KEGG: ypb:YPTS_2190
The YPTS_2190 protein is known by several alternative names and identifiers:
Gene Name: YPTS_2190
Synonyms: yciB, Inner membrane-spanning protein YciB
UniProt ID: B2K3V5
Recommended Name: Probable intracellular septation protein A
These identifiers are essential for cross-referencing research data and accessing protein information in various databases .
For optimal preservation of protein activity, the following storage guidelines should be implemented:
Long-term storage: Store at -20°C/-80°C
Working aliquots: Maintain at 4°C for up to one week
Storage buffer: Tris/PBS-based buffer with 6% Trehalose, pH 8.0 (or Tris-based buffer with 50% glycerol)
Important precaution: Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles as this can significantly degrade protein quality
For reconstitution, briefly centrifuge the vial before opening to bring contents to the bottom. Reconstitute the protein in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. Adding glycerol to a final concentration of 5-50% (with 50% being standard) is recommended for aliquoting and long-term storage .
The membrane topology of YPTS_2190 is characterized by multiple transmembrane domains, as evidenced by its amino acid sequence motifs (MKQLLDFLPLVVFFIFYKMYDIFVASGALIVATLVALAFTW...). Analysis reveals hydrophobic regions consistent with membrane-spanning segments and charged residues that likely reside in cytoplasmic or periplasmic domains.
This topology is critical for its presumed role in septation, where it may participate in:
Membrane remodeling during cell division
Protein-protein interactions with other divisome components
Coordination of peptidoglycan synthesis with membrane invagination
Research examining this protein in relation to other bacterial septation models suggests its position in the inner membrane allows it to function as a bridging element between cytoskeletal division machinery and membrane reorganization events. This interaction network makes it a potential target for understanding basic bacterial cell division mechanisms .
Multiple complementary approaches should be employed to comprehensively map the protein-protein interactions of YPTS_2190:
Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC): This technique can identify direct protein interactions in their native cellular environment. Following the approach demonstrated with Atg11 and Ypt1 interactions, researchers can fuse YPTS_2190 and potential binding partners with split fluorescent protein fragments to visualize interactions in vivo .
Co-immunoprecipitation with His-tag leverage: The His-tagged recombinant YPTS_2190 enables efficient pull-down assays to identify binding partners. Following isolation of protein complexes, mass spectrometry analysis can identify unknown interactors.
Yeast two-hybrid screening: This can serve as an initial high-throughput approach to identify potential interactors from a genomic library.
Fluorescence co-localization studies: Using fluorescently tagged YPTS_2190 in conjunction with other labeled septal proteins would reveal spatial and temporal patterns of co-localization during the cell division cycle.
These approaches, particularly when combined, provide mechanistic insights into how YPTS_2190 participates in the bacterial cell division process .
A systematic approach to structure-function analysis should include:
Multiple sequence alignment: Generate comprehensive alignments of YPTS_2190 with homologs from diverse bacterial species to identify conserved domains and species-specific variations.
Evolutionary analysis: Construct phylogenetic trees to understand evolutionary relationships and functional divergence among homologs.
Domain swapping experiments: Create chimeric proteins by exchanging domains between YPTS_2190 and homologs to determine which regions confer species-specific functions.
Site-directed mutagenesis: Target highly conserved residues for mutation to assess their contribution to protein function.
Complementation studies: Express YPTS_2190 in strains lacking homologous proteins to evaluate functional conservation and divergence.
This integrated approach allows researchers to map functional domains to specific structural elements and understand how variations in protein architecture influence cellular processes across bacterial species .
Expression and Purification Protocol:
Expression System Selection:
Recommended host: E. coli (as successfully used in available recombinant forms)
Expression vector: containing N-terminal His-tag for purification
Culture conditions: Optimize temperature (typically 18-25°C post-induction) to enhance soluble protein yield
Protein Induction:
Grow culture to mid-log phase (OD600 = 0.6-0.8)
Induce with IPTG (0.1-1.0 mM)
Continue expression for 4-16 hours (optimize time for maximum yield)
Cell Lysis:
Harvest cells by centrifugation (5,000 × g, 10 min, 4°C)
Resuspend in lysis buffer containing appropriate protease inhibitors
Lyse cells using sonication or pressure-based methods
Purification:
Ni-NTA affinity chromatography using the N-terminal His-tag
Wash extensively to remove non-specific binding
Elute with imidazole gradient
Post-purification Processing:
Dialyze against Tris/PBS-based buffer with 6% Trehalose, pH 8.0
Concentrate to desired concentration
Flash-freeze aliquots for long-term storage
This protocol yields greater than 90% purity as determined by SDS-PAGE analysis .
