protein of unknown function, verifying proper folding and functionality requires multiple complementary approaches:
Structural integrity assessments:
Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy to confirm secondary structure elements
Thermal shift assays to evaluate protein stability
Limited proteolysis to assess compact folding
Analytical ultracentrifugation to determine oligomeric state
Functional assays (based on predicted characteristics):
If predicted to be an outer membrane protein: Membrane association assays
If potentially involved in cell-cell aggregation: Assess impact on bacterial aggregation when added exogenously
If potentially secreted: Evaluate secretion in heterologous systems
Interaction partner identification:
Pull-down assays with X. fastidiosa lysates
Bacterial two-hybrid or yeast two-hybrid screening
Label-free interaction analysis using surface plasmon resonance or bio-layer interferometry
Similar approaches have been used with other X. fastidiosa proteins such as PD1063, which was found to be secreted in association with outer membrane vesicles and involved in cell-cell aggregation .
When designing gene constructs for optimal PD_0354 expression, several factors should be considered:
Signal sequence analysis:
Analyze the presence of signal peptides using SignalP 4.0
For prokaryotic expression, consider removing signal sequences if present
For eukaryotic expression, consider replacing with host-specific signals
Codon optimization:
Adapt codons to expression host preference (E. coli, yeast, etc.)
Avoid rare codons particularly at the N-terminus
Evaluate GC content for potential expression issues
Fusion tags selection:
N-terminal vs. C-terminal tag placement based on predicted structure
Tag options and considerations:
| Tag | Size | Advantages | Potential Issues |
|---|---|---|---|
| His6 | Small | Simple purification, minimal impact | May be buried, lower specificity |
| GST | Large | Enhanced solubility, sensitive detection | May affect folding, dimerizes |
| MBP | Large | Enhanced solubility, chaperone-like | Size may interfere with function |
| SUMO | Medium | Enhanced expression, removable | Requires specific protease |
Protease cleavage sites:
Include TEV or PreScission sites for tag removal
Ensure cleavage sites are accessible in the folded protein
Restriction site planning:
Avoid sites that occur within the gene
Include sites for subcloning into multiple vectors
Evidence from expression studies of X. fastidiosa proteins suggests that careful construct design with appropriate fusion partners can significantly impact final yield and functionality of the recombinant protein .
While the specific function of PD_0354 remains uncharacterized, researchers can investigate its potential role in pathogenicity through several approaches:
Comparative genomics analysis:
Analyze conservation across X. fastidiosa subspecies with different host specificities
Search for homologs in related plant pathogens
Evaluate genomic context for co-regulated genes
Expression profiling:
Mutant phenotype characterization:
Generate knockout or knockdown mutants
Assess impacts on:
Biofilm formation
Cell-cell aggregation
Xylem colonization efficiency
Virulence in different plant hosts
Protein localization studies:
Recent research has indicated that homologous recombination between different strains of X. fastidiosa can facilitate host shifts and lead to emergent diseases in new plant hosts . If PD_0354 is involved in host-pathogen interactions, sequence variations might correlate with host specificity patterns.
To investigate PD_0354's potential role in X. fastidiosa's adaptation to the xylem environment, consider these research approaches:
Environmental response profiling:
Test expression under xylem-mimicking conditions (low nutrients, plant extracts)
Evaluate impact of various xylem components on protein expression
Compare expression in different plant hosts with varying xylem compositions
Structure-function analysis:
Predict structural features consistent with xylem adaptation
Compare with other proteins known to function in xylem colonization
Identify potential binding sites for xylem components
Interaction studies:
Test binding to xylem components like cellulose, pectin, or xylem sap proteins
Evaluate potential role in adhesion to xylem surfaces
Investigate interactions with plant defense compounds
Stress response evaluation:
Assess protein expression under oxidative stress conditions
Test impact of plant defense molecules on protein function
Evaluate role in biofilm formation under stress conditions
Given that X. fastidiosa forms biofilms in the xylem vessels that play a key role in early colonization and pathogenicity , PD_0354 might contribute to this process if it has properties consistent with outer membrane proteins or secreted factors involved in bacterial attachment or biofilm matrix formation.
