RFXANK Antibody, FITC conjugated

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Antibody Design

  • Immunogen: Recombinant RFXANK protein (e.g., E.coli-derived or HEK293T-expressed) .

  • Epitope: Typically binds full-length or N-terminal/C-terminal regions (e.g., aa 1–90 or 79–248) .

  • Conjugation: FITC is attached via primary amines, preserving antibody functionality while enabling fluorescence detection .

Table 1: RFXANK Antibody Types and Conjugates

Antibody CatalogHostClone TypeConjugateApplicationsSource
ABIN1500684MouseMonoclonalNoneWB, IF
A07934RabbitPolyclonalNoneWB, ICC/IF, FC, ELISA
NBP2-97640FRabbitPolyclonalFITCWB, IP
PCRP-RFXANK-1A9MouseMonoclonalNoneIHC

Immunofluorescence (IF)

FITC-conjugated RFXANK antibodies localize the protein in cellular compartments. For example:

  • Protocol: Cells are fixed, permeabilized, and incubated with the antibody (1:100–1:500 dilution). Fluorescence is visualized using FITC-specific filters .

  • Example: Source demonstrated IF staining of RFXANK in PC-3 cells using a non-FITC antibody, highlighting the protein’s cytoplasmic distribution.

Flow Cytometry (FC)

Direct detection of RFXANK in live or fixed cells:

  • Protocol: Cells are labeled with FITC-conjugated antibody (e.g., 1:50 dilution), followed by analysis on a flow cytometer .

  • Note: Requires proper blocking to minimize background, as noted in mouse-on-mouse protocols .

Western Blot (WB)

While less common for FITC, some protocols use fluorescent detection systems:

  • Protocol: Membranes are incubated with FITC-conjugated antibody (1:2000 dilution), and signals are detected using imaging systems .

Role in MHC Class II Expression

RFXANK forms a scaffold for RFXAP and RFX5, enabling DNA binding to X-box motifs in MHC II promoters . Mutations in RFXANK disrupt this complex, leading to bare lymphocyte syndrome (BLS), a severe immunodeficiency .

Interaction with Caspase-2

RFXANK binds caspase-2, suggesting a non-apoptotic role in regulating MHC II expression. Overexpression of RFXANK enhances caspase-2 processing under chemotherapeutic stress .

Comparative Analysis of FITC-Conjugated RFXANK Antibodies

Table 2: FITC-Conjugated RFXANK Antibodies

Antibody CatalogHostClone TypeApplicationsCross-ReactivitySource
NBP2-97640FRabbitPolyclonalWB, IPHuman
OthersN/AN/AN/AN/A

Note: Limited FITC-conjugated RFXANK antibodies are commercially available; most FITC antibodies target other epitopes (e.g., anti-mouse IgG) .

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Typically, we are able to ship your order within 1-3 business days of receipt. Delivery times may vary depending on the method of purchase and location. Please consult your local distributors for specific delivery timelines.
Synonyms
ANKRA1 antibody; Ankyrin repeat containing regulatory factor X associated protein antibody; Ankyrin repeat family A protein 1 antibody; BLS antibody; DNA-binding protein RFXANK antibody; F14150_1 antibody; MGC138628 antibody; Regulatory factor X associated ankyrin containing protein antibody; Regulatory factor X subunit B antibody; Regulatory factor X, ankyrin repeat containing antibody; Regulatory factor X-associated ankyrin-containing protein antibody; RFX Bdelta4 antibody; RFX-B antibody; RFXANK antibody; RFXB antibody; RFXB delta 4 antibody; RFXK_HUMAN antibody
Target Names
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
RFXANK plays a crucial role in activating transcription from class II MHC promoters, a process that requires the activity of the MHC class II transactivator/CIITA. This protein may also regulate other genes within the cell. RFXANK binds to the X1 box of MHC-II promoters and can potentially enhance the activation of RAF1. It's important to note that Isoform 2 does not participate in the positive regulation of MHC class II genes.
Gene References Into Functions
  1. Mutations in RFXANK have been linked to Bare Lymphocyte Syndrome, Type 2, as observed in a child of Mexican descent. PMID: 26634365
  2. A comprehensive study involving 35 patients from 30 unrelated families in North Africa revealed a shared RFXANK founder mutation, a 26-bp deletion termed I5E6-25_I5E6 + 1). PMID: 21908431
  3. Research findings provide a strong link between the high frequency of combined immunodeficiency, defects in MHC class II expression, and a founder effect of the 752delG26 mutation within the North African population. PMID: 20414676
  4. Lower levels of RFX-B have been observed in macrophages of colorectal cancer patients, potentially contributing to the immunodeficiency associated with cancer. PMID: 11836625
  5. Studies have investigated the in vivo effects of mutations on the expression of RFXANK RNA and protein. PMID: 12618906
  6. ANKRA, RFXANK, and CIITA have been identified as novel targets of class IIa HDACs, suggesting a potential role for deacetylases in regulating MHCII expression. PMID: 15964851
  7. Extensive analysis has been conducted to understand the domains and function of RFXANK. PMID: 16166641
  8. RFXAP and RFXB have been shown to play a role in relieving autoinhibition of RFX5. PMID: 18723135

