RGP5 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
RGP5 antibody; At5g16510 antibody; MQK4.26 antibody; Probable UDP-arabinopyranose mutase 5 antibody; EC 5.4.99.30 antibody; Reversibly glycosylated polypeptide 5 antibody; AtRGP5 antibody; UDP-L-arabinose mutase 5 antibody
Target Names
RGP5
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
This antibody targets a probable UDP-L-arabinose mutase, an enzyme involved in the biosynthesis of cell wall non-cellulosic polysaccharides.
Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT5G16510

STRING: 3702.AT5G16510.1

UniGene: At.6462

Protein Families
RGP family
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm, cytosol. Golgi apparatus. Note=Localized predominantly in the cytosol.
Tissue Specificity
Widely expressed at low levels.

Q&A

What is rGP5 antibody and what is its significance in PRRSV research?

rGP5 antibody refers to antibodies that recognize recombinant Glycoprotein 5 of PRRSV. GP5 is a critical structural protein of PRRSV that contains important epitopes eliciting immune responses in infected pigs. Research indicates that GP5 has been extensively studied as a target for vaccine development due to its role in viral pathogenesis .

rGP5 antibodies are particularly valuable in research because they persist much longer in infected animals compared to antibodies against other viral proteins like the nucleocapsid (N) protein. This persistence makes them excellent candidates for developing more sensitive diagnostic tools with longer detection windows .

How is recombinant GP5 prepared for research applications?

The preparation of recombinant GP5 involves several molecular biology techniques:

  • RNA extraction from PRRSV strain (e.g., VR2332) using Trizol reagent

  • cDNA synthesis using a RT-PCR system

  • PCR amplification with primers containing appropriate restriction sites (BamHI and HindIII)

  • Cloning into an expression vector such as pRSET

  • Transformation into E. coli strains (JM109 and BL21(DE3)pLysS)

  • Protein expression induction using isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (1mM final concentration)

  • Protein purification via affinity chromatography (e.g., Probond purification system)

The PCR primers are specifically designed with the 5' primer containing a BamHI restriction site (GP5-F: 5′-AATT GGATCC ATGAGCAACGACAGCAGCTCCCA-3′) and the 3′ primer containing a HindIII restriction site (GP5-R: 5′-GGCC AAGCTT CTAAGGACGACCCCATTGTT-3′) .

What epitopes of GP5 are most important for antibody production and detection?

Research has identified several distinct epitopes within GP5 that are significant for antibody production:

  • Immunodominant peptides (VR #1 and VR #2): These regions elicit strong antibody responses but may not necessarily neutralize the virus

  • Neutralizing ectodomain-containing peptides (Ecto #1 and Ecto #2): These contain epitopes that can induce neutralizing antibodies

  • Main neutralization epitope: Located in the middle of the GP5 ectodomain (amino acids 37 to 45) in North American PRRSV strains

Interestingly, when VR #1 and VR #2 are combined (VR #1+#2), they show higher sensitivity in diagnostic assays than when used individually, suggesting a synergistic effect in antibody binding .

How do antibodies against different PRRSV structural proteins compare in terms of kinetics and persistence?

Antibodies against different PRRSV structural proteins exhibit distinct kinetics and persistence patterns that are critical for diagnostic test design:

  • GP5 peptide-binding antibodies: Appear within 30 days after farrowing, peak at 100-200 days, and maintain half-maximum titer for approximately 400 days

  • Nucleocapsid (N) protein-binding antibodies: Appear rapidly (within 7 days), peak at 100 days, but decrease below detectable levels by approximately 200 days

  • Neutralizing antibodies: Generated more slowly with titers remaining relatively low

These time-dependent differences indicate that the choice of target antigen for diagnostic tests should consider the time point of infection being investigated. For early detection, N protein-based assays may be preferred, while GP5-based tests offer advantages for detecting past infections or long-term immune monitoring .

What methodological approaches are recommended for evaluating rGP5 antibody-based diagnostic assays?