A comprehensive experimental design should include:
Gene Knockout and Complementation:
Create YPTS_2190 deletion mutants
Observe phenotypic changes in cell division, morphology, and growth rate
Complement with wild-type and mutant variants to confirm phenotype specificity
Fluorescent Tagging for Localization:
Generate C- or N-terminal fluorescent protein fusions (carefully considering topology)
Perform time-lapse microscopy to track protein localization during cell division
Co-localize with known septation markers (FtsZ, FtsA)
Interaction Studies:
Apply BiFC assays as described in research on other septation proteins
Use pull-down assays with the His-tagged recombinant protein
Environmental Variables Testing:
Assess function under varying conditions (temperature, pH, osmotic stress)
Examine how environmental factors affect localization and interaction patterns
Data Collection and Analysis:
Record quantitative measurements of division timing, septum formation, and localization dynamics
Organize data in properly formatted tables following scientific reporting standards
This multifaceted approach provides both qualitative and quantitative insights into YPTS_2190 function .
Essential quality control procedures include:
Purity Assessment:
SDS-PAGE analysis (standard should exceed 90% purity)
Densitometry analysis of protein bands
Identity Verification:
Western blot using antibodies against the His-tag and/or YPTS_2190
Mass spectrometry to confirm protein identity and detect modifications
N-terminal sequencing of at least 10 amino acids
Folding Verification:
Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy to assess secondary structure
Limited proteolysis to evaluate structural integrity
Size exclusion chromatography to detect aggregation
Functional Testing:
Binding assays with known interaction partners
Activity assays if enzymatic function is established
Contamination Screening:
Endotoxin testing if intended for cellular assays
Nucleic acid contamination assessment
These quality control measures ensure experimental reproducibility and reliability of subsequent functional studies .
When incorporating YPTS_2190 into pathogenesis studies using multicellular models, researchers should:
Select Appropriate Models:
Multicellular tumor spheroids offer three-dimensional tissue architecture that mimics avascular regions
Infection models should incorporate both normoxic and hypoxic conditions to replicate in vivo environments
Develop Tagged Protein Variants:
Create fluorescently tagged YPTS_2190 constructs to track localization
Develop antibodies against YPTS_2190 for immunohistochemistry in tissue sections
Design Cellular Uptake Experiments:
Similar to evaluating doxorubicin delivery, assess how YPTS_2190 interacts with host cells using an individual-cell-based mathematical model
Track protein distribution through tissue layers to understand diffusion parameters
Measure Host Response:
Evaluate host cell transcriptional and proteomic responses to YPTS_2190 exposure
Assess cytokine production and inflammatory signaling pathways
Data Collection Framework:
Implement systematic data collection that captures both spatial and temporal dynamics
Utilize quantitative image analysis for protein distribution studies
This integrated approach draws on established methodologies for investigating bacterial protein interactions with host tissues while specifically addressing the unique properties of YPTS_2190 .