Show More

Hide All

Database Links

HGNC: 9987

OMIM: 209920

KEGG: hsa:8625

STRING: 9606.ENSP00000305071

UniGene: Hs.153629

Involvement In Disease
Bare lymphocyte syndrome 2 (BLS2)
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm. Nucleus.
Tissue Specificity
Ubiquitous.

Q&A

What is RFXANK and why is it important in immunological research?

RFXANK (Regulatory Factor X-Associated Ankyrin-Containing protein) serves as a critical component of the heterotrimeric RFX complex alongside RFX5 and RFXAP. This complex plays an essential role in the coordinated transcription of Major Histocompatibility Complex class II (MHC II) genes in antigen-presenting cells, including B-lymphocytes, dendritic cells, and macrophages . The significance of RFXANK in immunological research stems from its direct involvement in MHC II expression, which is fundamental to adaptive immunity. Mutations in RFXANK are associated with Bare Lymphocyte Syndrome (complementation group B), a severe immunodeficiency disorder characterized by compromised CD4+ T-lymphocyte responses . Researchers investigate RFXANK to understand the molecular mechanisms of MHC II regulation and to develop potential therapeutic approaches for immunodeficiency disorders.

How does FITC conjugation affect antibody function and what are the optimal storage conditions?

FITC (Fluorescein Isothiocyanate) conjugation enables direct immunofluorescence detection of target proteins without requiring secondary antibodies. The conjugation process involves crosslinking the primary antibody with the FITC fluorophore using established protocols . While this modification facilitates visualization, researchers should be aware that continuous exposure to light causes gradual loss of fluorescence intensity .

For optimal preservation of FITC-conjugated antibodies, they should be stored at 4°C and protected from light exposure for short-term storage (guaranteed for six months from receipt date if properly stored) . For long-term storage, aliquoting the antibody and storing at –20°C or –80°C with protection from light is recommended . Repeated freeze-thaw cycles should be avoided as they may result in loss of antibody activity . Most commercial FITC-conjugated antibodies are supplied in Phosphate-Buffered Saline (PBS) with 0.01% sodium azide as a preservative, which should be handled with appropriate safety precautions as noted in safety data sheets .

What are the basic principles of detecting RFXANK using FITC-conjugated antibodies?

Detection of RFXANK using FITC-conjugated antibodies typically employs immunofluorescence techniques on fixed cells. The basic protocol involves:

  • Cell fixation and permeabilization (commonly using methanol or paraformaldehyde)

  • Blocking with PBS containing 10% fetal bovine serum to reduce non-specific binding

  • Incubation with the FITC-conjugated anti-RFXANK antibody (typically at a 1:500 dilution in PBS/10% FBS)

  • Washing steps with PBS to remove unbound antibody

  • Visualization using a fluorescence microscope equipped with a FITC filter

For optimal results, researchers should conduct experimental validation of antibody dilutions, as the appropriate concentration may vary depending on the application, sample type, or cell line . When studying RFXANK's interaction with other proteins like caspase-2, co-localization can be confirmed by transfection of fluorescently conjugated proteins and subsequent microscopic analysis . The excitation maximum for FITC is approximately 495 nm, and the emission maximum is around 520 nm, producing a green fluorescence that can be detected using standard FITC filter sets.

How can I optimize co-immunoprecipitation protocols for studying RFXANK interactions with other proteins?

Co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) represents a powerful approach for validating protein-protein interactions involving RFXANK. Based on published protocols, several optimization strategies can enhance experimental outcomes:

For exogenous protein interactions, consider the following approach:

  • Transfect HEK293T cells with RFXANK-myc-FLAG and the protein of interest (e.g., a catalytically inactive caspase-2 fused to mCherry)

  • Prepare cell lysates in a binding buffer containing 20 mM HEPES, 100 mM KCl, 0.5 mM DTT, 0.1% BSA, 0.1% NP-40, and protease inhibitors

  • Incubate cell lysates with anti-FLAG M2 antibody coupled to agarose beads for 1-2 hours

  • Wash the beads three times with binding buffer to remove non-specific interactions

  • Elute proteins in SDS-PAGE sample buffer and analyze by Western blotting using specific antibodies

For endogenous protein interactions:

  • Use an RFXANK-specific antibody immobilized on magnetic beads to capture endogenous RFXANK complexes

  • Validate results through densitometry analysis of band intensity, comparing input versus flow-through samples to quantify binding efficiency

  • Include appropriate controls, such as IgG isotype controls and single-transfection controls

To enhance specificity and reproducibility, consider crosslinking antibodies to beads, optimizing salt concentration in wash buffers, and performing reciprocal co-IPs where possible (immunoprecipitating with antibodies against each of the suspected interacting partners).

