KEGG: ypg:YpAngola_A1654
YpAngola_A1654 is a UPF0266 membrane protein found in Yersinia pestis biovar Antiqua, specifically strain Angola. This protein belongs to the UPF0266 family of membrane proteins with currently uncharacterized function (UPF stands for Uncharacterized Protein Family). The protein is encoded in the genome of Y. pestis bv. Antiqua, which is one of the historically significant strains of the plague-causing bacterium .
Yersinia pestis is the causative agent of plague and is known to have caused three major pandemics throughout human history. The Antiqua biovar represents one of the ancestral lineages of this pathogen, which emerged through the evolutionary divergence from Y. pseudotuberculosis at least 2,000 years ago .
The recombinant forms of YpAngola_A1654 available for research are typically expressed in E. coli expression systems with affinity tags to facilitate purification. The most common form available is:
| Cat.# | Product name | Source (Host) | Species | Tag | Protein Length |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RFL486YF | Recombinant Full Length Yersinia Pestis Bv. Antiqua Upf0266 Membrane Protein Ypangola_A1654 (Ypangola_A1654) Protein | E.coli | Yersinia pestis bv. Antiqua | His | Full Length (1-153) |
The His-tagged version is particularly useful for purification using nickel affinity chromatography and for detection using anti-His antibodies in various experimental applications .
Optimizing the expression and purification of YpAngola_A1654 requires careful consideration of its membrane protein nature. Since membrane proteins are often challenging to express in soluble form, consider these methodological approaches:
Expression System Selection: While E. coli is commonly used, consider specialized strains designed for membrane protein expression such as C41(DE3) or C43(DE3). These strains are better at accommodating the potential toxicity of membrane protein overexpression .
Solubilization Strategies: After expression, membrane proteins require proper solubilization. Use mild detergents such as n-dodecyl-β-D-maltoside (DDM) or CHAPS for initial solubilization, and test different detergent concentrations to optimize protein extraction without denaturation.
Purification Optimization: For His-tagged YpAngola_A1654, use immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) with increasing imidazole concentrations to distinguish between full-length protein and truncated forms. A stepwise elution can help separate the full-length protein from contaminants .
Quality Control: Verify the integrity of the purified protein using SDS-PAGE, Western blotting, and mass spectrometry to confirm the full sequence and proper folding.
Remember that transmembrane proteins present unique challenges, and maintaining their native conformation requires careful attention to buffer conditions throughout the purification process .
Based on the available information, the optimal storage conditions for recombinant YpAngola_A1654 are:
Buffer Composition: The protein should be stored in a Tris-based buffer containing 50% glycerol, optimized specifically for this protein.
Storage Temperature: Store at -20°C for regular use, or at -80°C for extended storage to maintain stability.
Handling Recommendations: Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles as these can lead to protein degradation and loss of function. Instead, prepare working aliquots and store them at 4°C for up to one week.
Stability Considerations: As a membrane protein, YpAngola_A1654 may have specific stability requirements. Monitor the protein's integrity over time using analytical techniques like size-exclusion chromatography or dynamic light scattering .
Membrane Integration: The amino acid sequence suggests multiple transmembrane domains, indicating that it functions within the bacterial membrane architecture .
Potential Roles: As a membrane protein in a pathogenic bacterium, it may be involved in:
Cell membrane integrity maintenance
Transport of molecules across the membrane
Sensing environmental conditions
Potentially contributing to virulence mechanisms
Evolutionary Context: In the context of Yersinia evolution, membrane proteins can play crucial roles in adaptation to different environments. The Yersinia genus has evolved through ecological specialization and gene gain-and-loss events that led to different pathogenic capabilities .
Further functional characterization would require targeted studies including gene knockout experiments, localization studies, and interaction analyses to determine its precise biological role.