When analyzing experimental data related to YPTS_2190, researchers should employ the following statistical approaches:
For Localization Studies:
Pearson's correlation coefficient for co-localization analysis
Spatial distribution analysis using Ripley's K-function
Time-series analysis for dynamic localization studies
For Protein-Protein Interaction Data:
ANOVA with post-hoc tests for comparing multiple interaction partners
Non-parametric tests (Mann-Whitney U) when normality cannot be established
Multiple testing correction (FDR) for high-throughput interaction screens
For Functional Impact Studies:
Survival analysis techniques for assessing effects on bacterial viability
Mixed-effects models for experiments with nested design structures
Power analysis to determine appropriate sample sizes (minimum n=3 biological replicates)
For Imaging Data:
Proper background subtraction and normalization procedures
Automated object identification and tracking algorithms
Machine learning approaches for pattern recognition in complex datasets
Data Presentation:
Properly formatted data tables following scientific standards
Appropriate error representation (standard deviation vs. standard error)
Data tables for YPTS_2190 research should follow these guidelines for maximum clarity and scientific rigor:
Table Title and Structure:
Clear, descriptive title indicating the experimental purpose
Independent variables in the left column
Dependent variables in subsequent columns
Derived calculations (averages, ratios) in the rightmost columns
Example Table Structure:
| Environmental Condition | Membrane Localization (%) | Septum Localization (%) | Cytoplasmic Distribution (%) | Localization Ratio (Membrane/Septum) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH 5.5 | 45.2 ± 3.1 | 38.7 ± 2.8 | 16.1 ± 1.5 | 1.17 ± 0.12 |
| pH 7.0 | 28.3 ± 2.7 | 62.4 ± 4.2 | 9.3 ± 1.1 | 0.45 ± 0.06 |
| pH 8.5 | 51.8 ± 3.9 | 33.7 ± 2.5 | 14.5 ± 1.8 | 1.54 ± 0.18 |
Essential Elements:
Include units of measurement in column headers
Present mean values with appropriate error measurements (±SD or ±SEM)
Maintain consistent significant figures
Include sample size (n) in table footnotes or headers
Additional Considerations:
Use clear row and column dividers
Apply consistent formatting throughout
Include explanatory footnotes for abbreviations or statistical methods
Number tables sequentially and refer to them explicitly in text
Following these guidelines ensures that data is presented in a standardized format that facilitates interpretation and comparisons across studies .
When facing contradictory results in YPTS_2190 research, scientists should implement the following systematic approach:
Methodological Reconciliation Strategy:
Perform side-by-side comparison of contradictory protocols using identical biological materials
Systematically vary individual experimental parameters to identify sources of variation
Implement blinded analysis to minimize unconscious bias in data interpretation
Common Sources of Contradiction to Investigate:
Expression system differences (E. coli strain variations, induction conditions)
Tag position effects (N-terminal vs. C-terminal tags may differently affect function)
Buffer composition variations that may alter protein folding or activity
Cell growth phase differences affecting septation protein function
Antibody specificity issues in detection methods
Resolution Approach:
Create a standardized experimental pipeline with defined quality control checkpoints
Utilize multiple complementary techniques to verify each finding
Perform collaborative cross-laboratory validation studies
Document and share detailed protocols including "silent variables" often omitted from methods sections
Reporting Recommendations:
Explicitly acknowledge contradictions in the literature
Present both supporting and contradicting evidence
Provide specific hypotheses for observed differences
This systematic approach establishes a framework for reconciling contradictory findings while advancing understanding of YPTS_2190 function .
Several high-potential research directions emerge from current understanding of YPTS_2190:
Infection Dynamics Studies:
Investigate how YPTS_2190 influences Yersinia pseudotuberculosis invasion processes
Determine if YPTS_2190 functions independently or cooperatively with YadA, a major adhesin that promotes tight adhesion to mammalian cells
Examine potential competitive or synergistic interactions with invasin, the major invasive factor
Host-Pathogen Interface:
Explore whether YPTS_2190 participates in host membrane interaction similar to YadA's binding to extracellular matrix proteins
Determine if YPTS_2190 contributes to bacterial adhesion and invasion efficiency
Investigate potential roles in immune evasion mechanisms
Structural Biology Approaches:
Determine high-resolution crystal structure to identify functional domains
Map interaction interfaces with host and bacterial proteins
Develop structure-based inhibitor design targeting conserved functional motifs
Systems Biology Integration:
Map YPTS_2190 within the broader network of virulence factors
Identify regulatory mechanisms controlling its expression during infection
Develop mathematical models predicting infection dynamics based on YPTS_2190 expression levels
These research directions offer potential for significant advances in understanding how this membrane protein contributes to bacterial pathogenesis and could identify novel therapeutic targets .