What techniques are available for investigating RFXANK's role in enhanceosome assembly on MHC II promoters in chromatin?

Several sophisticated techniques can probe RFXANK's role in enhanceosome assembly within the chromatin context:

  • Promoter Pull-Down Assays: This approach involves incubating DNA fragments containing the HLA-DRA promoter region with cell extracts from complemented BLS-1 cells (expressing wild-type or mutant RFXANK). DNA-bound enhanceosome complexes are purified, eluted, and analyzed by Western blotting for the presence of RFX complex components . This technique can determine which domains of RFXANK are essential for incorporation into the enhanceosome.

  • Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP): ChIP assays using FITC-conjugated anti-RFXANK antibodies can directly assess RFXANK binding to MHC II promoters in vivo. Sequential ChIP (re-ChIP) can also identify co-occupancy with other factors like CIITA, RFX5, and RFXAP.

  • Structure-Function Analysis: Combining knowledge of the three-dimensional structure of ankyrin repeat domain (ARD) proteins with site-directed mutagenesis enables mapping of specific residues involved in key functions. Research has shown that mutations within the fourth ankyrin repeat of RFXANK abolish enhanceosome assembly on MHC-II promoters in vivo but not in vitro, suggesting a specialized role in facilitating promoter occupation within chromatin .

  • Functional Complementation: Testing the ability of RFXANK mutants to restore MHC II expression in bare lymphocyte syndrome (BLS) group B cell lines provides functional validation of structure-activity relationships . This approach has revealed that the ARD of ANKRA2 can functionally replace the ARD of RFXANK in complementing BLS cells .

These methodologies collectively enable researchers to dissect the molecular mechanisms by which RFXANK contributes to enhanceosome assembly and stability in the context of chromatin.

How can I design experiments to investigate the non-apoptotic roles of caspase-2 in MHC class II expression through its interaction with RFXANK?

Investigating the non-apoptotic roles of caspase-2 in MHC class II expression through RFXANK interaction requires a multi-faceted experimental approach:

  • Interaction Domain Mapping: Implement a yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) screen followed by validation through co-immunoprecipitation using both exogenous and endogenous proteins . To determine subcellular localization of the interaction, perform cellular fractionation before co-IP, as previous research suggests binding occurs in the cytoplasm .

  • Fluorescence Co-localization: Utilize fluorescently conjugated proteins (e.g., RFXANK-GFP and caspase-2-mCherry) for live-cell imaging to visualize dynamic interactions. This approach has successfully confirmed cellular co-localization of caspase-2 and RFXANK .

  • Functional Analysis:

    • Compare MHC II expression in wild-type versus caspase-2-deficient antigen-presenting cells using flow cytometry with FITC-conjugated anti-MHC II antibodies

    • Analyze protein lysates to detect potential differences in total versus surface expression of MHC II molecules

    • Examine the impact of caspase-2 catalytic activity by comparing cells expressing wild-type versus catalytically inactive caspase-2 (C303A mutant)

  • Stress Response Analysis: Given that enhanced caspase-2 processing has been observed in RFXANK-overexpressing cells treated with chemotherapeutic agents , design experiments exposing cells to various stressors (e.g., 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin) and assess:

    • Changes in RFXANK-caspase-2 interaction

    • Alterations in MHC II expression and presentation

    • Downstream effects on CD4+ T cell responses

  • Mechanistic Dissection: Employ RNA interference or CRISPR-Cas9 to selectively deplete or mutate key components of the pathway to establish causality rather than correlation.

These experimental designs would help elucidate whether caspase-2's interaction with RFXANK represents a novel regulatory mechanism for MHC class II expression independent of its well-established role in apoptosis.

What are the recommended protocols for immunofluorescence staining using FITC-conjugated antibodies against RFXANK?