Based on published research, a comprehensive evaluation of rGP5 antibody-based diagnostic assays should include:

  • Comparison with reference methods:

    • Commercial ELISA kits (e.g., HerdChek that uses N protein) serve as benchmarks

    • Analysis of true/false positives and negatives relative to the reference

  • Appropriate controls implementation:

    • Positive controls: Serum from vaccinated animals

    • Negative controls: Serum from colostrum-deprived newborns of pathogen-free sows

  • Statistical validation:

    • Sensitivity and specificity calculations

    • Correlation analysis between different antigens (Pearson's correlation)

    • Statistical significance testing (ANOVA with Dunnett multiple-comparisons)

  • Threshold determination:

    • Setting cutoff values at mean OD of negative controls plus three standard deviations

The following table demonstrates correlation coefficients between different antigens, highlighting their relationship in antibody detection:

AntigenVR #1VR #2VR #1+#2rGP5Ecto #1Ecto #2
N0.138a0.1030.233b0.292b0.283b0.251b
VR #10.516b0.181b0.185b0.429b0.342b
VR #20.411b0.236b0.401b0.267b
VR #1+#20.600b0.513b0.249b
rGP50.555b0.374b
Ecto #10.741b

a: P < 0.05, b: P < 0.01

How does the sensitivity and specificity of different GP5-derived antigens compare for serodiagnosis?

The sensitivity and specificity of different GP5-derived antigens vary significantly, affecting their utility in diagnostic applications:

ResultNVR #1aVR #2aVR #1+2rGP5aEcto #1aEcto #2b
Sensitivity (%)-11.0013.4086.6099.5235.4175.12
Specificity (%)-89.8091.8444.908.1681.6348.98

a: Two-sided P-value < 0.001 (extremely significant), b: P < 0.01 (very significant) on Fisher's exact test

Key findings from this comparative analysis include:

  • rGP5 shows the highest sensitivity (99.52%) but lowest specificity (8.16%)

  • VR #1+#2 offers a good balance with high sensitivity (86.60%)

  • Ecto #1, despite containing a known neutralization epitope, shows relatively low sensitivity (35.41%)

  • Individual peptides VR #1 and VR #2 have high specificity but low sensitivity

These results suggest that different antigens might be selected depending on whether the diagnostic priority is sensitivity or specificity.

How can next-generation sequencing technologies enhance rGP5 antibody research?

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies offer transformative approaches to rGP5 antibody research:

  • High-throughput immunoglobulin sequencing:

    • NGS enables sequencing tens of thousands of Ig variable-region genes specific to GP5

    • When combined with droplet-based single-cell isolation and DNA barcode antigen technology, this approach can rapidly identify antigen-specific clones

  • Genotype-phenotype linkage systems:

    • Development of dual-expression vectors using Golden Gate Cloning

    • Simultaneous expression of heavy-chain and light-chain variable regions from single B cells

    • Membrane-bound Ig expression for flow cytometry-based screening

  • Accelerated antibody discovery workflow:

    • Single-step procedure for enriching antigen-specific, high-affinity antibodies

    • Significantly faster than conventional sequential cloning methods

    • Compatible with sequential immunization strategies to generate broadly reactive antibodies

This approach has been successfully applied to isolate broadly reactive antibodies against influenza virus hemagglutinin antigens and could be adapted for PRRSV GP5 research to identify antibodies with broader cross-reactivity against diverse viral strains .

What challenges exist in using rGP5 antibodies for cross-protection against different PRRSV strains?

Several significant challenges affect the use of rGP5 antibodies for cross-protection:

  • Antigenic variation:

    • GP5 exhibits substantial sequence variability between North American and European PRRSV strains

    • Neutralizing epitopes may differ between strains, limiting cross-reactivity

  • Neutralizing antibody characteristics:

    • Neutralizing antibodies develop slowly and maintain relatively low titers

    • The correlation between neutralizing antibody titers and protection is not always straightforward

  • Epitope-specific responses:

    • Different epitopes on GP5 elicit antibodies with varying cross-reactivity

    • Research shows that Ecto #1 (containing a neutralization epitope) had lower sensitivity in diagnostic tests compared to Ecto #2, suggesting epitope accessibility or immunodominance issues

  • Temporal variations in antibody responses:

    • The substantial time-dependent differences in antibody development against structural antigens complicate the evaluation of cross-protection

    • Researchers must consider timing when assessing cross-protective potential

What is the optimal ELISA protocol for detecting rGP5-specific antibodies?