Emerging technologies offer transformative approaches to studying YPTS_2190 function:
Advanced Imaging Applications:
Super-resolution microscopy (PALM/STORM) to visualize YPTS_2190 nanoscale organization within bacterial membranes
Cryo-electron tomography to observe YPTS_2190 in near-native environments
Single-molecule tracking to monitor dynamic behavior during septation events
FRET-based biosensors to detect conformational changes during protein activation
Computational Modeling Enhancements:
Molecular dynamics simulations to predict membrane protein behavior and interactions
Individual-cell-based mathematical models adapted from tumor spheroid research to simulate bacterial populations
Machine learning approaches to identify patterns in large-scale phenotypic screens
Network analysis to place YPTS_2190 within the context of bacterial protein interaction networks
Implementation Strategy:
Combine experimental data with computational predictions in iterative cycles
Develop quantitative metrics for model validation
Create standardized data formats to facilitate integration across platforms
Example Application:
Adapt the individual-cell-based mathematical model used for doxorubicin delivery to track YPTS_2190 distribution within bacterial populations
Incorporate variables for protein diffusion, membrane localization, and septation dynamics
Generate predictions for protein behavior under various environmental conditions
These technological applications provide unprecedented resolution and predictive power for understanding YPTS_2190 function in complex biological contexts .
To enhance reproducibility in YPTS_2190 research, the following standardized protocols are recommended:
Protein Production and Quality Control:
Standardized expression system (E. coli strain, vector, induction parameters)
Defined purification protocol with specific buffer compositions
Comprehensive quality control checklist including purity thresholds and functional verification
Functional Assays:
Validated localization protocols with controls for tag interference
Standardized interaction assays with positive and negative controls
Normalized reporting formats for quantitative measurements
Data Collection and Management:
Minimum dataset requirements for publication
Standardized data table formats following scientific guidelines
Required deposition of raw data in appropriate repositories
Methodological Transparency:
Detailed reporting of "silent variables" (laboratory temperature, plastic consumable brands)
Explicit description of randomization and blinding procedures
Comprehensive statistical analysis plans established before data collection
Strain and Reagent Verification:
Sequence verification of all constructs
Mycoplasma and contamination testing
Antibody validation requirements
Implementing these standardized protocols will significantly enhance data reliability and cross-laboratory reproducibility, accelerating progress in understanding YPTS_2190 function .
A multi-omics integration approach offers the most complete understanding of YPTS_2190:
Data Integration Framework:
Establish centralized databases for YPTS_2190-related data across methodologies
Develop common ontologies and metadata standards
Implement computational pipelines for cross-platform data analysis
Integration Methods:
Structure-function correlation through combined crystallography and mutagenesis
Network analysis linking genetic interactions with protein-protein interactions
Temporal integration mapping expression dynamics to functional outcomes
Spatial integration correlating subcellular localization with interaction partners
Workflow Example:
Begin with structural determination (X-ray crystallography or cryo-EM)
Map conserved domains through comparative genomics
Validate functional predictions through targeted mutagenesis
Place findings in cellular context through localization studies
Integrate with systems-level data on bacterial pathogenesis
Visualization and Analysis:
Develop interactive visualization tools for multi-dimensional data exploration
Implement machine learning approaches to identify patterns across datasets
Create mathematical models incorporating data from multiple experimental approaches
This integrated approach transforms disparate data points into cohesive models with greater explanatory and predictive power than any individual methodology could provide .
Researchers studying YPTS_2190 and similar virulence factors should adhere to the following ethical framework:
Biosafety Considerations:
Implement appropriate biosafety level protocols (BSL-2 minimum for Yersinia pseudotuberculosis)
Develop risk mitigation strategies for recombinant proteins with potential virulence functions
Ensure proper training and oversight for all laboratory personnel
Dual-Use Research Assessment:
Evaluate potential for misuse of research findings
Implement the "Do No Harm" principle in experimental design
Balance scientific transparency with security considerations
Collaborative Ethics:
Establish clear material transfer agreements for sharing strains and reagents
Define authorship and credit allocation in advance of multi-institution studies
Create frameworks for resolving disputes over intellectual property
Publication Responsibility:
Consider security implications of methodological details
Practice responsible communication of findings to public audiences
Ensure appropriate contextual framing to prevent misinterpretation
Environmental Impact:
Assess ecological risks of genetically modified organisms
Implement proper waste disposal procedures
Consider sustainability in research design