For optimal immunofluorescence staining with FITC-conjugated anti-RFXANK antibodies, researchers should follow this detailed protocol:

Materials Required:

  • Phosphate-Buffered Saline (PBS: 137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 4.3 mM Na₂HPO₄- 7H₂O, 1.4 mM KH₂PO₄, pH 7.3)

  • Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS)

  • Methanol or 4% paraformaldehyde (for fixation)

  • Blocking buffer (PBS + 10% FBS)

  • FITC-conjugated anti-RFXANK antibody

  • Fluorescence microscope with appropriate FITC filter

Protocol:

  • Culture cells on appropriate coverslips or in chamber slides

  • Remove culture medium and wash cells twice with PBS

  • Fix cells using either:

    • Cold methanol (100%) for 5 minutes at -20°C (provides both fixation and permeabilization)

    • 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 minutes at room temperature followed by permeabilization with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 5 minutes

  • Wash cells 3 times with PBS (5 minutes each)

  • Add 2 mL blocking solution (PBS + 10% FBS) and incubate for 20 minutes at room temperature to reduce non-specific binding

  • Remove blocking solution and add 1 mL of PBS/10% FBS containing FITC-conjugated anti-RFXANK antibody (1:500 dilution is typically recommended, but optimal concentration should be determined empirically)

  • Incubate for 1 hour at room temperature in the dark

  • Wash cells 2-3 times with PBS (5 minutes each)

  • If nuclear counterstaining is desired, incubate with DAPI solution for 5 minutes

  • Mount coverslips using anti-fade mounting medium

  • Observe under a fluorescence microscope equipped with a FITC filter

Critical Considerations:

  • Protect the FITC-conjugated antibody and stained specimens from light at all times to prevent photobleaching

  • Include appropriate controls: negative control (omitting primary antibody), positive control (cells known to express RFXANK), and isotype control (non-specific FITC-conjugated antibody of the same isotype)

  • For co-localization studies with other proteins, sequential or simultaneous staining protocols can be employed using compatible fluorophores with distinct spectral properties

How can I troubleshoot common issues with FITC-conjugated antibodies in flow cytometry applications?

When using FITC-conjugated antibodies against RFXANK or related proteins in flow cytometry, researchers may encounter several common issues. Here are troubleshooting strategies for each:

1. Weak or No Signal:

  • Verify antibody viability: FITC conjugates can lose fluorescence with improper storage or repeated freeze-thaw cycles

  • Optimize antibody concentration: Titrate the antibody to determine optimal working concentration

  • Check excitation/emission settings: Ensure flow cytometer is configured correctly for FITC detection (excitation ~495nm, emission ~520nm)

  • Evaluate expression levels: Confirm target protein expression in your cell type

  • Improve cell permeabilization: For intracellular targets like RFXANK, ensure adequate permeabilization

2. High Background/Non-specific Staining:

  • Increase blocking: Use 10% FBS or 1-5% BSA in staining buffer

  • Add more wash steps: Incorporate additional washing with PBS containing 0.1% BSA

  • Include isotype control: Use a FITC-conjugated isotype control antibody at the same concentration

  • Filter cell suspensions: Remove cell aggregates that can cause false signals

  • Check for autofluorescence: Run unstained cells to establish baseline autofluorescence

3. Spectral Overlap in Multicolor Panels:

  • Perform compensation: Use single-stained controls for each fluorochrome

  • Consider alternative fluorophores: Replace FITC with spectrally distinct fluorophores like PE or APC for targets with low expression

  • Use compensation beads: For more accurate compensation settings

4. Inconsistent Results Between Experiments:

  • Standardize protocols: Use consistent fixation, permeabilization, and staining conditions

  • Prepare fresh dilutions: Make fresh antibody dilutions for each experiment

  • Use internal controls: Include positive and negative control samples in each run

  • Standardize instrument settings: Use calibration beads to normalize instrument settings between runs

5. Cell Death During Processing:

  • Optimize fixation: Avoid harsh fixation conditions

  • Maintain cold temperatures: Keep cells at 4°C during staining when possible

  • Include viability dye: Incorporate a viability marker to exclude dead cells from analysis

  • Minimize processing time: Reduce the time between sample collection and analysis

These troubleshooting approaches should help researchers optimize their flow cytometry experiments using FITC-conjugated antibodies for RFXANK detection and related applications.

What are the considerations for using FITC-conjugated antibodies in co-labeling experiments to study RFXANK interactions?

When designing co-labeling experiments to study RFXANK interactions using FITC-conjugated antibodies, researchers should address several critical considerations:

Spectral Compatibility:

  • FITC emits green fluorescence (emission peak ~520nm) that can overlap with other green-emitting fluorophores

  • For multicolor imaging or flow cytometry, pair FITC with spectrally distinct fluorophores such as:

    • Texas Red or PE (orange-red, ~570-590nm)

    • APC or Cy5 (far-red, ~650-670nm)

    • Pacific Blue or DAPI (blue, ~450-460nm)

  • Ensure your microscope or flow cytometer has appropriate filter sets to distinguish between fluorophores

Sequential versus Simultaneous Staining:

  • For co-detection of RFXANK with interacting partners (e.g., caspase-2, RFX5, RFXAP):