Transcriptomic approaches can provide valuable insights into PD_0354 function through:
Expression correlation networks:
Identify genes co-expressed with PD_0354 across various conditions
Construct regulatory networks to predict functional relationships
Compare expression patterns across different X. fastidiosa subspecies
Dual RNA-seq analysis:
Differential expression analysis:
Transcriptional response to environmental conditions:
Stress responses (oxidative, nutrient limitation, antimicrobial compounds)
Biofilm versus planktonic growth states
In vitro versus in planta conditions
Recent transcriptomic analysis of X. fastidiosa has revealed that bacteriocin-related genes are among the most abundantly transcribed genes both in vitro and in planta, suggesting their importance in bacterial competition and survival . Similar approaches could reveal whether PD_0354 shares expression patterns with known virulence factors or stress response elements.
To investigate the protein interaction network involving PD_0354, researchers should consider these methodological approaches:
Computational prediction:
Use structural modeling to predict potential interaction interfaces
Apply co-evolution analysis to identify potential interaction partners
Compare with known interaction networks of homologous proteins
Experimental interaction mapping:
Apply pull-down assays coupled with mass spectrometry
Use bacterial two-hybrid or yeast two-hybrid screening
Employ protein complementation assays in bacterial systems
Validation of interactions:
Confirm direct interactions using purified components
Validate in vivo using co-immunoprecipitation
Assess functional significance using mutagenesis of interaction interfaces
Network analysis:
Integrate with existing X. fastidiosa protein interaction data
Compare interaction patterns across subspecies
Identify hub proteins that may coordinate with PD_0354
Research on disease mutations in protein-protein interaction networks has demonstrated that disease-associated variants are significantly enriched in sequences encoding PPI interfaces . Similar principles could be applied to analyze PD_0354 sequence variations across X. fastidiosa strains to identify potentially functionally important interaction sites.
Addressing solubility challenges with recombinant PD_0354 requires a systematic approach:
Expression condition optimization:
Reduce induction temperature (16-25°C)
Lower inducer concentration (0.05-0.1 mM IPTG)
Extend expression time at lower temperatures (16-24 hours)
Test various media formulations
Construct modification strategies:
Fusion with solubility enhancers (MBP, SUMO, Trx)
Domain truncation to remove hydrophobic regions
Site-directed mutagenesis of aggregation-prone residues
Codon optimization for balanced translation rate
Buffer optimization during purification:
Screen buffer compositions using a factorial approach:
| Buffer Component | Range to Test |
|---|---|
| pH | 6.0-8.5 |
| NaCl | 100-500 mM |
| Glycerol | 0-20% |
| Detergents | 0.05-0.1% non-ionic |
| Stabilizers | 1-5 mM reducing agents |
Co-expression strategies:
Co-express with molecular chaperones (GroEL/ES, DnaK/J)
Co-express with potential binding partners
Express in specialized E. coli strains (SHuffle, Origami)
These approaches have been successful for expressing other challenging X. fastidiosa proteins and could be adapted for PD_0354 . Systematic experimental design methodologies have allowed the development of optimized process conditions to attain high levels (250 mg/L) of soluble expression of functional recombinant proteins from bacterial sources.
If post-translational modifications (PTMs) are critical for PD_0354 function, consider these methodological approaches:
PTM prediction and identification:
Use bioinformatic tools to predict potential modification sites
Perform mass spectrometry analysis of native protein from X. fastidiosa
Compare PTM patterns across different growth conditions
Expression system selection based on required PTMs:
For phosphorylation: Use eukaryotic systems or E. coli with co-expressed kinases
For glycosylation: Consider yeast, insect, or mammalian expression systems
For disulfide bonds: Use specialized E. coli strains (SHuffle, Origami) or eukaryotic systems
In vitro modification strategies:
Enzymatic modification post-purification
Chemical mimetics of PTMs
Site-directed mutagenesis to mimic constitutive modification
Functional assessment with and without PTMs:
Compare activity of protein from different expression systems
Evaluate impact of PTM inhibitors on protein function
Create mutants that cannot be modified at specific sites
Studies of X. fastidiosa proteins have shown that some, like PD1063, undergo processing that results in a mature protein (19.2 kDa) that corresponds to the predicted size after leader sequence cleavage . Similar processing may be important for PD_0354 function and should be considered when designing expression constructs.