Based on research findings, an optimized ELISA protocol for rGP5-specific antibody detection includes:

  • Antigen coating:

    • Dilute peptide antigens (10 μg/mL) or recombinant protein (5 μg/mL) in carbonate-bicarbonate buffer

    • Incubate at 4°C overnight in 96-well plates

  • Blocking and sample preparation:

    • Block with 5% skim milk in PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20

    • Dilute serum samples 1:100 in PBS

  • Antibody detection:

    • Use HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (e.g., goat anti-pig IgG at 1:500 dilution)

    • Develop with appropriate substrate (TMB with hydrogen peroxide)

    • Read absorbance at 405 nm after 15 minutes

  • Result interpretation:

    • Consider positive when absorbance exceeds mean OD of negative controls plus 3 standard deviations

    • Include appropriate positive controls (vaccinated animals) and negative controls (colostrum-deprived piglets from pathogen-free sows)

How can researchers distinguish between vaccine-induced and infection-induced rGP5 antibodies?

Distinguishing between vaccine-induced and infection-induced rGP5 antibodies remains challenging but several approaches may be considered:

  • Epitope-specific assays:

    • Design peptide-based assays targeting regions present in wild-type virus but absent or modified in vaccine strains

    • Develop assays for non-structural proteins absent in subunit vaccines

  • Antibody profile analysis:

    • Examine the pattern of antibody responses against multiple viral proteins

    • Compare ratios of antibodies against different epitopes which may differ between vaccination and infection

  • Avidity testing:

    • Measure antibody avidity which typically increases over time following infection

    • Vaccine-induced antibodies may show different avidity profiles compared to infection-induced antibodies

  • Time-course studies:

    • Monitor the dynamics of antibody responses over time

    • Consider that GP5 antibodies persist longer than N protein antibodies, which could help differentiate recent vaccination from past infection

How might single-cell antibody technologies advance rGP5 antibody discovery?

Recent advances in single-cell antibody technologies offer promising avenues for rGP5 antibody discovery:

  • Integrated genotype-phenotype linkage:

    • Single-step cloning procedures that link heavy and light chain variable regions

    • Expression systems compatible with high-throughput screening by flow cytometry

  • Cross-reactive antibody identification:

    • Sequential immunization strategies with heterotypic antigens to generate broadly reactive B cells

    • Flow cytometry-based selection using multiple labeled antigens simultaneously

  • Structural and functional characterization:

    • Rapid identification of antibodies with diverse binding properties

    • Structure-function analysis to understand the basis of cross-reactivity

These approaches could significantly accelerate the discovery of therapeutically relevant rGP5 antibodies with broader strain coverage and improved neutralizing capacity .

What are the prospects for developing GP5-based universal vaccines against PRRSV?

The development of GP5-based universal vaccines against PRRSV faces several challenges but also opportunities:

  • Epitope targeting strategies:

    • Focus on conserved neutralizing epitopes within GP5

    • Combine multiple epitopes to broaden coverage against diverse strains

    • Consider including VR #1+#2 immunodominant regions alongside neutralizing epitopes

  • Antibody persistence considerations:

    • Leverage the longer persistence of GP5 antibodies for more durable protection

    • Design vaccine formulations that enhance the neutralizing antibody response, which typically develops more slowly

  • Integrated approaches:

    • Combine GP5 with other viral antigens for broader immune stimulation

    • Utilize advanced sequencing and antibody screening technologies to identify optimal epitope combinations

The research suggests that understanding the time-dependent and antigen-dependent differences in antibody responses is crucial for developing more effective vaccines and diagnostic tools against PRRSV .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.