    • Sequential staining may reduce cross-reactivity between antibodies

    • Simultaneous staining can save time but may require more extensive controls

    • When using antibodies from the same species, consider directly conjugated antibodies or use isotype-specific secondary antibodies

Fixation and Permeabilization Optimization:

  • Different fixation methods may preferentially preserve certain epitopes

  • Test multiple fixation approaches (e.g., paraformaldehyde, methanol, acetone) to optimize detection of both RFXANK and its interacting partners

  • Permeabilization requirements may differ between membrane, cytoplasmic, and nuclear proteins

Controls for Co-localization Studies:

  • Single-labeled controls to assess bleed-through

  • Negative controls (cells where one or both proteins are known to be absent)

  • Positive controls (cells where co-localization has been previously demonstrated)

  • Competition controls (unlabeled antibody to verify specificity)

Quantitative Analysis of Co-localization:

  • Use appropriate software tools for co-localization quantification (e.g., Pearson's correlation coefficient, Manders' overlap coefficient)

  • Implement threshold settings to minimize background interference

  • Consider super-resolution microscopy techniques for more precise co-localization assessment

Practical Example:
For studying RFXANK-caspase-2 interactions as described in the literature, researchers have successfully employed:

  • Transfection of RFXANK-myc-FLAG alongside catalytically inactive caspase-2 fused to mCherry

  • Verification of interaction through both fluorescence co-localization and co-immunoprecipitation

  • Cellular fractionation to determine that binding occurs predominantly in the cytoplasm

By carefully addressing these considerations, researchers can develop robust co-labeling experimental designs that accurately characterize RFXANK interactions while minimizing artifacts and misinterpretation.

How can I distinguish between specific and non-specific binding when using FITC-conjugated antibodies against RFXANK?

Distinguishing between specific and non-specific binding is critical for accurate interpretation of results when using FITC-conjugated antibodies. Implement these strategies to maximize specificity:

Essential Controls:

  • Isotype Control: Use a FITC-conjugated antibody of the same isotype but without specificity for RFXANK at the same concentration as your primary antibody . This controls for non-specific Fc receptor binding and background fluorescence.

  • Blocking Validation: Compare staining with and without FBS/BSA blocking to confirm effective reduction of non-specific binding .

  • Peptide Competition: Pre-incubate the FITC-conjugated anti-RFXANK antibody with excess purified RFXANK protein or immunizing peptide before staining to demonstrate binding specificity.

  • Negative Cell Line Control: Include a cell line known not to express RFXANK or use RFXANK-knockout cells as negative controls.

Optimization Approaches:

  • Titration Experiments: Perform serial dilutions of the FITC-conjugated antibody to identify the optimal concentration that maximizes specific signal while minimizing background .

  • Modified Washing Protocols: Increase washing stringency by adding 0.05-0.1% Tween-20 to wash buffers or increasing the number of wash steps.

  • Alternative Blocking Agents: Test different blocking solutions (e.g., normal serum from the same species as the experimental cells, commercial blocking reagents) if standard FBS blocking is insufficient.

Analytical Methods:

  • Signal-to-Noise Ratio Calculation: Quantify the ratio between mean fluorescence intensity in positive versus negative populations to objectively assess specificity.

  • Multiparameter Analysis: For flow cytometry applications, use additional markers to identify specific cell populations where RFXANK should be expressed.

  • Comparison with Alternative Detection Methods: Validate FITC-antibody results against other techniques like Western blotting or RT-PCR to confirm specificity.

Specialized Techniques:

  • For co-immunoprecipitation experiments validating RFXANK interactions, include appropriate controls for each step, such as protein lysates from untransfected cells and immunoprecipitation with non-specific IgG .

  • When studying specific RFXANK functions like enhanceosome assembly, use promoter pull-down assays with mutant RFXANK variants to distinguish specific from non-specific binding to DNA-protein complexes .

These combined approaches will provide strong evidence for binding specificity and significantly improve confidence in experimental outcomes.

What strategies can I employ to enhance signal detection when working with low-abundance RFXANK protein?

Detecting low-abundance RFXANK protein presents significant challenges that require multiple signal enhancement strategies. Researchers can implement the following approaches:

Antibody Optimization:

  • High-Affinity Antibodies: Select FITC-conjugated antibodies with demonstrated high affinity for RFXANK epitopes.

  • Signal Amplification Systems: Consider using biotinylated primary antibodies followed by fluorophore-conjugated streptavidin for signal enhancement.

  • Reduced Antibody Loss: Minimize antibody adsorption to tubes and plates by using low-protein binding plasticware and including carrier proteins (0.1-0.5% BSA) in antibody dilution buffers.

Sample Preparation Enhancements:

  • Optimized Fixation: Test different fixation protocols to maximize epitope preservation while maintaining cell morphology.