Designing experiments to characterize potential host-pathogen protein interactions involving YpAngola_A1654 requires a multi-faceted approach:
Yeast Two-Hybrid Screening:
Modified membrane yeast two-hybrid (MYTH) systems are particularly suitable for membrane proteins like YpAngola_A1654
Use the bacterial protein as bait against a human cDNA library to identify potential host interacting partners
Validate positive interactions with secondary assays
Co-Immunoprecipitation (Co-IP):
Express tagged versions of YpAngola_A1654 in a mammalian cell line
Use anti-tag antibodies to pull down the protein complex
Identify co-precipitated host proteins through mass spectrometry
Confirm specific interactions with Western blotting
Proximity Labeling Methods:
Fuse YpAngola_A1654 with enzymes like BioID or APEX2
These enzymes will biotinylate nearby proteins when activated
Purify biotinylated proteins and identify them by mass spectrometry
This approach is particularly valuable for transient or weak interactions
Infection Models with Mutant Bacteria:
While specific information about YpAngola_A1654's role in pathogenicity is limited, we can draw insights from our understanding of Yersinia infection mechanisms:
Potential Immunogenicity:
Comparison with Known Virulence Mechanisms:
Yersinia species are known to introduce virulence proteins like Yop51 into host cells
While YpAngola_A1654 is not specifically identified as a virulence factor, its membrane localization positions it at the interface between pathogen and host
It could potentially be involved in host cell adhesion, invasion, or modulation of host responses
Experimental Approach to Study Immune Recognition:
Express recombinant YpAngola_A1654 and assess its ability to stimulate immune cells
Develop an in vitro system to test whether YpAngola_A1654 epitopes are presented by MHC class I molecules, similar to experiments done with Yop51
Use proliferation assays with T-cells to determine if YpAngola_A1654 stimulates a cellular immune response
Determining the structure of membrane proteins like YpAngola_A1654 presents unique challenges that require specialized approaches:
X-ray Crystallography:
Purify large quantities of homogeneous protein in detergent micelles or lipidic cubic phases
Screen multiple crystallization conditions optimized for membrane proteins
Consider using antibody fragments (Fab or nanobodies) to stabilize the protein and facilitate crystal contacts
Analyze diffraction data to resolve the three-dimensional structure
Cryo-Electron Microscopy (Cryo-EM):
Particularly valuable for membrane proteins that resist crystallization
Prepare YpAngola_A1654 in nanodiscs or amphipols to mimic the membrane environment
Use direct electron detectors and advanced image processing to achieve high-resolution structures
Visualize the protein in different conformational states that may be relevant to its function
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Spectroscopy:
Suitable for smaller membrane proteins or domains (YpAngola_A1654 at 153 amino acids may be amenable)
Requires isotopic labeling (15N, 13C) of the recombinant protein
Provides dynamic information about protein movements in addition to structure
Can detect protein-ligand interactions in solution
Computational Prediction and Validation:
Studying the evolutionary significance of YpAngola_A1654 requires comparative genomic and functional approaches:
Phylogenetic Analysis:
Compare YpAngola_A1654 sequences across Yersinia species and strains
Determine whether the gene has undergone positive selection, suggesting functional importance
Identify conserved domains that may indicate critical functional regions
Map the presence/absence of the gene in relation to the evolutionary emergence of pathogenic Yersinia species
Comparative Genomic Context:
Analyze the genomic neighborhood of ypangola_a1654 across Yersinia species
Identify potential operons or gene clusters that may suggest functional relationships
Determine if the gene was acquired through horizontal gene transfer or ancient in the Yersinia lineage
Gene Gain-Loss Analysis:
In the context of Yersinia evolution, gene gain-and-loss events have been critical in the emergence of pathogenic species
Determine if YpAngola_A1654 was part of the core genome during ecological specialization
Assess whether the gene has undergone modifications that correlate with changes in ecological niche or host range
Functional Conservation Testing:
Test whether orthologs from different Yersinia species can complement mutants lacking YpAngola_A1654
Compare protein-protein interaction networks across species
Evaluate whether sequence variations correspond to functional differences
Developing an ELISA system for YpAngola_A1654 detection requires careful consideration of several factors:
Antibody Development:
Generate high-affinity antibodies against YpAngola_A1654 by immunizing animals with the recombinant protein
Consider developing antibodies against multiple epitopes to increase specificity
Test monoclonal antibodies for their ability to recognize native and denatured forms of the protein
Validate antibody specificity against closely related proteins from other Yersinia strains
ELISA Format Selection:
Sandwich ELISA: Use capture antibodies specific to one epitope and detection antibodies to another
Direct ELISA: Immobilize samples containing the protein directly on plates
Competitive ELISA: Particularly useful for samples containing potential interfering substances
Optimization Protocol:
