Recombinant Yersinia pseudotuberculosis serotype O:3 L-threonine 3-dehydrogenase (TDH) is a genetically engineered enzyme produced for research applications. This oxidoreductase catalyzes the NAD+-dependent conversion of L-threonine to 2-amino-3-ketobutyrate, a critical step in threonine degradation pathways. In Y. pseudotuberculosis, TDH is functional, unlike its human counterpart, which exists as a pseudogene . The recombinant form enables biochemical and immunological studies of bacterial metabolism and virulence mechanisms .
TDH facilitates the first step in L-threonine catabolism:
In Y. pseudotuberculosis, this pathway contributes to central carbon metabolism, potentially influencing bacterial adaptation to host environments . Unlike humans, where the TDH gene is nonfunctional , the bacterial enzyme supports metabolic flexibility, which may enhance survival during infection .
Recombinant TDH is utilized in:
Enzyme Activity Assays: Quantifying kinetic parameters (e.g., , ) under varying conditions.
Antibody Production: Generating polyclonal/monoclonal antibodies for pathogen detection .
Structural Studies: Analyzing substrate-binding pockets via X-ray crystallography or NMR.
Metabolic Profiling: Investigating threonine utilization in bacterial pathogenesis .
Metabolic Adaptation: Y. pseudotuberculosis reroutes central carbon fluxes during infection, with pyruvate-TCA cycle nodes acting as virulence control points . TDH-mediated threonine degradation may contribute to this metabolic plasticity.
Antibiotic Resistance: Enzymes in core metabolism (e.g., TCA cycle) support bacterial persistence under antibiotic stress . Targeting TDH could disrupt metabolic resilience.
Comparative Genomics: The tdh gene is conserved in Yersinia pathogens but absent in non-pathogenic species , highlighting its potential role in virulence.
Further studies could explore:
In Vivo Role: Knockout models to assess tdh’s contribution to Y. pseudotuberculosis virulence.
Drug Discovery: Screening inhibitors against TDH to impair bacterial metabolism.
Structural Dynamics: Resolving 3D structures to identify allosteric regulatory sites.
KEGG: ypy:YPK_4144
L-threonine 3-dehydrogenase (tdh) is a key enzyme in the threonine metabolic pathway that catalyzes the NAD+-dependent oxidation of L-threonine to 2-amino-3-ketobutyrate, which can be further converted to glycine and acetyl-CoA. In Yersinia pseudotuberculosis, particularly serotype O:3, this enzyme plays a critical role in amino acid metabolism and energy production. The metabolism of threonine provides essential precursors for bacterial growth and may contribute to survival within host environments .
Methodological approach: To characterize the basic properties of tdh, researchers typically employ spectrophotometric assays measuring NAD+ reduction at 340 nm to determine enzyme kinetics (Km, Vmax, substrate specificity). Complementary approaches include isothermal titration calorimetry for binding studies and site-directed mutagenesis to identify catalytic residues.
The tdh gene from Y. pseudotuberculosis serotype O:3 is typically amplified using PCR with primers designed based on the published genome sequence. The cloning strategy generally follows these steps:
PCR amplification of the tdh gene using high-fidelity polymerase
Restriction digestion of the amplified product and selected expression vector
Ligation and transformation into E. coli cloning strains
Sequence verification of positive clones
Transformation into expression hosts (typically E. coli BL21(DE3) or derivatives)
For expression, induction conditions (IPTG concentration, temperature, duration) must be optimized to maximize soluble protein yield. Similar to the approach used with Y. enterocolitica proteins, the tdh gene can be cloned into expression vectors with affinity tags (His6, GST) to facilitate purification .
The purification of recombinant tdh typically follows this methodological workflow:
| Purification Step | Conditions | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Cell lysis | Sonication or French press in buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol) | Release of intracellular protein |
| Affinity chromatography | Ni-NTA or glutathione resin depending on tag | Initial capture |
| Tag cleavage | TEV or thrombin protease treatment | Removal of affinity tag |
| Ion exchange | Q-Sepharose at pH 8.0 with salt gradient | Separation based on charge |
| Size exclusion | Superdex 200 in 25 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl | Final polishing step |
For optimal stability, purified tdh should be stored with 1 mM DTT and 10% glycerol at -80°C. Protein purity should be verified by SDS-PAGE (>95%) and mass spectrometry for accurate mass determination.