  • Enhanced Permeabilization: For intracellular proteins like RFXANK, optimize permeabilization conditions to improve antibody access while preserving target protein.

  • Antigen Retrieval: Consider gentle heat-induced epitope retrieval methods if appropriate for your sample type.

Enrichment Strategies:

  • Cell Sorting: Enrich for cell populations with higher RFXANK expression prior to analysis.

  • Subcellular Fractionation: Concentrate nuclear fractions where RFXANK functions in transcriptional regulation to increase relative abundance.

  • Immunoprecipitation: Pre-enrich RFXANK using immunoprecipitation before detection with FITC-conjugated antibodies.

Detection System Optimization:

  • Sensitive Instrumentation: Use high-sensitivity detectors (e.g., photomultiplier tubes with optimized voltage settings).

  • Long Exposure Times: For microscopy applications, increase exposure time while controlling for photobleaching.

  • Digital Enhancement: Apply appropriate post-acquisition processing (deconvolution, background subtraction) while maintaining data integrity.

Experimental Design Considerations:

  • Overexpression Models: For initial characterization, consider transiently transfecting cells with RFXANK expression constructs as demonstrated in studies of RFXANK-caspase-2 interactions .

  • Positive Controls: Include samples with known RFXANK upregulation (e.g., cells treated with IFN-γ which induces MHC class II expression).

  • Signal Verification: Confirm specific signal by knockdown approaches (siRNA against RFXANK) to demonstrate signal reduction.

Advanced Techniques:

  • Proximity Ligation Assay (PLA): For detecting protein-protein interactions involving low-abundance RFXANK, PLA can significantly amplify signal.

  • Tyramide Signal Amplification (TSA): This technique can increase fluorescence signal intensity by 10-100 fold.

  • Super-resolution Microscopy: Techniques like STORM or STED can provide enhanced detection sensitivity and spatial resolution.

Implementing combinations of these strategies will significantly improve the detection of low-abundance RFXANK protein in research applications.

How do I optimize Western blot protocols for detecting RFXANK using FITC-conjugated antibodies?

While FITC-conjugated antibodies are more commonly used in immunofluorescence and flow cytometry, they can be adapted for Western blot detection of RFXANK with appropriate protocol modifications. Here is an optimized approach:

Sample Preparation:

  • Efficient Lysis: Use RIPA or NP-40 based buffers with protease inhibitors to extract RFXANK effectively

  • Loading Control: Include appropriate loading controls (β-actin, GAPDH) to normalize for protein quantity

  • Positive Control: Include lysates from cells known to express high levels of RFXANK (e.g., B lymphocytes or dendritic cells)

Gel Electrophoresis and Transfer Considerations:

  • Protein Amount: Load higher protein amounts (50-100 μg) when detecting endogenous RFXANK

  • Gel Percentage: Use 10-12% polyacrylamide gels for optimal resolution of RFXANK (~35 kDa)

  • Transfer Conditions: Optimize transfer conditions for RFXANK size range (semi-dry vs. wet transfer)

  • Transfer Verification: Use reversible staining (Ponceau S) to confirm successful protein transfer

FITC Detection Optimization:

  • Direct Detection Method:

    • After transfer, block membrane with 5% non-fat milk or BSA in TBST

    • Incubate with FITC-conjugated anti-RFXANK antibody (1:250-1:1000 dilution typically)

    • Wash thoroughly with TBST

    • Protect from light during all steps

    • Visualize using a fluorescence imager with appropriate FITC excitation/emission settings

  • Sensitivity Enhancement Method:

    • After standard FITC antibody incubation, apply an anti-FITC HRP-conjugated antibody

    • Develop using chemiluminescence for enhanced sensitivity

    • This two-step approach combines fluorescence specificity with chemiluminescence sensitivity

Critical Parameters to Optimize:

  • Blocking Buffer: Test different blocking agents (milk vs. BSA) to determine optimal signal-to-noise ratio

  • Antibody Concentration: Titrate FITC-conjugated antibodies to determine optimal working dilution

  • Incubation Time/Temperature: Test different combinations (4°C overnight vs. room temperature for 1-2 hours)

  • Washing Stringency: Optimize number and duration of wash steps to reduce background while preserving specific signal

Troubleshooting Common Issues:

  • High Background: Increase blocking time/concentration and washing stringency; reduce antibody concentration

  • Weak Signal: Increase protein loading, antibody concentration, or incubation time; consider signal amplification methods

  • Multiple Bands: Verify antibody specificity with knockout/knockdown controls; optimize gel resolution

Alternative Approach:
For studies involving RFXANK protein-protein interactions, consider the co-immunoprecipitation approach used in published research:

  • Transfect HEK293T cells with RFXANK-myc-FLAG

  • Immunoprecipitate using anti-FLAG antibody

  • Analyze by Western blotting using specific antibodies for RFXANK and potential interacting partners

These optimized protocols should enable successful detection of RFXANK in Western blot applications using FITC-conjugated antibodies.

