KEGG: yen:YE1335
STRING: 393305.YE1335
YE1335 refers to a UPF0208 membrane protein found in Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:8/biotype 1B. It is classified as a membrane protein with 151 amino acids in its full-length form . Yersinia enterocolitica is a facultative anaerobic gram-negative rod belonging to the Enterobacteriaceae family, closely related to Yersinia pestis (the causative agent of bubonic plague) . The bacterium is motile with flagella and can survive at refrigerator temperatures, making it a significant foodborne pathogen . In terms of classification, YE1335 has been annotated as a hypothetical protein or a DUF412 domain-containing protein, suggesting its function may not be fully characterized .
Yersinia enterocolitica has significant relevance in both clinical and research contexts. This pathogen causes yersiniosis, a gastrointestinal illness that can mimic appendicitis due to its ability to cause mesenteric lymphadenitis and mucosal ulceration of the terminal ileum . The bacterium primarily spreads through contaminated food (especially pork products, poultry, and seafood) and water sources . What makes this organism particularly interesting for research is its pathogenic mechanism – it binds to and invades intestinal epithelial cells, potentially spreading to regional lymph nodes and occasionally causing bacteremia and sepsis . Additionally, it produces an enterotoxin similar to E. coli heat-stable enterotoxin (ST), which contributes to diarrhea symptoms . The organism's ability to grow at refrigeration temperatures and its prolonged shedding in stool (up to 3-4 months after symptom resolution) make it an important subject for food safety and public health research .
While the search results provide limited specific information on YE1335's function, we can analyze its structural characteristics from the available data. YE1335 is a 151-amino acid membrane protein with the following sequence:
MTTKPSDSVSWFQVLQRGQHYMKTWPADKRLAPVFPENRVATATRFGIRFMPPLAIFTLTWQIALGGQLGPAIATALFACGLPLQGLWWLGKRAITPLPPTLLQWFHEVRNKLAEAGQAVAPVEQTPTYQSLADVLKRAFKQLDKTFLDDL
As a UPF0208 family protein, it belongs to a class of proteins with uncharacterized function. The "DUF412 domain-containing protein" annotation suggests it contains a Domain of Unknown Function 412 . Its classification as a membrane protein indicates it is embedded within or associated with cellular membranes, potentially playing a role in membrane integrity, transport, signaling, or other membrane-associated processes. Research on similar bacterial membrane proteins might focus on their roles in virulence, antibiotic resistance, or bacterial physiology.
Several recombinant forms of YE1335 are available for research purposes, differing in expression systems, tags, and coverage of the amino acid sequence:
This diversity of expression systems allows researchers to select the most appropriate form based on their experimental requirements, such as the need for specific post-translational modifications or protein folding conditions.
When choosing an expression system, researchers should consider:
E. coli expression: Advantages include high yield, rapid growth, and cost-effectiveness. This system is particularly suitable for proteins that don't require complex post-translational modifications. The successful expression of full-length YE1335 in E. coli suggests that this membrane protein can be properly produced in this system .
Yeast expression: Provides some eukaryotic post-translational modifications and may offer better folding for certain membrane proteins. This could be beneficial if the bacterial E. coli system produces insoluble or misfolded YE1335.
Baculovirus/insect cell expression: Offers more complex eukaryotic modifications and can be excellent for membrane proteins that are difficult to express in other systems.
Mammalian cell expression: Provides the most complex eukaryotic modifications but at higher cost and lower yield. Consider this system if studying YE1335 interactions with mammalian proteins.
Cell-free expression: Avoids potential toxicity issues and allows for rapid production, which might be advantageous when working with a bacterial membrane protein like YE1335 .
The optimal choice depends on your specific research goals, required protein modifications, downstream applications, and resources.
While the search results don't provide detailed purification protocols specific to YE1335, we can infer appropriate methods based on the available recombinant forms. For the His-tagged version of YE1335 , immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) would be the primary purification method:
Recommended Purification Protocol for His-tagged YE1335:
Cell Lysis: For E. coli-expressed YE1335, use either sonication, French press, or detergent-based lysis. Since YE1335 is a membrane protein, include appropriate detergents (e.g., n-dodecyl β-D-maltoside (DDM), CHAPS, or Triton X-100) to solubilize the protein from membranes.
IMAC Purification:
Equilibrate Ni-NTA or other metal affinity resin with binding buffer containing detergent
Apply clarified lysate to the column
Wash with increasing imidazole concentrations to remove non-specific binding
Elute His-tagged YE1335 with high imidazole concentration (typically 250-300 mM)
Secondary Purification:
Consider size exclusion chromatography (SEC) to remove aggregates and further purify the protein
Ion exchange chromatography may provide additional purification if needed
Quality Control:
For non-His-tagged versions or alternative expression systems, different purification strategies would need to be employed based on the specific tags or properties of the recombinant protein.