The enzymatic activity of recombinant tdh can be assessed using several complementary approaches:
Spectrophotometric assay: Monitor NAD+ reduction at 340 nm in a reaction mixture containing L-threonine, NAD+, and buffer.
Coupled enzyme assay: Link tdh activity to a secondary reaction that produces a colorimetric or fluorescent signal.
Mass spectrometry: Detect and quantify reaction products directly.
A standard reaction mixture typically contains:
50 mM HEPES buffer (pH 8.0)
0.5 mM NAD+
10 mM L-threonine
0.1-1 μg purified tdh enzyme
Total volume: 100 μL
Activity is calculated by measuring the initial velocity of NADH formation (ε340 = 6,220 M−1 cm−1) and expressed as μmol NADH formed per minute per mg protein.
While specific structural data for Y. pseudotuberculosis tdh is limited in the provided search results, the enzyme typically belongs to the medium-chain dehydrogenase/reductase family. Key structural features likely include:
NAD+ binding domain with Rossmann fold
Substrate binding domain
Catalytic zinc ion coordinated by conserved residues
Dimeric or tetrameric quaternary structure
Methodological approach: Researchers can employ X-ray crystallography or cryo-EM to determine the three-dimensional structure. Comparative structural analysis with homologs can be conducted using tools like PyMOL or UCSF Chimera. Molecular dynamics simulations can provide insights into substrate binding and catalytic mechanisms.
Recombinant proteins from Yersinia species, including tdh, may contribute to immunomodulatory effects through several mechanisms. Similar to the lipoprotein described in Y. enterocolitica, tdh might affect immune response by:
Stimulating cytokine production (particularly IL-6) from immune cells
Acting as a B-cell mitogen
Inducing expression of costimulatory molecules like B7.1 and B7.2
Potentially generating cross-reactive antibodies with host proteins
These effects could influence bacterial survival and persistence within host tissues. Experimental approaches to study these effects include:
Stimulation of immune cells (splenocytes, macrophages) with purified tdh and measurement of cytokine production
Flow cytometry analysis of surface marker expression after tdh exposure
Adoptive transfer studies to assess T-cell responses in vivo
While specific information about tdh in the context of macrophage survival is not directly provided in the search results, Yersinia pseudotuberculosis employs various strategies to survive within phagocytes. The role of tdh in this process can be investigated through:
Comparison of wild-type and tdh knockout strains in macrophage infection models
Transcriptomic analysis of bacteria during macrophage infection to assess tdh expression
Proteomics to determine if tdh is actively secreted or exposed to the host
Research has shown that Y. pseudotuberculosis proteins contribute to bacterial colonization of lymphoid organs through effects on immune cells, potentially polarizing macrophages toward an M2 phenotype that is less bactericidal . The role of tdh in this process requires further investigation using macrophage polarization assays and in vivo infection models.
Contradictory findings regarding tdh expression are common challenges in bacterial research. To address such contradictions, researchers should:
Employ topological analysis of contradictions to systematically categorize discrepancies in reported findings
Consider strain-specific differences that might affect gene expression
Account for experimental conditions (growth medium, temperature, growth phase)
Use standardized methodologies for quantification
A comprehensive approach involves:
| Analysis Level | Methods | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Genomic | Whole genome sequencing, comparative genomics | Identify strain-specific differences in tdh gene and regulatory regions |
| Transcriptomic | RT-qPCR, RNA-seq | Quantify expression levels under different conditions |
| Proteomic | Western blot, mass spectrometry | Determine protein abundance |
| Functional | Enzyme activity assays | Assess actual enzymatic activity regardless of expression level |
This multi-omics approach allows for triangulation of findings to resolve apparent contradictions in the literature .