To establish structure-function relationships for PD_0354, employ these methodological approaches:
Structural characterization:
X-ray crystallography or cryo-EM for high-resolution structure
NMR for solution structure and dynamics
Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) for envelope determination
Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry for conformational dynamics
Structure-guided mutagenesis:
Alanine scanning of predicted functional regions
Conservative vs. non-conservative substitutions
Domain swapping with homologous proteins
Creation of chimeric proteins to map functional domains
Functional assays correlated with structural features:
Binding assays for potential ligands or interaction partners
Activity assays based on predicted function
Stability measurements following mutations
In vivo complementation of knockout mutants
Molecular dynamics simulations:
Predict conformational changes under different conditions
Model interactions with potential binding partners
Evaluate impact of mutations on protein dynamics
Identify allosteric communication networks
For proteins like PD_0354 with unknown function, structural studies can provide crucial insights. For example, PFAM analysis of X. fastidiosa PD1063 amino acid sequence predicted it to be an outer membrane protein classified as an outer membrane protein β-barrel domain based on structural similarity to E. coli OmpX . Similar structural classification of PD_0354 could provide initial functional hypotheses.
Investigating PD_0354's role in host specificity could follow these research directions:
Comparative analysis across subspecies:
Sequence comparison of PD_0354 across X. fastidiosa subspecies with different host ranges
Expression analysis in different subspecies when exposed to host plant extracts
Functional complementation studies across subspecies
Host response investigation:
Evaluate plant immune responses to purified PD_0354 from different subspecies
Determine if PD_0354 interacts with host plant factors
Assess if sequence variations correlate with virulence in different hosts
Recombination analysis:
Examine evidence for intersubspecific homologous recombination affecting the PD_0354 locus
Determine if recombination events correlate with host range expansion
Create chimeric PD_0354 proteins based on naturally occurring recombination patterns
Functional genomics approaches:
CRISPR-based editing to introduce subspecies-specific PD_0354 variants
Transcriptome analysis of host responses to different PD_0354 variants
Metatranscriptomics of natural infections to correlate PD_0354 expression with host specificity
Research has demonstrated that intersubspecific homologous recombination in X. fastidiosa strains can facilitate host shifts and lead to emergent diseases in new plant hosts . If PD_0354 plays a role in host-pathogen interactions, studying its evolution and variation across subspecies could provide insights into adaptation mechanisms.
Emerging technologies that could advance PD_0354 research include:
Advanced structural biology techniques:
Cryo-electron microscopy for membrane-associated states
Integrative structural biology combining multiple techniques
Computational structure prediction using AlphaFold or RoseTTAFold
Time-resolved structural studies to capture conformational dynamics
High-throughput functional screening:
Systems biology integration:
Multi-omics data integration (genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics)
Network analysis to position PD_0354 in cellular pathways
Machine learning approaches to predict functional interactions
Genome-scale metabolic modeling to predict metabolic roles
Advanced in planta techniques:
CRISPR-based in planta bacterial tracking
Single-cell transcriptomics of infected plant tissues
Spatial transcriptomics to localize bacterial gene expression in plant tissues
Optical techniques for real-time monitoring of protein localization in planta
The massively parallel approach for designing, manufacturing, and screening proteins described by Silva et al. could be adapted to systematically probe PD_0354 function through directed evolution or domain swapping experiments.
Research on PD_0354 could inform disease control strategies through these approaches:
Target validation studies:
Determine if PD_0354 is essential for virulence or fitness
Evaluate conservation across strains to assess potential for broad-spectrum targeting
Identify specific functions that could be disrupted for disease control
Intervention development:
Design of antibodies or nanobodies targeting surface-exposed regions
Development of small molecule inhibitors if enzymatic activity is identified
Creation of peptide mimetics to disrupt protein-protein interactions
Design of aptamers targeting functional domains
Diagnostic applications:
Resistance engineering:
Expression of inhibitory molecules in transgenic plants
CRISPR-based approaches to modify susceptibility factors that interact with PD_0354
Design of decoy molecules to be expressed in plants