Based on the information provided for commercially available recombinant YE1335, the following storage and handling recommendations should be followed to maintain protein stability and activity:
Storage Temperature:
Physical Form:
Buffer Conditions:
Handling Precautions:
Working with the Protein:
Thaw aliquots on ice or at 4°C
As a membrane protein, YE1335 may require detergents to maintain solubility in aqueous solutions
Following these guidelines will help ensure that the recombinant YE1335 maintains its structural integrity and functional properties for your experiments.
While the specific function of YE1335 remains uncharacterized, researchers can employ several approaches to investigate its potential roles:
Membrane Localization Studies:
Use fluorescently-tagged YE1335 to visualize its cellular localization
Employ subcellular fractionation followed by Western blotting to confirm membrane association
Investigate potential lipid raft associations using detergent-resistant membrane isolation
Protein-Protein Interaction Studies:
Structural Analysis:
Conduct circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy to assess secondary structure elements
For high-resolution structure, consider X-ray crystallography or cryo-electron microscopy, though membrane proteins present challenges for these techniques
NMR studies on isotopically labeled YE1335 could provide structural insights
Functional Assays:
Generate YE1335 knockout or knockdown in Yersinia enterocolitica to assess phenotypic changes
Complement with recombinant YE1335 to confirm specificity of observed effects
Investigate potential roles in membrane integrity, transport, or virulence
Transcriptional Analysis:
Examine expression patterns of YE1335 under different growth conditions
Identify potential co-regulated genes to infer function
When designing these experiments, researchers should consider the membrane protein nature of YE1335, which may require specialized approaches compared to soluble proteins.
When investigating YE1335's potential role in Yersinia enterocolitica virulence, researchers should consider:
Pathogenesis Mechanisms: Yersinia enterocolitica causes disease through two primary mechanisms - systemic invasion (binding to and invading intestinal epithelial cells) and enterotoxin production . Design experiments to determine if YE1335 contributes to either pathway.
Growth Conditions: Y. enterocolitica can grow at refrigeration temperatures , so assess YE1335 expression at different temperatures to understand its potential role in cold adaptation, which contributes to foodborne transmission.
Cell Infection Models:
Use intestinal epithelial cell lines to study potential roles in adhesion and invasion
Develop assays measuring bacterial translocation across epithelial monolayers
Consider macrophage infection models to assess roles in intracellular survival
Animal Models:
Mouse models can recapitulate aspects of Y. enterocolitica infection
Compare wild-type to YE1335 mutant strains for colonization, dissemination to lymph nodes, and disease severity
Relevant Conditions to Test:
pH variation (to mimic gastric passage)
Bile salt exposure (intestinal conditions)
Iron limitation (host environment)
Temperature shifts (environmental to host temperature)
Potential Virulence Connections:
Assess contribution to membrane integrity under stress conditions
Investigate roles in antibiotic resistance or efflux
Examine potential interactions with known virulence factors
| Research Approach | Methodology | Expected Outcome | Control Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gene knockout studies | CRISPR or homologous recombination to delete YE1335 | Virulence phenotype changes | Complementation with functional YE1335 |
| Protein localization | Immunofluorescence or GFP fusion | Membrane distribution pattern | Comparison with other membrane proteins |
| Host cell interaction | Cell infection assays with YE1335 mutants | Changes in invasion or intracellular survival | Comparison with wildtype bacteria |
| Expression analysis | qRT-PCR under virulence-inducing conditions | Correlation with virulence gene expression | Housekeeping gene normalization |
When encountering contradictory data in research involving YE1335 or any other protein, a systematic approach is necessary to resolve the inconsistencies:
Thorough Data Examination:
Evaluate Experimental Design:
Consider whether the contradiction might stem from differences in:
Consider Alternative Explanations:
Different folding or post-translational modifications across expression systems
Potential contamination with bacterial proteins
Detergent effects on membrane protein structure/function
Batch-to-batch variability in protein preparation
Refine Variables and Controls:
Modification of Protocols:
Collaborative Verification:
Seek independent verification from collaborators using different techniques
Consider cross-laboratory validation of key findings
Remember that contradictory data often leads to new insights and can advance understanding of complex biological systems, especially for proteins like YE1335 whose functions remain largely uncharacterized.