To identify potential cross-reactivity between tdh and host proteins, researchers can employ several methodological approaches:
Generation of antibodies against purified recombinant tdh and testing for cross-reactivity with host tissue extracts using Western blot, as demonstrated with Y. enterocolitica lipoprotein
Epitope mapping to identify shared sequences between tdh and host proteins
Phage display technology to screen for cross-reactive peptides
Protein array analysis to detect binding to host proteins
In silico analysis using algorithms that predict antigenic determinants and structural similarities
For experimental validation, researchers should:
Perform ELISAs with both recombinant tdh and candidate host proteins
Conduct competition assays to confirm specificity
Use surface plasmon resonance to measure binding kinetics
Validate findings in animal models by detecting auto-antibodies after immunization with tdh
To elucidate the role of tdh in Y. pseudotuberculosis virulence, researchers should employ a comprehensive experimental design:
Generate isogenic mutants:
Complete gene deletion (Δtdh)
Point mutations in catalytic residues (enzymatically inactive)
Complemented strains (restored expression)
Conduct in vitro assays:
Growth curves in minimal media to assess metabolic requirements
Stress resistance tests (acid, oxidative, nutrient limitation)
Adhesion and invasion assays with epithelial cell lines
Survival in macrophages and neutrophils
Perform in vivo experiments:
Animal infection models (typically mice)
Competitive index assays (wild-type vs. mutant)
Histopathological examination of infected tissues
Immune response characterization (cytokine profiles, cellular infiltration)
Apply systems biology approaches:
Transcriptomics of both pathogen and host during infection
Metabolomics to trace threonine metabolism in vivo
Proteomics to identify interaction partners
This deductive qualitative analysis approach allows testing and refinement of theories about tdh's role in virulence through systematic examination of evidence .
Optimizing crystallization of recombinant tdh for structural studies requires a systematic approach:
Protein preparation:
Ensure high purity (>95% by SDS-PAGE)
Verify monodispersity by dynamic light scattering
Test multiple constructs (full-length, truncations, surface mutations)
Consider co-purification with cofactors (NAD+)
Initial screening:
Commercial sparse matrix screens (Hampton, Molecular Dimensions)
Varying protein concentrations (5-20 mg/mL)
Different temperatures (4°C, 18°C)
Addition of substrates or substrate analogs
Optimization strategies:
Fine gradient screens around promising conditions
Additive screens (ions, polyols, detergents)
Seeding techniques (micro, streak, cross)
Surface entropy reduction mutations
Alternative approaches if crystallization proves challenging:
Fusion with crystallization chaperones (T4 lysozyme, MBP)
In situ proteolysis to remove flexible regions
Nanobody co-crystallization
Cryo-EM as an alternative structure determination method
When studying recombinant tdh activity in vitro, researchers should include the following controls:
Enzyme controls:
Heat-inactivated tdh (95°C for 10 minutes)
Catalytically inactive mutant (site-directed mutagenesis of active site residues)
Known concentration of commercial dehydrogenase with similar activity
Substrate controls:
No substrate blank
Substrate analogs to assess specificity
Varying substrate concentrations for kinetic analysis
Reaction condition controls:
Buffer-only control
No-cofactor control (NAD+ omitted)
pH series to determine optimum
Inhibition controls:
Known dehydrogenase inhibitors
Reducing agents (DTT, β-mercaptoethanol)
Metal chelators (EDTA)
These controls help ensure specificity, reproducibility, and validity of enzyme activity measurements.