Determine optimal coating buffer, blocking conditions, and antibody concentrations
Establish standard curves using purified recombinant YpAngola_A1654
Validate the assay by spiking known quantities of protein into negative samples
Test sensitivity and specificity using samples containing other Yersinia proteins
Application-Specific Considerations:
Working with membrane proteins like YpAngola_A1654 presents several challenges:
Low Expression Yields:
Problem: Membrane proteins often express poorly in standard systems
Solution: Optimize codon usage for the expression host, reduce expression temperature (16-20°C), and use specialized E. coli strains designed for membrane protein expression
Alternative: Consider cell-free expression systems that can directly incorporate the protein into liposomes or nanodiscs
Protein Aggregation:
Problem: Hydrophobic regions of membrane proteins tend to cause aggregation
Solution: Screen multiple detergents and lipid-like molecules (amphipols, nanodiscs) to identify optimal solubilization conditions
Approach: Use dynamic light scattering or size-exclusion chromatography to monitor protein aggregation state
Loss of Native Conformation:
Problem: Membrane proteins may lose their native structure when extracted from the membrane
Solution: Use mild detergents and consider adding lipids that mimic the native membrane environment
Validation: Develop functional assays to confirm that the purified protein retains its native activity
Difficult Purification:
Problem: Challenging to separate the protein of interest from other membrane components
Solution: Use a two-step purification approach combining affinity chromatography with size exclusion or ion exchange
Strategy: Increase imidazole concentration gradually during elution to distinguish full-length His-tagged protein from truncated products
Validating the structural integrity and functionality of purified YpAngola_A1654 requires multiple complementary approaches:
Biophysical Characterization:
Circular Dichroism (CD) Spectroscopy: Assess secondary structure content and thermal stability
Fluorescence Spectroscopy: Monitor tertiary structure through intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence
Dynamic Light Scattering: Confirm monodispersity and absence of aggregation
Size-Exclusion Chromatography: Verify the oligomeric state of the purified protein
Structural Validation:
Limited Proteolysis: Properly folded proteins show distinct digestion patterns
Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry: Map solvent-accessible regions
Cross-linking Studies: Identify spatial relationships between different protein regions
Functional Assays:
Membrane Incorporation: Test the ability of the purified protein to insert into model membranes
Liposome Binding Assays: Measure interaction with lipid bilayers
If specific function is unknown, develop surrogate assays based on predicted functions (e.g., binding to potential ligands, interactions with other proteins)
Comparative Analysis:
Several cutting-edge technologies hold promise for elucidating the function of YpAngola_A1654:
CRISPR-Cas9 Genome Editing:
Create precise knockouts or tagged versions of YpAngola_A1654 in Yersinia
Perform high-throughput phenotypic screens under various conditions
Introduce specific mutations to test structure-function hypotheses
Single-Cell Techniques:
Single-cell RNA-seq to examine host transcriptional responses to bacteria expressing or lacking YpAngola_A1654
Mass cytometry (CyTOF) to analyze protein expression and signaling at single-cell resolution
Live-cell imaging with fluorescently tagged YpAngola_A1654 to track localization during infection
Proteomics Approaches:
Thermal proteome profiling to identify proteins whose stability is affected by YpAngola_A1654
Secretome analysis to determine if YpAngola_A1654 influences protein secretion
Phosphoproteomics to identify signaling pathways affected by the protein
Structural Biology Innovations:
Research on YpAngola_A1654 has potential to contribute to our understanding of bacterial pathogenesis in several ways:
Evolutionary Insights:
Comparison across Yersinia species may reveal how membrane proteins contribute to adaptation to different ecological niches
Understanding whether YpAngola_A1654 was gained or lost during the evolution of pathogenic Yersinia could provide insights into essential virulence determinants
Analysis of selection pressure on the gene could indicate its importance in host adaptation
Novel Pathogenesis Mechanisms:
If YpAngola_A1654 is found to interact with host proteins, this could reveal new mechanisms of host manipulation
Investigation of its role in membrane integrity might uncover strategies used by bacteria to survive host defenses
Studying its expression regulation during infection could identify environmental cues important for virulence
Immune Recognition Pathways:
Research could determine whether YpAngola_A1654 generates epitopes recognized by the host immune system
This would contribute to our understanding of how bacterial membrane proteins are processed and presented to T cells
Findings could parallel discoveries about other Yersinia proteins that are recognized by the adaptive immune system
Therapeutic Implications:
If YpAngola_A1654 proves essential for Yersinia survival or virulence, it could represent a novel therapeutic target
Understanding its structure and function might facilitate the design of inhibitors or vaccines
Knowledge of its role in host-pathogen interactions could inform broader antimicrobial strategies