How can FITC-conjugated RFXANK antibodies be used to study the pathogenesis of bare lymphocyte syndrome?

FITC-conjugated RFXANK antibodies provide powerful tools for investigating bare lymphocyte syndrome (BLS) pathogenesis, particularly complementation group B which results from RFXANK mutations. Here are methodological approaches utilizing these antibodies:

Diagnostic and Phenotypic Characterization:

  • Flow Cytometric Analysis: FITC-conjugated antibodies enable quantitative assessment of RFXANK expression patterns in patient-derived cells compared to healthy controls . This approach can help characterize the molecular basis of the disease by determining whether mutations affect protein expression or localization.

  • Immunofluorescence Microscopy: Using standardized immunofluorescence protocols with FITC-conjugated anti-RFXANK antibodies, researchers can visualize RFXANK's subcellular distribution in patient cells . This approach can reveal whether mutant RFXANK proteins mislocalize within cells, potentially explaining functional defects.

Functional Complementation Studies:

  • Restoration of MHC II Expression: Following gene therapy approaches or complementation with wild-type RFXANK, FITC-conjugated anti-MHC II antibodies can quantify restoration of surface expression, while anti-RFXANK antibodies monitor the introduced protein .

  • Structure-Function Analysis: FITC-labeled antibodies can be employed to track expression of various RFXANK mutants in complementation assays. Research has demonstrated that the C-terminal region containing the ankyrin repeat domain (ARD, amino acids 84-260) is essential and sufficient for RFXANK function in complementing BLS cells .

Molecular Interaction Studies:

  • Protein Complex Assembly: FITC-conjugated RFXANK antibodies can be used in immunoprecipitation experiments to investigate how BLS-causing mutations affect RFXANK's ability to form complexes with RFX5 and RFXAP . Previous research has mapped the RFXANK-RFX5 interaction domain to an outer surface of ankyrin repeats 2 and 3 .

  • Enhanceosome Formation: FITC-labeled antibodies can be employed in chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays to assess how RFXANK mutations impact enhanceosome assembly on MHC II promoters in vivo. Research has shown that mutations in the fourth ankyrin repeat abolish enhanceosome assembly in vivo but not in vitro, suggesting a specialized role in the chromatin context .

Therapeutic Development Applications:

  • Gene Therapy Monitoring: When testing gene therapy approaches for BLS, FITC-conjugated antibodies provide a means to track successful expression and localization of therapeutic RFXANK constructs.

  • Drug Screening: In high-throughput screens for compounds that might restore function to mutant RFXANK, FITC-conjugated antibodies can assess both expression levels and subcellular localization changes in response to candidate therapeutics.

These methodological approaches utilizing FITC-conjugated RFXANK antibodies enable comprehensive investigation of BLS pathogenesis, potentially leading to improved diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for this severe immunodeficiency.

What are the emerging applications of studying RFXANK-caspase-2 interactions in cancer research?

The discovery of interactions between RFXANK and caspase-2 opens significant new research directions in cancer biology, with several methodological approaches utilizing FITC-conjugated antibodies:

Dysregulated Immune Surveillance Mechanisms:

  • Tumor Antigen Presentation Analysis: FITC-conjugated antibodies can be used to investigate whether the RFXANK-caspase-2 interaction influences MHC class II expression in tumor-associated antigen-presenting cells . This may reveal novel mechanisms by which tumors evade immune surveillance through manipulation of this pathway.

  • Immunophenotyping Tumor Microenvironments: Flow cytometry with FITC-conjugated antibodies against RFXANK, caspase-2, and MHC II can characterize how this pathway is altered within the tumor microenvironment compared to normal tissue contexts.

Chemotherapy Response Mechanisms:

  • Chemosensitivity Profiling: Research has demonstrated that RFXANK overexpression facilitates proteolytic caspase-2 processing in response to chemotherapeutic agents like 5-fluorouracil and doxorubicin . FITC-conjugated antibodies can track changes in protein localization and complex formation during treatment response.

  • Cell Death Pathway Discrimination: Using FITC-labeled antibodies in combination with other apoptotic markers can help distinguish between classic apoptotic roles of caspase-2 and potential non-apoptotic functions mediated through RFXANK interaction .

Stress Response Signaling:

  • Subcellular Translocation Analysis: Immunofluorescence with FITC-conjugated antibodies can reveal how cellular stressors affect the subcellular distribution of RFXANK-caspase-2 complexes, potentially uncovering novel signaling mechanisms.