Deductive Qualitative Analysis (DQA) can significantly improve experimental design for tdh research:
Developing research questions and selecting guiding theory:
Operationalizing theory:
Data collection and analysis:
Theory refinement:
Revise working hypotheses based on experimental results
Identify gaps in understanding that require additional experiments
Build an expanded model of tdh function and significance
Low solubility of recombinant tdh is a common challenge that can be addressed through several strategies:
Expression conditions optimization:
Lower induction temperature (16-20°C)
Reduce inducer concentration
Extended expression time (overnight)
Use richer media (TB, 2xYT)
Construct modification:
Try different affinity tags (MBP, SUMO, TrxA)
Generate truncated constructs to remove hydrophobic regions
Codon optimization for expression host
Site-directed mutagenesis of aggregation-prone residues
Solubility enhancement:
Co-expression with chaperones (GroEL/ES, DnaK)
Addition of osmolytes (glycerol, sorbitol) to growth media
Supplementation with enzyme cofactors during expression
Alternative approaches if solubility issues persist:
Inclusion body isolation followed by denaturation and refolding
Cell-free protein expression systems
Expression in alternative hosts (yeast, insect cells)
| Strategy | Implementation | Expected Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Temperature reduction | Express at 18°C after induction | Slower folding, less aggregation |
| Chaperone co-expression | Co-transform with pGro7 (GroEL/ES) | Assisted protein folding |
| Fusion partners | Express as MBP-tdh fusion | Enhanced solubility via highly soluble partner |
| Refolding | 8M urea denaturation, gradual dialysis | Recovery of active protein from inclusion bodies |
When troubleshooting discrepancies in tdh activity data across different experimental setups, researchers should systematically:
Standardize measurement conditions:
Use consistent buffer systems, pH, and ionic strength
Control temperature precisely (±0.5°C)
Standardize enzyme concentrations using Bradford or BCA assays
Prepare fresh substrate and cofactor solutions
Instrument calibration:
Calibrate spectrophotometers using NADH standards
Verify linear range of detection
Use the same pathlength cuvettes or microplates
Data analysis consistency:
Apply uniform methods for calculating initial velocities
Use standardized software for enzyme kinetics (e.g., GraphPad Prism)
Apply appropriate statistical tests
Systematic investigation of variables:
Test effects of protein batch variations
Examine storage conditions impact
Assess reagent lot-to-lot variation
Compare results between different laboratory members
When contradictions persist, apply topological analysis of contradictions to categorize and resolve discrepancies, as described in search result . This approach helps identify whether contradictions arise from methodological differences, biological variations, or other factors.
CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing offers several advantages for studying tdh function in Y. pseudotuberculosis:
Precise genetic manipulation:
Generation of clean deletions without antibiotic resistance markers
Introduction of point mutations to study specific residues
Creation of reporter fusions at native loci
Simultaneous editing of multiple genes
Methodological approach:
Design sgRNAs targeting tdh with minimal off-target effects
Clone sgRNAs and repair templates into Cas9-expressing vectors
Transform into Y. pseudotuberculosis using electroporation
Screen transformants using PCR and sequencing
Confirm phenotypes with complementation
Advanced applications:
CRISPRi for tunable gene repression without gene deletion
CRISPRa for enhanced expression under native regulation
Base editing for introducing specific mutations without double-strand breaks
CRISPR screening to identify genetic interactions with tdh
This technology enables more sophisticated genetic analysis than traditional methods, allowing researchers to dissect tdh function with unprecedented precision.
Computational approaches offer powerful tools for predicting novel functions or interactions of tdh:
Structural bioinformatics:
Homology modeling based on related dehydrogenases
Molecular docking to identify potential substrates beyond threonine
Molecular dynamics simulations to study conformational changes
Virtual screening for potential inhibitors
Systems biology approaches:
Metabolic network analysis to predict pathway interactions
Protein-protein interaction networks to identify functional partners
Gene co-expression analysis across conditions
Flux balance analysis to predict metabolic consequences of tdh alterations
Machine learning applications:
Prediction of post-translational modifications
Identification of regulatory motifs in the tdh gene region
Classification of tdh variants based on virulence potential
Deep learning for function prediction from sequence
Integrative approaches:
Multi-omics data integration to place tdh in biological context
Evolutionary analysis to identify conserved features
Host-pathogen interaction modeling
These computational methods generate testable hypotheses that can guide experimental design and reveal unexpected aspects of tdh biology.
Understanding tdh function could contribute to novel therapeutic approaches through several mechanisms:
Target-based drug development:
Structure-based design of specific inhibitors
Fragment-based screening for binding molecules
Allosteric modulators that affect enzyme regulation
Covalent inhibitors targeting catalytic residues
Metabolic vulnerability exploitation:
Identification of metabolic bottlenecks created by tdh inhibition
Combination approaches targeting related pathways
Nutrient restriction strategies that enhance tdh dependency
Immunomodulatory approaches:
Attenuated vaccine strains with modified tdh
Targeting tdh-mediated immune evasion mechanisms
Development of antibodies that neutralize extracellular tdh
Diagnostic applications:
tdh-based biomarkers for infection detection
Strain typing based on tdh variants
Monitoring treatment efficacy through tdh activity measurement
These approaches could address the growing concern of antibiotic resistance by providing alternative treatment strategies for Y. pseudotuberculosis infections, including Far East scarlet-like fever which often involves liver pathology .