Studying interactions involving membrane proteins like YE1335 requires specialized analytical approaches:
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) with Membrane-Specific Adaptations:
Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR):
Immobilize purified YE1335 on sensor chips with lipid nanodiscs
Measure real-time binding kinetics with potential partner proteins
Determine association/dissociation constants (ka, kd, KD)
Microscale Thermophoresis (MST):
Label YE1335 with fluorescent dyes
Measure thermophoretic movement in response to potential binding partners
Particularly useful for membrane proteins as it works in solution with detergents
Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET):
Create fluorescently labeled YE1335 constructs
Measure energy transfer to acceptor-labeled potential interaction partners
Can be performed in cellular contexts to verify physiologically relevant interactions
Biolayer Interferometry:
Native Mass Spectrometry:
Analyze intact protein complexes including membrane proteins in native-like states
Requires specialized detergents or nanodiscs for membrane protein analysis
Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC) Adaptations:
Measures thermodynamic parameters of binding
Requires careful background subtraction due to detergent effects
| Analytical Method | Advantages | Limitations | Data Analysis Approach |
|---|---|---|---|
| Co-IP with Western blot | Identifies specific interactions | Qualitative rather than quantitative | Band intensity comparison |
| SPR | Real-time kinetics, label-free | Surface immobilization may affect function | Binding curve fitting |
| MST | Works in solution, minimal sample | Requires fluorescent labeling | KD determination from binding curves |
| FRET | Can detect interactions in cells | Distance dependent, requires labeling | FRET efficiency calculation |
| Native MS | Identifies complex components | Specialized equipment needed | Mass shift analysis |
When analyzing data from these methods, account for the unique challenges of membrane proteins, including detergent effects, proper control experiments, and potential oligomerization states.
When working with recombinant YE1335 and encountering unexpected results, a systematic troubleshooting approach is essential:
Protein Quality Assessment:
Verify protein integrity by SDS-PAGE (should show >90% purity for research-grade material)
Check for degradation using Western blot with anti-His antibodies
Assess aggregation state using size exclusion chromatography or dynamic light scattering
Verify protein folding using circular dichroism or limited proteolysis
Storage and Handling Issues:
Ensure proper storage conditions were maintained (-20°C/-80°C)
Verify the protein wasn't subjected to repeated freeze-thaw cycles
Check if reconstitution was performed according to recommendations (0.1-1.0 mg/mL in deionized sterile water)
Confirm appropriate glycerol concentration for long-term storage (recommended 50%)
Buffer and Reaction Conditions:
Expression System Considerations:
Assay-Specific Troubleshooting:
Include positive and negative controls specific to your assay
Vary protein concentration to identify optimal working range
Consider time-course experiments to capture transient effects
Test for interfering substances in your experimental system
Documentation and Controls:
Maintain detailed records of protein lot numbers and preparation methods
Use multiple approaches to validate unexpected findings
Consider blinding experiments to eliminate unconscious bias
When facing contradictory data, remember that unexpected results often lead to new discoveries, particularly with proteins of unknown function like YE1335 .
The appropriate statistical methods for analyzing YE1335 experimental data depend on the type of experiment and data collected. Here are recommended approaches for different experimental scenarios:
Comparative Studies (e.g., wildtype vs. YE1335 mutant):
For normally distributed data: t-tests (paired or unpaired) or ANOVA (for multiple conditions)
For non-normally distributed data: Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test
Effect size calculations (Cohen's d) to determine biological significance beyond statistical significance
Dose-Response Experiments:
Nonlinear regression to fit appropriate models (e.g., sigmoidal dose-response)
Calculation of EC50/IC50 values with confidence intervals
Comparison of curve parameters across experimental conditions
Time-Course Experiments:
Repeated measures ANOVA or mixed-effects models
Area under the curve (AUC) analysis
Curve fitting to appropriate kinetic models
Binding and Interaction Studies:
Regression analysis to determine binding constants (KD, Bmax)
Scatchard or Hill plot analysis for complex binding behaviors
Statistical comparison of binding parameters across conditions
Microscopy and Localization Studies:
Quantitative image analysis with appropriate controls
Colocalization statistics (Pearson's correlation coefficient, Manders' overlap coefficient)
Statistical analysis of distribution patterns
General Best Practices:
Determine appropriate sample sizes through power analysis
Apply corrections for multiple comparisons (e.g., Bonferroni, Holm-Sidak, or FDR)
Report effect sizes alongside p-values
Consider Bayesian approaches for complex datasets
Use bootstrapping or permutation tests for non-standard distributions
Handling Contradictory Data:
Meta-analytic approaches to synthesize conflicting results
Subgroup analysis to identify factors contributing to heterogeneity
Sensitivity analysis to assess robustness of findings
| Statistical Approach | Applicable Experiment Type | Key Assumptions | Reporting Requirements |
|---|---|---|---|
| ANOVA | Multiple condition comparisons | Normal distribution, homogeneity of variance | F-statistic, degrees of freedom, p-value, post-hoc test results |
| Nonlinear regression | Binding studies, dose-response | Appropriate model selection | Parameter estimates with CI, goodness-of-fit statistics |
| Survival analysis | Time-to-event data | Proportional hazards (for some models) | Hazard ratios with CI, log-rank test results |
| Mixed-effects models | Repeated measures with missing data | Proper covariance structure | Fixed and random effect estimates, model comparison statistics |
When analyzing data involving membrane proteins like YE1335, pay particular attention to the potential for aggregation, detergent effects, and expression system differences that might introduce variability into your results.