  • Protein Complex Stability Assessment: Co-immunoprecipitation followed by quantification can determine how different cancer-relevant stressors affect the stability and composition of RFXANK-containing complexes.

Therapeutic Target Identification:

  • Small Molecule Screening: FITC-based high-content screening assays can identify compounds that disrupt or enhance RFXANK-caspase-2 interactions, potentially leading to novel cancer therapeutics.

  • Synthetic Lethality Exploration: Combined depletion of RFXANK and caspase-2 pathway components may reveal synthetic lethal interactions specific to certain cancer types, identifiable through FITC-labeled antibody screening approaches.

Methodological Approach for Investigation:

  • Compare RFXANK-caspase-2 interaction patterns across cancer cell lines with varying degrees of aggressiveness and therapeutic resistance

  • Analyze clinical specimens using FITC-conjugated antibodies to correlate RFXANK-caspase-2 complex formation with patient outcomes

  • Develop genetic models (knockouts, mutations) to assess how disruption of this interaction affects tumor progression and treatment response

  • Implement live-cell imaging with fluorescently tagged proteins to observe dynamic changes in complex formation during cancer-relevant cellular processes

These emerging applications highlight how FITC-conjugated antibodies targeting the RFXANK-caspase-2 interaction provide valuable tools for exploring novel cancer biology and potential therapeutic avenues.

How can RFXANK antibodies be used to study the relationship between MHC class II expression and autoimmune diseases?

FITC-conjugated RFXANK antibodies offer powerful tools for investigating the complex relationship between MHC class II expression regulation and autoimmune pathogenesis. Here's how researchers can employ these reagents in methodological approaches:

Genetic Variant Characterization:

  • Expression Quantitative Trait Loci (eQTL) Studies: FITC-conjugated antibodies can quantify how genetic polymorphisms in RFXANK regulatory regions correlate with protein expression levels in patient-derived cells. Flow cytometry analysis allows population-level assessment of expression variability.

  • Allele-Specific Expression Analysis: By combining FITC-labeled antibodies with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for specific alleles, researchers can determine whether certain RFXANK variants display differential expression patterns in autoimmune conditions.

Tissue-Specific Dysregulation Studies:

  • Immunohistochemistry in Target Tissues: FITC-conjugated RFXANK antibodies can map protein expression in tissues affected by autoimmune diseases (e.g., pancreatic islets in type 1 diabetes, synovium in rheumatoid arthritis), helping identify aberrant expression patterns.

  • Single-Cell Analysis: Flow cytometry with FITC-labeled antibodies enables correlation of RFXANK expression with MHC class II levels at the single-cell level, revealing potential heterogeneity in autoimmune contexts.

Molecular Complex Formation:

  • Enhanceosome Assembly Assessment: Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) using FITC-conjugated RFXANK antibodies can determine whether enhanceosome assembly on MHC II promoters is altered in autoimmune conditions. The RFX complex (including RFXANK, RFX5, and RFXAP) plays a critical role in coordinated transcription of MHC II genes .

  • Protein-Protein Interaction Changes: Co-immunoprecipitation experiments can reveal whether autoimmune-associated factors alter RFXANK's interactions with its binding partners, particularly in response to inflammatory stimuli.

Environmental Trigger Response:

  • Cytokine Stimulation Profiles: FITC-labeled antibodies can track how RFXANK expression and localization respond to autoimmune-relevant cytokines (e.g., IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-17), potentially identifying dysregulated responses in autoimmune cells.

  • Epigenetic Modification Analysis: Combined with techniques assessing DNA methylation or histone modifications, FITC-conjugated antibodies can help correlate RFXANK binding with epigenetic changes at MHC II promoters in autoimmune conditions.

Therapeutic Application Monitoring:

  • Immunomodulatory Drug Effects: FITC-conjugated antibodies provide tools to assess how current and experimental autoimmune therapies affect RFXANK expression and function, potentially identifying mechanism-based biomarkers of response.

  • Targeted Intervention Development: By characterizing the specific aspects of RFXANK function disrupted in autoimmune diseases, researchers can design targeted interventions that normalize MHC II expression without broadly suppressing immune function.

Methodological Considerations:
When investigating autoimmune contexts, researchers should pay particular attention to:

  • Implementing appropriate controls to distinguish disease-specific changes from general inflammatory effects

  • Correlating RFXANK findings with clinical parameters and established autoimmune biomarkers

  • Considering cell type-specific effects, as RFXANK regulation may differ between professional antigen-presenting cells and non-immune cells in target tissues

These approaches utilizing FITC-conjugated RFXANK antibodies can substantially advance our understanding of MHC class II dysregulation in autoimmune pathogenesis.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.