While the specific role of YE1335 in Y. enterocolitica pathogenesis is not explicitly described in the search results, we can formulate evidence-based hypotheses based on its membrane localization and the known pathogenesis mechanisms of the organism:
Potential Involvement in Cellular Invasion:
Y. enterocolitica binds to and invades intestinal epithelial cells
As a membrane protein, YE1335 could potentially mediate interactions with host cell receptors
It might form part of a membrane complex involved in adhesion or invasion processes
Research approaches could include comparing invasion efficiency between wildtype and YE1335 mutant strains
Possible Role in Environmental Adaptation:
Y. enterocolitica can grow at refrigerator temperatures , suggesting specialized membrane adaptations
YE1335 might contribute to membrane fluidity regulation under different temperature conditions
Expression analysis of YE1335 at different temperatures could provide insights into this potential role
Hypothetical Functions in Resistance Mechanisms:
Membrane proteins often participate in efflux systems or permeability barriers
YE1335 might contribute to survival in hostile host environments (e.g., acidic pH, antimicrobial peptides)
Susceptibility testing of YE1335 mutants to various stressors could reveal protective functions
Potential Contribution to Virulence Regulation:
Membrane proteins can function as sensors for environmental cues
YE1335 might participate in signaling pathways that regulate virulence gene expression
Transcriptional profiling of YE1335 mutants under infection-relevant conditions could identify regulatory roles
Possible Involvement in Enterotoxin Secretion:
These hypothetical functions would need to be tested experimentally, starting with the creation of YE1335 knockout strains and phenotypic characterization under various conditions relevant to pathogenesis.
Revealing the function of uncharacterized proteins like YE1335 requires innovative techniques that go beyond traditional approaches:
Cryo-Electron Microscopy (Cryo-EM):
Apply single-particle cryo-EM to determine the high-resolution structure of YE1335
Consider lipid nanodisc reconstitution to maintain a native-like membrane environment
Structural insights can provide functional clues through identification of potential binding sites or functional domains
AlphaFold2 and Computational Structure Prediction:
Use AI-based structure prediction to generate models of YE1335
Compare predicted structure to known membrane proteins to identify functional analogues
Molecular dynamics simulations can reveal dynamic properties and potential functional sites
CRISPR Interference (CRISPRi) and CRISPR Activation (CRISPRa):
Apply for fine-tuned modulation of YE1335 expression rather than complete knockout
Identify phenotypic effects of varying expression levels under different conditions
Combine with transcriptomic analysis to identify compensatory responses
Thermal Proteome Profiling (TPP):
Identify potential ligands or interaction partners through shifts in YE1335 thermal stability
Apply to whole cells to identify targets in their native environment
Can reveal unexpected functions through identification of stabilizing molecules
Proximity-Dependent Biotin Identification (BioID or TurboID):
Fuse biotin ligase to YE1335 to biotinylate proximal proteins in vivo
Identify the neighborhood of proteins surrounding YE1335 in the membrane
Provides context for potential functional roles in larger complexes
Lipidomics Analysis with YE1335 Variants:
Compare lipid profiles between wildtype and YE1335 mutant strains
Investigate potential roles in membrane lipid organization or metabolism
Apply to different growth conditions relevant to the Y. enterocolitica lifecycle
Single-Cell Techniques:
Apply single-cell RNA-seq to identify transcriptional heterogeneity in response to YE1335 modulation
Use single-cell microscopy with fluorescent reporters to track dynamic processes
Reveal population heterogeneity that might be masked in bulk assays
These advanced approaches can be combined in an integrative strategy to build converging evidence for YE1335 function, leading to a more comprehensive understanding of this uncharacterized protein's role in Yersinia enterocolitica.
The recombinant YE1335 protein could be leveraged in several innovative approaches to developing antimicrobial strategies:
Structural Vaccinology Approach:
Drug Target Validation:
Antibody-Based Therapeutics:
Generate monoclonal antibodies against recombinant YE1335
Evaluate their ability to neutralize bacterial virulence
Develop antibody-antibiotic conjugates for targeted delivery
Phage Display for Peptide Inhibitors:
Structure-Based Drug Design:
Adjuvant Development:
Diagnostic Development:
Use recombinant YE1335 to generate specific antibodies
Develop rapid diagnostic tests for Yersinia enterocolitica detection
Create multiplex assays distinguishing pathogenic serotypes like O:8
These approaches would require thorough validation of YE1335's role in pathogenesis, as the search results don't provide direct evidence for its function in virulence. The development process would need to consider differences between the recombinant protein expressed in E. coli versus its native form in Y. enterocolitica.